I'm an enthusiast but don't really like or dislike it.It's a bit cringe, but I suspect only train enthusiasts will be dissatisfied with the stereotypes portrayed, in particular by the older of the two chaps. 99.9% of the population may find it mildly amusing/comforting.
GBR barely exists yet, as the Railways Bill has yet to go before parliament; relinquished National Rail Contracts are currently being consolidated as part of the DfT operator (under the "Shadow Great British Railways" umbrella structure). Crosscountry cannot be brought under state control on a whim, as its core contract term runs until October 2027.This is where GB Railways need to be getting a grip. This advertising is a waste of money and if rail is being advertised, it should be the national network rather than a failed brand and operation like Cross Country.
If Hendy had any sense he would order the Cross Country brand to be removed and obliterated.
GBR barely exists yet, as the Railways Bill has yet to go before parliament; relinquished National Rail Contracts are currently being consolidated as part of the DfT operator (under the "Shadow Great British Railways" umbrella structure). Crosscountry cannot be brought under state control on a whim, as its core contract term runs until October 2027.
Do DfT own the brand? I think that’s good news, but as we saw with Northern, there were still complications with Arriva claiming they owned the font associated with the brand or some such nonsense. We ended up with a capitalised logo designed by a 5 year old with childish font to go with it.
Anyway, I like the ad but it’s just not giving me warm fuzzy feelings about the incompetence that runs the company, too late for that. Maybe this is a last ditched attempt to portray a rosy picture so that they can continue to operate the service on behalf of GBR when it happens.
Yes, quite. It does a good job of describing what the services do.CrossCountry is a BR era brand, no reason to suggest that GBR won't continue to use it for non London intercity services.
I beleve they do and the pre-privatisation logo is one of the trademarks registered with DfT. Cross Country though is a tarnished brand so it would make sense to drop it sooner rather than later.
Seriously, I don’t have a clue which series you mean.
It might be an unpopular opinion but I agree, the Eleanor ads have a bit of charm to them with their Christopher Walken dance parody.Even the music for the LNER advert, when I hear it, instinctively think of LNER.
Thanks, I hadn’t seen that before. It’s a bit chaotic for my taste and difficult to watch but I guess I’m getting old and don’t occupy the TikTok world where everything has to be done in a millisecond. Appreciate the link though.There's a fair few of these in 30 & 15 second format floating around on the internet.
It might be an unpopular opinion but I agree, the Eleanor ads have a bit of charm to them with their Christopher Walken dance parody.
I recogonise the bridge - it is between St. Germans and Trerulefoot in Cornwall. A favoured spot for enthusiasts / photographers down the ages!I'd imagine standing in Birmingham New Street for a minute is likely equivalent to 1 million trains passing under a bridge you're above.
Why not, that corner seems like a decent spot to get a voyager going at speed (if only they still tilted).
Bit limited to IETs and GWR 150s these days apart from the odd Voyager. Although it maybe a good spot to watch the final run in England of HST next year. Maybe the enthusiasts start gathering there again once the 175s start running down that way.I recogonise the bridge - it is between St. Germans and Trerulefoot in Cornwall. A favoured spot for enthusiasts / photographers down the ages!
Anybody know which station the Voyagers pulling away from each other at the start of the ad is filmed at. If it’s all filmed down in the south west could it be Newton Abbott?
Putting the quality up to maximum, I think the sign says Paignton... which admittedly seems a little unlikely as a place for two Voyagers to meet, but would probably be a less disruptive place to film.Doesn't look like Newton Abbot to me.
Is it Taunton?
This XC thing is a waste of money and effort, and why bother when their trains are wedged to standing anyway.....and that's the ones that aren't half locked out to passengers.I quite like the most recent DafT effort currently on the airways with the grandma reminiscing about her first love with her granddaughter:
Certainly more memorable than that series with the mongolian throat singing...
Putting the quality up to maximum, I think the sign says Paignton... which admittedly seems a little unlikely as a place for two Voyagers to meet, but would probably be a less disruptive place to film.
Yes, it is at the Goodrington end of Paignton, looking from Platform 2 to 1. Must have been a special working for the film to get two Voyagers there at the same time.Well spotted!
Would be interesting to find out if the two Voyagers did actually meet, or if it was a clever bit of editing...
Yes, it is at the Goodrington end of Paignton, looking from Platform 2 to 1. Must have been a special working for the film to get two Voyagers there at the same time.
The east end of Plymouth briefly appears too.
Capturing the Francis Borgoues vibe?I don’t like the ad. Why would they stand on top of the bridge just to photograph the roof of the train and then get fumes going into their lungs? Drivers would also be ‘concerned’ about people on bridges right above them.
It would have been far better to highlight Cross Country routes / have film of the trains passing landmarks or attractive countryside settings. What about showing the interiors of refurbished trains? What is the point of paying for expensive advertising when they can barely cope with the number of passengers they already have - hence the high fares - especially on routes where they are the sole provider.
This is probably one of my favourite rail ads, it's a real early 2000s throwback, I had a DVD of the making of this add and from memory, they used a Voyager dressed up as a Pendolino for the filming.
Think this one dates back to September 2006. Filmed in Cumbria and Weardale, County Durham, apparently. The "Apache" advert had to be subsequently cleared by the Advertising Standards Authority, after a number of complaints were made about the stereotypical portrayal of the Native Americans shown in the ad.
Think this one dates back to September 2006. Filmed in Cumbria and Weardale, County Durham, apparently. The "Apache" advert had to be subsequently cleared by the Advertising Standards Authority, after a number of complaints were made about the stereotypical portrayal of the Native Americans shown in the ad.
I share that. XC is effectively a state run farm controlled from Whitehall. So if DfT want 100 acres of land to grow barley that is what XC will do etc etc.A lot of the issues XC face come from the DFT, so unless the DFT have a change of heart towards XC, any new branding will end up just as tarnished over time, so is there any point?
I share that. XC is effectively a state run farm controlled from Whitehall. So if DfT want 100 acres of land to grow barley that is what XC will do etc etc.
So for those calling for the XC brand to be dispensed with, a replacement needs to be provided for the customers to buy tickets for and use. Simply binning a bramsd without an alternative is not like you favourite supermarket withdrawing a certain brand of baked beans - because alternatives are available. Not quite so easy for customers travellign from say Macclesfield to Oxford or Darlington to Cheltenham.
I wouldn't have minded their open acess plans (albeit a bit ambitious and discussed at length on other threads.)That's it, I think we should hand the WCML back to Branson so we can get adverts like this again.
The most recent one would have cost a fortune too. Although it is a slight improvementExactly this, rebranding is just lining the pockets of Best Impressions, or whichever branding designers Arriva use.

The most recent one would have cost a fortune too. Although it is a slight improvement