Apologies if they’ve been mentioned before but hand-held leaf blowers. Almost always a complete waste of time and energy in a windy climate like ours. I can see they have some niche uses but I don’t think I’ve seen them being used for any of those!
They create employment in the UK's urban areasApologies if they’ve been mentioned before but hand-held leaf blowers. Almost always a complete waste of time and energy in a windy climate like ours. I can see they have some niche uses but I don’t think I’ve seen them being used for any of those!

You may wish to consider any similar jobs which your spouse has been putting off, or which you otherwise wish to have carried out, and purchase the necessary tools and/or materials as a gift.The Exile's suggestion prompts another one to ban: seasonal adverts for home and garden DIY / maintenance equipment.
I have come to realise that the adverts are actually aimed at our spouses, not at us. I realise this, because of how often I open a birthday or a Christmas gift which "enables me to do that home / garden job I've put off".
Thanks, advertisers. Just. Ruddy. Thanks.
You may wish to consider any similar jobs which your spouse has been putting off, or which you otherwise wish to have carried out, and purchase the necessary tools and/or materials as a gift.
If you attempt this strategy, I'd recommend ensuring that the spare bedding has already been laid out in some suitable space ahead of time.
Wherever is the most inconvenient.Where does Murphy’s & Sod’s fit in?
The pigeons spoke to him?Mike Tyson (famous boxer) did an interview that talks about how much he loves pigeons & how they convinced him to get into boxing
Of course pigeons speak to him as you clearly haven't seen his show Mike Tyson Mysteries where it is a more adult scooby doo like show. I personally found it verry funny but that might be due to the fact i'm autistic & love using scooby doo like shows to mellow out.The pigeons spoke to him?
I wonder if they bit his ear……The pigeons spoke to him?

Or, as my physical chemistry lecturer called it, the law of maximum bastardry.Where does Murphy’s & Sod’s fit in?
On this theme: a friend of mine used to talk about Fettridge's Principle of Frustration.Or, as my physical chemistry lecturer called it, the law of maximum bastardry.![]()
I'd beg to differ -- feel that the usage for which you express loathing here, belongs legitimately in "figures of speech" territory. People have long spoken / written -- with a jocular "flavour" more often than not -- of "braving" something in the sense of choosing -- or having forced on one -- something not wished-for or particularly pleasant, but well short of the actual facing of terrors / horrors. Not wishing to come across as confrontational; but are you one who holds the view that language should always be a highly-precision instrument -- one word, one meaning, no overlapping of any kind: "vocabulary played with, to entertain", a snare and a delusion to be eschewed? I have a -- greatly liked -- friend who has a number of, shall we say, unusual views on language-related matters; including that which I've described here -- over which he can get quite irate.The word ‘brave’ when totally used out of context.
BBC website this morning said Wimbledon tennis fans are ‘braving’ the high temperatures.
No. You are brave if you jump into a river to save someone’s life, you are not brave standing in a queue to watch a game of tennis.
Here’s another one. People who write an essay when two words ‘I disagree’ would cover itI'd beg to differ -- feel that the usage for which you express loathing here, belongs legitimately in "figures of speech" territory. People have long spoken / written -- with a jocular "flavour" more often than not -- of "braving" something in the sense of choosing -- or having forced on one -- something not wished-for or particularly pleasant, but well short of the actual facing of terrors / horrors. Not wishing to come across as confrontational; but are you one who holds the view that language should always be a highly-precision instrument -- one word, one meaning, no overlapping of any kind: "vocabulary played with, to entertain", a snare and a delusion to be eschewed? I have a -- greatly liked -- friend who has a number of, shall we say, unusual views on language-related matters; including that which I've described here -- over which he can get quite irate.
Very good…I was just thinking the very same!Here’s another one. People who write an essay when two words ‘I disagree’ would cover it![]()
Here’s another one. People who write an essay when two words ‘I disagree’ would cover it![]()
I'll see you pigeons and raise you seagulls. Despicable, greedy, theiving creatures. There's a whole bloody ocean of fish and they go for what I have instead.I know I shouldn't say this as I love nature, but I bloody hate pigeons. The vermin of the bird world. Rats with wings. The only benefit I can see in a pigeon is that it provides a tasty meal for a sparrowhawk (other birds of prey are available).
Of course, whether you like pigeons or not will depend on where you live and more importantly where the pigeons live. Unfortunately me & pigeons live in close proximity. They wake me up every morning with their cooing. They eat all the food I put out for other birds. They sh*t everywhere. They are a bloody nuisance.
Every time I watch a nature programme, they'll say 'x' bird is in decline. This doesn't seem to apply to pigeons.....
You can't ban seagulls as they don't exist, there are many species of gull but not a seagull.I'll see you pigeons and raise you seagulls. Despicable, greedy, theiving creatures. There's a whole bloody ocean of fish and they go for what I have instead.
Also, "self catering" hotels. If you advertise yourself as a hotel, I expect breakfast at the very least.
Ahh, but does the ocean of fish have salt, vinegar, and sauce on it?I'll see you pigeons and raise you seagulls. Despicable, greedy, theiving creatures. There's a whole bloody ocean of fish and they go for what I have instead.
With the state a lot of the UK coastal waters are in it wouldn't surprise me to detect vinegar and sauce, alongside less appetising substances!Ahh, but does the ocean of fish have salt, vinegar, and sauce on it?
I bet the Mediterranean is worse. Probably just looks better.With the state a lot of the UK coastal waters are in it wouldn't surprise me to detect vinegar and sauce, alongside less appetising substances!
House alarms must be one of the most ignored alarms ever invented.The house across the street from ours which has had a loud alarm sounding continuously..
Equally as silly, I discovered a couple of months ago at Tesco that authorisation is required to buy a box of liqueur chocolates.Why do I have to get authorisation for non-alcoholic wine? I presume that they are worried that I would scan a non-alcoholic bottle, but then put a bottle of proper wine down in the packing area. Much easier to do that than stop a teenager grabbing a bottle and walking out.
From what a Peroni representative told us, it's a voluntary measure agreed upon between supermarkets and the alcohol industry to reduce the risk and optics of underage drinking - and by voluntarily doing it, it reduces the risk of it being a public spectacle and being formally legislated for.Why do I have to get authorisation for non-alcoholic wine? I presume that they are worried that I would scan a non-alcoholic bottle, but then put a bottle of proper wine down in the packing area. Much easier to do that than stop a teenager grabbing a bottle and walking out.
And of course means that any public indignation is because “this is excessive” (ie the way they want it to be) rather than in favour of tighter controls.From what a Peroni representative told us, it's a voluntary measure agreed upon between supermarkets and the alcohol industry to reduce the risk and optics of underage drinking - and by voluntarily doing it, it reduces the risk of it being a public spectacle and being formally legislated for.