contrex
Established Member
"The car was a right off"
That rather embarrassingly caught me out at work many years ago when I had to send a staffing survey to branches at both S. Abbotts and S Mountfitchet.Stanstead for Stansted.
I agree; I had to look up the spelling for a recent post myself.Despite having lived on the area for over 25 years I still have to stop and think about the sted/stead difference between Berko and Hemel.
Voice to text can often be responsible for jumbled nonsensical posts as well; my wife has used it on a train and managed to send half the announcement to someone when the PA started half way through her dictating the message; she's also sent messages from home with bits of the BBC News mixed in...It’s sometimes useful to note when our blind contributors contribute that their spelling mistakes may be far from intentional because of voice-to-text.
But people use "carnage" to mean all sorts of disorder, it has lost its traditional meaning. A 24 car pile up is carnage even if nobody died. And "hate" has extremely strong connotations, yet you use it to describe your annoyance that people don't use the dictionary definition for everything.It's how I feel about the frequent misuse of carnage to describe relatively minor events, - a stage beyond extreme dislike and irritation. Totally different from what @Gloster is describing.
In the OED, Merriam-Webster Dictionary, Cambridge Dictionary, Collins Dictionary, Dictionary.com the english word 'carnage' is defined as involving death on a large scale. The word also translates into the same or a similar derivative of the french word 'charnage' or the germanic words for bloodbath 'blutbad' for all western european languages except greek. So no references that come near to, say a bad day for a rail;way keeping to its timetables or even a really bad traffic jam, unless one goes through the slang dictionaries, which can make for pointless posts here.But people use "carnage" to mean all sorts of disorder, it has lost its traditional meaning. A 24 car pile up is carnage even if nobody died. And "hate" has extremely strong connotations, yet you use it to describe your annoyance that people don't use the dictionary definition for everything.
Interestingly, the term "pet hate" means a relatively minor irritation which you find more bothersome than most, not something you actually would place "beyond extreme dislike and irritation".
Yes, and pet hate means a (trivial) annoyance, yet you claim at the same time to actually "hate" this, so choose if you'd like to die by what the internet says or notIn the OED, Merriam-Webster Dictionary, Cambridge Dictionary, Collins Dictionary, Dictionary.com the english word 'carnage' is defined as involving death on a large scale.
That bothers me not, - unlike the issue of carnage used in as describing trivial problems that others share ire along with me.Yes, and pet hate means a (trivial) annoyance, yet you claim at the same time to actually "hate" this, so choose if you'd like to die by what the internet says or not- it can't be both!
Poor voice to text can be a nightmare. Best to utter garbage until it gives up and you get to speak to a real human.Voice to text can often be responsible for jumbled nonsensical posts as well; my wife has used it on a train and managed to send half the announcement to someone when the PA started half way through her dictating the message; she's also sent messages from home with bits of the BBC News mixed in...
I got irritated not just by rail strikes on Saturdays, but by the added announcement that it would affect "commuters".Has anyone mentioned using 'commuter' for all rail passengers, no matter how far or how often they are travelling?
That ‘and’ should be ‘than’. I can’t recall seeing that before, is it a regional thing?More often and not its older users who post the above.
An argument could be made in favour of the former rendering being as valid as the latter; or even being correct, whereas the latter is not. "Here, here" could be seen as signifying: "we people here, agree with what you people there are saying"“Here, here” when someone is agreeing. It’s actually “hear, hear”
So all the explanations Google throws up are wrong? A quick summary as far as I can see is that in parliament the original cry was ‘hear him’ or ‘hear them’, because applause was forbidden. The phrase then eventually got shortened.An argument could be made in favour of the former rendering being as valid as the latter; or even being correct, whereas the latter is not. "Here, here" could be seen as signifying: "we people here, agree with what you people there are saying"...
The use of weary when people mean wary feels as though it’s coming more common.
I've seen that from a poster on another forum I frequent, surely it's not that difficult to use a computer or phone?Boarder for Border, see that commonly.
Stanstead for Stansted.
I also see strange ways people post comments on social media posts.
Capitals on all words.
'She Was Running Down The Hill To The Grocery Shop' Must be a habit to do that.
Large spaces between words. Does not come through when I post this post.
' He was shining his shoe at the garage' Another habit or is it voice to text?
More often and not its older users who post the above.