• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Charfield Station - a new station to be built.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Annetts key

Established Member
Joined
13 Feb 2021
Messages
3,816
Location
West is best
A new two platform station is to planned to be built at Charfield (CHD).

This is at or very near the site of the former station. It's between Yate Station (Wickwar Tunnel) and Cam & Dursley Station (Berkeley Road Junction) (GW401 - BGL) and is planned for CP7.

Enabling works are currently underway. Some details of which are in this post.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Annetts key

Established Member
Joined
13 Feb 2021
Messages
3,816
Location
West is best
Is this part of the today's government announcement or a separate confirmation?
Separate. I posted because there did not appear to be a thread for it and I just got around to reading some information from last week that mentions Charfield.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
28,684
Location
Nottingham
Quick search found this link: https://beta.southglos.gov.uk/charfield-train-station/. This links to a plan and progress updates.
Charfield train station will be in the centre of the village, off Station Road, within a 10 minute walk for all Charfield residents. The station is expected to be completed by spring 2027.

You can view a map of where the station will be located.

We are working with Network Rail on the project with funding from the West of England Mayoral Combined Authority.

This was the site of a serious accident in 1928: https://www.railwaysarchive.co.uk/docsummary.php?docID=304
t the moment of collision, an up empty (L.M. & S.R.) unfitted freight (3) was travelling in a northerly direction at a speed of about 20 to 25 m.p.h. The engine and about twelve wagons had passed clear of an overbridge north of Charfield Station. A down semi-fitted (G.W.R.) freight train (2) was being slowly propelled off the down main line in a northerly direction into a down lie-by siding. With the exception of all but two of the wagons and the engine and tender, this train had passed clear of the fouling point of the siding with the down main line, the engine at the moment of the collision being under the overbridge. The 10 pm. (Leeds to Bristol) down mail passenger train (1), travelling at high speed in a southerly direction, grazed the two wagons of the Great Western freight train, and struck the right-hand back end of the tender of the engine of that train, with the result that the engine of the mail train was derailed towards the six-foot, and came into contact with the empty wagons of the L.M. & S.R. up train. The mail train engine drove its way under the bridge past the Great Western engine, and through seven or eight wagons of train (3), and finally overturned on its right side, coming to rest leaning against the up side slope of the cutting about 25 ft. clear of the south face of the overbridge. The Great Western tender was overturned on to its left (east) side against the northern abutment wing wall of the bridge. The tender of the mail engine, and the Great Western engine which became wedged under the bridge against the eastern abutment wall, together with the wreckage of the destroyed wagons of train (3), blocked the forward movement of the coaching stock behind the mail engine. The result was that the first vehicles piled themselves on each side of, but chiefly under, the bridge in an extricable mass of steelwork and timber wreckage.
The linked report includes a plan of the station at the time, showing it to be on pretty much the same site as proposed. The goods yard looks very curious, being centred on a wagon turntable.
 

RailWonderer

Established Member
Joined
25 Jul 2018
Messages
2,217
Location
All around the network
It better have shelters like Bristol Parkway that actually close and are heated rather than bus shelters, and I'd also rather it didn't look like an eyesore either.
 

The exile

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2010
Messages
9,429
Location
Somerset
It better have shelters like Bristol Parkway that actually close and are heated rather than bus shelters, and I'd also rather it didn't look like an eyesore either.
Parkway is an important IbterCity interchange so is designed for people awaiting connections. Other than during disruption this will not be the case at Charfield any more than it is at any of the other local stations.
However, I’m sure NR would be amenable if the parish council offered to pay for them!
 

Gloster

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Sep 2020
Messages
13,011
Location
Up the creek
The linked report includes a plan of the station at the time, showing it to be on pretty much the same site as proposed. The goods yard looks very curious, being centred on a wagon turntable.

Having access to the goods shed and dock via a wagon turntable seems to be a quirk of the Bristol & Gloucester Railway with several stations having this arrangement; the one at Charfield lasted until 1966. It is a bit of an indictment of the lack of forward-thinking in wagon design that the turntables lasted so long.
 

Seagull2006

Member
Joined
30 Jan 2022
Messages
28
Location
Aberystwyth
Looking forward to this one opening. I remember the council talking about a charfield station over 10 years ago, so to see it materialise is nice to see.
 

JKF

Established Member
Joined
29 May 2019
Messages
1,313
I think there were also plans for a station at Winterbourne a while back (further south beyond Westerleigh Jn) but that seems to have gone quiet. Probably scope for a stopping service between Bristol & Gloucester with all these added stops.
 

Noddy

Established Member
Joined
11 Oct 2014
Messages
1,652
Location
UK
I think there were also plans for a station at Winterbourne a while back (further south beyond Westerleigh Jn) but that seems to have gone quiet. Probably scope for a stopping service between Bristol & Gloucester with all these added stops.

It does make you wonder why they are planning on building a turn back at Yate. Cam and Dursley is only going to get busier and busier with hundreds (thousands?) more new houses in the planning system in the immediate vicinity (in addition to the 650 they are currently building along the road to the station), Charfield, a possible new Stonehouse station, also adjacent to a lot of new development, rather than ‘out of town’ as the site historically was.
 
Last edited:

Dr Day

Member
Joined
16 Oct 2018
Messages
759
Location
Bristol
Previous incarnations of Metro West train service plans had Yate as the northern terminus of a second north train per hour rather than Gloucester. May be easier to get 4 tph stacking up in business case for next phase terminating Yate rather than anywhere else?
 

The exile

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2010
Messages
9,429
Location
Somerset
Previous incarnations of Metro West train service plans had Yate as the northern terminus of a second north train per hour rather than Gloucester. May be easier to get 4 tph stacking up in business case for next phase terminating Yate rather than anywhere else?
And probably advantageous to be able to do a turn back there (planned or during disruption) than clogging up Parkway which is often at, or over, capacity.
 

JKF

Established Member
Joined
29 May 2019
Messages
1,313
Previous incarnations of Metro West train service plans had Yate as the northern terminus of a second north train per hour rather than Gloucester. May be easier to get 4 tph stacking up in business case for next phase terminating Yate rather than anywhere else?
And Yate-Thornbury is a remote possibility from there (although some years off I imagine, the railway is somewhat indirect compared to road).
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
28,684
Location
Nottingham
It does make you wonder why they are planning on building a turn back at Yate. Cam and Dursley is only going to get busier and busier with hundreds (thousands?) more new houses in the planning system in the immediate vicinity (in addition to the 650 they are currently building along the road to the station), Charfield, a possible new Stonehouse station, also adjacent to a lot of new development, rather than ‘out of town’ as the site historically was.
And probably advantageous to be able to do a turn back there (planned or during disruption) than clogging up Parkway which is often at, or over, capacity.
Previous incarnations of Metro West train service plans had Yate as the northern terminus of a second north train per hour rather than Gloucester. May be easier to get 4 tph stacking up in business case for next phase terminating Yate rather than anywhere else?
I doubt there will ever be more than 2TPH that might stop at Charfield, as they have to stay ahead of XC between Bristol and Gloucester. A turnback at Yate would presumably allow extension of the current Abbey Wood all stations service and might allow a second one, and could allow a Yate stop to be dropped from the Gloucester or the Worcester in favour of Charfield.
And Yate-Thornbury is a remote possibility from there (although some years off I imagine, the railway is somewhat indirect compared to road).
Unfortunately Yate station is in the wrong place for the start of the branch to be used as a turnback, which would also make it unsuitable for any future Thornbury trains to call. There doesn't seem to be much chance of getting to the former Thornbury station site anyway, let alone the centre.
 

Noddy

Established Member
Joined
11 Oct 2014
Messages
1,652
Location
UK
I doubt there will ever be more than 2TPH that might stop at Charfield, as they have to stay ahead of XC between Bristol and Gloucester. A turnback at Yate would presumably allow extension of the current Abbey Wood all stations service and might allow a second one, and could allow a Yate stop to be dropped from the Gloucester or the Worcester in favour of Charfield.

Are they not going to be extending the Abbey Wood stoppers to Brabazon/Henbury? This would seem more logical, although I accept logic and railways don’t always go together. At the moment C+D (and likely Charfield) doesn’t even have a proper 2tph service so even a 2tph Bristol-Gloucester service would be an improvement. As I say there is so much development near C+D and to a lesser degree at Charfield, these stations are only going to get busier and busier.

Unfortunately Yate station is in the wrong place for the start of the branch to be used as a turnback, which would also make it unsuitable for any future Thornbury trains to call. There doesn't seem to be much chance of getting to the former Thornbury station site anyway, let alone the centre.

Only the southbound platform is in the wrong place and they could shift the current Thornbury junction further north (back to its original location) if they really wanted or needed to:

1752220085957.png

1752220991540.png
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
28,684
Location
Nottingham
Are they not going to be extending the Abbey Wood stoppers to Brabazon/Henbury? This would seem more logical, although I accept logic and railways don’t always go together. At the moment C+D (and likely Charfield) doesn’t even have a proper 2tph service so even a 2tph Bristol-Gloucester service would be an improvement.
If they're planning a turnback then something must be planned to turn back at Yate, whether it's that one or an extra service from Temple Meads, so it could relieve the existing Bristol-Gloucester service which is 2TPH except at Cam & Dursley. But south of Yate these only call at Parkway and Filton, and I'm not sure it would be wise to drop either, so maybe a Yate terminator would allow some of the existing Gloucester trains to skip Yate and make extra calls at C&D and/or Charfield.

Only the southbound platform is in the wrong place and they could shift the current Thornbury junction further north (back to its original location) if they really wanted or needed to:
They could, or demolish what looks like a small industrial estate and relocate the platform, but it would make the turnback a lot more expensive than if they could just use what is there now.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,585
Location
Northampton
If they're planning a turnback then something must be planned to turn back at Yate, whether it's that one or an extra service from Temple Meads, so it could relieve the existing Bristol-Gloucester service which is 2TPH except at Cam & Dursley. But south of Yate these only call at Parkway and Filton, and I'm not sure it would be wise to drop either, so maybe a Yate terminator would allow some of the existing Gloucester trains to skip Yate and make extra calls at C&D and/or Charfield.
I expect it's probably an additional service, because the Filton Service usually shunts onto the west/south curve to change platforms. There are odd hours when it goes up to Parkway and back, presumably to let a freight pass to or from Avonmouth (which won't be a problem when it's extended). The Filton Abbey Wood Service seems very clearly aimed at the Henbury service, especially considering that Henbury would be on the 'Relief' side for an all-stations train, but Yate would be on the Mains and require crossing at Horfield Jn. Yate is also further out from Bristol, so would see the benefit of running non-stop between Filton and Temple Meads but the Henbury line is service a continuous metro area so intermediate connectivity is probably as important as end-to-end journey times to Temple meads.
 

The exile

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2010
Messages
9,429
Location
Somerset
I expect it's probably an additional service, because the Filton Service usually shunts onto the west/south curve to change platforms. There are odd hours when it goes up to Parkway and back, presumably to let a freight pass to or from Avonmouth (which won't be a problem when it's extended). The Filton Abbey Wood Service seems very clearly aimed at the Henbury service, especially considering that Henbury would be on the 'Relief' side for an all-stations train, but Yate would be on the Mains and require crossing at Horfield Jn. Yate is also further out from Bristol, so would see the benefit of running non-stop between Filton and Temple Meads but the Henbury line is service a continuous metro area so intermediate connectivity is probably as important as end-to-end journey times to Temple meads.
Missing out Filton AW or Parkway would be plain daft. If there’s a gap that needs plugging it’s precisely the “metro style” one - ie all stations from Temple Meads to Yate. A journey from Clifton (or anywhere else on the Beach line) to Parkway or Yate currently involves either changing twice or a long double-back (is that even permitted?) via Temple Meads.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,585
Location
Northampton
Missing out Filton AW or Parkway would be plain daft. If there’s a gap that needs plugging it’s precisely the “metro style” one - ie all stations from Temple Meads to Yate.
Nowhere did I say the service would miss out FIlton AW or Parkway. (Indeed I explicitly said 'between Filton and Temple meads', i.e. stopping at Filton!). If platforms on the Up and Down Main at Stapleton Road were restored I could see the case for stopping there, but the Yate service does not *need* to stop at Lawrence Hill, Stapleton Road or Ashley Down.
A journey from Clifton (or anywhere else on the Beach line) to Parkway or Yate currently involves either changing twice or a long double-back (is that even permitted?) via Temple Meads.
Travelling via Temple Meads is permitted, it's the recommended itinerary for lots of journeys. Stapleton Road to Bristol Temple meads is about 6 minutes, it's not a huge double back. (I regularly do Clifton Down to Cardiff, and the itinerary is always to change once at Temple Meads rather than at Filton AW and Stapleton Rd, not least because it's currently only 1tph from Filton AW to Stapleton Rd.)
 

Annetts key

Established Member
Joined
13 Feb 2021
Messages
3,816
Location
West is best
Rather than cluttering up this thread with speculation about the Thornbury line, I've started a new topic here. Please reply on this subject in the new topic.
 

mds86

Member
Joined
10 May 2015
Messages
33
When the 2nd tph to Gloucester was introduced, the reason said at the time why it didn't call at Cam & Dursley was to allow provision for it to call at Charfield when it eventually opens. Thus the plan a few years ago was that Yate will receive 2 tph but Charfield and Cam & Dursley only 1 tph on different services. I believe the train planners said there wasn't enough time to give both stations 2 tph as well without impacting on other services.
 

JKF

Established Member
Joined
29 May 2019
Messages
1,313
When the 2nd tph to Gloucester was introduced, the reason said at the time why it didn't call at Cam & Dursley was to allow provision for it to call at Charfield when it eventually opens. Thus the plan a few years ago was that Yate will receive 2 tph but Charfield and Cam & Dursley only 1 tph on different services. I believe the train planners said there wasn't enough time to give both stations 2 tph as well without impacting on other services.
They want to introduce some nice electric or battery trains with fast acceleration, thus saving a couple of minutes to fit in an extra stop.
 

father_jack

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2010
Messages
1,557
When the 2nd tph to Gloucester was introduced, the reason said at the time why it didn't call at Cam & Dursley was to allow provision for it to call at Charfield when it eventually opens. Thus the plan a few years ago was that Yate will receive 2 tph but Charfield and Cam & Dursley only 1 tph on different services. I believe the train planners said there wasn't enough time to give both stations 2 tph as well without impacting on other services.
The actual reason for the second service not stopping CDU is that there was fear of an outcry from stakeholders if they added a stop to only have to remove it again when Charfield opens. And with current linespeeds/rolling stock and consequent turnaround times at each ends there isn't room for threes stops between Bristol Parkway and Gloucester.
 

Baxenden Bank

Established Member
Joined
23 Oct 2013
Messages
4,748
Preparatory works have been underway for a few months. Activity has now moved to building the station proper. Progress reports are provided by South Gloucestershire Council. Link: South Gloucestershire Council Charfield Station

From that page:
Charfield train station will be in the centre of the village, off Station Road, within a 10 minute walk for all Charfield residents. The station is expected to be completed by spring 2027.

Most recent update:

November to December 2025​

Overnight work will take place between 11pm and 8am every Saturday night up to and including 20 December.
It will include the use of excavators, construction vehicles, and vibration and hand tools. Steps will be taken to minimise noise as much as possible for people living nearby.

Christmas railway works​

Construction will take place between 7am on Christmas day and 4pm on Boxing day. The work will be continuous during this time.
The installation of an under track crossing for power supplies must be completed while no trains are in use and coincides with a planned closure of the railway line until 27 December.
Disruption to residents will be minimal with low level noise expected.
Construction will restart on the Charfield site on Monday 5 January 2026.
 

Snow1964

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2019
Messages
11,157
Location
West Wiltshire
WEMCA (the now renamed WECA with Mayoral added in name) has announced that agreement has been reached with DfT for half hourly rail services permanently on some lines from Bristol, including to Gloucester (which will serve Charlfield)

The article also says WEMCA will be launching a Transport Vision this week

6th February
Half-hourly rail services on some lines in the West are set to continue permanently, after agreement with the Department for Transport.

Since the regional authority, in partnership with Great Western Railway, introduced more frequent services on lines between Bristol Temple Meads and Westbury; Bristol Temple Meads and Gloucester, via Yate; and between Bristol Temple Meads and Severn Beach, there have been over 3 million more train journeys on those routes. This represents an 28% increase in people benefitting from the services, including Jayden from Yate (video on click to open in a new window Facebook | click to open in a new window Instagram | click to open in a new window Bluesky | click to open in a new window LinkedIn | click to open in a new window X (Twitter) ).

The half-hourly trains have boosted rail connections along the following routes and stations:
  • Bristol Temple Meads to Westbury (part of the Heart of Wessex Line), also stopping at Keynsham, Oldfield Park, Bath Spa, Freshford, Avoncliff, Bradford-on-Avon, Trowbridge, and Westbury
  • Bristol Temple Meads to Gloucester, via Yate, also stopping at Filton Abbey Wood and Bristol Parkway – and will also serve every hour the new Charfield station currently under construction
  • Bristol Temple Meads to Severn Beach (the Severn Beach Line), also stopping at Lawrence Hill, Stapleton Road, Montpelier, Redland, Clifton Down, Sea Mills, Shirehampton, Portway Park & Ride, Avonmouth, St Andrews Road (hourly), and Severn Beach (hourly)
The Mayor of the West of England, Helen Godwin, has repeatedly spoken of the need to further increase the frequency of train services across the West. A longer-term ambition is there for four trains per hour to serve stations across the network, click to open in a new window after the region secured a record £752 million investment for transport infrastructure improvements to enable those increases over the coming years.

Next week, a new Transport Vision for the West of England will be shared, setting out more details about the authority’s goals for the future.

 

The exile

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2010
Messages
9,429
Location
Somerset
WEMCA (the now renamed WECA with Mayoral added in name) has announced that agreement has been reached with DfT for half hourly rail services permanently on some lines from Bristol, including to Gloucester (which will serve Charlfield)

The article also says WEMCA will be launching a Transport Vision this week



Though services to Charfield will be, and those to Cam & Dursley remain, hourly until something a bit quicker of the mark arrives to work the trains.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top