• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Reasons for paper tickets being the only option, rather than e-tickets?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sonic1234

Member
Joined
25 Apr 2021
Messages
802
Location
Croydon
The reality is that using PAYG for your local London bit is usually cheaper than buying a through ticket, especially if the tube is involved. For example, if I pick a few places in all directions around Central London within the Oyster area and compare the same Advance price level (the below use ticket code BUS as an example):
Worth checking through tickets though. For journeys in the NSE area often a through ticket is only around £2 more so better value than using Oyster, and there is one operator where the through Advances are actually cheaper than the ticket to/from London Terminals.

If you use Advances, they also give you protection in the case of delays on the local leg.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

redreni

Established Member
Joined
24 Sep 2010
Messages
2,745
Location
Slade Green
Worth checking through tickets though. For journeys in the NSE area often a through ticket is only around £2 more so better value than using Oyster, and there is one operator where the through Advances are actually cheaper than the ticket to/from London Terminals.

If you use Advances, they also give you protection in the case of delays on the local leg.
You'll certainly find the through tickets sold against an itinerary for the through journey helpful when pointing out the railway caused you to miss your booked train and that you are therefore entitled to travel on the next one.

Worth remembering some journeys attract delay repay at between 25% and 100%, which also applies to the cost of the local leg if you have through tickets.
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
24,849
a through ticket is only around £2 more so better value than using Oyster,
Paying more is better value?
Worth remembering some journeys attract delay repay at between 25% and 100%, which also applies to the cost of the local leg if you have through tickets.
It applies to the whole journey for split tickets as well.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

You'll certainly find the through tickets sold against an itinerary for the through journey helpful when pointing out the railway caused you to miss your booked train and that you are therefore entitled to travel on the next one.
Corrected that for you.
 

BazingaTribe

Member
Joined
7 Oct 2024
Messages
391
Location
Basingstoke
Yeah, it probably also saves on having to handle different tickets as well. For all of £2 I'd find that a bit more valuable myself.
 

miklcct

Established Member
Joined
2 May 2021
Messages
5,017
Location
Cricklewood
You'll certainly find the through tickets sold against an itinerary for the through journey helpful when pointing out the railway caused you to miss your booked train and that you are therefore entitled to travel on the next one.

Worth remembering some journeys attract delay repay at between 25% and 100%, which also applies to the cost of the local leg if you have through tickets.
If your local journey is reservable (e.g. St Pancras - East Croydon) and you use an Advance ticket, you are forced to take the exact train on your local journey even if there are many trains on your local line. Using Oyster / contactless avoids the problem.
 

island

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2010
Messages
17,914
Location
0036
If your local journey is reservable (e.g. St Pancras - East Croydon) and you use an Advance ticket, you are forced to take the exact train on your local journey even if there are many trains on your local line. Using Oyster / contactless avoids the problem.
I believe it is GTR policy not to enforce this on the "local" leg of long distance advances.
 

miklcct

Established Member
Joined
2 May 2021
Messages
5,017
Location
Cricklewood
I believe it is GTR policy not to enforce this on the "local" leg of long distance advances.
Not if the other leg is also a GTR service, for example, Kings Lynn to Kings Cross.

Other examples of reservable local trains in the Oyster area include Clapham Junction to Waterloo (in the Waterloo direction only), Shenfield - Liverpool Street, Watford Junction - Euston, Bromley South - Victoria, Orpington - London Bridge, Wembley Stadium - London Marylebone.
 

redreni

Established Member
Joined
24 Sep 2010
Messages
2,745
Location
Slade Green
I believe it is GTR policy not to enforce this on the "local" leg of long distance advances.
Which is not to say people who don't know that aren't put off buying through tickets by the railway's apparent policy of ambiguity on whether and when these things will be enforced.
 

Sonic1234

Member
Joined
25 Apr 2021
Messages
802
Location
Croydon
I believe it is GTR policy not to enforce this on the "local" leg of long distance advances.
But what is does allow GTR to do is prevent you using an Advance ticket on certain services, as they set the quota to zero. They don't seem to allow long distance Advances before 0930 except on Mondays, Fridays and weekends.

Reservable Thameslink trains are nonsense, and means you get an extra ticket while we're being told using CCSTs is evil for the environment.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top