a good off
Member
Years ago this would have been impossible due to the heavy amount of freight traffic on the Reliefs. Not much to get in the way now…
XC would not be calling at the new local stations (with the possible exception of Cardiff Parkway, which is a different development anyway).Where does the XC Cardiff-Nottingham fit into all that? Would that make Cheltenham 3tph or would they put the new stops in?
It’s already been extended from Gloucester to Cheltenham, and now there is a proposal to double the service. I think there is a limit to how much TfW should be relied upon to improve services in England. Extension of the hourly Bristol to Gloucester service would be the obvious answer.I think that the TFW Cardiff to Cheltenham service should be extended - see:> https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/ashchurch-for-tewkesbury-station-needs-more-services.289599/
Having say FLIRTS running a stopping service from Bristol TM to Cardiff seems a good idea apart from the problem of terminating in Cardiff. I wonder if they could be extended to Bridgend via Rhoose - which would give the added bonus of serving Cardiff Airport?
I suppose it deppends on whether such an extention would be profitable. Obviously it would be unresonable ro expect Welsh taxpayers to subsidise improved services in England.It’s already been extended from Gloucester to Cheltenham, and now there is a proposal to double the service. I think there is a limit to how much TfW should be relied upon to improve services in England.
Not that having a service physically operated by a TfW train and crew need mean any greater call on the Welsh public purse regardless of whether or not the extension washes its face financially (which it almost certainly wouldn’t). Any necessary subsidy could come from one of several English pots, which unfortunately are all rather empty at the moment.I suppose it deppends on whether such an extention would be profitable. Obviously it would be unresonable ro expect Welsh taxpayers to subsidise improved services in England.
True, but the reality is that the Welsh govt is unlikely to even want to get involved in it. I can’t see what possible upside there would be for it.Not that having a service physically operated by a TfW train and crew need mean any greater call on the Welsh public purse regardless of whether or not the extension washes its face financially (which it almost certainly wouldn’t). Any necessary subsidy could come from one of several English pots, which unfortunately are all rather empty at the moment.
Indeed.True, but the reality is that the Welsh govt is unlikely to even want to get involved in it. I can’t see what possible upside there would be for it.
And as noted before, there is a much more logical service to extend to facilitate it, which is the Bristol to Gloucester hourly service. That keeps all the financials within England, and moreover I think it is a much more logical fit in terms of customer demand.
Is it actually Welsh taxpayers or more general UK taxpayers, like those who subsidise all the rest of TfWs/XC/GWR/Avanti services across both Wales and England?I suppose it deppends on whether such an extention would be profitable. Obviously it would be unresonable ro expect Welsh taxpayers to subsidise improved services in England.
Is it actually Welsh taxpayers or more general UK taxpayers, like those who subsidise all the rest of TfWs/XC/GWR/Avanti services across both Wales and England?I suppose it deppends on whether such an extention would be profitable. Obviously it would be unresonable ro expect Welsh taxpayers to subsidise improved services in England.
Well unless the Welsh govt was fully recompensed for any loss for the net cost of the extended service I don’t see how it wouldn’t end up with Welsh taxpayers footing the bill.Is it actually Welsh taxpayers or more general UK taxpayers, like those who subsidise all the rest of TfWs/XC/GWR/Avanti services across both Wales and England?
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
Is it actually Welsh taxpayers or more general UK taxpayers, like those who subsidise all the rest of TfWs/XC/GWR/Avanti services across both Wales and England?
I'd disagree. It's located next to Tremorfa and Splott which are densely populated areas. It's on the edge of Roath and a bit further to Pen-y-lan. There's been some housing developments along Colchester Avenue.Cardiff East is poorly located imo unless there are plans to knock down a lot of the industrial units and retail park units and replace them with high density housing longer term?
I strongly suspect that the retail park at least towards the city is doing very badly. TGI Fridays went bust, Poundland is virtually bust (sold for £1 itself!), huge charity shop, Argos unit has been vacant for years.
However if it remains as is - then it is going to be extremely poorly used imo. Not a nice place on foot to walk to, nearly all of the shops are geared to heavy stuff/DIY which needs a car. Even on bus it's pretty oppressive just crossing Newport road to get from from the station to the bus stop out of the city.
Perhaps slightly more useful when/if the bay tram gets there, but even still the interchange options are going to be pretty niche, given you could go the other way towards central and queen Street which gives far better destinations and timings.
For roath and Penylan crwys road would be much more convenient and far better on foot.
I thought the West of England rail plans propose some additional services between Bristol and Worcester?I think that the TFW Cardiff to Cheltenham service should be extended - see:> https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/ashchurch-for-tewkesbury-station-needs-more-services.289599/
One of Mark Barry's Metro papers makes exactly that point, that with a railway station you could have more valuable businesses thereCardiff East is poorly located imo unless there are plans to knock down a lot of the industrial units and retail park units and replace them with high density housing longer term?
Which is of course also proposed.Perhaps slightly more useful when/if the bay tram gets there
Well in my view Splott should have its own station. Re Roath and Colchester Avenue (and indeed Heath Hospital), there would be interchange to Cardiff Bus' existing orbital routes 1/2.I'd disagree. It's located next to Tremorfa and Splott which are densely populated areas. It's on the edge of Roath and a bit further to Pen-y-lan. There's been some housing developments along Colchester Avenue.
There's industrial areas in Tremorfa as well as Ipswich Road.
You do realise the 1 and 2 routes are every 1 hour, no sunday service and finish at ~6pm?I thought the West of England rail plans propose some additional services between Bristol and Worcester?
One of Mark Barry's Metro papers makes exactly that point, that with a railway station you could have more valuable businesses there
Which is of course also proposed.
Well in my view Splott should have its own station. Re Roath and Colchester Avenue (and indeed Heath Hospital), there would be interchange to Cardiff Bus' existing orbital routes 1/2.
The City Circle has been running for at least 50 years, and I understand it the primary purpose is to provide better connectivity to the Heath Hospital and enable people visiting and attending appointments to not have to go into the centre and back out again.You do realise the 1 and 2 routes are every 1 hour, no sunday service and finish at ~6pm?
I completely agree!Yes but I cannot see how it could provide any reasonable connectivity to the new train station we are discussing. I've got it a few times and I am often the only passenger.
It can be quiet during the middle of the day, but it's never dead. I've often caught this bus and it can be busy. Its difficult to gauge its popularity because of its routing around the city.Yes but I cannot see how it could provide any reasonable connectivity to the new train station we are discussing. I've got it a few times and I am often the only passenger.
Well orbital routes in particular rely on good interchange to make them successful...You do realise the 1 and 2 routes are every 1 hour, no sunday service and finish at ~6pm?
Why does it seem unreasonable? Fwiw I'm assuming that moor Street train would be cross-country (GBR) rather than tfw and so would be an express service. So the smaller stations would still be tfw only. Assuming the lines have the capacity why is it unreasonable to use it?Isn't there a plan under Midlands Rail Hub for there to be an extra hourly service from Moor St to Cardiff. How do these plans for another Cardiff-Cheltenham stopper impact this? 4tph from Cardiff to Gloucester/Cheltenham seems unreasonable.
It seems logical that this could be one of the stoppers, it could always run faster north of Cheltenham. And if TfW, doesn't really matter - although given the bays/sharing, I would think interworking would be planned with the new Bristol, and indeed the Hereford. TfW could run the Bristol-Moor St, and maybe it could interwork with the Bristol-Cardiff, and be something of a triangular operation, if needed.It’s already been extended from Gloucester to Cheltenham, and now there is a proposal to double the service. I think there is a limit to how much TfW should be relied upon to improve services in England. Extension of the hourly Bristol to Gloucester service would be the obvious answer.