The competitive market seems to gravitate towards operating kind of semi fast routes that are merged out of fast routes. It won't be non stop, but it also won't bring services into smaller settlements. Seems efficient for the operator rather than the passenger
I appreciate that running a National Express is really really difficult, because our roads are awful and our trains aren't actually that bad. But it feels like they fail to hit the markets that are available to them, or to let people know what it is they actually do.
- Overnight travel can be a strength; the railways aren't good at that
- Airports can be a strength, particularly airports to not the nearest big city
- Low cost flexibility can be a strength, as the railways are awful at this
The above three factors can work absolutely beautifully together; people don't exactly know when exactly very late at night they might turn up at an airport. And, frankly, National Express loads are so poor that they can afford to let people be flexible. But somehow (certainly for me and my local airports) they just don't manage to hit the mark.
- Additionally, our railways are often very London centric, and there's a lot of routes where coach times can be really competitive.
But where they do run those routes, perhaps only enthusiasts would ever run the risk of finding out! And the Lake District is visited by millions of people a year, and only bits of it are well served by trains. It feels like a national coach operator ought to be able to find a place for itself within it!