• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Potential South London improvement ideas?

ScotGG

Established Member
Joined
3 Apr 2013
Messages
1,585
Ideally there would be 6tph from Kent to Abbey Wood to connect with Crossrail.

Two from Dartford as now, two from Gravesend replacing the trains via Sidcup and two from Medway. Ditch the Thameslink if needed. A nice solid turn up and go service to and from Crossrail from a decent chunk of highly populated parts of Kent would be a winner. It won't happen as South eastern don't want to give up revenue into central London terminals so we have the current shoddy service.

There's 4 at the moment from Dartford but spaced so poorly it may as well be just two. Beyond is just 2tph on the crawling Thameslink.

Those trains replacing Thameslink could also stop at stations it skips past in S-E London. The only reason TL skips is to ensure lots of time in hand to regulate reaching the core at the expense of towns such as Erith and Woolwich.

There should be stock as for years they ran to Gillingham as well as others to Dartford and beyond.
 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Mattplans

Member
Joined
27 Sep 2024
Messages
715
Location
London, UK
Well the Bexleyheath line to/from Victoria can be curtailed to Dartford, this would give Gravesend 4tph to Abbey Wood, 2tph semi fast, 2tph stopping.
Have to agree here. The Victoria route is very prone to delays moreso than the London Bridge routes. It's very common to see the Gravesend train being curtailed to Northfleet or Dartford, and/or running fast on any day of the week. I question Southeastern's current decision to keep it at Gravesend when it's the least suited compared to of all the services that currently terminate at Dartford.
Those trains replacing Thameslink could also stop at stations it skips past in S-E London. The only reason TL skips is to ensure lots of time in hand to regulate reaching the core at the expense of towns such as Erith and Woolwich.
It could, but it probably won't. The SE service the TL replaces also skipped Erith and Belvedere, and even Slade Green. In the interests of capacity, especially if the frequency is ever increased, it does make sense for some Southeastern services to run nonstop ABW to DFD. Wool Dockyard is probably the most irrelevant station on the line and I wouldn't be surprised if it's also the least used. If there's a station that has to be skipped, it should definitely come first. Especially to maintain a faster link between Abbey Wood and the Meday towns where we agree there's a lot of potential if a direct link is introduced.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

As for extending the ELL to Lewisham, there is no turn back point there but if this were to happen you could extend Blackheath and reopen the bay platform there, but I doubt if any extension to this line will happen.
The Bromley North line is ideal for an extension? Not sure the cost could ever be justified as it would require a Grade seperated junction or conflict with the SEML. But Bromley N is definitely ideal
 
Last edited:

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,398
Location
Yorks
Given how trendy East London is nowadays, I sometimes think that reinstating platforms on the fast lines at New Cross Gate could be worthwhile, to allow interchange between that area and the Kent/Sussex coasts easier.

HS1 seems to have taken over a lot of straightforward London Journeys, however the classic lines seem to be well used for connections.

Other than that, bring back EPB's :)
 

cle

Established Member
Joined
17 Nov 2010
Messages
5,654
Given how trendy East London is nowadays, I sometimes think that reinstating platforms on the fast lines at New Cross Gate could be worthwhile, to allow interchange between that area and the Kent/Sussex coasts easier.

HS1 seems to have taken over a lot of straightforward London Journeys, however the classic lines seem to be well used for connections.

Other than that, bring back EPB's :)
I agree. It should get a Reading/OOC treatment - with every Southern and Thameslink service calling there. Only once the Bakerloo is extended there (and to Hayes) - and also if the ELL goes up in frequency. Then it'd be quite the hub.

The Bromley North line is ideal for an extension? Not sure the cost could ever be justified as it would require a Grade seperated junction or conflict with the SEML. But Bromley N is definitely ideal
I think Bromley North should go to the 2tph Hayes fast line paths that peel off for Ladywell (which the Bakerloo frees up) - they supposedly don't fit through the two track section below Orpington anyway. So it's that - or the Swanley way. You could do a few mins dwell to wait for conflicts.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
23,375
Given how trendy East London is nowadays, I sometimes think that reinstating platforms on the fast lines at New Cross Gate could be worthwhile, to allow interchange between that area and the Kent/Sussex coasts easier.
There are fast line platforms at New Cross Gate, but not at New Cross. The timetable doesn't have room for fast line calls, ostensibly because it is the point at which both trains from Thameslink and the terminating London Bridge platforms both pass through.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,398
Location
Yorks
Given how trendy East London is nowadays, I sometimes think that reinstating platforms on the fast lines at New Cross Gate could be worthwhile, to allow interchange between that area and the Kent/Sussex coasts easier.

HS1 seems to have taken over a lot of straightforward London Journeys, however the classic lines seem to be well used for connections.

Other than that, bring back EPB's :)

There are fast line platforms at New Cross Gate, but not at New Cross. The timetable doesn't have room for fast line calls, ostensibly because it is the point at which both trains from Thameslink and the terminating London Bridge platforms both pass through.

Sorry - I meant New Cross - In my defence I'm usually whizzing past :lol:

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

I agree. It should get a Reading/OOC treatment - with every Southern and Thameslink service calling there. Only once the Bakerloo is extended there (and to Hayes) - and also if the ELL goes up in frequency. Then it'd be quite the hub.

Yes, what's good for the South Eastern is good for Surrey and the Sussex coast.
 
Last edited:

cle

Established Member
Joined
17 Nov 2010
Messages
5,654
Yes, what's good for the South Eastern is good for Surrey and the Sussex coast.
If we are trying to create more outer hubs (Stratford, Lewisham etc) to stimulate not just rabbit-hutch apts but job creation, decentralized growth etc - this feels like a hub.

And totally agree, a call there might be very helpful for many journeys (that ELL connection from the BML for instance) - it would also relieve London Bridge, and especially the Jubilee line there - with a capacious Bakerloo waiting in the basement. I'd wager NXG Bakerloo might see people in the West End in about the same time too (NXG-LB is about 8 mins average - you'd be in Elephant by then!) - especially as the interchange will be far shorter in itself. I'd be curious also on East Croydon - Oxford Circus via NXG, vs via Victoria. Again, you're off at NXG before you're leaving Clapham, I would guess!
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,398
Location
Yorks
If we are trying to create more outer hubs (Stratford, Lewisham etc) to stimulate not just rabbit-hutch apts but job creation, decentralized growth etc - this feels like a hub.

And totally agree, a call there might be very helpful for many journeys (that ELL connection from the BML for instance) - it would also relieve London Bridge, and especially the Jubilee line there - with a capacious Bakerloo waiting in the basement. I'd wager NXG Bakerloo might see people in the West End in about the same time too (NXG-LB is about 8 mins average - you'd be in Elephant by then!) - especially as the interchange will be far shorter in itself. I'd be curious also on East Croydon - Oxford Circus via NXG, vs via Victoria. Again, you're off at NXG before you're leaving Clapham, I would guess!

Indeed. Both of the New Crosses aren't quite the premier option anymore (central has Vic, SE has HS1). If the timings can be made to work, the hub opportunities could be good.
 

NorthKent1989

Established Member
Joined
13 May 2017
Messages
2,172
Ideally there would be 6tph from Kent to Abbey Wood to connect with Crossrail.

Two from Dartford as now, two from Gravesend replacing the trains via Sidcup and two from Medway. Ditch the Thameslink

Agreed.

They should be funnelling through as many Kent commuters into Abbey Wood as possible.

Definite yes to ditching Thameslink as well, the Medway service can be returned to being a Southeastern one and semi fast at least at 2tph, then Gravesend would have 4tph to AW.


South eastern don't want to give up revenue into central London terminals so we have the current shoddy service.

Which is bizarre as commuters not just on the Woolwich line but also the Bexleyheath line which still gets 1tph to Charing Cross, have given up on SE anyway, SE have lost out to the EL anyway. Prior to the Dec 2022 timetable change SE services were still doing well along side EL services.

Those trains replacing Thameslink could also stop at stations it skips past in S-E London. The only reason TL skips is to ensure lots of time in hand to regulate reaching the core at the expense of towns such as Erith and Woolwich.

To be fair, as another poster has said, Erith and Belvedere were skipped before by the old CHX-Gillingham semi fasts, however back then at least they had 6tph, Slade Green was skipped too.

Even if Thameslink goes I think they’d still keep it fast between Dartford and Abbey Wood

Woolwich Dockyard is an odd one as it’s surrounded by new housing developments yet the station is still quiet from my observations I do wonder if people in Dockyard to making the journey to Woolwich CrossRail station for the EL instead of using Dockyard.

Plumstead also has lots of houses and now gets 8tph but again it seems more people are making the journey to Woolwich CrossRail for the EL.

The same can’t be said for Woolwich Arsenal as it has the DLR which provides a different purpose I guess.

Have to agree here. The Victoria route is very prone to delays moreso than the London Bridge routes. It's very common to see the Gravesend train being curtailed to Northfleet or Dartford, and/or running fast on any day of the week. I question Southeastern's current decision to keep it at Gravesend when it's the least suited compared to of all the services that currently terminate at Dartford.

I do think extending the Vic-Dartford service was an odd choice back in 2018, especially since this is semi fast after Dartford calling only at Greenhithe then Gravesend, skipping Stone, Swanscombe & Northfleet, which is what the CHX-Gillingham service used to do, however I do see that it’s good that Bexleyheath line customers do get an interchange for the HS1 at Gravesend plus a one seat journey to Greenhithe for Bluewater.
 

ScotGG

Established Member
Joined
3 Apr 2013
Messages
1,585
The thing to remember about Woolwich Dockyard as noted is that its close to a planned major housing programme. Same as Belvedere and Erith.

Thameslink skips it despite taking the same time from Dartford to London Bridge as the SE all stoppers do and slower than the semi fast used to do it, and that was before the London Bridge works with extra platforms and the dive unders. The extra 5-6 mins are solely to give allowance to reach the core. If SE take over from Medway they can run an all stopper in the same time it takes Thameslink and still call at three more stations as the other SE services do. Or it could run semi fast a fair bit quicker again. But in time I suspect all the new homes around Woolwich Dockyard, Erith and Belvedere means it would stop at them all - and still be no slower than TL.

Woolwich Dockyard is probably the quietest now I agree on the line. That is likely to change with housing zones nearby. It's a funny station I don't like using as it feels secluded and I've seen agro there. No staff ever seem present either. Another which seems to have potential that is going begging.

Slade Green has seen a steep rise in usage in recent years. I suspect less to do with new housing but people driving in from Kent for onward connection to the Liz. Probably the easiest to park near a station and controlled parking zones.
 
Last edited:

Mattplans

Member
Joined
27 Sep 2024
Messages
715
Location
London, UK
Agreed.
however I do see that it’s good that Bexleyheath line customers do get an interchange for the HS1 at Gravesend plus a one seat journey to Greenhithe for Bluewater.

This would be cool if Bluewater Shopping Cnt was actually near the station. Customers from London stations will have to pay additionally another fee (don’t forget they’re already paying for another expensive ticket since this is outside the Oyster zone) for their bus and it still takes a while to get to the Shopping centre. There are no London buses directly outside the station (these run non-stop between Dartford and the Shopping center) so you have to use another operator. It is almost always faster and more sensible to use the TfL buses that go to Bluewater. They should honestly remove the ‘for Bluewater’ as its horribly misleading and much more convenient for the average passenger to get out before you reach there and change for a London bus.

tldr/ Nobody travelling from the Bh line to Bluewater will use that station.
 

cle

Established Member
Joined
17 Nov 2010
Messages
5,654
The thing to remember about Woolwich Dockyard as noted is that its close to a planned major housing programme. Same as Belvedere and Erith.

Thameslink skips it despite taking the same time from Dartford to London Bridge as the SE all stoppers do and slower than the semi fast used to do it, and that was before the London Bridge works with extra platforms and the dive unders. The extra 5-6 mins are solely to give allowance to reach the core. If SE take over from Medway they can run an all stopper in the same time it takes Thameslink and still call at three more stations as the other SE services do. Or it could run semi fast a fair bit quicker again. But in time I suspect all the new homes around Woolwich Dockyard, Erith and Belvedere means it would stop at them all - and still be no slower than TL.

Woolwich Dockyard is probably the quietest now I agree on the line. That is likely to change with housing zones nearby. It's a funny station I don't like using as it feels secluded and I've seen agro there. No staff ever seem present either. Another which seems to have potential that is going begging.

Slade Green has seen a steep rise in usage in recent years. I suspect less to do with new housing but people driving in from Kent for onward connection to the Liz. Probably the easiest to park near a station and controlled parking zones.
Isn't Dockyard constrained length-wise which is why certain trains don't call? It's usage figures are very low for where it is, and the service it gets. Maybe it could go parliamentary, or M-F peaks potentially.
 

ScotGG

Established Member
Joined
3 Apr 2013
Messages
1,585
Woolwich Dockyard can take up to 10 car. Amusingly Thameslink said that's why they don't call but it's only ever had 8-car from them.

In the early 1990s during the 12-car Network SouthEast programme WD was supposed to see a primitive SDO. That standard couldn't then apply when another 12-car programme launched in the early 2010s. A substation building was upgraded for it though. It's the newish structure beside the Kent bound platform.

In the event neither project ever resulted in 12-car services along the line. A lot of money spent for little reward.

Any Networker replacement should have modern SDO to allow 12-cars to stop there should it be required.

Done a quick Google and looks like 5k homes planned around the station. A fair bit of industry to the north in line for residential development. Not an amount to sniff at. Certainly enough that it could have a decent future passenger usage wise.

EDIT: Just googling more and saw a Google map image. Large amount of residential development seen near Woolwich Dockyard to the west and pretty close by. It's certainly the closest station. Whether people would go past it to reach Woolwich to use Liz to head into London I'm not sure. If I lived there I'd certainly be tempted to go Woolwich Dockyard and save the hassle of a bus into Woolwich just to head back out on a Liz train. Woolwich Dockyard to Greenwich then the DLR or London Bridge/Cannon Street etc isn't too long at all of a journey.
 
Last edited:

PGAT

Established Member
Joined
13 Apr 2022
Messages
2,132
Location
Selhurst
Isn't Dockyard constrained length-wise which is why certain trains don't call? It's usage figures are very low for where it is, and the service it gets. Maybe it could go parliamentary, or M-F peaks potentially.
12-car Networkers can't stop there but that's no reason for Thameslink running fast through
 

frankmoh

On Moderation
Joined
7 May 2025
Messages
826
Location
London
I think Bromley North should go to the 2tph Hayes fast line paths that peel off for Ladywell (which the Bakerloo frees up) - they supposedly don't fit through the two track section below Orpington anyway. So it's that - or the Swanley way. You could do a few mins dwell to wait for conflicts.
Are you proposing bringing back through services from Charing Cross to Bromley North? I always assumed they stopped doing it because the junction at Grove Park was blocking the fast line or something. I would like to see those through services return but I don't see how the Hayes line leaving SE will affect the run from Grove Park to Lewisham.
 

PGAT

Established Member
Joined
13 Apr 2022
Messages
2,132
Location
Selhurst
Are you proposing bringing back through services from Charing Cross to Bromley North? I always assumed they stopped doing it because the junction at Grove Park was blocking the fast line or something. I would like to see those through services return but I don't see how the Hayes line leaving SE will affect the run from Grove Park to Lewisham.
Removing the Hayes services frees up 6tph on the Charing Cross lines (which then turn into the fast lines after Parks Bridge) so that should give room on the fasts for a new through service.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
23,375
Removing the Hayes services frees up 6tph on the Charing Cross lines (which then turn into the fast lines after Parks Bridge) so that should give room on the fasts for a new through service.
Could a train starting at Bromley North and running on the fast deliver a fully and standing 10-car load at London Bridge? The basic problem is that the branch is too short, and although Bromley North is a focal point for bus services, the area is already well served by other stations.
 

PGAT

Established Member
Joined
13 Apr 2022
Messages
2,132
Location
Selhurst
Could a train starting at Bromley North and running on the fast deliver a fully and standing 10-car load at London Bridge? The basic problem is that the branch is too short, and although Bromley North is a focal point for bus services, the area is already well served by other stations.
It’s hard to say and the question of whether the capacity can be used effectively is an entirely different one to if it is possible in the first place. At the very least, it could take some pressure off the Orpington trains at Grove Park.
 

brad465

Veteran Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
11,530
Location
Taunton or Kent
Are you proposing bringing back through services from Charing Cross to Bromley North? I always assumed they stopped doing it because the junction at Grove Park was blocking the fast line or something. I would like to see those through services return but I don't see how the Hayes line leaving SE will affect the run from Grove Park to Lewisham.
There could be capacity currently for a Saturday service into Charing X from Bromley North, as there are no peak services and the Tunbridge Wells' semi-fasts only run in the morning at the moment. If it runs fast from Grove Park it should be easier to path, plus also appeals to some Grove Park passengers who, for Charing X, currently have to call at Hither Green and Lewisham on the way.

Could a train starting at Bromley North and running on the fast deliver a fully and standing 10-car load at London Bridge? The basic problem is that the branch is too short, and although Bromley North is a focal point for bus services, the area is already well served by other stations.
Does it need to be 10-car? Plenty of 8-car services run in the peak, and the Beckenham Jct-Blackfriars' peak extras are 4-6 car max.
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
21,973
Location
Airedale
It’s hard to say and the question of whether the capacity can be used effectively is an entirely different one to if it is possible in the first place. At the very least, it could take some pressure off the Orpington trains at Grove Park.
Would that be better than running additional services from Orpington?
The last surviving BMN-CHX (dep around 0808?) was diverted in the mid 80s to start from somewhere like Petts Wood (it must have come ECS from a siding - Orpington didn't then have platforms 7/8).
 

PGAT

Established Member
Joined
13 Apr 2022
Messages
2,132
Location
Selhurst
Would that be better than running additional services from Orpington?
The last surviving BMN-CHX (dep around 0808?) was diverted in the mid 80s to start from somewhere like Petts Wood (it must have come ECS from a siding - Orpington didn't then have platforms 7/8).
Depends whether you value direct through trains more than more frequent services south of Grove Park and how well each one would load
 

frankmoh

On Moderation
Joined
7 May 2025
Messages
826
Location
London
Could a train starting at Bromley North and running on the fast deliver a fully and standing 10-car load at London Bridge? The basic problem is that the branch is too short, and although Bromley North is a focal point for bus services, the area is already well served by other stations.
I've always assumed the branch has remained open and well-used in the peaks because it goes to Charing Cross and therefore gives the people of Bromley better connections; it goes through Lewisham, London Bridge and Waterloo East on the way. Where I live, the stations serving Victoria and the stations serving Charing Cross are very close to each other, so there is a lot of overlap in which station people choose. Kent House and Clock House for example.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
23,375
I've always assumed the branch has remained open and well-used in the peaks because it goes to Charing Cross and therefore gives the people of Bromley better connections; it goes through Lewisham, London Bridge and Waterloo East on the way.
Indeed, but my point is that those passengers are accommodated on the services that stop at Grove Park from further afield, and they don't constitute a full load into Charing Cross, that can be used for a train that serves more places.
 

frankmoh

On Moderation
Joined
7 May 2025
Messages
826
Location
London
Indeed, but my point is that those passengers are accommodated on the services that stop at Grove Park from further afield, and they don't constitute a full load into Charing Cross, that can be used for a train that serves more places.
Surely a 6-car or 8-car would be adequate?
 

Acey

Member
Joined
16 Nov 2018
Messages
429
Checking through my old guards diagram book I found this duty,ECS from GPk Depot to Bromley North ,a few trips BN to G PK then an attachment at B NTH which then made a through service to CX ,calling at Sundridge/G PK/H GRN then fast to London Bridge./Waterloo and Charing Cross ! As I recall it was very busy and there was a lot of moaning when the service was withdrawn ! I believe there was another morning through train as well
ps just checked another duty,indeed there was another through train 08,07 to CX,same stopping pattern !
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20251011_143348.jpg
    IMG_20251011_143348.jpg
    1.7 MB · Views: 15
Last edited:

stssts1985

Member
Joined
21 Aug 2022
Messages
77
Location
London
It's as good as it's going to get during the pm peak and it is not difficult for passengers to change at London Bridge for southbound services.
I was quite surprised by the backlash to the new timetable. The press showed some pretty extreme images of crowds at LBR during disruption — whether that was fully representative, I’m not sure. And honestly, I’m not sure what LBR usually looks like during disruption anyway.
I'm not sure how helpful a choice of termini really is, as people seem to react best to clear and frequent timetables and providing 2tph to one location and 2tph to another doesn't work for a short distance metro service
I’m also not convinced that offering multiple termini is especially helpful. In my experience, people respond best to clear, consistent, and frequent timetables. Splitting services (2tph to one place, 2tph to another) rarely works well for short-distance metro routes.


I completely agree with the points made about Southeastern — and the same goes for Southern and Thameslink (look at Thornton Heath or Hackbridge, for example). We still see big timetable gaps even where there are decent tph figures on paper — 23 minutes on the Bexleyheath line off-peak, and I think Hackbridge has 26-minute gaps. Southern, Thameslink, and Southwestern haven’t yet restored their full off-peak frequencies either.


People like predictability. A “turn up and go” service only really works when you’ve got 15 minutes or less between trains. I’d honestly “TfL” the whole network: named lines, simple patterns, and a unified fare structure so you can change to the Underground or DLR without a huge price jump. I’d still have Southeastern/Southern operate the trains for compatibility with their mainline services, but branded and structured as part of TfL.


As for rolling stock, people don’t really like sitting next to people — and I think that’s part of why Overground-style seating works so well. On short journeys, no one’s filling up a 6-bay; two people in airline seats feels cramped. For sub-hour trips, the Overground layout is probably the best balance (even though, as an infrastructure fan, I prefer a window view!). On the Overground, people will fill every seat and keep a personal space feeling.


I’ve got friends in North Kent who wouldn’t dream of using Southeastern — they see it as confusing and expensive. But they’ll happily drive to Abbey Wood and take the Elizabeth line. That says a lot.

his shows the most basic way you can travel between each node, thus tracing out routes between destinations. You should be able to work out the station names from the two-letter codes
the map shared above is brilliant — thank you! It shows clearly how people move between nodes, and that’s exactly why people love the Tube map: it’s simple and frequent, with at least 4tph on every line.
Yes, you could send them to Lewisham – but there are no bay platforms at Lewisham, and all of the through platforms are far too busy to terminate and reverse a train every 15 minutes.
As for Lewisham, I don’t think the lack of bay platforms is an insurmountable issue. If there’s no room there, find the next feasible location with a bay or siding. Removing the Lewisham skippers and running 4tph to Victoria (or even better, Clapham Junction), with stops at Brockley, Loughborough Junction, and Brixton (see origional post), would really strengthen Lewisham as a hub — DLR, buses, everything — and maybe even reduce the need for the costly Bakerloo extension.


There’s nothing wrong with heavy rail as an urban mode — look at Germany. But it needs to be done better.
Could a train starting at Bromley North and running on the fast deliver a fully and standing 10-car load at London Bridge?
And yes — I recently made a trip to Bromley North to finish my London map. What a strange little branch! I’ve got friends nearby who live five minutes from Sundridge Park and have never used it.

In the long term, I’d love to see a tram-train setup from Crystal Palace to Beckenham Junction (replacing Southern’s lightly used 2tph), continuing to Bromley South, through Bromley town centre to Grove Park — and ideally to Lewisham somehow. Southern could then run 4tph to East Croydon.
 

frankmoh

On Moderation
Joined
7 May 2025
Messages
826
Location
London
I’m also not convinced that offering multiple termini is especially helpful. In my experience, people respond best to clear, consistent, and frequent timetables. Splitting services (2tph to one place, 2tph to another) rarely works well for short-distance metro routes.
It works for Caterham and Tattenham Corner! I can't think of many other places in or near London that has a splitting service though.
People like predictability. A “turn up and go” service only really works when you’ve got 15 minutes or less between trains. I’d honestly “TfL” the whole network: named lines, simple patterns, and a unified fare structure so you can change to the Underground or DLR without a huge price jump. I’d still have Southeastern/Southern operate the trains for compatibility with their mainline services, but branded and structured as part of TfL.
Most of SE's metro services through Bromley get 4tph already so this is a sensible idea. Personally I can see a 465 in Overground colours (and the 376 obviously), although I know this is not what you meant by "operate the trains".
As for rolling stock, people don’t really like sitting next to people — and I think that’s part of why Overground-style seating works so well. On short journeys, no one’s filling up a 6-bay; two people in airline seats feels cramped. For sub-hour trips, the Overground layout is probably the best balance (even though, as an infrastructure fan, I prefer a window view!). On the Overground, people will fill every seat and keep a personal space feeling.
On the other hand, I detest longitudinal seating for heavy rail. It personally makes me feel a little light-headed sitting sideways for a while, in addition to massively reducing the amount of seats on the train. From my experience, people will fill every seat up on a train even if there is lots of standing room. If suburban stock is going to go down this route I would like to see half-and-half seating at least, or something seen on the Elizabeth Line. I also think that trains should abandon airline seating entirely and go back to bays for every seat.
I’ve got friends in North Kent who wouldn’t dream of using Southeastern — they see it as confusing and expensive. But they’ll happily drive to Abbey Wood and take the Elizabeth line. That says a lot.
I'm going to be quite honest but I don't believe you on this. What is their supposedly confusing local station then? The only way I could see it being confusing and expensive is if it's outside of the Oyster/Travelcard Zones, which even then isn't a fair comparison because you are comparing a Kent station to a London station.
 

stssts1985

Member
Joined
21 Aug 2022
Messages
77
Location
London
I would like to see half-and-half seating at least, or something seen on the Elizabeth Line
Yeh that works I think, also I wouldn't see the need to get rid of the 376 377 And 465s before their time - refurb to metro-ise but sacking of working stock is just inefficient.
What is their supposedly confusing local station then?
Gravesend. For people who aren't used to it or use it much the railway has an image of being expensive and confusing, we got to remember we on this forum are not your average traveller. People like simple systems, with spider maps like TFl With contactless payment. Rail is not so accessible for people don't use it regularly.
It works for Caterham and Tattenham Corner! I can't think of many other places in or near London that has a splitting service though.
I think he means splitting, in context, as having a different destination - e.g. selhurst - 2tph to London bridge, 2tph to Victoria. And 2tph west Croydon, 3tph East Croydon. Other examples of this - hackbridge, grove park, Lewisham from the hayes or Sidcup line. It's not good for turn up and go and simplicity\predictability.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
23,375
I think he means splitting, in context, as having a different destination - e.g. selhurst - 2tph to London bridge, 2tph to Victoria. And 2tph west Croydon, 3tph East Croydon. Other examples of this - hackbridge, grove park, Lewisham from the hayes or Sidcup line. It's not good for turn up and go and simplicity\predictability.
The problem is that taking away those historical links to the two different destinations upsets those people who currently travel to the one which is discontinued.
 

stssts1985

Member
Joined
21 Aug 2022
Messages
77
Location
London
The problem is that taking away those historical links to the two different destinations upsets those people who currently travel to the one which is discontinued.
Well, you can't make an omelette without cracking eggs! Otherwise we carry on in South London with a complex tangled web of lines with low frequencies - in order to metro-ise South London you need to simplify and increase frequencies. No body complains the bakerloo line doesn't branch off to Epping to make a direct journey possible.
 

Top