Indeed (again!)We are often critical of normals failing to understand railways, this thread is becoming rail enthusiasts failing to understand marketing.![]()
Indeed (again!)We are often critical of normals failing to understand railways, this thread is becoming rail enthusiasts failing to understand marketing.![]()
To some extent - although I rather think it's more people applying their own view on the matter. As in: "I don't associate with a puppet, I only want steam locomotives and interwar styling as that's how I see the ideal railway"We are often critical of normals failing to understand railways, this thread is becoming rail enthusiasts failing to understand marketing.![]()
Indeed. And to paraphrase Lord Leverhulme (or possibly U.S. retail magnate John Wanamaker)... "Half of the money I spend on advertising is wasted, the trouble is you never know which half!'"We are often critical of normals failing to understand railways, this thread is becoming rail enthusiasts failing to understand marketing.![]()
I wouldn't want Eleanor in my quiet coach!
It isn't real! Please lighten up a bitI'm half surprised she isn't featured playing garbage out loud on her phone, as that is the attitude her other actions are in line with.

True, although perhaps not going as far as Northern's current "500+ Destinations" marketing line.You'd also think that they could advertise their destinations in the process. Surely one of the most important things about a transport "product" is the destination. LNER need people to be saying "it would be nice to go to York on the weekend" or "flying to Edinburgh is too much hassle, let's take the train"
I don't think using a Muppet to advertise your train service gives a good impression of your competence at the operation thereof, personally. Mind you, perhaps it's in line with the fares policy.
I suspect the way forward will be a mix of generic GBR advertising for the national network and travelling by rail and regional local advertising for travel to specific areas.
I think Eleanor has devalued LNER as a brand. This is a route associated with the Flying Scotsman, Mallard and the Gresley Streamliners. Indeed, the London Weekend Television adaptations of Christie's Poirot starring David Suchet used a CGI of an A4 branded LNER in the titles. Had LNER been the brand for East Coast Main Line services then, it would have free, classy, advertising. Maybe this was a factor in Sea Containers using GNER as the branding when they won the InterCity East Coast franchise?
I wouldn't want Eleanor in my quiet coach!
I'm half surprised she isn't featured playing garbage out loud on her phone, as that is the attitude her other actions are in line with.
I wonder if you’d all be so irate if the puppet was male…
Who said that they should? They care about going places (which may be places they haven't previously thought of) quickly, comfortably and for a reasonable price. This ad isn't really selling that for me.The average person booking a train ticket in the Uk doesnt care about Sir Nigel Stanier or William Gresley.
No one was demanding steam locomotives (though when introducing a new and improved service a montage showing progress from old to new might work well).As in: "I don't associate with a puppet, I only want steam locomotives and interwar styling as that's how I see the ideal railway"
They can hardly promote the frequency and reliability of their services!True, although perhaps not going as far as Northern's current "500+ Destinations" marketing line.
Even with the most charitable view, I can think of many of their stations which make far better origins than destinations!
I think she's rather cute too. She's certainly a damn sight less creepy than the Argos doll.I think she's cute, and, having made the mistake of showing her picture to my niece and nephew, now have the task of sourcing two. Can she be bought anywhere?
My niece says she 'feels sorry for her'.She's certainly a damn sight less creepy than the Argos doll.
Well, I haven't got the slightest whiff of misogyny from the language of any of the anti-puppet comments so far, so I'm not sure why you would think that.I wonder if you’d all be so irate if the puppet was male…
And you know the profession of everyone posting in this thread, do you?We are often critical of normals failing to understand railways, this thread is becoming rail enthusiasts failing to understand marketing.![]()
How did the jingle go again? "This is a Epoch of the Rail" or something like that?I prefer the messaging of the classic Intercity advert. All about how much more convenient train travel was on business trips ("when did you last see a train with a puncture?...").
Buzby was male, and just as irritatingI wonder if you’d all be so irate if the puppet was male…
To me, they communicate Enid-Blytonesque toffee-nosed brattish values.GWR’s Famous Five communicates relaxation and leisure values.
To me, they communicate Enid-Blytonesque toffee-nosed brattish values.

Oh, so you have been to Newcastle then?Imagine a hen-do group of lots of them![]()
That one was "We're getting there"How did the jingle go again? "This is a Epoch of the Rail" or something like that?
That one was "We're getting there"
Pretty sure that "we're getting there" came first. It was definitely the one used on the police class 37 advert."This is the age of the train" - yeah, about 40 years old or so...
Doncaster, I'd have thought.Oh, so you have been to Newcastle then?
The "Age of the Train" ones were first (late 70s-early 80s). The "We're Getting There" ones were the next tranche (early-mid-80s). Which fits with the the Class 37 advert, which was 1984.Pretty sure that "we're getting there" came first. It was definitely the one used on the police class 37 advert.
I met a hen-party on the Tyne Valley line on my way to my father's deathbed. They were lovely.Oh, so you have been to Newcastle then?
Hmm. Well the voice was Bernard Cribbins (before he narrated The Wombles).Buzby was male, and just as irritating
Coverage in recent issues of Private Eye has been especially critical of this from the DafT. 1658 has a decent writeup on how LNER's policy is effectively a wrecking ball to affordable walk up travel, whereas more recently 1660 has taken aim at Northern's new DPAYG scheme on the Leeds-Harrogate route, asserting that it will "add yet more fares and and ticket rules to the soup."an abomination of a ticketing policy