Is that ECML vs WCML/HML/A2I (Aberdeen to Inverness)?
Reason I ask is because the scheduled trains (sleeper and Chieftain) both use the HML as far as Edinburgh and there aren't any trains scheduled from Aberdeen to London via Inverness (are there?)
Yes, ECML Vs WCML. Of course, prior to 1967 the two rival routes joined/divided at Kinnaber Junction, about 3:miles North of Montrose.Then they share Aberdeen to Dundee at least. Admittedly not the majority of the route, but still seventy plus miles.
Since when have Horsham and Epsom been considered as major cities?Chester to Liverpool, via Runcorn or Rock Ferry
London to Horsham, via Gatwick Airport or Dorking
London to Epsom, via Wimbledon or Sutton
Birmingham to Edinburgh, via Carlisle or Newcastle
Apart from Manchester, none of those places could be remotely described as major cities!Manchester to Rochdale, Altrincham, Ashton-under-Lyne, Manchester Airport, Eccles and East Didsbury via train or tram.
Again, I would not describe Aylesbury as a major city!Marylebone to Aylesbury via High Wycombe and via Amersham.
Then I'd say London to Dundee is a better shout than London to Aberdeen.Yes, ECML Vs WCML. Of course, prior to 1967 the two rival routes joined/divided at Kinnaber Junction, about 3:miles North of Montrose.
OK. I'll give you that!Then I'd say London to Dundee is a better shout than London to Aberdeen.
Like!Manchester Victoria or Piccadilly to Salford Crescent
If we are being like that then:Manchester Victoria or Piccadilly to Salford Crescent
You can now add Manchester-York to that, with the Castleford route (York & North Midland) carrying passengers again.
Salford (a city, with a population of over a quarter of a million) is more valid than the many towns in this thread.If we are being like that then:
London Bridge (City of Southwark) to Cannon Street (City of London) and London Blackfriars (City of London)
Also the Salford Crescent example can include trains that terminate at Manchester Oxford Road.
Absolutely agree.....some of the posts on this thread are completely off-topic, but I'm too much of a softy to report them!Salford (a city, with a population of over a quarter of a million) is more valid than the many towns in this thread.
I was just following the thread title![]()
It was geniusSalford (a city, with a population of over a quarter of a million) is more valid than the many towns in this thread.
I was just following the thread title![]()
Edinburgh to London has direct trains via either the east and west coast as does Edinburgh to Birmingham.Can anybody think of major cities that have two independent lines connecting them?
Isn't it really London to Edinburgh anyway, or is there a WCML service to Aberdeen (or Dundee) that isn't via Edinburgh?Then I'd say London to Dundee is a better shout than London to Aberdeen.
OK. I'll give you that!
Technically as Stourbridge and Coseley are both in the Metropolitan borough of Dudley there is a direct service from Birmingham to Dudley but I don't think it really counts as Dudley.
I don't know if it's been mentioned yet but Manchester to Chester had two routes either the Mid-Cheshire line or the one via Warrington Bank Quay. Manchester to Preston either goes via Bolton or via Wigan.
As a through service, no. But I thought the thread was about lines rather than services. There's an entirely logical route via both the ECML and WCML.Isn't it really London to Edinburgh anyway, or is there a WCML service to Aberdeen (or Dundee) that isn't via Edinburgh?
A small number of peak Portsmouth Direct services run via Effingham in the normal timetable, either for route knowledge retention or to avoid congestion at Woking Junction (or both).London to Portsmouth has 3 regular routes - via Guildford, via Eastleigh and via Horsham. It used to have a 4th on Sundays, via Hove. Not to mention substantial diversions via Effingham Junction or Staines when there is engineering work on the main lines.