• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Route conducting for drivers: what actually happens?

Status
Not open for further replies.

adc82140

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2008
Messages
3,407
I see lot of mention of route conducting for drivers on various threads.

I know the purpose- to guide drivers on routes they don't sign, for unusual stock moves etc.

But what does route conducting actually involve? Does the route conductor have to verbally draw attention to speed limits, braking points, signal aspects etc or is it more answering queries from the driver as they crop up?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
19,874
Location
East Anglia
I see lot of mention of route conducting for drivers on various threads.

I know the purpose- to guide drivers on routes they don't sign, for unusual stock moves etc.

But what does route conducting actually involve? Does the route conductor have to verbally draw attention to speed limits, braking points l, signal aspects etc or is it more answering queries from the driver as they crop up?
The route conductor Would advise of everything from braking to signal sighting, speeds and even gradients. The rule book also used to state that if the route conductor signed the traction then they should drive. Lots of chitty chatty too.
 

whoosh

Established Member
Joined
3 Sep 2008
Messages
1,892
But what does route conducting actually involve? Does the route conductor have to verbally draw attention to speed limits, braking points, signal aspects etc or is it more answering queries from the driver as they crop up?

I've been route conducted quite a few times when they drove, but have only been route conducted once when I didn't sign the route but they didn't sign the traction, so I had to drive and follow their instructions.

You've summed it up pretty well there - its all of those things!
To clarify about signal aspects - it's also route indications needed or mustn't have at various locations.
 

Boilinthebag

Member
Joined
12 Jul 2022
Messages
49
Location
GWR
The route conductor Would advise of everything from braking to signal sighting, speeds and even gradients. The rule book also used to state that if the route conductor signed the traction then they should drive. Lots of chitty chatty too.
It still does...TW1 29

conductor driver

If you are the conductor driver, you must:
-take responsibility for the safe working of the train
-observe all signals and speed restrictions
-drive the train if authorised and competent to do so
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
19,874
Location
East Anglia
It still does...TW1 29

conductor driver

If you are the conductor driver, you must:
-take responsibility for the safe working of the train
-observe all signals and speed restrictions
-drive the train if authorised and competent to do so
Cheers!!
 

800301

Member
Joined
29 Dec 2022
Messages
537
Location
Essex
It still does...TW1 29

conductor driver

If you are the conductor driver, you must:
-take responsibility for the safe working of the train
-observe all signals and speed restrictions
-drive the train if authorised and competent to do so

When GWR were doing Euston, despite the GBRF drivers signing the traction and route they weren’t permitted to drive, despite the fact they took the same trains back to the depot and stabled them in various places
 

Pete_uk

On Moderation
Joined
28 Jan 2017
Messages
1,548
Location
Stroud, Glos
It's a bit old and maybe not very representative for today, but here is a cab ride and interesting chatter with a HST driver being guided from Gloucester down to Severn Tunnell Jn.

 

PudseyBearHST

Member
Joined
28 Sep 2015
Messages
1,116
Location
South West
When GWR were doing Euston, despite the GBRF drivers signing the traction and route they weren’t permitted to drive, despite the fact they took the same trains back to the depot and stabled them in various places
Surely that was ASLEF imposing that rather than an operational restriction? Otherwise GBRf could drive passenger trains on behalf of GWR which wouldn’t go down well with GWR drivers. Or do some GBRf drivers not have category A(?) on their license to operate passenger trains.
 

800301

Member
Joined
29 Dec 2022
Messages
537
Location
Essex
Surely that was ASLEF imposing that rather than an operational restriction? Otherwise GBRf could drive passenger trains on behalf of GWR which wouldn’t go down well with GWR drivers. Or do some GBRf drivers not have category A(?) on their license to operate passenger trains.
No idea but either way it was nice to have some company in the cab for a change

I don’t think all of them signed the traction but the 3/4 drivers I had in my cab all did
 

Harpo

Established Member
Joined
21 Aug 2024
Messages
3,862
Location
Newport
Route conducting is certainly way more professional than in previous generations where uncomplicated traction meant the ‘who will drive’ was a mutual agreement and locating the cancel button for the AWS could be the only temporary job-stopper. You might even have found yourself with a one shot route learning session from your ‘pilot’ (old term) ending with a cheery ‘be alright on your own next time?’
 

RiverDon

On Moderation
Joined
11 Mar 2024
Messages
297
Location
UK
In my experience, it is the conductor drivers who speak to the signaller.
My TOC driving handbook has a whole section on route conducting and says in a big red box at the end of it:

"Remember that as conductor driver YOU are responsible for the safe working of the train and YOU are required to communicate with the signaller"
 

norbitonflyer

Established Member
Joined
24 Mar 2020
Messages
5,754
Location
SW London
Very different from 1962. A conductor driver was driving a Class 40 on a sleeper service diverted by the "Joint Line", and approached Lincoln at 55mph - nearly four times the speed limit. He was not passed to drive diesels, although he had occasionally driven diesel shunters. It did not end well.
 

Western Lord

Member
Joined
17 Mar 2014
Messages
1,062
Very different from 1962. A conductor driver was driving a Class 40 on a sleeper service diverted by the "Joint Line", and approached Lincoln at 55mph - nearly four times the speed limit. He was not passed to drive diesels, although he had occasionally driven diesel shunters. It did not end well.
The other major accident involving a conductor driver was Sutton Coldfield in 1955, a York-Bristol express diverted via Lichfield. The train driver left the footplate at Burton and took a seat in the train as he was feeling unwell. The conductor driver obviously knew the road and was familiar with Black Fives but entered the sharp curve at Sutton Coldfield at greatly excessive speed. Often regarded as an inexplicable mistake, I have often wondered if the driver had never previously driven a non stop train on the route (there were presumably not many) and therefore had never had to think about the speed restriction.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top