(In) 2025(,) is the correct date for the withdrawal of 175s from TfW as this is when they were returned off-lease. TfW had chosen not to use the trains for a period of time prior to 2025 but kept them on lease.
Oh OK, yeah, that hadn't occurred to me.
However, I consider
withdrawal of the trains from that operator to be the point at which they
stopped using them (not the point at which they "could've used them until"), which in this case was 2023, so I disagree that 2025 is the "correct date" for the
withdrawal of them from that operator.
I consider 2025 to merely be the "correct date" for them being off-leased by that operator. They had
not been used for nearly 2 years (whether they "could've used them" more recently than that or not), and a lot of them were stored away from their network, in Ely in Eastern England.
The RAIL article stated:
The Class 175 fleet, originally built by Alstom in Birmingham between 1999 and 2001, was previously operated by Transport for Wales until earlier this year.
"This year" in this case is 2025, and I take the above statement to mean that Transport for Wales used Class 175 trains in passenger service until earlier this year / earlier in 2025. It actually said "
operated by Transport for Wales until earlier this year".
I don't consider trains that were sat in storage to have been "operated" nearly 2 years after they were last
actually operated (in passenger service), just because they were still on lease and "could've still been operated" (but weren't).
To say that they were
operated until 2025 is just misleading, as they were last
operated in 2023. "They could've still been used in 2025" doesn't count. They weren't!
The article should've just stated:
"The Class 175 fleet, originally built by Alstom in Birmingham between 1999 and 2001, was previously operated by Transport for Wales
until late 2023."