It might be rail replacement service but buses look smart![]()
Hmm... rail replacement or rail preplacement?
It might be rail replacement service but buses look smart![]()
The route moved into the new Sydenham Garage and other routes operating from there have been suffering similar tracking issuesFor the last fortnight or so there seems to have been an issue with live tracking of 227 Crystal Palace/Bromley North. Service seems to be running roughly normally but both live arrivals online and displays at bus stops mostly show no buses at all expected. Other routes don't seem to be affected. An issue with transponders on the buses themselves perhaps? Anyone any idea what's going on?
It won’t be anywhere near as useful as the usual tracking since most buses are missing, but some of the service is still showing up on bustimes.org.For the last fortnight or so there seems to have been an issue with live tracking of 227 Crystal Palace/Bromley North. Service seems to be running roughly normally but both live arrivals online and displays at bus stops mostly show no buses at all expected. Other routes don't seem to be affected. An issue with transponders on the buses themselves perhaps? Anyone any idea what's going on?
Just a new garage to increase garage capacity in the wider South East London area especially with the electrification of buses.Has Sydenham garage replaced another one, or is just a new one ?
The real test will be how many journeys it has added to the network rather than passengers who have switched from other services. Hopefully the numbers will tell a good story!It'll be successful. Hard to fail when you have towers with thousands of new homes beside pretty much every stop.
Dashcam footage has emerged of a bus crash in central London.
The video, sent to the BBC, appears to show a Number 3 double decker bus turning right into a road near Westminster and immediately hitting a black taxi waiting at the junction.
The taxi is then seen being pushed onto the pavement as the bus careers into a dental clinic on the corner of Marsham Street and Great Peter Street.
Could the steering have jammed?A slightly strange incident between a 3 and a taxi today. A video on the BBC website, so higher profile than is it had just been posted on social media
![]()
London bus crashes into taxi and dental clinic near Westminster
Dashcam video shows the moment a double decker bus ploughs into a taxi and building in Westminster.www.bbc.co.uk
So, route 224 has gone First - Metroline - RATP - First - Metroline!Couple of routes have changed operator today.
144 is now GoAhead who are using 9-10 year old MHV and WHV class buses (until yesterday was Arriva)
224 is now Metroline, who are using 13-14 year old DEL class that were acquired when they took over some First garages about 12 years ago (until yesterday route was operated by First who had bought/acquired RATP), so First have now lost this route again.
haveyoursay.tfl.gov.uk/sl15-superloopThe consultation for the SL15 is here and it looks like a good route with some crossover with other Superloop services like the SL4 although Eltham seems an odd place to connect to from Clapham Junction.
Proposals
The SL15 would run between Clapham Junction and Eltham stations, via Tulse Hill and Catford, and would primarily follow the A205 South Circular Road.
The SL15 would operate as an express bus service. It would serve a limited number of key bus stops, including eight rail interchanges, local town centres and other busy locations along its proposed route. As part of the Superloop family the SL15 service would be frequent, simple, inclusive and reliable.
At Clapham Junction, the route would start and end at Falcon Road. In Eltham, it would start and end at Eltham Station after serving the High Street.
Low bridge
Due to the low railway bridge on Thurlow Park Road, double-deck vehicles would not be suitable for the SL15. Therefore, subject to the outcome of consultation, the SL15 would operate with single-deck buses, featuring the usual Superloop accessibility provisions and on-board facilities such as USB charging points and travel information.
Proposed timings and bus stops
We propose the SL15 bus route would run:
Seven days a week
Operating between approximately 05:00 and 00:30
Every 12 minutes during Monday to Saturday daytimes
Every 15 minutes all evenings, on Sundays, and on early morning weekdays
The SL15 is not proposed to operate through the night.
Times shown are indicative for consultation purposes. Timetables would only be developed following consultation, and once a decision as to how to proceed is reached
What else we would like you to know
The SL15 would be an addition to the south London bus network, operating alongside other local bus routes across its proposed route. This would increase the number and frequency of buses in the area and may create more room on-board for customers of other routes such as the P13, 160 and 185.
Bus stops and stands
Subject to the outcome of consultation, we would review bus stop and stand arrangements to help accommodate new route SL15 where it starts and ends, and to manage bus driver facilities.
At Clapham Junction, and subject to agreement with the London Borough of Wandsworth, we would review bus stopping arrangements around Clapham Junction station. This may result in changes to local bus stops for routes C3, 35, 39, 49, 170, 295, 319, and 344. We are also considering introducing a new set-down bus stop on Falcon Road (for alighting passengers off terminating routes), beneath the railway bridge.
At Eltham Station, subject to agreement with the Royal Borough of Greenwich we would consider converting a disused coach stop to a new SL15 pick up point.
Further information about these potential changes and how they may affect customers can be found the ‘How it impacts you’ section. The potential Clapham Junction bus stop changes are described in detail in the initial Equalities Impact Assessment document, found in the ‘Maps and more information’ section.
The consultation for the SL15 is here and it looks like a good route with some crossover with other Superloop services like the SL4 although Eltham seems an odd place to connect to from Clapham Junction.
It would still need its own buses for peak times when the SL6 is running.Unfortunately, it will be single deck due to a low railway bridge - maybe it should be a bendy bus!
Following the South Circular may not mean that it will be a very fast route. Also, given it crosses over the peak-hours only SL6, I thought it could make use of those buses which otherwise spend most of the day laid up, but not if the route is single-decked.
The route could easily divert via Lancaster Avenue (I believe the 3 goes there on diversions?) with minimal time penalty and no change to the stops and I intend to suggest this to themLaunching with single deck buses would be unfortunate, and a decision that’s already been reversed on the SL5.
That said, I’m not overly familiar with the Dulwich area. How much of a diversion would the nearest double decker-compliant routing entail? (Or, to ask the same question another way, what traffic objectives would be missed, in avoiding the low bridge?)
The bridge is at Tulse Hill on A205. Buses could divert via Lancaster Avenue, which is a wide suburban street and has traffic lights that would make it easy for buses turning right onto A215 heading westbound (but it's just a give way turning right onto A205 eastbound). The diversion wouldn't miss any proposed stops, but according to current traffic levels on Google Maps would add 2–3 minutes to the running time.That said, I’m not overly familiar with the Dulwich area. How much of a diversion would the nearest double decker-compliant routing entail? (Or, to ask the same question another way, what traffic objectives would be missed, in avoiding the low bridge?)
Following a detailed review of the consultation responses, we are planning the following changes to the route:
A large number of responses wanted us to operate route 310 later into the evening. We are looking into the costs for this, with a view to introducing a new timetable in August 2026. We will update customers once we have the final timetable.
We are also planning to extend the service to serve Rookwood Road in Stamford Hill as many people suggested this in the consultation. We are investigating how to provide the infrastructure to enable this
We are also considering a re-routeing of the service to serve Holloway Road Nag’s Head rather than Stroud Green Road, subject to further consultation. The date for the new consultation is not yet confirmed, but when it is we will publicise it widely within the community.
oh.Courtesy of an Arriva procurement manager, here's a picture of one of the Croydon-bound B12s (link).
![]()
A great 4 days at BYD there HQ in Shenzhen China meeting senior BYD MD and senior people getting a great insight into the depth of BYD, battery technology and safety. new vehicle developments l,… | Richard Yoxall
A great 4 days at BYD there HQ in Shenzhen China meeting senior BYD MD and senior people getting a great insight into the depth of BYD, battery technology and safety. new vehicle developments l, product plans over the next 2 years and beyond and the after sales support Also a visit to...www.linkedin.com
That said, it would have been more accurate to say These aren't the first single decks BYD have built for the UK market![]()
My hunch is that the route will go via Lancaster Avenue and TfL will use this to show that the consultation process works.The bridge is at Tulse Hill on A205. Buses could divert via Lancaster Avenue, which is a wide suburban street and has traffic lights that would make it easy for buses turning right onto A215 heading westbound (but it's just a give way turning right onto A205 eastbound). The diversion wouldn't miss any proposed stops, but according to current traffic levels on Google Maps would add 2–3 minutes to the running time.
Very local resident here. I think they’d have a tall order persuading the residents to accept a regular bus service down there. It used to have a regular flow of empty buses when Norwood ran the 176 and there was a song and dance about that. It would also slow down the new route by I’d say 5 mins, Norwood Road north towards Tulse Hill can be very slow. Norwood Road to Lancaster would be a tight turn too. I reckon it’ll go ahead with SDs but I can see the demand for this being strong towards Clapham Junction where links from this area are limited. Eltham I agree with others is a less attractive destination, I’d have thought Lewisham or Bromley would be make more sense.My hunch is that the route will go via Lancaster Avenue and TfL will use this to show that the consultation process works.
The BYD single decker is already in service with UNO Bus - seen earlier:oh.
The design is definitely a choice.
It's not great on the outside but maybe it'll look better in red.The BYD single decker is already in service with UNO Bus - seen earlier:
![]()