• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

NAAR Signals

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

rower40

Member
Joined
1 Jan 2008
Messages
577
Suggest it’s “Not Approachable At Red”. Effectively “double block “ operation.
 

NSEWonderer

Established Member
Joined
5 Dec 2020
Messages
2,899
Location
London
Pretty much above, its pretty much a distant signal that can show a Red, making the actual Signal thats truly set at danger, un approachable. Thats how I've always understood them.
 

Supercoss

Member
Joined
5 Jun 2016
Messages
457
A few of these in London on Thameslink route
“ mid platform signals” non approachable at red to avoid train being stopped at location where it will not be fully accommodated in platform, looks just like a regular signal
 
Last edited:

BTU

Member
Joined
13 Jan 2016
Messages
257
That makes perfect sense it's the distant signal that can show a red. I was missing that I kept thinking distant signal that cant show a red as in 2 aspect signalling here making the double block and Not Approachable at Red.
Thank you everyone.
 

Sunset route

Established Member
Joined
27 Oct 2015
Messages
1,223
We’ve got distant signals on some of our bi directional signalled running lines where in the normal direction of traffic of flow the distant signals for the wrong direction bi-di will show red and can not be approached whilst showing red. But as soon as the bi directional signalling is used will trains now travelling counter to normal flow and to approach them the, they behave like normal distant signals with the red aspect disengaged. The reason for this was during normal working was to reduce the risk of driver reading across errors.
 

Tester

Established Member
Joined
5 Jul 2020
Messages
1,656
Location
Watford
We’ve got distant signals on some of our bi directional signalled running lines where in the normal direction of traffic of flow the distant signals for the wrong direction bi-di will show red and can not be approached whilst showing red. But as soon as the bi directional signalling is used will trains now travelling counter to normal flow and to approach them the, they behave like normal distant signals with the red aspect disengaged. The reason for this was during normal working was to reduce the risk of driver reading across errors.
I can follow the logic of that.

For context, where is this, please.
 

Supercoss

Member
Joined
5 Jun 2016
Messages
457
Down Moorgate
TWH3007 TWH3011 TWH3015 TWH3019
Up Moorgate
TWH3008 TWH3014 TWH3018
so all underground in Thameslink Core
All these are NOT signals controlling the IMG_0979.jpeg

entrance to a track circuit block section.
 
Last edited:

Supercoss

Member
Joined
5 Jun 2016
Messages
457
Consider them as distant signals on a Bi Directional line But due to signal sighting issues , so they are not mistaken or read through risk ,they show red when Bi Di working not in use
This is all well and good until someone decided to do a bit of parallel running through the core , two northbound trains running next to each other …….!
 

Port Road

Member
Joined
27 Sep 2025
Messages
84
Location
Scotland
Consider them as distant signals on a Bi Directional line But due to signal sighting issues , so they are not mistaken or read through risk ,they show red when Bi Di working not in use
This is all well and good until someone decided to do a bit of parallel running through the core , two northbound trains running next to each other …….!
Interesting. But the signal in the photo is plated as an automatic [stop] signal?
 

milooo

Member
Joined
3 Dec 2024
Messages
201
Location
Stevenage
Doesn't this kind of signal also exist in the Trent valley especially on the approach to junctions and rugby?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top