• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Gunnislake Branch branch disruption (until at least 27 September)

Status
Not open for further replies.

D Williams

Member
Joined
27 Jul 2022
Messages
298
Location
Worcestershire
TRAIN services on a Cornwall to Devon cross-Tamar branch line are to be suspended for two weeks due to urgent repairs being required to a bridge.
Services between Gunnislake and Plymouth on the Tamar Valley line are set to be interrupted until at least the end of September 27.
It comes after Network Rail declared the bridge unsafe to run over, with the line requiring immediate closure while further inspections and repairs are carried out.
Rail replacement transport between the stations will be in place for the duration of the closure, which has come after engineers discovered a defect in the structure and a track issue on a bridge between Calstock and Gunnislake during the morning of Friday, September 13.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Western 52

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2020
Messages
1,672
Location
Burry Port
I thought one of the reasons why that line escaped closure in the 1960s was the lack of a suitable alternative road route. Which route can the buses now take?
 

6Gman

Established Member
Joined
1 May 2012
Messages
9,227
I thought one of the reasons why that line escaped closure in the 1960s was the lack of a suitable alternative road route. Which route can the buses now take?
If trains can run to Calstock (which I believe they can) the road link on to Gunnislake is probably quicker than the train!

The lack of an alternative road route is crossing the Tamar south of Calstock.
 

nanstallon

Member
Joined
18 Dec 2015
Messages
1,063
If trains can run to Calstock (which I believe they can) the road link on to Gunnislake is probably quicker than the train!

The lack of an alternative road route is crossing the Tamar south of Calstock.
By the time you've walked down the path from Calstock station to the road, and the mini-bus has been loaded, it won't be quicker than the train continuing to Gunnislake.
 

185143

Established Member
Joined
3 Mar 2013
Messages
5,367
I thought one of the reasons why that line escaped closure in the 1960s was the lack of a suitable alternative road route. Which route can the buses now take?
I've been on a replacement bus to Bere Ferrers which had to run via Tavistock. Wasn't quick!
 

johnnychips

Established Member
Joined
19 Nov 2011
Messages
3,826
Location
Leeds
I've been on a replacement bus to Bere Ferrers which had to run via Tavistock. Wasn't quick!
It apparently takes nine minutes by car from Calstock to Gunnislake along the same route as the 79 bus. As others have said, it is bridging the Tamar that is the problem for cars between Bere Alston and Calstock: but apparently that is only 19 minutes by car.
 

QueensCurve

Established Member
Joined
22 Dec 2014
Messages
2,203
TRAIN services on a Cornwall to Devon cross-Tamar branch line are to be suspended for two weeks due to urgent repairs being required to a bridge.
Services between Gunnislake and Plymouth on the Tamar Valley line are set to be interrupted until at least the end of September 27.
It comes after Network Rail declared the bridge unsafe to run over, with the line requiring immediate closure while further inspections and repairs are carried out.
Rail replacement transport between the stations will be in place for the duration of the closure, which has come after engineers discovered a defect in the structure and a track issue on a bridge between Calstock and Gunnislake during the morning of Friday, September 13.
It always surprises me that the Gunislake branch survived given the three major structures required to maintain it.
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
21,985
Location
Airedale
Very true must be an absolute mammoth task keeping those lines going
OTOH a service entirely operated by DMUs isn't going to place huge stresses on the viaducts (two of which were built for the main line), so as long as they don't have structural defects. The underbridges approaching Gunnislake were light railway standard though, and could well be life-expired.

(Idle thought - if Tavistock "South" reopens, would Gunnislake lose a lot of its traffic?)
 

nanstallon

Member
Joined
18 Dec 2015
Messages
1,063
OTOH a service entirely operated by DMUs isn't going to place huge stresses on the viaducts (two of which were built for the main line), so as long as they don't have structural defects. The underbridges approaching Gunnislake were light railway standard though, and could well be life-expired.

(Idle thought - if Tavistock "South" reopens, would Gunnislake lose a lot of its traffic?)
I don't think that reopening the line to Tavistock would affect Gunnislake. The most logical railhead at present for Tavistock would be Bere Alston, rather than Gunnislake. I'd have thought that Gunnislake passengers were more likely to come from Gunnislake itself and points west such as Callington.
 

Sir Felix Pole

Established Member
Joined
21 Oct 2012
Messages
2,205
Location
Wilmslow
Calstock - Gunnislake reopened this p.m. after bridge repairs.

NR Press

Network Rail has reopened the Gunnislake branch line a day earlier than planned, with services able to use the line again this afternoon (Thursday 26 September) following a two-week closure for emergency repair work.

The line was closed on Friday 13 September after engineers discovered a structural defect and track issue on a bridge between Calstock and Gunnislake, following a routine inspection. As a result, the train service between those two stations was suspended to enable engineers to repair the bridge and replace the track.

Network Rail’s team has worked around the clock to complete the repairs, which involved laying a bespoke timber deck onto the steel structure of the bridge and lifting the track to allow for access. While trains weren’t running because of the closure, Network Rail also used the opportunity to carry out maintenance on the line.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top