• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Poll: Pendolino vs Evero: travel experiences and preferences?

Which WCML InterCity rolling stock do you prefer?

  • Class 390 'Pendolino'

    Votes: 78 67.2%
  • Class 805/807 'Evero'

    Votes: 31 26.7%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 7 6.0%

  • Total voters
    116
Status
Not open for further replies.

Sorcerer

Established Member
Joined
20 May 2022
Messages
2,172
Location
Liverpool
Today I had my first experience travelling on an Avanti West Coast Class 807 Evero between Liverpool and London, and on the return journey I travelled on a Class 390 Pendolino. I did this booking deliberately so I could get the experience of travelling on both units to see which I might've liked better.

The Evero was nice and more spacious than a Pendolino, which at first felt comparatively cramped on the return journey, and even the restriction to 110mph didn't really bother me that much since it didn't feel much different on the train itself. My phone might've slipped out to the side slightly but it wasn't exactly a white-knuckle ride going around corners.

That said, I think that my preference still lies with the Pendolino. While I do think it's a visually better and more iconic unit, that is just a personal preference, and all things considered it's more of a personal bias ingrained on me from childhood. The Evero is nice, but it's nothing truly special since it was merely meant as a secondary fleet, though I will gladly admit that it does this job perfectly, and I'm glad it has enabled extra Liverpool services.

But what do you all prefer? Do you think the Pendolino remains the superior product of the InterCity fleet on the West Coast Main Line, or has the Evero's trading of tilt and speed for extra space proven to be a turning point for you? I look forward to hearing your opinions below.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Jamesrob637

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2016
Messages
6,080
An Evero can run short if there's a failure. A Pendo can't. Evero just maybe. But haven't done one yet. Done plenty of other Hitachi trains though. GWR have hard seats, TPE less so. LNER aren't too bad either.
 

FrontSideBus

On Moderation
Joined
11 Feb 2025
Messages
451
Pendo. Smooth ride and I actually like the narrow windows, almost gives it an aeroplane cabin feel to it.
It says it all how a 20+ year old train can still compete with a brand new one!
IMO, the Evero's are among the better 800's since they actually use decent seats. Just a shame there are no readings lights at the tables!
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
21,935
Location
Mold, Clwyd
An Evero can run short if there's a failure. A Pendo can't. Evero just maybe. But haven't done one yet. Done plenty of other Hitachi trains though. GWR have hard seats, TPE less so. LNER aren't too bad either.
Bi-mode 805s can run off the wires or if they are down but straight EMU 807s can't.
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
12,884
Location
Cambridge
An Evero can run short if there's a failure. A Pendo can't.
Says a lot about our railways when your preference between two trains depends on their ability to cope with a failure. How about your opinion when both trains are working as they should be?
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
13,194
The 805s do normally
Have 805 + 807 consists (i.e. 12 cars) ever operated in passenger service, or is 10 cars a hard limit for platform lengths?

Says a lot about our railways when your preference between two trains depends on their ability to cope with a failure.
Is that not a valid opinion? Modern rolling stock is typically designed with some level of redundancy in the event of loss of traction power.
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
12,884
Location
Cambridge
Have 805 + 807 consists (i.e. 12 cars) ever operated in passenger service, or is 10 cars a hard limit for platform lengths?
They have 26m carriages so it’d be about the length of a sixteen carriage 350, or just under.
Is that not a valid opinion? Modern rolling stock is typically designed with some level of redundancy in the event of loss of traction power.
I didn’t say it wasn’t a valid opinion, but when you have to put aside (to some extent) how you feel about the actual passenger experience of travelling on a train and make a judgement based on what might happen if the train fails, it says a lot - aka, that our trains fail at a very high rate.

It would definitely be a good point for if we’re asking what is the better train, but we’re not. Asking which you think is the better train, and which train you prefer, are two very separate questions.
 

D1511

Established Member
Joined
29 Jul 2023
Messages
1,215
Location
WCML N
Given that my water bottle stays still on the 390 and it slides across the table on a 807, my votes for the Pendo everytime......since a 81 with a rake of corridor Mk1s wasn't one of the options!
Seriously though, I use both every journey......Evero on the MKC CRE section and Pendo on the CRE EDI leg, and I can't wait for the Pendo to roll in. Only downside is the panto "clunks" in coach H
 

vuzzeho

Member
Joined
11 Apr 2022
Messages
667
Location
London
I like the Pendolinos more. Maybe nostalgia, but I find the Everos noticeably slower (I mostly ride between Euston and MKC) and that kinda annoys me. Also, I like the ambiance on the 390s more - the Everos are very nice but the Pendos take it. I also love the tilting of the 390s. That said, I like the more spacious Everos and their reading lights (not that I've ever actually used them...). But the tilting Pendolinos are so nice (and fast) on the WCML that they'll take it for me. I hope whatever replaces them (in many years' time) is as good, and tilts.
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,546
Location
LBK
Pendolino is the best intercity stock on the railway at the moment. LNER’s 225 sets excepted. It’s not close.
 

Skie

Established Member
Joined
22 Dec 2008
Messages
1,239
807s for me

The 390s are a bit tired, with dodgy aircon, terrible mobile signals and still have a bog pong. I’ve done enough late night journeys on them to get fed up of the cramped environment.

The Evero might have a harsher ride compared, but for just pure comfort and usability they’re miles better. The big windows and more tables (together, which is good for groups) make them more pleasant.
 

FrontSideBus

On Moderation
Joined
11 Feb 2025
Messages
451
What about a Class 47 and Mk2F's? :)

The thing about the 805 being able to run when the power goes off is a bit of a moot point when chances are the trains on the same section of track can't so will be blocked anyway?

Will Pendo's ever be allowed to run at 140mph?
 

stadler

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2023
Messages
3,304
Location
Horsley
I find the 805s and 807s to be miles better. They are a huge improvement. I am not the biggest fan of IETs but compared to Pendolinos i see them as a big upgrade. They have a nicer interior and ambiance.

The 390s are horrible cramped and poorly designed trains. They feel cramped inside and they have those horrible small windows. I have always hated travelling on them. I find even the 220s and 221s are nicer.
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
12,884
Location
Cambridge
Pendolino is the best intercity stock on the railway at the moment. LNER’s 225 sets excepted. It’s not close.
Agreed on those two. I’d give Pendolino no. 1 (I’d say it’s the UK’s flagship train, giving the primary service to Manchester, Glasgow, Birmingham, Liverpool, The Lakes and the Black Country from London) and IC225 no. 2. in terms of best UK IC stock.
 

19Gnasher69

Member
Joined
1 Jul 2021
Messages
172
Location
Aire Valley
Has to be the 805s/807s. I’ve never even been on an Evero but know it will be a more pleasurable experience than a class 390. The latter is a truly awful train - in my opinion the worst inter-city train of the past god knows how many decades and echo Stadler’s comments above. I always use TPE on the northern WCML and, thankfully, I can now avoid 390s on the southern section. I really can’t understand the liking for them but each to their own.
 

Russel

Established Member
Joined
30 Jun 2022
Messages
5,554
Location
Lichfield
Depends on if Avanti have the heating set to "slow cook" on the Everos as soon as the temperature drops below about 18 degree as they do on the Pendolinos...
 

Jamesrob637

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2016
Messages
6,080
They have 26m carriages so it’d be about the length of a sixteen carriage 350, or just under.

I didn’t say it wasn’t a valid opinion, but when you have to put aside (to some extent) how you feel about the actual passenger experience of travelling on a train and make a judgement based on what might happen if the train fails, it says a lot - aka, that our trains fail at a very high rate.

It would definitely be a good point for if we’re asking what is the better train, but we’re not. Asking which you think is the better train, and which train you prefer, are two very separate questions.

A post-refurb Pendo is very good but the original interior was very dated even in the 10s, let alone just after Covid.
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
12,884
Location
Cambridge
A post-refurb Pendo is very good but the original interior was very dated even in the 10s, let alone just after Covid.
Matter of opinion. I completely disagree. What was dated, was the East Midlands Trains HST interior. And the Greater Anglia MK3.
 

Russel

Established Member
Joined
30 Jun 2022
Messages
5,554
Location
Lichfield
Matter of opinion. I completely disagree. What was dated, was the East Midlands Trains HST interior. And the Greater Anglia MK3.

It's hard to believe the Virgin interior is now 20+ years old, it's aged well.

If you look past the dirt and shabbiness of the Cross Country Voyagrers, the design it's self still feels modern, yet isn't lit up like a dental surgery, I like it.
 

satisnek

Member
Joined
5 Sep 2014
Messages
1,097
Location
Kidderminster/Mercia Marina
OK, you've twisted my arm and I've voted for Evero even though I'm not a big Avanti user and will readily admit to belonging in the "all modern trains are the same" camp. My only experience so far was an 807 COV - BHM a couple of months back but yes, the interior is more spacious, it's more like a 'proper' train and it's a refreshing break from that Branson airline stigma which the 390s will carry until their withdrawal.
 

Jamesrob637

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2016
Messages
6,080
Matter of opinion. I completely disagree. What was dated, was the East Midlands Trains HST interior. And the Greater Anglia MK3.

Love the old HST seats: don't diss! But some "larger" people might struggle with the fixed armrests.

evero is a silly name compared to Pendolino though? At least with Pendolino you think of pendulum.

However, until I do a proper journey on the Evergreen or whatever it's called, I'm undecided in the interest of fairness.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top