Thanks for the very quick response! Having seen stories on this Forum of people handed Penalty Fares and worse in apparently similar circumstances, I wonder if this guidance has been published anywhere? If not, I might decide whether or not to "run the gauntlet" according to the weather on the day, and the prospect of a Mancunian soaking on the 10 minute walk back along Whitworth Street!Technically, no.
I practice, yes. If you’re not avoiding paying a higher fare by doing so (which you won’t be) then the guidance is to allow it.
Industry guidance is that there's no issue so long as there's no blatant attempt to avoid paying a higher fare (which in this case you've pointed out there isn’t).
Industry guidance is that no action should be taken on this unless the passenger is starting or finishing short in order to save money. Which you would be.
Although starting/finishing short with an Advance ticket is not strictly in accordance with the rules for Advance tickets, the policy of the Rail industry is that no additional fare should be charged (unless there is clear evidence of intent to try and avoid a higher fare).
Would the barriers (if there are such) at Deansgate let you through anyway? If there were no barriers I'd risk it. Though isn't there a 'Manchester termini' arrangement which treats them all interchangeably?Though it does seem Northern are quite picky about it unlike most other TOCs who seem not to care that much. Given that it'd just be to save about 10 minutes' walk I'm actually not sure I would do it in this case despite the above guidance.
Would the barriers (if there are such) at Deansgate let you through anyway? If there were no barriers I'd risk it. Though isn't there a 'Manchester termini' arrangement which treats them all interchangeably?
Don't think there are any barriers whatsoever at Deansgate. Just security/revenue staff, in high vis, near the overbridge, and also down the bottom of the ramp, quite near the ticket office window.Would the barriers (if there are such) at Deansgate let you through anyway? If there were no barriers I'd risk it. Though isn't there a 'Manchester termini' arrangement which treats them all interchangeably?
This one is an e-ticket which explicitly states Manchester Oxford Road instead of "Manchester Stations", and is the last leg of a split ticket journey from Aberdeen bought on the RailUK Forum ticketing site. Remarkably, it tells me that the price for this leg, with a Senior Railcard, is just £2.65, so a £50+ Penalty Fare for getting off less than 700 yards early would be a bit of a scunner!Would the barriers (if there are such) at Deansgate let you through anyway? If there were no barriers I'd risk it. Though isn't there a 'Manchester termini' arrangement which treats them all interchangeably?
What if you bought a single *back* from where the advanced fare took you, to where you wanted to leave the station?![]()

Looks like that would cost me £2.05, which takes the gloss off my £2.65 Lancaster to Manchester triumph, and apparently introduces a whole new level of peril with the possibility of being interviewed under caution and reported for investigation for short faring by trying to exit from the wrong platform! Manchester consolidating my view of it as a dystopian hell-hole......What if you bought a single *back* from where the advanced fare took you, to where you wanted to leave the station?![]()
Not if you’re stubborn and actually travel there and backLooks like that would cost me £2.05, which takes the gloss off my £2.65 Lancaster to Manchester triumph, and apparently introduces a whole new level of peril with the possibility of being interviewed under caution and reported for investigation for short faring by trying to exit from the wrong platform! Manchester consolidating my view of it as a dystopian hell-hole......
Not if you’re stubborn and actually travel there and back![]()
The Trafford Centre service starts from Castlefield.If you're looking for a tram, anything that goes from Castlefield Deansgate will have called at St Peter's Square so go and get it from there (after the Salisbury).

It is a bit anti-consumer if someone is receiving “less” of a serviceSuppose this is another instance of finding out that a cheaply priced, booked train only, advance ticket, isn't necessarily quite as flexible as other ticket types, which do allow 'break of journey'.
Thanks for your proactive concern for my consumer rights, but honestly, I'm not complaining, with a ticket price of £2.65 from Lancaster, a chance to see the remarkable architecture of Oxford Road Station, a pint in a Manchester landmark pub and a free bus back to Castlefield/Deansgate, all thanks to the excellent advice and suggestions here!It is a bit anti-consumer if someone is receiving “less” of a service
Who says they don`t? They`re in the public domain. They are available to passengers deciding whether or not to enter into the contract. Has a Court ever convicted a passenger who was following published "internal" guidelines? Are you saying that the railway, by publishing "internal" guidelines, could entice a passenger into breaking the rules and then prosecute on the basis that the "internal" guidelines don`t count?The trouble with internal guidelines is that they don't form part of the contract
Can anyone (without endangering their employment) point to where such guidelines have been made available to the public?Who says they don`t? They`re in the public domain. They are available to passengers deciding whether or not to enter into the contract. Has a Court ever convicted a passenger who was following published "internal" guidelines? Are you saying that the railway, by publishing "internal" guidelines, could entice a passenger into breaking the rules and then prosecute on the basis that the "internal" guidelines don`t count?
Individual railway staff may have no knowledge of the internal guidelines. Some may not agree with them. But that doesn`t mean they`re not part of the contract.
As far as I am aware the guidlelines have not been made available to the public. What I said upthread is what appears in the internal industry guidance.Can anyone (without endangering their employment) point to where such guidelines have been made available to the public?
I can't really see how the document can be part of the contract when it isn't published at the time the contract was formed i.e. the ticket purchased.If the railway publishes, or allows to be published, an easement in the passenger`s favour, that surely becomes part of the contract.