Transilien
Member
Is it because of cost? The vinyl ones look tacky and make the name about as replaceable as the livery.
A couple of reasons I can think of off the top of my head;
Cost - Every TOC across England being under the thumb of the DfT who would I'm sure rather not be spending money on shiny cast frivolities such as nameplates
Temporary / Permentant nature
Gauge Clearance - It's not much, but it's still an extra inch sticking off the bodyside.
I cant imagine someone like Hitachi being too pleased to have extra holes drilled into the sides of their shiny new units for example while nameplates are bolted on - and we can see the after effects what this looks like with the XC Voyagers.
You make it sound like you don't think the owners have a right to consider the long term condition of their assetCome "leasing" of course , then permission had to be sought from the asset owners who of course made this a financial isissue.
In the case of the Voyagers it’s all down to the cost of repairing the body after the removal of the nameplates. If a higher quality job was done after the removal of the nameplates and the area repainted, there would have been no evidence there had previously been a nameplate there. This also explains the reason why on the Cross Country Voyagers that the outline of the Virgin badge on the front is still visible after almost 17 years since Virgin lost the franchise!Look at the repairs to the Voyager Carbodies where the Virgin Nameplates were removed and you'll find your answer.
Absolutely, but those repair costs can't be cheap!In the case of the Voyagers it’s all down to the cost of repairing the body after the removal of the nameplates. If a higher quality job was done after the removal of the nameplates and the area repainted, there would have been no evidence there had previously been a nameplate there. This also explains the reason why on the Cross Country Voyagers that the outline of the Virgin badge on the front is still visible after almost 17 years since Virgin lost the franchise!