The dwell at Ebbsfleet was three or four minutes. I'm not convinced that the journey times have improved since they ceased stopping there.Why do we have to go with Brussels? Why not use Rotterdam as an example? Four minutes.
The dwell at Ebbsfleet was three or four minutes. I'm not convinced that the journey times have improved since they ceased stopping there.Why do we have to go with Brussels? Why not use Rotterdam as an example? Four minutes.
You can do Lille to Brussels for £26 today on every train. I’ve seen quite a few people (maybe up to 20) take trains from Lille while I was coming off.That's what I'm seeing, can’t select Paris/Brussels-Lille on Eurostar website
This way that's expected, it actually used to be possible to do that on the London-bound services.You can do Lille to Brussels for £26 today on every train. I’ve seen quite a few people (maybe up to 20) take trains from Lille while I was coming off.
Coming back however your only option is SNCF.
I doubt many were able to enter that way, but AFAIK no figures were ever published. Before they finally stopped selling Brussels to Lille, there were dedicated carriages for these passengers, which therefore had to be empty after arrival in Lille.Getting a ticket to Lille, before ~2015 was a massive loophole and probably allowed a lot of illegal immigrants to enter the UK. In 2015 they basically closed the loophole with locking the last Std class carriage with security staff preventing you entry to the rest of the train.
Technically, the operator in Belgium is NMBS/SNCB. However, the service is a by-product of the domestic TGV service of SNCF, who therefore determine most of its specifics.Coming back however your only option is SNCF.
Getting a ticket to Lille, before ~2015 was a massive loophole and probably allowed a lot of illegal immigrants to enter the UK
They haven’t, but mothballing/not reopening the Kent stops was a cost measure rather than anything else.The dwell at Ebbsfleet was three or four minutes. I'm not convinced that the journey times have improved since they ceased stopping there.
IIRC the trains now leave St Pancras 6min later (eg xx04 not xx58 for Ebbsfleet), not sure about inbound.They haven’t, but mothballing/not reopening the Kent stops was a cost measure rather than anything else.
Six minutes is neither here nor there. I'm not going to cease travelling by Eurostar if the trains take six minutes longer to stop at Stratford or Ebbsfleet.IIRC the trains now leave St Pancras 6min later (eg xx04 not xx58 for Ebbsfleet), not sure about inbound.
Well, that's what the Ebbsfleet stop cost. I agree it's something and nothing.Six minutes is neither here nor there. I'm not going to cease travelling by Eurostar if the trains take six minutes longer to stop at Stratford or Ebbsfleet.
Have the schedules slowed down slightly more recently? I'm sure that Paris used to be 2h15 but that they're now booked for an extra 5m.IIRC the trains now leave St Pancras 6min later (eg xx04 not xx58 for Ebbsfleet), not sure about inbound.
It's more the impression that is given. You're 3 minutes out of London after joining a queue 90 mins earlier and you're already stopping. "Why couldn't these people travel the 6 mins and queue with me?" they'll ask.I'm not going to cease travelling by Eurostar if the trains take six minutes longer to stop at Stratford or Ebbsfleet.
The idea is to reduce those queues by taking the pressure off of St Pancras.
More fool them. Go to Stratford and skip the queue! To be pedantic, it is six minutes rather than three.It's more the impression that is given. You're 3 minutes out of London after joining a queue 90 mins earlier and you're already stopping. "Why couldn't these people travel the 6 mins and queue with me?" they'll ask.
Where did the slow-down happen? As far as I'm aware the St Pancras-Chunnel section has stayed the same.Have the schedules slowed down slightly more recently? I'm sure that Paris used to be 2h15 but that they're now booked for an extra 5m.
Agreed, there is definitely opportunities to expand capacity furtherHonestly, all they need to do is transform the upper level of St Pancras into an extension of the departure lounge. There's a huge amount of pretty much wasted space between the end of the lines and the exits, and the Betjeman Arms would make an excellent Business Premier lounge. There's also another bar on the other side of the station on the upper level that could act as a second Business Premier lounge. Combine it with transforming the Euston Road entrance into a Business Premier-only entrance, and you've got a substantial increase in capacity without requiring any major changes to the station.
The talk of capacity restraints at St Pancras is simply because of the layout, nothing more. There's definitely space to add at least another train worth of passengers with only minor remodelling required.
Fine for the one or two of sixteen or eighteen coaches that is Business Premier, not so much for the plebs.
Agreed, there is definitely opportunities to expand capacity further
I'm pretty sure London-Brussels used to be 1h52' at some point with a non-stop train. I now see 1h57' for the non-stop trains, so it's basically extra buffer time.The dwell at Ebbsfleet was three or four minutes. I'm not convinced that the journey times have improved since they ceased stopping there.
IIRC Brussels in 1h48 and Paris in 2h13 was advertised when STP first opened. When Amsterdam started, the London-Brussels sector was timetabled at 1h48 but that was when the overall timing was 3h40 or so which no longer exists.I'm pretty sure London-Brussels used to be 1h52' at some point with a non-stop train. I now see 1h57' for the non-stop trains, so it's basically extra buffer time.
You’re slowing to the stop after 3.it is six minutes rather than three.
I was on a London to Amsterdam train early this year that took 1 hour 45 mins to get to Brussels.I'm pretty sure London-Brussels used to be 1h52' at some point with a non-stop train. I now see 1h57' for the non-stop trains, so it's basically extra buffer time.
Presumably one of the trains that doesn't stop in Lille?I was on a London to Amsterdam train early this year that took 1 hour 45 mins to get to Brussels.
Yes it was. Impressive.Presumably one of the trains that doesn't stop in Lille?
The usage vs St Pancras would be negligible and the overhead in staffing it would be enormous.The idea is to reduce those queues by taking the pressure off of St Pancras.
Perhaps in order to run 2tph between Paris and London - in addition to restoring the 1tph Brussels service - within the constraints St Pancras has, one train should run fast, and the other call at all stations (St Pancras, Stratford, Ebbsfleet, Ashford, Calais, Lille, Paris Nord). We just need a pro-European government who favour sustainable transport over helicopters to fund the customs/border staff.
Good luck getting 30+ countries to cooperate and implement a project on the same conditions everywhere, this is one of the issues that got EES so delayed.It is the EU adding friction at the border removing the ability to travel at short notice.
I recieved an email that my trip has changed seat allocation, however, it's the same exact seat map so idk what that's about.I'm not sure if I've been unlucky or these are regular events.