• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

New Transport Secretary - Louise Haigh

Status
Not open for further replies.

Howardh

Established Member
Joined
17 May 2011
Messages
9,796
One thing I would love to see, as soon as the advertising contracts end, is the huge screen at Euston returned to showing the train times. Absolutely awful what they have done to Euston, and I'm sure the vast majority of pax would agree with this!
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
21,938
Location
Mold, Clwyd
One thing I would love to see, as soon as the advertising contracts end, is the huge screen at Euston returned to showing the train times. Absolutely awful what they have done to Euston, and I'm sure the vast majority of pax would agree with this!
Not sure if politics has any part of that.
It's just Network Rail doing its thing at its main stations.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
23,389
The big problem is this effectively stops anyone moving from one company to another if they think the new T&C will be worse than they currently get. To join a new company will get the new standard terms and conditions and salary, and lose any better legacy terms.
There is nothing to stop a provision that employees already working for another company can enter on different terms to someone 'off the street'.
 

Howardh

Established Member
Joined
17 May 2011
Messages
9,796
Not sure if politics has any part of that.
It's just Network Rail doing its thing at its main stations.
I hope that's not the case and stations can be there to benefit the passengers rather than advertisers. If it's National Rail being awkward then National Rail should be disbanded for something government-owned and government-run. The state of Euston is inexcusable.
 

WAB

Established Member
Joined
27 Jun 2015
Messages
1,302
Location
Anglia
I hope that's not the case and stations can be there to benefit the passengers rather than advertisers. If it's National Rail being awkward then National Rail should be disbanded for something government-owned and government-run. The state of Euston is inexcusable.
Well you will be pleased to hear that HMG plan to disband Network Rail then.
 

JamesT

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2015
Messages
4,903
I hope that's not the case and stations can be there to benefit the passengers rather than advertisers. If it's National Rail being awkward then National Rail should be disbanded for something government-owned and government-run. The state of Euston is inexcusable.
Network Rail is government-owned.
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
21,938
Location
Mold, Clwyd
I hope that's not the case and stations can be there to benefit the passengers rather than advertisers. If it's National Rail being awkward then National Rail should be disbanded for something government-owned and government-run. The state of Euston is inexcusable.
The new boards at Euston (and elsewhere) are part of the industry's (led by Network Rail) effort to improve passenger information.
You might have liked the old board but its technology was becoming out of date (as did earlier boards like the rotating flap indicators).
Monochrome dot-matrix signs are old hat now.
 

Howardh

Established Member
Joined
17 May 2011
Messages
9,796
The new boards at Euston (and elsewhere) are part of the industry's (led by Network Rail) effort to improve passenger information.
You might have liked the old board but its technology was becoming out of date (as did earlier boards like the rotating flap indicators).
Monochrome dot-matrix signs are old hat now.
I doubt few think the new system is better than the old.
 

Energy

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2018
Messages
5,135
The new boards at Euston (and elsewhere) are part of the industry's (led by Network Rail) effort to improve passenger information.
You might have liked the old board but its technology was becoming out of date (as did earlier boards like the rotating flap indicators).
Monochrome dot-matrix signs are old hat now.
It isn't the technology, its the positioning which was obviously done to fit in more advertising space to pay for the new screens.
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
30,941
Location
UK
There's always the option to blame failures on the previous Government - cleaning up their mess, years of mismanagement etc.

True, but it's not quite the same. Might work for the first term though.
 

BrianW

Established Member
Joined
22 Mar 2017
Messages
2,133
It isn't the technology, its the positioning which was obviously done to fit in more advertising space to pay for the new screens.
If income from advertising is to be rejected, that will need to be replaced by higher fare income and/or more subsidy by the (mostly not rail travelling) taxpayer?
 

Harpers Tate

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2013
Messages
2,053
My prediction: those who thought that voting for "change" would actually mean anything material (especially, but not exclusively with the Railway) are going to be disappointed. Now, let's wait and see......
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
30,941
Location
UK
My prediction: those who thought that voting for "change" would actually mean anything material (especially, but not exclusively with the Railway) are going to be disappointed. Now, let's wait and see......

The ONLY way to get fares down is throw more money at the railway. That's literally it. If you look at the running costs as a whole, shareholder dividends or drivers on £70 or £80k, really doesn't make much difference*. How much of the fare is subsidised is what counts, and I bet most people would go 'oh, wait, I don't want to pay more tax'.

* Of course there are lots of little things that can be done to help a bit, but it won't make much difference - especially when the mindset has been to save money to reduce the burden on the state, not to pass on fare cuts.
 

Kaliwax

Member
Joined
24 Oct 2023
Messages
288
Location
UK
I wonder how many areas will be in the process of bus franchising by the time of the next election
 

irish_rail

On Moderation
Joined
30 Oct 2013
Messages
4,527
Location
Plymouth
The only way I can see it could happen ( same salary and T&C’s for all crew ) is to employ newcomers on new contract countrywide and let the existing employees retire or transfer to the new one .
Similarly to GWR drivers after harmonisation - before 3 different T&C’s now just one GWR driver grade.
That's news to me. GwR very much still has two groups of drivers on different Ts and Cs (though on pretty much the same money). This conditions and wage harmonisation isn't going to happen on GBR, let's be honest. As much as I'd like it to, it will prove simply too difficult.
 

Energy

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2018
Messages
5,135
If income from advertising is to be rejected, that will need to be replaced by higher fare income and/or more subsidy by the (mostly not rail travelling) taxpayer?
Yes but it isn't that much (couple million from memory) and the advertising boards could be put elsewhere.
 

BrianW

Established Member
Joined
22 Mar 2017
Messages
2,133
True, but it's not quite the same. Might work for the first term though.
Re 'blaming the previous government'- the Tories banged on, and on, for more than 14 years, supported by the press barons, incorrectly blaming Gordon Brown for 'crashing the economy' when he 'saved the world' from economic meltdown. That's a lot longer than 'the first term'.
 

Mojo

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
7 Aug 2005
Messages
21,191
Location
0035
I noticed that Lord Hendy, Network Rail Chairman and former London Transport Commissioner has been appointed as a junior transport minister. Haven’t seen anywhere that states what exactly his portfolio will be.
 

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
9,671
I think I would cautiously describe that as positive. He knows exactly the trouble the industry is having that the government are influencing, such as boom and bust cycles and micromanagement so maybe he can get them dealt with.

Maybe there is some hope...
 

Thirteen

Established Member
Joined
3 Oct 2021
Messages
1,902
Location
London
I've seen Louise Haigh doing interviews when she was Shadow Transport Secretary and she came across as competent although those interviews also showcased how ill informed the interviewers like Kay Burley were about transport bodies.
 

Donny Dave

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2005
Messages
5,394
Location
Doncaster

Several newly-elected Labour MPs have criticised the reliability of train services after suffering disruption during journeys to take their seats in the House of Commons.

The politicians took to X to complain as they travelled to London ahead of Parliament sitting on Tuesday for the first time since the general election.

Paul Foster, MP for South Ribble in Lancashire, wrote, external: "Day One on my way to Parliament and guess what... AvantiWestCoast go and cancel my train just as I get to Preston station". He added it was an "utter shambles".

The rail company said: "We are sorry for any inconvenience caused to our customers with some of our train services being cancelled."

Mr Foster also posted an image of a departures board showing the cancellation of a 06:00 BST train to London Euston.

Another disgruntled Avanti West Coast passenger was Claire Hughes, MP for Bangor Aberconwy, who wrote, external: "In news that will shock absolutely no-one, my AvantiWestCoast train down to London for my first day in Westminster has been cancelled."

"That'll be my train too," replied Andrew Ranger, who was elected to represent Wrexham, adding "we have another thing to add to the list of things to tackle".

During the election campaign, Transport Secretary Louise Haigh said that, if Labour won, the party would urgently consider stripping Avanti West Coast of its contract due to its "woeful service" on the West Coast Main Line.

She has pledged to bring all train services on Britain's railways into public ownership.

Josh Fenton-Glynn, MP for Calder Valley, suffered disruption while travelling with Northern, which is already controlled by the Department for Transport.

'Work to be done'
He posted an image, external at 09:24 BST of himself at Hebden Bridge station in Yorkshire, with the caption: "On my way to London! I'm so excited to be starting a journey to be the voice in Westminster for the Calder Valley communities I love."

In a subsequent post eight minutes later, he added: "In news that will shock absolutely no one, my northernassist train is delayed."

Kirith Entwistle, who represents Bolton North East, posted an image of the town's railway station, external with the caption: "Day 1 and my train into Manchester to get to London is cancelled. Off to a great start!"

Henry Tufnell, MP for Mid and South Pembrokeshire, who travelled to the capital on Sunday, posted, external: "Heading to London and excited to begin work as the MP for Mid & South Pembrokeshire.

"Unfortunately the journey involves no direct trains from #Pembrokeshire and a delayed GWRHelp train via Gloucester. Lots of work to be done..."

Northern apologised and said staff sickness and industrial relations issues were having an "impact".

"We are working hard with our colleagues and other train operators to improve service reliability,” a spokesman said.
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
8,041
Location
Surrey
Would have to give up his chairmanship of NR?
Hes only part time and given its a state body i doubt he would have to but its question of what his brief is going to be but its got to be a good thing that its a transport industry lifer that has got this position as it should rapidly focus the DfT into the best way ahead for all forms of public transport.
 

Thirteen

Established Member
Joined
3 Oct 2021
Messages
1,902
Location
London
I don't mean to be unkind but surely these new MPs are fully aware of the service from certain TOCs.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Hes only part time and given its a state body i doubt he would have to but its question of what his brief is going to be but its got to be a good thing that its a transport industry lifer that has got this position as it should rapidly focus the DfT into the best way ahead for all forms of public transport.
It's a shame that Andy Byford is running Amtrak because he would have been good as a Transport Minister.
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
21,938
Location
Mold, Clwyd
It's a shame that Andy Byford is running Amtrak because he would have been good as a Transport Minister.
Junior ministers don't have it all their own way, though.
As a political appointment Peter Hendy will have to conform to Cabinet rules and work within whatever parameters are set by Rachel Reeves and Louise Haigh.
Huw Merriman was very capable and industry-wise, but he couldn't step out of the Tory party line on things like industrial relations or HS2.
Louise Haigh's first speech/actions as Secretary of State will steer the way, perhaps.
As I understand it, Hendy is Minister of State which means he is No 2 at the DfT.
There will be a couple of other more junior appointments, probably covering roads, aviation and local transport.

Plenty of cancellations in the north today, by various well-known TOCs, "due to a short-notice change to the timetable".
Just routine poor performance, really.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top