• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Suggestions for new short-ish lines

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Cambus731

Established Member
Joined
19 Jul 2013
Messages
1,404
Location
Chelmsford
A curve just east of Shenfield station. That would enable direct trains to run without reversing, from Southend on Sea to places such as Colchester, Clacton, Ipswich, Norwich, or even Cambridge or Peterborough.
 

devon_belle

Member
Joined
21 Jul 2022
Messages
656
Location
Surrey
Clifton Maybank was only for freight, so doesn't really count as a reopening.
You're good, because Clifton Maybank was North to West, predating the wartime connection between the Yeovil Town line and the Heart of Wessex. South to West had earthworks but track was never laid. I agree a valuable suggestion (as does Dorset Council, I believe).

My own, probably fanciful, chord ideas would be at Romsey and Eastleigh to send some freight (and passenger, in case of an incident/engineering) avoiding Southampton Central-St Denys. Would also need some doubling.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,343
Location
Yorks
You're good, because Clifton Maybank was North to West, predating the wartime connection between the Yeovil Town line and the Heart of Wessex. South to West had earthworks but track was never laid. I agree a valuable suggestion (as does Dorset Council, I believe).

Ah thanks. I know there was a freight spur from South to West, however I might have got the name wrong !
 

The Ham

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Jul 2012
Messages
12,036
Ascot - Frimley line connecting to North Downs line, across the Blackwater river (and relief road!) and also North Downs Line to Aldershot North Jn.

WAO

You could probably deliver most of the benefits with a new station on the North Downs line near to Frimley station (would also be useful for the "Frimley4 Business Park" and the retail park there. It would also be slightly closer to Farnborough Sixth Form College than Farnborough North.

You could build it so the access was from ramps down from the A325 bridge over the A331/railway and you'd only need to cross one road to get between the two.

Such a short walk interchange would be useful in its own right, but could be even more useful with a new short line.

If you build a grade separated junction to allow trains to run between Ascot and Basingstoke via Farnborough Main that would make it very easy to interchange between all three lines which ruin in that area.

It would also allow some new stations to be built to create a metro service for the Aldershot Urban area (population of circa 266,000) and some of the places within its orbit.

For example, there could be stations at:
- Old Basing
- Fleet West
- Southwood
- Frimley Junction
- Watchmore Park
- Old Dean

They would likely only be served by the new trains, although you could have the Waterloo services mix and match which of the stations they call at. For example Hook to Winchfield would be served by the new trains, so them dropping to 1tph direct to Waterloo (especially if the metro services arrived at Farnborough Main 5 minutes before the fast London services so changing trains would be faster than the current direct service) wouldn't be an issue.

Whilst it wouldn't give Camberley a direct train to London, it would give an option to go via Farnborough Main rather than Ascot which could be slightly faster.

There would be a need for limited other works as the slow lines west of Brookwood can cope with 2tph without too much issue, and both lines are electrified, so these would be run by electric trains.

Even in a post Crossrail 2 situation the 2 fast and 2 slow lines aren't really all that busy so could easily absorb an extra 8tph (2tph for the metro and up to 6tph from the extra services from Waterloo). East of Woking there's an extra 8tph compared to West of Brookwood. Also, with the potential for an extra train per hour for the Basingstoke Stoppers Hook and other stations could retain 2tph direct to Waterloo.

Adding the Southern Approach to Heathrow may be a bit more of an issue, but you'd still be running fewer services than East of Woking.

You would probably need to do something at Basingstoke, however that could be reopening (on the WofE line) Oakley station (or a siding station for the leisure park) so no trains terminate at Basingstoke and fewer need to cross the lines east of the station (should be XC services and freight), which would gain some capacity before needing to make larger changes at Basingstoke.

Whilst there's no value in diversion routes, it would mean that far fewer rail replacement bus services would be needed, as any engineering works between the new junction and Clapham Junction could divert around (although probably only 1tph).
 

xotGD

Established Member
Joined
4 Feb 2017
Messages
7,863
Skipton to Colne, and a cross-Bradford link, of course!
 

Magdalia

Established Member
Joined
1 Jan 2022
Messages
7,387
Location
The Fens
Cambridge isn't the only destination in the East of England
Cambridge is the only place in the East of England that is home to one of the top ten Universities in the world, with high economic growth very specific to its location.

How do you think they support the bridges over the river?
Bridges are short, viaducts are long. Variations in ground movement can be managed on a short bridge much more easily than on a long viaduct. Even then many Fenland railways have significant issues, necessitating temporary or permanent speed restrictions. This recent discussion about electrification in the Fens covers some of the issues:

 
Last edited:

PedroHav

Member
Joined
14 Apr 2022
Messages
70
Location
Havant
Eastleigh curve so that trains from Fareham can turn directly to Southampton Parkway without reversing at Eastleigh.
 

stuu

Established Member
Joined
2 Sep 2011
Messages
3,766
Bridges are short, viaducts are long. Variations in ground movement can be managed on a short bridge much more easily than on a long viaduct. Even then many Fenland railways have significant issues, necessitating temporary or permanent speed restrictions. This recent discussion about electrification in the Fens covers some of the issues:
The A142 viaduct south of Chatteris is still there, and that's very much in the fens. You need very long piles, it's an engineering and especially a financial problem but it is soluble
 

Magdalia

Established Member
Joined
1 Jan 2022
Messages
7,387
Location
The Fens
The A142 viaduct south of Chatteris is still there, and that's very much in the fens. You need very long piles, it's an engineering and especially a financial problem but it is soluble
At Ely very very long piles. See this report about the Ely Southern bypass:


The cost of a bypass for the Fenland city of Ely has spiralled to £13m over its initial budget and completion will be delayed by several months.

Work began on the £36m Ely Southern Bypass in January 2017 and the road was expected to open by late summer 2018.

However, the county council said "tricky conditions" including a floodplain and working near a "national heritage site" meant costs spiralled.

A spokesman added: "The depth of the foundations for the river viaduct is two thirds the height of the cathedral - much more than expected.

"Also, as Ely Cathedral is a national heritage site, a unique, specially-designed viaduct needed to be created which has given the team significant challenges."

A short viaduct built 7 years ago ended up costing almost £50m.

Then there is the ongoing saga of the Ralph Butcher bridge at Kings Dyke:


Traffic around a town has been described as a "nightmare" by residents who "fear the worst" if the partial closure of a £32m bridge was not restored.

The King's Dyke bridge, which connects Peterborough and Whittlesey over the Peterborough-Ely railway line, was opened in 2022 to ease traffic caused by a level crossing.

Yet two years after it opened, it was partially closed in June after cracks were spotted in the westbound carriageway.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,524
Location
Northampton
No reopenings. They've been done to death. Especially that one!
Uckfield to Glynde (and onto Lewes) via Ringmer - would be 95%+ a new alignment, serving a village rapidly becoming a town as well as connecting the weald to Brighton without reversal and avoiding a National Park to boot.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
19,685
Whitacre curve. 300m of track. Would allow Birch Coppice freight access to the WCML without the magical mystery tour of the West Mids. Could also send the empty Kingsbury tanks back via Leicester.
 

Nottingham59

Established Member
Joined
10 Dec 2019
Messages
3,332
Location
Nottingham
Bridges are short, viaducts are long. Variations in ground movement can be managed on a short bridge much more easily than on a long viaduct.

Do the Ely Capacity Enhancement project team know about this?
Round 2 (part 2) – Queen Adelaide level crossings:
  • Option 2 Northern bypass. A new road (2188m long) with a 1215m long viaduc
  • Option 3 Long Southern Bypass. A new 2040m long road with a 1000m long viaduct
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,524
Location
Northampton

Magdalia

Established Member
Joined
1 Jan 2022
Messages
7,387
Location
The Fens
Do the Ely Capacity Enhancement project team know about this?
I am very sceptical about the prospects for the Ely Capacity enhancement because I can't see any of the long viaduct options ever happening.

However, terra firma on the Isle of Ely itself is not far away to the west, and one of the few bits of the Isle that hasn't been covered in houses yet. The B1382 road through Queen Adelaide crosses 4 railways, and the only bridge is the most westerly, over the avoiding line. Chettisham is firmly on the Isle and the A10 has a bridge over the March line there.

I think there is a solution, but it isn't in the current options, and is off topic here!
 

Doctor Fegg

Established Member
Joined
9 Nov 2010
Messages
2,135
Location
Charlbury
  • 1km South-East chord at Manton Junction to allow services between Oxford and Peterborough without reversing, connecting the South Midlands and the Eastern side of the country. It would support maybe one tenth of the benefit of East-West Rail from Bedford to Cambridge, at around one fiftieth of the cost. So better value for money.
A south<–>east chord at Manton would also free up paths through Leicester by enabling the cement trains between St Pancras (Churchyard) and Ketton to go via Corby.

I like the idea of a passenger service, but I suspect the only way it could wash its face is if you could magic up a bunch of local passengers for Corby/Kettering–Peterborough journeys.
 

Nottingham59

Established Member
Joined
10 Dec 2019
Messages
3,332
Location
Nottingham
I like the idea of a passenger service, but I suspect the only way it could wash its face is if you could magic up a bunch of local passengers for Corby/Kettering–Peterborough journeys.
I don't know. Peterborough is the eleventh most popular destination out of Leicester, with 111 passengers a day. If with a direct service Peterborough was the eleventh destination out of Kettering, then that particular station pair would generate 12 passengers a day.

A Manton S-E chord would only work if it enabled passenger connections across a wider area, and as you say, relieved freight congestion in the Leicester area.
 

YorksLad12

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2020
Messages
2,709
Location
Leeds
Skipton to Colne, and a cross-Bradford link, of course!
Yer barred!

Then again, I was waiting for someone to suggest a dedicated curve for the former Midland route into Leeds from the south, or possibly a Leeds Avoiding Line in the east (come off after Neville Hill via the existing line), demolish half of Hunslet with two curves NW and SE, and freight won't need paths through Leeds.
 

Oxfordblues

Member
Joined
22 Dec 2013
Messages
1,124
Askam-in-Furness to Millom with a new Duddon Viaduct, as originally proposed before the Furness Railway ran out of money (it would have cost only £37k in 1843!)
 

65477

Member
Joined
30 Mar 2017
Messages
257
One that has been suggested many times in the years I have known the area is an extension of the Central Line to Harlow.
 

A S Leib

Established Member
Joined
9 Sep 2018
Messages
3,328
One that has been suggested many times in the years I have known the area is an extension of the Central Line to Harlow.
Stansted to Braintree or Chelmsford and (possibly? I'm not quite sure if it's under 15 miles) Crossrail 2, sticking with lines which would benefit Harlow.
 

brad465

Veteran Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
11,468
Location
Taunton or Kent
Two chords in Somerset: one to bypass Castle Cary for trains to/from Yeovil, another to bypass Taunton between Langport and Bridgwater. If combined with other Heart of Wessex upgrades further south (that allow new services in addition to the via Bath/Westbury ones), this would provide an additional route to Bristol from Yeovil and Weymouth, that also connects the large towns of Bridgwater and Weston-super-Mare, plus acts as a diversionary route during closures like the current Westbury one. Should stations at Langport and/or Somerton also reopen, services doing this could help serve them, and allow for an alternative interchange to Castle Cary if any services between Taunton and east of Castle Cary call too.
 

quantinghome

Established Member
Joined
1 Jun 2013
Messages
2,882
At Ely very very long piles. See this report about the Ely Southern bypass:


A short viaduct built 7 years ago ended up costing almost £50m.

Then there is the ongoing saga of the Ralph Butcher bridge at Kings Dyke:


Geotechnical engineers have saying - you always pay for a decent ground investigation, whether you do one or not!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top