• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Proposed Transdev X41/X43 Changes within Manchester

Status
Not open for further replies.

bowen

Member
Joined
5 Sep 2024
Messages
5
Location
moor lane
Did you share your views as part of the consultation?
I wasn’t even aware there was a consultation. I just moved in in June in Moor Lane area to take care of my elderly and have been heavily relying on X41 & X43 to go to St Peters Square for his therapy until this happened…

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

That’s just what you think. Which tourists would like to have convenient bus stops near St Peters Square etc?
No, it won't. Most tourists will just take the bus to the main bus station and work it out from there.
 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Leedsbusman

Member
Joined
9 May 2021
Messages
694
Location
Layton
I wasn’t even aware there was a consultation. I just moved in in June in Moor Lane area to take care of my elderly and have been heavily relying on X41 & X43 to go to St Peters Square for his therapy until this happened…
It’s a shame - but to be fair they have done a consultation and made adjustments to the proposal in response. Manchester’s road network isn’t geared up to drive buses through and further closures are planned so you can see why.

There is a free bus link from Shudehill to Chorlton Street or Chinatown.

Or the tram from Shudehill to St Peter’s - a bus+zone 1 day ticket is £6 (£5.40 off peak) and concessions are free on both after 930.
 

TheSmiths82

Member
Joined
29 Jun 2023
Messages
607
Location
Manchester
This will effect my mate quite badly. We tend to pubs/bars/clubs in the Oxford Road/Princess Street area and he used to always get the 3:00am from Chorlton Street. I doubt he would want to go walk all the way down to Shude Hill at that time of night. It is probably the most dangerous time as there will be people looking for trouble that have staggered out of some of the more dubious watering holes!.
 

bowen

Member
Joined
5 Sep 2024
Messages
5
Location
moor lane
Hi
This will affect my mate quite badly. We tend to pubs/bars/clubs in the Oxford Road/Princess Street area and he used to always get the 3:00am from Chorlton Street. I doubt he would want to go walk all the way down to Shude Hill at that time of night. It is probably the most dangerous time as there will be people looking for trouble that have staggered out of some of the more dubious watering holes!

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Exactly. Even Picadilly garden is better Shudehill. Piccadilly at least is full of people and lighted up whereas Shudehill is kind a hole hidden somewhere in the wall. This stop by the way goes all the way at the very end of the Shudehill station. Not safe certainly for ladies at night.
 

ant123

New Member
Joined
22 Sep 2024
Messages
1
Location
Haslingden
Transdev Burnley are proposing changes to the Witchway X43 & Red Express X41 services in Manchester.

Buses would no longer serve Chorlton St, John Dalton St, or Victoria Bridge.
Buses would instead serve Victoria Station itself, Printworks, and then terminate at Shudehill Interchange.

Tweet link here
Consultation link here

Image attached from consultationView attachment 157707
This is a cracking idea! I always jump off at The Cathedral as it’s such a painfully slow trek through the streets to Chorlton Street.. Should have had done this years ago
 

Baxenden Bank

Established Member
Joined
23 Oct 2013
Messages
4,744
This is a cracking idea! I always jump off at The Cathedral as it’s such a painfully slow trek through the streets to Chorlton Street.. Should have had done this years ago
They did! At different times the route has terminated at the Arndale Bus Station, Victoria Station and Cannon Street.

I did the cross-city transfer on the free bus this week - a mere 40 minutes between buses on a supposed 10 minute frequency service. As a result I reluctantly paid £1.40 on the tram for the return journey the following morning.
 

Andyh82

Established Member
Joined
19 May 2014
Messages
4,573
They did! At different times the route has terminated at the Arndale Bus Station, Victoria Station and Cannon Street.

I did the cross-city transfer on the free bus this week - a mere 40 minutes between buses on a supposed 10 minute frequency service. As a result I reluctantly paid £1.40 on the tram for the return journey the following morning.
Did the X43 actually terminate inside the coach station at one point (maybe pre-rebuild?) rather than just at the bus stop outside?
 

Baxenden Bank

Established Member
Joined
23 Oct 2013
Messages
4,744
Did the X43 actually terminate inside the coach station at one point (maybe pre-rebuild?) rather than just at the bus stop outside?
Regarding the X41:

From Deregulation (October 1986) until July 1988 Blackburn Transport services operated from the grim dark version of Chorlton Street Bus Station and Ribble operated from the Arndale Bus Station / Arndale Centre - where they also operated Manchester services from (M10 and others as I recall) and where there was an inspectors office etc. Ribble withdrew the 235 north of Walmersley from that date so all 'X41' services operated from Chorlton Street.

In September 2001 (probably, I don't have every timetable produced) what was now Lancashire United moved the terminus to Victoria Rail Station.

In October 2002 the terminus was moved to Cannon Street.

The shiny new Chorlton Street coach emporium opened in 2002. As far as I can tell from timetables or recall from memory the X41 (X1 and X2 at the time) never operated from the new station. Other long distance bus services did operate from inside the coach station (Trans-Peak etc).

In May 2003 the X41 terminus was moved to Stop EZ on Chorlton Street, where it has remained ever since.

The X43 I imagine was similar but I haven't looked.

UPDATE
The X43 ran from Chorlton Street Bus Station until October 2001.
In October 2001 it moved to Lever Street.
In August 2002 it moved into Chorlton Street inside the coach station.
In April 2003 it set down outside the coach station on Chorlton Street and picked up on the opposite side in Sackville Street.
In October 2003 the terminus moved to Stop EZ, as per the X41.
 
Last edited:

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
35,419
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
Shudehill is kind a hole hidden somewhere in the wall. This stop by the way goes all the way at the very end of the Shudehill station. Not safe certainly for ladies at night.
Shudehill bus station is nothing whatsoever like what you describe. Buses to the north and west of Manchester run from there, so services to Accrington and Burnley would fit in with that.
 

Baxenden Bank

Established Member
Joined
23 Oct 2013
Messages
4,744
Shudehill bus station is nothing whatsoever like what you describe. Buses to the north and west of Manchester run from there, so services to Accrington and Burnley would fit in with that.
I was not especially impressed the other morning (sensible time, not 'after a nightclub' morning!). Not as dark as the old Chorlton Street but large amounts of solid walls forming the central building where it would have been better to be transparent. Not many staff visible (if any), whichever coach company has a waiting room - that was open (and is close to the X41 stand) but the ticket office was shuttered. Plus the toilets were closed - not a good thing before a bus journey of an hour or longer. On the return journey I alighted at Shudehill, walked through the city centre and the bus I had just alighted from passed me near Piccadilly Gardens, heading to Chorlton Street private to do a pm peak journey back to Burnley. Rub it in why not!
 

Rail Ranger

Member
Joined
20 Feb 2014
Messages
1,127
Measured from the blind men sculpture, 465m to the Chorlton Street bus stop, 1,100 to the nearest part of Shudehill, slightly more than double. But that assumes a person can walk such a distance, wants to walk such a distance, has minimal luggage (and/or children etc) and there isn't any heavy Manchester Sunshine coming down.

I am convinced, in a conspiracy theorist sort of way, that the delays in the city centre are a deliberate policy in order to deter traffic, including buses. The green phase for traffic at Victoria Bridge Street allows only a couple of vehicles through each time.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


Well, it would be helpful if Metrolink published timetables, or at least journey times between stops. Combined with frequency you could then make an estimate of the likely time required. As it stands the TfGM jouney planner seems to assume we all want to cycle everywhere, all the time.
Metrolink times can be found by using the journey planner on www.traveline.info.
 

Class 466

Established Member
Joined
5 Mar 2010
Messages
2,134
Location
Atherton, UK
Shudehill is a much better place to wait than under a single shelter in winter. Funnily enough it’s just a vocal few that have a big issue with this and most people seem to be doing fine.
 

Baxenden Bank

Established Member
Joined
23 Oct 2013
Messages
4,744
Metrolink times can be found by using the journey planner on www.traveline.info.
So it does, well I never!

It's not a site I like, things sliding up and down allover the place. The tram times are based on adding multiples of standard frequency (every 12 minutes) from start of service but I can cope with building a 12 minute frequency and an x minutes journey time into my itineraries. I just don't understand this secret squirrel mentality where the information is known but someone won't share it!

Traveline SW only returns bus travel.

Transport for Greater Manchester, well it's an abomination.

One of the suggested alternatives for those previously boarding at Chorlton Street is to use the free city centre bus. These are the actual times (from Bustimes.org) for the supposed 10 minute frequency on Thursday afternoon:
1122 - 1155 depart Piccadilly - arrive Piccadilly,
1131 - 1206,
1157 - 1230,
1200 - 1232,
1209 - 1237,
1236 - 1312,
1242 - 1314,
1250 - 1321,
1318 - 1356,
1323 - 1354,
1330 - stopped short
1356 - 1432,
1412 - 1444,
1446 - 1529,
1450 - 1517,
1520 - 1551,
1532 - 1600,
1535 - 1609,
1548 - 1624,
1550 - 1622,
1617 - 1656,
1622 - 1657,
1631 - 1703,
1710 - 1750,
1713 - 1751,
1731 - 1806,
1808 - 1842,
1833 - 1913,
1852 - 1914.
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
27,252
Location
Bolton
Hi


== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


Exactly. Even Picadilly garden is better Shudehill. Piccadilly at least is full of people and lighted up whereas Shudehill is kind a hole hidden somewhere in the wall. This stop by the way goes all the way at the very end of the Shudehill station. Not safe certainly for ladies at night.
Perhaps Lancashire or the relevant district council could have offered a subsidy for the route to continue running across the city centre.

Of course, like most English local authorities they have almost no money available to spend on bus services, so something else would have to be cut.
 

Baxenden Bank

Established Member
Joined
23 Oct 2013
Messages
4,744
Shudehill is a much better place to wait than under a single shelter in winter. Funnily enough it’s just a vocal few that have a big issue with this and most people seem to be doing fine.
You don't wait in the shelter, you wait in the coach station, follow your bus on bustimes.org, then wander across the road as your bus turns into Chorlton Street!
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
35,419
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
Perhaps Lancashire or the relevant district council could have offered a subsidy for the route to continue running across the city centre.

Of course, like most English local authorities they have almost no money available to spend on bus services, so something else would have to be cut.
Most local authorities have a wide-ranging calls for more money from a number of sources.
 

Djb1

Member
Joined
12 Aug 2021
Messages
85
Location
Manchester
So it does, well I never!

It's not a site I like, things sliding up and down allover the place. The tram times are based on adding multiples of standard frequency (every 12 minutes) from start of service but I can cope with building a 12 minute frequency and an x minutes journey time into my itineraries. I just don't understand this secret squirrel mentality where the information is known but someone won't share it!

Traveline SW only returns bus travel.

Transport for Greater Manchester, well it's an abomination.

One of the suggested alternatives for those previously boarding at Chorlton Street is to use the free city centre bus. These are the actual times (from Bustimes.org) for the supposed 10 minute frequency on Thursday afternoon:
1122 - 1155 depart Piccadilly - arrive Piccadilly,
1131 - 1206,
1157 - 1230,
1200 - 1232,
1209 - 1237,
1236 - 1312,
1242 - 1314,
1250 - 1321,
1318 - 1356,
1323 - 1354,
1330 - stopped short
1356 - 1432,
1412 - 1444,
1446 - 1529,
1450 - 1517,
1520 - 1551,
1532 - 1600,
1535 - 1609,
1548 - 1624,
1550 - 1622,
1617 - 1656,
1622 - 1657,
1631 - 1703,
1710 - 1750,
1713 - 1751,
1731 - 1806,
1808 - 1842,
1833 - 1913,
1852 - 1914.
You can also find the metrolink times on bustimes.org
They are generally reliable in the week, but can be a bit late updating for weekends where there are altered service patterns

 

RustySpoons

Member
Joined
5 Apr 2019
Messages
868
Perhaps Lancashire or the relevant district council could have offered a subsidy for the route to continue running across the city centre.

Of course, like most English local authorities they have almost no money available to spend on bus services, so something else would have to be cut.
I don't think a subsidy, or lack of, is the issue.

The main reason for the change to Shudehill was due to the amount of time lost with buses stuck in City Centre traffic. There were times when up to half of the fleet was stuck in Manchester City Centre making it a real hassle to keep the service running to time. A duty manager tells me that at one point the entire branded fleet was stuck in Manchester.
 

Baxenden Bank

Established Member
Joined
23 Oct 2013
Messages
4,744
I don't think a subsidy, or lack of, is the issue.

The main reason for the change to Shudehill was due to the amount of time lost with buses stuck in City Centre traffic. There were times when up to half of the fleet was stuck in Manchester City Centre making it a real hassle to keep the service running to time. A duty manager tells me that at one point the entire branded fleet was stuck in Manchester.
I'm sure that was a very rare exception though, not a sufficient reason on it's own to amend a service. I've travelled through at various times of day, in either direction, and there can be next to no traffic through the centre up to lots of it.

Interesting that the journey times offered to the passenger haven't shortened as a result of this change! You would think they would have cut the running time as a result of the 'benefits' of moving to Shudehill and avoiding all those crowded central streets.

X41 off peak
Previous: Accrington 0938, Chorlton Street 1103. Now Accrington 0930, Shudehill 1055, exactly the same. In the opposite direction times are identical (1110 - 1229)

X43 off peak:
Previous: Burnley 0910, Chorlton Street 1029. Now: Burnley 0905, Shudehill 1026, so 2 minutes longer! In the opposite direction times are identical (1040 - 1158).

I can only go by limited experience but there doesn't seem to be much commuter time traffic of any kind in Manchester nowadays, be that on the bus, in cars, trams or trains!

It's done now, I'm sure the impact of the revision is being monitored.
 

Statto

Established Member
Joined
8 Feb 2011
Messages
4,080
Location
At home or at the pub
The other issues are traffic lights, particularly in Manchester City Centre, they're traffic lights at most junctions in the City Centre & feel like they're on Red for an age, but only show Green briefly, one of the worst ones is when turning right from Portland Street onto Princess Street, you can wait for a few cycles to get through them
 

mangad

Member
Joined
20 Jun 2014
Messages
718
Location
Stockport
I can only go by limited experience but there doesn't seem to be much commuter time traffic of any kind in Manchester nowadays, be that on the bus, in cars, trams or trains!
Believe me, there's plenty of commuter traffic in Manchester. I don't use the buses much but commute regularly in on train and tram, and at rush hour in the morning, they're always busy. My local train is regularly standing room only. I doubt the buses are any different.
 
Last edited:

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
35,419
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
Believe me, there's plenty of commuter traffic in Manchester. I don't use the buses museums but commute regularly in on train and tram, and at rush hour in the morning, they're always busy. My local train is regularly standing room only. I doubt the buses are any different.
Deangate in particular always seems very busy with car traffic when I visit that area.
 

158756

Established Member
Joined
12 Aug 2014
Messages
1,628
I'm sure that was a very rare exception though, not a sufficient reason on it's own to amend a service. I've travelled through at various times of day, in either direction, and there can be next to no traffic through the centre up to lots of it.

Interesting that the journey times offered to the passenger haven't shortened as a result of this change! You would think they would have cut the running time as a result of the 'benefits' of moving to Shudehill and avoiding all those crowded central streets.

X41 off peak
Previous: Accrington 0938, Chorlton Street 1103. Now Accrington 0930, Shudehill 1055, exactly the same. In the opposite direction times are identical (1110 - 1229)

X43 off peak:
Previous: Burnley 0910, Chorlton Street 1029. Now: Burnley 0905, Shudehill 1026, so 2 minutes longer! In the opposite direction times are identical (1040 - 1158).

I can only go by limited experience but there doesn't seem to be much commuter time traffic of any kind in Manchester nowadays, be that on the bus, in cars, trams or trains!

It's done now, I'm sure the impact of the revision is being monitored.

Not only has the end to end journey time not got any shorter, they're actually using more buses in the new timetable - it looks like 10 off-peak/12 peak, up from 9/11 previously.

Before, off-peak buses had 12 minutes turnaround at Burnley and 11 in Manchester, now it's 14 in Manchester and 27 in Burnley. And in the afternoon buses have up to 29 minutes in one case to get from finishing an inbound service at Shudehill to starting the outbound at Chorlton Street. So the new timetable should certainly be more reliable, but it's also more expensive to run on top of serving less of the city centre. (In the morning peak the extra bus has actually provided an additional service, but into Burnley rather than Manchester)
 

Baxenden Bank

Established Member
Joined
23 Oct 2013
Messages
4,744
Not only has the end to end journey time not got any shorter, they're actually using more buses in the new timetable - it looks like 10 off-peak/12 peak, up from 9/11 previously.

Before, off-peak buses had 12 minutes turnaround at Burnley and 11 in Manchester, now it's 14 in Manchester and 27 in Burnley. And in the afternoon buses have up to 29 minutes in one case to get from finishing an inbound service at Shudehill to starting the outbound at Chorlton Street. So the new timetable should certainly be more reliable, but it's also more expensive to run on top of serving less of the city centre. (In the morning peak the extra bus has actually provided an additional service, but into Burnley rather than Manchester)
Only if they actually ran the full timetable!

The extension to Chorlton Street is costing them a whole bus. Then there are two trips into Manchester in the morning which now return to Burnley (I assume) private. In the afternoon there is one bus which runs to Manchester private then operates back to Burnley in service. Finally there is a 1700 from Burnley to Manchester which returns private.

The X41 has had a similar arrangement for some time which is why there is a large gap in the afternoon timetable from Accrington to Manchester, the bus runs private instead.
 

Class 466

Established Member
Joined
5 Mar 2010
Messages
2,134
Location
Atherton, UK
I'm sure that was a very rare exception though, not a sufficient reason on it's own to amend a service. I've travelled through at various times of day, in either direction, and there can be next to no traffic through the centre up to lots of it.

Interesting that the journey times offered to the passenger haven't shortened as a result of this change! You would think they would have cut the running time as a result of the 'benefits' of moving to Shudehill and avoiding all those crowded central streets.

X41 off peak
Previous: Accrington 0938, Chorlton Street 1103. Now Accrington 0930, Shudehill 1055, exactly the same. In the opposite direction times are identical (1110 - 1229)

X43 off peak:
Previous: Burnley 0910, Chorlton Street 1029. Now: Burnley 0905, Shudehill 1026, so 2 minutes longer! In the opposite direction times are identical (1040 - 1158).

I can only go by limited experience but there doesn't seem to be much commuter time traffic of any kind in Manchester nowadays, be that on the bus, in cars, trams or trains!

It's done now, I'm sure the impact of the revision is being monitored.
Every weekday evening and Saturday evening my local bus route goes to pot because of city centre traffic. Take this as a recent example. Not uncommon to get 3-4 135s snarled up in the city centre at a time all evening, then running in a pack all the way to Bury. The X43 experienced the same. 1727214510628.jpeg
 

Andyh82

Established Member
Joined
19 May 2014
Messages
4,573
Not only has the end to end journey time not got any shorter, they're actually using more buses in the new timetable - it looks like 10 off-peak/12 peak, up from 9/11 previously.

Before, off-peak buses had 12 minutes turnaround at Burnley and 11 in Manchester, now it's 14 in Manchester and 27 in Burnley. And in the afternoon buses have up to 29 minutes in one case to get from finishing an inbound service at Shudehill to starting the outbound at Chorlton Street. So the new timetable should certainly be more reliable, but it's also more expensive to run on top of serving less of the city centre. (In the morning peak the extra bus has actually provided an additional service, but into Burnley rather than Manchester)
Adding extra buses into the cycle and more layover time to make the service more reliable should surely be applauded?

I know if it was the opposite it would be heavily criticised
 

M60lad

Established Member
Joined
31 May 2011
Messages
1,567
Before the timetable/route change was there a reason why the peak Burnley FASTs on X43 went via High Street leaving Manchester? I would have thought the quickest route out of Manchester to get onto Rochdale Road these days would have been Lever Street, Great Ancoats Street, Oldham Road & Thompson Street as this is the route most Stagecoach Queens Road Depot drivers take when running dead out of Manchester.
 

Leedsbusman

Member
Joined
9 May 2021
Messages
694
Location
Layton
Adding extra buses into the cycle and more layover time to make the service more reliable should surely be applauded?

I know if it was the opposite it would be heavily criticised
Indeed. I doubt the cost increase is significant as the 29 mins at Burnley won’t incur any more paid time than the 12 minutes did as the driver will always need a break after a round trip. The mileage will be slightly less too as the extra bus doesn’t mean more trips.

If it means better timekeeping - which certainly seems to be the case then it’s a good result.
 

Cambus731

Established Member
Joined
19 Jul 2013
Messages
1,404
Location
Chelmsford
I wonder if Transdev are under estimating how many people use the X43 to get within walking distance of Manchester Piccadilly in order to catch a train from there. Chorlton Street is handy for Piccadilly
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
35,419
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
I wonder if Transdev are under estimating how many people use the X43 to get within walking distance of Manchester Piccadilly in order to catch a train from there. Chorlton Street is handy for Piccadilly
People in Burnley (X43) and Accrington (X41) have railway stations with services to Preston railway station, where West Coast main line trains call at.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top