• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

GBR Transition - Automatic mutual ticket acceptance between Government controlled operators

Status
Not open for further replies.

vuzzeho

Member
Joined
11 Apr 2022
Messages
667
Location
London
From Yahoo News:
...Northern and TransPennine Express, together with London North Eastern Railway (LNER), will allow customers affected by on-the-day cancellations to travel on each other's services at no extra cost from Sunday, the public company that manages the operators announced...
This is good, right? Is this really a GBR thing or just something they should've done and are now doing because they can use GBR as promo?
 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Simon11

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2010
Messages
1,389
But all operators already do this? What is the difference in this scheme?
 
Joined
7 Jan 2009
Messages
1,031
Looks like that it will be requirement. Currently they have the ability to refuse other operators' tickets during 'normal' disruption. It is only in more severe circumstances eg. possible stranding of passengers overnight that (under the Conditions of Carriage) are they obliged to employ all means to get passengers to their destinations (and today sometimes refuse to do this).
 

A S Leib

Established Member
Joined
9 Sep 2018
Messages
3,361
I think it applies to Southeastern as well, with the caveat that there's no routes where that currently helps. Hopefully that extends to TfW Rail between Manchester / Airport, Crewe, Chester and Liverpool, and ScotRail between Edinburgh and Aberdeen / Inverness (although I'd guess that due to the limited service you could always get the next train between Perth and Inverness in case of disruption?).
 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
7,378
But all operators already do this? What is the difference in this scheme?
In times of service disruption they do, but this new agreement also means if one TransPennine between Newcastle and York for example is cancelled, then the customer can automatically travel on a LNER or TPE services within 2 hours of the cancellation.
Before it would be tough, wait for next service, or LNER case they would allow you to travel on the 2 services either side of cancellation.
 

Twingo37175

Member
Joined
24 Mar 2019
Messages
246
I travel regularly between Doncaster and Leeds. I assume this means if I am booked on the northern and it is cancelled I can then get the LNER as against having to wait an hour for the next northern?
 

A S Leib

Established Member
Joined
9 Sep 2018
Messages
3,361
I travel regularly between Doncaster and Leeds. I assume this means if I am booked on the northern and it is cancelled I can then get the LNER as against having to wait an hour for the next northern?
I also wonder if that extends to a right to use any reasonable route, such as going via York without any permission needed if Wakefield's blocked in that scenario, if that isn't already the case.
 

sjoh

Member
Joined
7 Apr 2016
Messages
372
Location
London, E11.
I wonder how long a "delayed" train has to be delayed for before it's a de-facto cancellation? I'd define it that if your delayed service is so delayed that another train will get you to your destination at or after your scheduled arrival time, and before your original train... but they don't seem to have gone into much detail!
 

Joe Paxton

Established Member
Joined
12 Jan 2017
Messages
2,959
I hadn't come across the change of name from DOHL (DfT OLR Holdings Limited) to DfT Operator Ltd until now, but of course it makes sense as it's no longer the Operator of Last Resort (a phrase which always sounded rather cataclysmic to my ears... maybe because of the similarity to the letters of last resort!).

DfT Operator Limited has this page on the GOV.UK website which states:
Formerly known as DfT OLR Holdings Limited (DOHL), the Department for Transport established DfT Operator in 2019.

I don't quite understand where the 2019 date has come from, as DOHL was formed in 2016... unless the 2019 is a typo for 2016?
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
78,421
Location
Yorkshire
But all operators already do this? What is the difference in this scheme?
Sadly they do not always do this; it is a sign of progress to see that some operators are being forced to do the right thing.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Looks like that it will be requirement. Currently they have the ability to refuse other operators' tickets during 'normal' disruption. It is only in more severe circumstances eg. possible stranding of passengers overnight that (under the Conditions of Carriage) are they obliged to employ all means to get passengers to their destinations (and today sometimes refuse to do this).
Yes, that's right.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

I travel regularly between Doncaster and Leeds. I assume this means if I am booked on the northern and it is cancelled I can then get the LNER as against having to wait an hour for the next northern?
That's correct, yes. It's great to see companies like LNER being required to do the right thing; they were not going to do this of their own accord, that's for sure!

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

I also wonder if that extends to a right to use any reasonable route, such as going via York without any permission needed if Wakefield's blocked in that scenario, if that isn't already the case.
Certainly any permitted route would qualify, but the extent to which normally non-permitted routes would become permitted, when there are no permitted routes where trains are operating at that time, might be a matter of a case-by-case basis. I hope that common sense would prevail.

In the hypothetical example of Doncaster to Leeds being blocked, passengers holding tickets from Peterborough (and further south, such as London and beyond) are already automatically allowed to travel via York (subject to any applicable TOC restrictions), however tickets from Grantham (and further north, including Doncaster) are not.

This does create the absurdity where a Leeds train could be cancelled at Doncaster; passengers holding tickets such as Peterborough to Leeds can just get a train to York and change there, but passengers holding tickets from Grantham have to hope or plead for ticket acceptance via York. LNER could change that, at a stroke, by requesting RDG amend the permitted routes accordingly. But that's a different topic.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

I wonder how long a "delayed" train has to be delayed for before it's a de-facto cancellation? I'd define it that if your delayed service is so delayed that another train will get you to your destination at or after your scheduled arrival time, and before your original train... but they don't seem to have gone into much detail!
As a minimum, I would imagine an hour would be an automatic entitlement, in line with the Rail Passenger Rights and Obligations (PRO), but I would hope that common sense would be applied for a shorter duration. If anyone knows of any specific guidance/policy regarding that, it would be interesting to hear/see it...
 
Last edited:

Cowley

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
15 Apr 2016
Messages
18,940
Location
Devon
Having discussed things behind the scenes, it would be better if the discussion was moved to this thread to avoid duplication:
Thanks
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top