Why should any development be to make life easier for passengers? They're the only reason bus services exist.That sounds like a pretty weak complaint I have to say
Last edited by a moderator:
Why should any development be to make life easier for passengers? They're the only reason bus services exist.That sounds like a pretty weak complaint I have to say
The timetable changes for the 590-2 seem to have been cancelled at Vosa. Various systems are showing a mix of old and new timetables.I used the 591/2 locally in Todmorden on Saturday for the first time in a while, and noticed every bus was a single-decker - this was the final day of the 'old' timetable. Do I take it we have reverted to single-deck operation, after doubles were brought in for the previous changes (ie cuts!) in February?
Oh, that's interesting. I did look at Metro's website yesterday for a possible trip to Hebden Bridge this evening, and that definitely had the new one on. I won't be making the trip out this evening (partly on the reduced bus timetable being rather inconveniently timed) and I've not been out today so I can't report what's actually running.The timetable changes for the 590-2 seem to have been cancelled at Vosa. Various systems are showing a mix of old and new timetables.
A lot of systems (like bustimes.org) are still showing the old times for some of the routes that are supposed have changed last weekend (like the 586).
However, a commenter has replied:Residents in a York suburb have lost a bus service because First’s new electric single-decker buses are too tall to go under a bridge, a councillor said.
Kallum Taylor, Holgate ward councillor, said the “farcical” situation means residents in the Leeman Road area have “been overlooked” as the buses cannot fit under the railway bridge at Kingsland Terrace.
So, who is right? (I am sure @dodecahedron67 will have some thoughts on this)But there is still a 19, 30 and 31 service that’s goes Leeman Road - and the 59 does stop, so they’ve probably got a better service than any other suburb!
The 19, 30 and 31X (note only Reliance operated 31X use Leeman Road) all only operate into York using Leeman Road, not out of York. But, as the commenter says, the 59 does provide a regular service along Leeman Road.However, a commenter has replied:
The 10 now also serves York Station, which comes with the obvious benefits for passengers.Of course, no mention is ever made of places that benefit, e.g. there is now a more frequent service along Holgate Road, which has various B&Bs and workplaces along it, as well as probably serving a larger catchment area of residents along that road than Leeman Road.
The Leeman Road area has the 59 running every 15 minutes during the daytime between York city centre and Poppleton Bar P&R, and the 10L running about every hour in the evening between Stamford Bridge, York city centre and Poppleton village, as well as occasional services running a one-way loop inbound from the A19 corridor.I rarely use buses in York, but I saw this pop up in the York Press:
![]()
Anger as new single-decker electric buses too tall to fit under York bridge
Residents in a York suburb have lost a bus service because First’s new electric single-decker buses are too tall to go under a bridge, a…www.yorkpress.co.uk
However, a commenter has replied:
So, who is right? (I am sure @dodecahedron67 will have some thoughts on this)
I see the York Bus map still shows the 10 as going via Leeman Road.
I don't quite get the fuss about no longer having a direct bus from Leeman Road to Manor School, given Leeman Road is much closer to Millthorpe School, which is also the catchment school for that entire area, so I suspect that only affects a tiny number of students who have chosen to go to a more distant school.
Of course, no mention is ever made of places that benefit, e.g. there is now a more frequent service along Holgate Road, which has various B&Bs and workplaces along it, as well as probably serving a larger catchment area of residents along that road than Leeman Road.
Yes that’s cynical.Am I to cynical to suggest that the all night 72, linking two city centres rather than places that people live and want to get home to, looks like an exercise in "proving" a lack of demand for overnight services?
It's a route that's had a previous Night service in the late 90s - the service ran on the 72 route between Leeds and Bradford and then the 576 route between Bradford and Halifax, running hourly for 4 journeys on Friday and Saturday nights.Am I to cynical to suggest that the all night 72, linking two city centres rather than places that people live and want to get home to, looks like an exercise in "proving" a lack of demand for overnight services?
Oh, that's interesting. I did look at Metro's website yesterday for a possible trip to Hebden Bridge this evening, and that definitely had the new one on. I won't be making the trip out this evening (partly on the reduced bus timetable being rather inconveniently timed) and I've not been out today so I can't report what's actually running.
Lots of people live on the route of the 72, but the real value will be in not having to take a taxi from Leeds back to Bradford. It’s often cheaper to get a hotel in Leeds than do that.Am I to cynical to suggest that the all night 72, linking two city centres rather than places that people live and want to get home to, looks like an exercise in "proving" a lack of demand for overnight services?
Indeed. The 72 has run as often as every 8 minutes pre-pandemic, which isn't bad given that during the day there's 6 trains an hour from Leeds to Bradford (though split between the 2 Bradford stations).Lots of people live on the route of the 72, but the real value will be in not having to take a taxi from Leeds back to Bradford. It’s often cheaper to get a hotel in Leeds than do that.
Indeed. The 72 has run as often as every 8 minutes pre-pandemic, which isn't bad given that during the day there's 6 trains an hour from Leeds to Bradford (though split between the 2 Bradford stations).
I've not seen any indication of whether there's any restrictions on the use of season tickets (MCards or First's own) on overnight journeys.
And whatever you do, don't rely on the WY Metro timetable for a route description, or any indication in the times bank that there are now two routes into Burnley!Tracking is now working on bustimes.org . Definitely running the new times.
As predicted the new times towards Burnley are very loose. I can't find any bus (though some didn't track properly) which took more than 13 minutes for Mereclough to Burnley. Which fits with the formerly timetabled 12 minutes, but not the new times.
Today's winner for early running is either this one, arriving 10 minutes early
Vehicles – 591 – bustimes.org
bustimes.org
or this, last tracked just around the corner from the bus station 13 minutes before it's scheduled arrival
That one also stopped for 4 minutes at Portsmouth, and that's after recovering from running late all the way from Halifax to Todmorden.Vehicles – 591 – bustimes.org
bustimes.org
My prediction is that the route will go hourly, at least beyond Portsmouth to Burnley which is what First put forward in their consultation proposals. Just as soon as passengers on the section of route through Brunshaw and Mereclough 'adjust' to their reduced service.591
Burnley - Halifax
Burnley Bus Station, Croft Street, Yorkshire Street, Harry Potts Way, Brunshaw Road, Red Lees Road, Burnley Road, Todmorden Bus Station....
592
Burnley - Halifax
Burnley Bus Station, Croft Street, Yorkshire Street, Harry Potts Way, Brunshaw Road, Red Lees Road, Mount Lane, Park Road, Burnley Road, Todmorden Bus Station....
Given the 59 is one of the few services to be operated at a clockface timetable (albeit with running time variations peak/off peak), the ‘approx 15 min’ is false.The fuss about the no10 and Leeman Rd is that the service is 'at approx 15 min intervals' not a fixed 15 min interval. It does not allow passengers off after Water End. I wanted to get off at the Fire Station. The driver refused to stop and took me to the Ring Rd from where I had to walk back as the service does not pick up until the first stop after Water End in bound. Most of the passengers are elderly and are unable to walk very far. Not a very local passenger orientated service
The fuss about the no10 and Leeman Rd is that the service is 'at approx 15 min intervals' not a fixed 15 min interval. It does not allow passengers off after Water End. I wanted to get off at the Fire Station. The driver refused to stop and took me to the Ring Rd from where I had to walk back as the service does not pick up until the first stop after Water End in bound. Most of the passengers are elderly and are unable to walk very far. Not a very local passenger orientated service
Given the 59 is one of the few services to be operated at a clockface timetable (albeit with running time variations peak/off peak), the ‘approx 15 min’ is false.
As for not stopping apart from Leeman Road, the number of passengers that actually make Malvern Ave - Leeman Road journeys is so so slim.
I’m sorry that you can’t read a bus timetable and expected the driver to drop you off where you liked though…
| Upper Poppleton Poppleton Bar Park & Ride |
| Nether Poppleton, opp Langley Gate |
| Clifton Sailsbury Road (opp 13) |
| Clifton Kingsland Terrace |
| Clifton Carleton Street (opp.) |
| National Railway Museum (West Entrance) |
| York Royal Mail Offices (RL) |
| York Rougier Street (Setting Down Only) |
| York Micklegate (CJ) |
| York Clifford Street (TD) |
| York Station Road (CD) |
| York Station Rise (RK) |
| National Railway Museum (Main Entrance) |
| National Railway Museum NRM Car Park |
| Clifton, o/s Carleton Street |
| Clifton Livingstone Street |
| Clifton Salisbury Road (o/s 9) |
| Upper Poppleton, adj Langley Gate |
| Upper Poppleton Poppleton Bar Park & Ride |
The wrong route details for the 592 are pretty shocking, and even worse really is the fact that the 592 is still shown as going via Mereclough in the timings, which I suspect more people will look at.And whatever you do, don't rely on the WY Metro timetable for a route description, or any indication in the times bank that there are now two routes into Burnley!
My prediction is that the route will go hourly, at least beyond Portsmouth to Burnley which is what First put forward in their consultation proposals. Just as soon as passengers on the section of route through Brunshaw and Mereclough 'adjust' to their reduced service.
Adjust = buying a car and such like.
First Transforming Travel.
No, it still operates like this.Not stopping on Boroughbridge Road until Wheatlands Grove is how the 59 operated when it ran via Holgate Road. Sounds like a driver unfamilar with revised service beyond the route it follows.
The 3 is often full and standing during rush hour with bus after bus being packed, leaving no capacity onboard for it to stop elsewhere. Even on weekends, the service is busy. The 3 passes by my local bus stop, nonstop, but the 4 stops every 10 minutes, plus a variety of other services like Coastliner, 12, 13 and the 37 (although the last one is a limited service in comparison). All of the stops the 3 doesn't stop at have a decent service into York, even without the 4, with them having up to 4 buses an hour (sometimes 5) to get them into York, or between Tesco and their local bus stop.I know there are some issues with the 3.
It’s strange that it doesn’t stop. Since it first started the community has been requesting it as it would improve their service. Looking at a couple of journeys on Friday the all stops 10 only took a minute longer than the non stop 59 did on the common section. There are only five stops missed. There is 20 minutes layover so there’s scope in the cycle.No, it still operates like this.
Poppy Bar - Wheatlands - Leeman Road (all stops) - City Centre and reverse
The 59 does not, and is not supposed to, stop at any stops on Boroughbridge Road apart from Wheatlands/Langley Gate
Could it be due to potential capacity issues on the Versas with potential standing room only occurring or that the loss in custom for the 10 would affect its viability ?It’s strange that it doesn’t stop. Since it first started the community has been requesting it as it would improve their service. Looking at a couple of journeys on Friday the all stops 10 only took a minute longer than the non stop 59 did on the common section. There are only five stops missed. There is 20 minutes layover so there’s scope in the cycle.