• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Unadvertised stops at Reading - 27/12/24

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rebel Viking

Member
Joined
18 Jun 2019
Messages
10
Why are trains from Euston to Swansea stopping at Reading but the stops are unadvertised?

For context, a relative of mine was travelling from Burnham to Neath for a wedding this morning and all the journey planners routed her
Burnham to Reading,
Reading to Swindon,
Swindon to Neath.

Why would GWR not just route her and any other passengers travelling from the Thames Valley to South Wales directly on to the train at Reading and publicise the secret stop?

That’s what she ended up doing anyway, because her first train from Burnham was cancelled which meant the next advertised connections were an hour later and there was a high risk of her being late for the wedding if there were any further journey complications, I checked the RTT website for departures from Reading and noticed the Euston to Swansea train was stopped at Reading for “staffing reasons”, and just happened to be sat on platform 15 as her next train from Burnham arrived on platform 14. I advised her to walk across, explain the situation to a guard and ask if she could board. As it happens she just walked up to the door, pressed the button, and let herself on unchallenged.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

JN114

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2005
Messages
3,529
Capacity was perceived to be very limited on the Eustons; thus the decision was made to not convey passengers to/from Reading at all on them.

Whilst RTT shows a stop at Reading for staffing purposes, and in your specific example that stop occurred, not all of those stops are actually required; and thus there’s no guarantee the train will actually stop if it isn’t required to do so.
 

Rebel Viking

Member
Joined
18 Jun 2019
Messages
10
Capacity was perceived to be very limited on the Eustons; thus the decision was made to not convey passengers to/from Reading at all on them.

Whilst RTT shows a stop at Reading for staffing purposes, and in your specific example that stop occurred, not all of those stops are actually required; and thus there’s no guarantee the train will actually stop if it isn’t required to do so.
Thanks, that makes sense when explained like that
 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
7,372
Thanks, that makes sense when explained like that
Also, normally the stops are for either driver/guard change over, so a full door release does not always happen.
Although in your case today, it is good it did to enable the journey to continue with less delay.
 

800301

Member
Joined
29 Dec 2022
Messages
540
Location
Essex
Also, normally the stops are for either driver/guard change over, so a full door release does not always happen.
Although in your case today, it is good it did to enable the journey to continue with less delay.

It’s changed this time, all trains must release doors and be dispatched as normal at Reading

Last time even if there was a driver/guard changeover doors should not have been released on some services, there was some logic to it but I can’t remember it now
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,283
Link not working (13:50)
I think it might have linked to an earlier thread that was later merged into this one:

The general subject of the apparent “planning error” is also mentioned in an existing thread about diversions in the fares forum.


A couple of hours ago I think this event was being discussed in four places…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top