• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Signal berth codes?

saismee

Established Member
Joined
20 Oct 2023
Messages
1,675
Location
UK
Most likely just to clear the previous trains headcode and avoid confusion. Same reason you see FUEL, JUBI, SHNT in Norwich for the respective Sidings a lot of the time.
And because there's a ground frame (?) for the sidings. It's a bit more than just two tracks here.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Vexed

Member
Joined
12 Jan 2020
Messages
637
Location
Herts / Hants
Anyone know the origin of C216. Currently showing around Huddersfield (blockaded).
Not sure why it's there apart from the blockade but I can tell you it was interposed at 0500 on Sat 20th Sept and is unchanged since. Maybe a reference to some possession number?
 

Freightmaster

Verified Rep
Joined
7 Jul 2009
Messages
4,411
Not sure why it's there apart from the blockade but I can tell you it was interposed at 0500 on Sat 20th Sept and is unchanged since. Maybe a reference to some possession number?
Correct - possession of the Penistone line in this case. There are also a load of [-142] entries between
Stalybridge and Diggle for the same reason.


MARK
 

High Dyke

Established Member
Joined
1 Jan 2013
Messages
4,995
Location
Yellabelly Country
Anyone know the origin of C216. Currently showing around Huddersfield (blockaded).
Yes, it's the possession item number. Each route divides its engineering notices into areas. The 'C' means LNE Central Weekly Operating Notice. The number is the specific item number.
 

HChip

On Moderation
Joined
14 Jul 2025
Messages
19
Location
England
Think someone might be getting into a bit of trouble down at Ipswich!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1784.jpeg
    IMG_1784.jpeg
    59.9 KB · Views: 113

Numbskull100

Member
Joined
29 Jul 2017
Messages
190
Don’t know what happened here as bizarrely 4M63 was then allowed to leave the yard on time?! Seems a bit strange.
Not really strange at all.

Suggests that the traction and driver taking m63 forward were not involved.

It's even occurred on a different road (R4) to m63 (R3).
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,401
Location
Northampton
Don’t know what happened here as bizarrely 4M63 was then allowed to leave the yard on time?! Seems a bit strange.
From the look of that snip the SPAD happened at the far end of the yard for a train travelling away from 4M63. If 4M63 isn't affected and is safe to depart then getting it out of the yard is probably the best thing.
 

Class15

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2021
Messages
4,100
Location
North London or Mildmay line
Not really strange at all.

Suggests that the traction and driver taking m63 forward were not involved.

It's even occurred on a different road (R4) to m63 (R3).
From the look of that snip the SPAD happened at the far end of the yard for a train travelling away from 4M63. If 4M63 isn't affected and is safe to depart then getting it out of the yard is probably the best thing.
Makes sense, my apologies.
 

Steve Harris

Member
Joined
11 Dec 2016
Messages
1,193
Location
ECML
Isnt that quite usual for one of the locos off the sleeper that parks up there?
Indeed it is. If my memory serves me correctly that is the 'Klondyke' (or is it Klondike?) siding and has been used to stable the Euston - Edinburgh sleeper loco(s) for 25+ years.
 

milooo

Member
Joined
3 Dec 2024
Messages
201
Location
Stevenage
This morning on the wcml "sagy wire ohle brok oh no" in the Kings Langley area
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20251118-083345.png
    Screenshot_20251118-083345.png
    176.9 KB · Views: 230

rower40

Member
Joined
1 Jan 2008
Messages
577
Indeed it is. If my memory serves me correctly that is the 'Klondyke' (or is it Klondike?) siding and has been used to stable the Euston - Edinburgh sleeper loco(s) for 25+ years.
One of the Edinburgh signallers told me that they'd had an incident some time ago when a class 66 on a route-learning trip had been abandoned in that siding at Waverley, blocking in the Electric loco for that night's Up Highland Sleeper. The signaller was waiting for a phone call from the Electric loco driver to say they were ready to shunt onto the sleeper - but the loco driver wasn't going to call when there was a "shed" between their engine and the siding starting signal! And at that time in the morning, it's tricky to find someone with traction or route knowledge to move the front loco. So ever since, they've been careful to use the TD to remind them what engines are in that siding.
 

saismee

Established Member
Joined
20 Oct 2023
Messages
1,675
Location
UK
Got UDGD and LRDS on the East Suffolk Line. Supposedly a shunting move?
 
Joined
7 Aug 2011
Messages
269
One of the Edinburgh signallers told me that they'd had an incident some time ago when a class 66 on a route-learning trip had been abandoned in that siding at Waverley, blocking in the Electric loco for that night's Up Highland Sleeper. The signaller was waiting for a phone call from the Electric loco driver to say they were ready to shunt onto the sleeper - but the loco driver wasn't going to call when there was a "shed" between their engine and the siding starting signal! And at that time in the morning, it's tricky to find someone with traction or route knowledge to move the front loco. So ever since, they've been careful to use the TD to remind them what engines are in that siding.

Hypothetically, if the Sleeper driver was qualified on Class 66 would he have been able to jump in and move it out of the way if it was a different company's loco? Or is it more difficult than that?
 

Top