• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

New units for Northern - shortlist of manufacturers

Status
Not open for further replies.

RealTrains07

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2019
Messages
1,900
Ok possible misunderstood, maybe delivery is 2028 and entry into service 2030 or is 2028 way too optimistic?
I highly doubt entry into service will be 2030 based on the way northerns has worded it. Iam going so guess as long as training and testing goes well then 2031 will probably see them into passenger service?

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

It looks like it. The rest of phase 1 is 150,155,156,769 replacements. It's unclear whether the 158s are getting replaced in phase 2 or sooner.

They pretty much are, phase one is TRU EMUs + 150/155/156/769 replacement, phase two is 323/333 replacement. This way allows for a common design between fleets.
Where does it say on Northerns annoucements that 769 are going in phase 1? They have only specified 150, 155 and 156s so far?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Ribbleman

Member
Joined
12 Jun 2019
Messages
326
I highly doubt entry into service will be 2030 based on the way northerns has worded it. Iam going so guess as long as training and testing goes well then 2031 will probably see them into passenger service?

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


Where does it say on Northerns annoucements that 769 are going in phase 1? They have only specified 150, 155 and 156s so far?
I think that the 769s are approaching the last chance saloon. They could be gone long before new stock appears. If there is not a radical improvement in reliability once sets have been through the planned C6 overhaul at Kilmarnock, Northern will be considering the limited alternatives open to them with acquiring the use of some of the TfW Class 158s, once available, being the most obvious solution.
 

David Bullock

Member
Joined
18 Mar 2018
Messages
69
Odd it states the first phase has being trains between York, Leeds, Huddersfield and Manchester then goes on to state all class 156 are part of this phase of which their are a significant number running on Tees Valley and Durham coastlines.
As has been mentioned earlier, I would guess that 158s would be cascaded off the Hull-Halifax and Leeds-Wigan via dewsbury routes.

It’s also possible that 195s would be cascaded from the York-Blackpool and possibly the Leeds-Chester or this new fast Leeds-Sheffield via Wakefield Westgate that’s being introduced in 2025. Others might be able to say whether it’s likely they’d end up in the north east.

By 2030 all these routes might have changed anyway but you get the gist
 

Harvey B

Established Member
Joined
11 Mar 2019
Messages
1,241
They've been in service 24 years now (the 332s only had 22.95 years of service), it'll likely be many years until Phase 2 units show up, they will definitely make it to 30 years.
Assuming that the phase 1 units enter service in 2032, then it's quite possible that the phase 2 units won't be introduced before 2034/35 (and it could be as late as 2037) so I'm guessing that the 333s will likely be safe for another 10-12 years at the very least (at which point they'll be around 35 years old)
 
Joined
3 Mar 2020
Messages
669
Location
Furness
And the same goes for those in Cumbria.
One or two on a Saturday evening end up in Barrow and come out again as 4 the next morning . on Sunday afternoon they get sent up and down as 4 on some services but with the rear unit locked out. However due to a rugby game last year I noticed the train was busy and gangway open.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Manchester Airport > Barrow always seems to be three car, usually never enough! but having 3-car has the advantage of doubling up to 6, whereas I doubt Northern would ever double up a 5-car as platforms simply wouldn't be long enough away from the major stations?

But that aside, yes they should be a minimum of four-car.
They spent lots of money on the maintenance facilties at Barrow to enable 6 car to be fuelled and inspected and sent back out. The platforms were also extended at some stations to enable 6 car operation.
 
Last edited:

Iskra

Established Member
Joined
11 Jun 2014
Messages
10,663
Location
West Riding
It’s interesting that the 158’s are expected to soldier-on beyond the introduction of these new trains. I like the 158, but I don’t see the point in keeping them at such an age and as a remaining Sprinter outlier fleet.
 

JD2168

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2022
Messages
1,707
Location
Sheffield
Nice to see the announcement that 150/155/156 are scheduled for replacement. They have served passengers well but in terms of comfort & quietness are due replacing.

It will mean an end to 150's door between the carriages slamming shut or swinging wildly if left open, the cramped nature of the facing seats & these having the horrible 3x2 seating which is not great on comfortability, legroom & space in gangway.
 

WAB

Established Member
Joined
27 Jun 2015
Messages
1,288
Location
Anglia
The 158s are capable enough for a few more years, but I think it would be worthwhile to reshuffle the fleets to simplify operations and maintenance. 158s to the North East, 170s to EMR?
 
Last edited:

JordR

Member
Joined
31 Aug 2014
Messages
234
Location
Leeds
So this procurement seems to include replacing generally newer 323s (1992-1995) and 333s (2000-2003) but exclude replacing generally older 158s (1989-1992) and 170s (1998-2005).

Does that possibly make sense as it allows two generally smaller fleets to be gotten rid of entirely and involves replacing EMUs on a like for like type basis, even if for hopefully improved performance and capacity? Whereas there's possibly more complexity on how you replace the DMU fleets deemed to have a bit of life left in them?
 

Russel

Established Member
Joined
30 Jun 2022
Messages
5,380
Location
Lichfield
I highly doubt entry into service will be 2030 based on the way northerns has worded it. Iam going so guess as long as training and testing goes well then 2031 will probably see them into passenger service?

Pretty poor when you take into consideration that 2031 is 6 years away.
 

Mat17

Member
Joined
17 Aug 2019
Messages
961
Location
Barnsley
The 158s are capable enough for a few more years, but I think it would be worthwhile to reshuffle the fleets to simplify operations and maintenance. 158s to the North East, 170s to EMR?
I wish people would stop trying to get rid of the 170s, they're the best trains Northern have by a long chalk.
 

QSK19

Member
Joined
29 Dec 2020
Messages
1,143
Location
Leicestershire
Agreed - my experiences on Northern’s 170s have been excellent and, on a separate note, is what EMR’s 170 refurb should have strived to achieve.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Pretty poor when you take into consideration that 2031 is 6 years away.
And you know what, chances are it may end up being later than 2031. Look at EMR’s 810 introduction - admittedly a completely different train; but goes to show that constant problems and delays make what was “there’s no way it’ll take that long” to not just a possibility, but a distinct reality.
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
13,157
Proper fitment of guard panels in cabs is a must. As this was a serious problem for both CAF and Alston in some recent purchases - demanding huge extortionate modification fees to change the order, they should perhaps be punished for their greed.
Which train classes are you talking about?
 

YorksLad12

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2020
Messages
2,697
Location
Leeds
So this procurement seems to include replacing generally newer 323s (1992-1995) and 333s (2000-2003) but exclude replacing generally older 158s (1989-1992) and 170s (1998-2005).
I suspect we’ll need some diesels for a while yet. Modernising the electric fleets is easy enough, new-build diesels a bit harder.
 

Howardh

Established Member
Joined
17 May 2011
Messages
9,770
Driving them every day, I will confirm the 333s are beginning to get rather ropey!
Driving them? You need to be a passenger in them!!

If those are the ones now on the Manchester/Blackpool line, I'm getting the bus....
 

js1000

Member
Joined
14 Jun 2014
Messages
1,022
The replacement of the Sprinter classes in long overdue so I'm pleased to hear this was not an expression of interest/pipe dream but a genuine tender/order process that will happen.

They have aged even more compared since the 195/331 introduction with nicer interiors.
 

RealTrains07

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2019
Messages
1,900
Pretty poor when you take into consideration that 2031 is 6 years away.
Yeah it is but i guess thats just how it is but it will mean by the end of it northern will have more new trains to work alongside the 195s and 331s

So hopefully this process will be worth the end result for passengers.
 

InkyScrolls

On Moderation
Joined
20 Jul 2022
Messages
1,455
Location
North of England
Driving them? You need to be a passenger in them!!
I have been, most days, for the past twenty years!
If those are the ones now on the Manchester/Blackpool line, I'm getting the bus....
They aren't, no. 333s are only used on the North West Triangle and, soon, also on the Leeds-Doncaster line.

They're getting tired but are a great pleasure to drive.
 

BoroAndy

Member
Joined
11 Jan 2020
Messages
272
Location
Scarborough
My bet would be an Alstom - Siemens split to keep Derby open because the HS2 order won't be enough to keep them going. Siemens has space to build more as well (after the Picadilly line, only the Bakerloo line is a possibility). Two train types to replace 150, 155, 156, 158 and 769s would still be a major improvement.
I thought the 2024 stock for LU would eventually replace Central line units too.
 

skyhigh

Established Member
Joined
14 Sep 2014
Messages
6,843
Which lines are they on - I would imagine Leeds/Harrogate for starters?
Harrogate isn't wired for a start....

Most Leeds- Bradford, Ilkley and Skipton services and from May also Doncaster.
 

Halish Railway

Established Member
Joined
26 Apr 2017
Messages
2,173
Location
West Yorkshire / Birmingham
Driving them every day, I will confirm the 333s are beginning to get rather ropey!
That’s not a great sign, especially considering they’re not the oldest units around, are maintained by Siemens and that they’re going to transfer to another depot in the forthcoming years.

At the moment 12/16 are in service, with another having gone to the depot earlier today so ok availability, but it does seem like there should be another one or two out. Much better than certain other Northern units though…

It does make you wonder whether it has been determined that an extensive overhaul would be uneconomical given the benefits of eliminating this microfleet.
 

skyhigh

Established Member
Joined
14 Sep 2014
Messages
6,843
It does make you wonder whether it has been determined that an extensive overhaul would be uneconomical
A fairly extensive overhaul is in the pipeline. I wouldn't be surprised if the 333s last at least another decade.
 

Harvey B

Established Member
Joined
11 Mar 2019
Messages
1,241
A fairly extensive overhaul is in the pipeline. I wouldn't be surprised if the 333s last at least another decade.
What sort of Overhaul are you meaning?

I'm also fairly certain that they'll last for another 10-12 years at least. If anything, their replacements likely won't come before 2035 anyway
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
19,347
Location
Yorkshire
Every operator will want to hold on to the 168/170/171s they have already got (they will all be shooting themselves in the foot in they don't hold them), however there will be a stream of 185 stating to be available in 3 years time if the TP North rolling stock order and deliveries go to plan...
The 185s also have the performance to be able to deal with some of Northern's more challenging residual diesel routes and existing conveniently placed maintenance depots.
The 185s are heavy and fuel-thirsty, hence expensive to operate. It may be possible to make more use of "eco-mode" on routes a bit less demanding than Trans-Pennine, but that won't do anything for the weight.
There may be a few routes where those issues aren't as pronounced, but 185s are unlikely to be a long-term solution. From a passenger perspective they'd be great on Leeds to Carlisle (perhaps with the addition of internal doors to reduce draughts at stations!) and they wouldn't have any additional slowdowns compared with the 158s... but that's a heavily subsidised route where costs need to be kept in check.

I agree 170s (and their 168/171 variants) will be in high demand for the foreseeable future. The best hope for freeing some up will be electrification and/or battery projects.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top