Falcon1200
Established Member
The link above says the score was 1-1 in its headline.
It does, but I have no idea why; The score was of course 1-0 to the mighty Yellows!
The link above says the score was 1-1 in its headline.
Aside from the fact they almost certainly wouldn't have been relegated to league 1 in the first place if the current owners didn't have the brainwave of sacking John Eustace and replacing him with Wayne Rooney, who's record of 2 wins in 15 games dropped the club from 5th to 20th in the league.Birmingham City are, now, an example of a well run club, record season ticket sales, increased attendences, increased high yeilding hospitality sales and increached merch sales. Means greater revenues to boost the cash flow and allow further investment in the squad, and ground.
Time will tell whether that is really the case, or whether it is just another club have vast amounts of money pumped into it by owners on an ego trip.Birmingham City are, now, an example of a well run club,
Aside from the fact they almost certainly wouldn't have been relegated to league 1 in the first place if the current owners didn't have the brainwave of sacking John Eustace and replacing him with Wayne Rooney, who's record of 2 wins in 15 games dropped the club from 5th to 20th in the league.
that is a brave statement to make in relation to any football club! How much debt is being loaded? Who owns what and on what terms? etc etcBirmingham City are, now, an example of a well run club, record season ticket sales, increased attendences, increased high yeilding hospitality sales and increached merch sales. Means greater revenues to boost the cash flow and allow further investment in the squad, and ground.
I don't know if they were actually criminals, but I heard and saw plenty of criticism. I don't really understand how you could have missed it.Funny how nobody cared to even criticise our last owners despite them being literal criminals
Not by them mass media to even 1% of the current levels, and not by the general footballing community who now can't wait to shove their 2p in.I don't know if they were actually criminals, but I heard and saw plenty of criticism. I don't really understand how you could have missed it.
Ah, so you mean those of us questioning the idea that the club is now well run? I'm afraid that if you shout from the rooftops about how wonderful you are, then you have to accept some scepticism in return. And I would point out that your CEO wanting matches to take place thousands of miles away won't help your cause.the general footballing community who now can't wait to shove their 2p in
That's because nobody had heard of them prior to them buying Blues and they didn't really do anything to draw attention to themselves nationally, generally trying to avoid publicity. They were undeniably useless as owners and very possibly a bit on the dodgy side but that's not especially unusual as English football club owners go.Not by them mass media to even 1% of the current levels, and not by the general footballing community who now can't wait to shove their 2p in.
In the draw for the FA CUP 3rd qualifying round, Darlo have been drawn at home to Gainsborough Trinity who play in the same league as Hyde United, Northern Premier League, Premier Division. They finished 4th last season, but lost in the play-offs on penalties. They are a difficult side to play against.I would take Bury in the next round. Obviously we will draw coined up celebrity super club Macclesfield.
In the year ended 30JUN2023, they (Birmingham City FC Limited) reported a loss for the year of -GBP25.4mln on football related revenue of GBP19mln. Year before that, it was a loss of -GBP24.8mln on a slightly smaller revenue figure of GBP17.6mln. Total liabilities exceeded total assets by GBP71.4mln as at 30JUN2023. Not really a sustainable business model had that continued as was.Birmingham City are, now, an example of a well run club, record season ticket sales, increased attendences, increased high yeilding hospitality sales and increached merch sales.
I believe out of the 34 penalties only 3 were missed. Excellent penalty taking.…. and Preston vs Fulham treating us to a shootout with 34 penalties taken
I posted the above comment on June 5th, since when Reading have been negotiating a takeover by former Wycombe owner Rob Couhig. However, today it has been revealed that he too has pulled out after failing to get final agreement to sign the contract. So Reading fans are back where they were, stuck with Dai Yongge. I imagine they'll be thinking about a protest against him for their forthcoming televised match at home to Huddersfield on Saturday 28th. In the meantime it looks like the sell-on fee they received from Michael Olise's transfer (from Crystal Palace to Bayern) is keeping the club going.Reading are stuck with owner Dai Yongge for a bit longer as agreement with a potential buyer hasn't been reached during the exclusivity period. Talks continue with that group and other interested parties.
I believe out of the 34 penalties only 3 were missed. Excellent penalty taking.
Compared with Stoke vs Fleetwood, 10 penalties taken only 3 were scored. Absolutely terrible.
At Preston vs Fulham spectators at one end witnessed a goal fest. Those at the other end needed binoculars.
Yeah, just the 9. It's not even like any of the saves were exceptional, either.Only 9, I think, but yes still awful for professional footballers
Happy with that as a draw. Radcliffe have the Salford chuckle brothers as managers so they will be a rugged teamIn the draw for the FA CUP 3rd qualifying round, Darlo have been drawn at home to Gainsborough Trinity who play in the same league as Hyde United, Northern Premier League, Premier Division. They finished 4th last season, but lost in the play-offs on penalties. They are a difficult side to play against.
Bury, on the other hand, have been drawn away to their local neighbours, Radcliffe, who play in the same league as Darlo.
repeating: Where is the debt getting loaded? Who is actually paying for all this?Theose figures should be better, and the 24/25 results should show a significant improvement, with vastly increased turnover.
Fit and proper person test................I posted the above comment on June 5th, since when Reading have been negotiating a takeover by former Wycombe owner Rob Couhig. However, today it has been revealed that he too has pulled out after failing to get final agreement to sign the contract. So Reading fans are back where they were, stuck with Dai Yongge.
It’s better now than it was, but it can only ever look at a moment in time and not what people’s future intentions might be.Fit and proper person test...
agreed - but does anyone fail the test? Putin maybeIt’s better now than it was, but it can only ever look at a moment in time and not what people’s future intentions might be.
Several people have failed the test in recent years - it’s certainly why Everton and Morecambe still haven’t changed ownership. Putting up a bond is no different to the proof of funding that is required now, but how much would you expect it to be? What is needed, in my view, is an annual licensing system but that wouldn’t be perfect.agreed - but does anyone fail the test? Putin maybe
You should have to put up a good behaviour bond out of your own pocket ( Not a loan, not a fancy debt instrument, not debt loaded against the club, not fake bit coin. Cash. Cold hard cash. Your cash out of your pocket) before being allowed to own or control a club.
Proof of funding could ( will be?) be someone else's money though. The tests are a joke. Turn up, wear a suit, don't call the FA chunts, have an excel business plan, shake hands, pocket the cash, strip the assets. Fit and proper.Putting up a bond is no different to the proof of funding that is required now, but how much would you expect it to be?
In seriousness I agree -owners should be licensed and have that license revoked if they behave badly/breach agreed financial performance/health measures. I am sure I read something by/for Gary Neville about this and it seemed like a sensible starting point.in my view, is an annual licensing system but that wouldn’t be perfect.
So could a bond. If you mortgage your house is the money you receive yours or someone else’s.Proof of funding could ( will be?) be someone else's money though.
Clearly not the case with the EFL and Premier League, and the FA have much a much lower bar, which is understandable for the levels they govern.The tests are a joke. Turn up, wear a suit, don't call the FA chunts, have an excel business plan, shake hands, pocket the cash, strip the assets. Fit and proper.
And that’s the problem whatever system you use - you cannot force an unwilling owner to leave (see Fleetwood Town, Macclesfield Town, Bury).What happens once the license is revoked is an open question!