• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Article in Sheffield Star about Pacers

Status
Not open for further replies.

tempests1

Member
Joined
3 Aug 2010
Messages
239
Location
Haslemere
Fair enough, I’ll strike you a deal: I’ll take the thirty class 375/8s for the North West electrification, and you can have the ninety(ish) 142s in exchange (I recognise that Northern don’t have control over all the 142s, with ATW having a sizeable number as well). Then you’ve got a tripled up Pacer formation (six carriages) for every four carriage 375 you’ve lost. Enjoy! ;) :D

Or to give the North the fairer deal, you take the ninety(ish) 142s in exchange for all 97 of the 375s, with electrification for the North west and the Valley lines to make use of them...Similar number of units, but a very different number of carriages and seats... <D

I had a mad vision of a twelve car Pacer on a Peak service from Portsmouth to Waterloo scary!:D
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

sprinterguy

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,572
Location
Macclesfield
I had a mad vision of a twelve car Pacer on a Peak service from Portsmouth to Waterloo scary!:D
Bouncing all the way! I hope you’ve got plenty of continuous welded track down south…The sight of a twelve carriage Pacer formation diving in and out of the rail joints on a nice long section of jointed track would be a sight to behold, with every carriage at a different angle! :lol:
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
32,909
Location
Fenny Stratford
I had a mad vision of a twelve car Pacer on a Peak service from Portsmouth to Waterloo scary!:D

I would pay good money to see that. Can you imagine the response form both the passengers and the government. The units would be withdrawn ASAP and replaced with a £2bn order for 400 new trains! (then sent back to Northern )
 

junglejames

Established Member
Joined
8 Dec 2010
Messages
2,069
Fair enough, I’ll strike you a deal: I’ll take the thirty class 375/8s for the North West electrification, and you can have the ninety(ish) 142s in exchange (I recognise that Northern don’t have control over all the 142s, with ATW having a sizeable number as well). Then you’ve got a tripled up Pacer formation (six carriages) for every four carriage 375 you’ve lost. Enjoy! ;) :D

Or to give the North the fairer deal, you take the ninety(ish) 142s in exchange for all 97 of the 375s, with electrification for the North west and the Valley lines to make use of them...Similar number of units, but a very different number of carriages and seats... <D

Your on. I tell you what. You take all of our 375s, and any shortfall in stock down south will be made up with Mk2s hauled by 47s!!! Oh yeah, the 375s are gone, and i get my own large rake of 47s and mk2s!! Game on :D

Amazingly i dont actually mind the 375s, but they arent a patch on the slamdoors, which i really am starting to miss big style.

We had better strike this deal behind closed doors. Im not worried about the South Easts commuters, but the pacer guys on here really do not want their pacers heading down south. So keep it on the hush hush:lol:
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
I would pay good money to see that. Can you imagine the response form both the passengers and the government. The units would be withdrawn ASAP and replaced with a £2bn order for 400 new trains! (then sent back to Northern )

Brilliant. What a way to solve the stock shortages. Swap pacers for anything down south. Then watch the government replace the pacers with newbuilds, and pacers head back up north. All of a sudden the north sees twice as many trains!!! :D
But i lose the pacers down south :-x
 

northwichcat

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
32,692
Location
Northwich
I had a mad vision of a twelve car Pacer on a Peak service from Portsmouth to Waterloo scary!:D

Did it consist of 4x142s for standard class and 2x144s for first class? (or should I say 4x142s for triple super economy class and 2x142s for double super economy class)
 

BestWestern

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2011
Messages
6,736
Wait a minute. Are you assuming that i said the Northerners had it worse? No, i said us Southerners had it worse. We got rid of our quality slamdoors, and have to put up with 375s.
I reckon we have it worse down here. Id rather a pacer or sprinter turned up into my local station, and not a 375.
Yep, reading your post all through, you definitely have me wrong. I was complaining that the North has it better than the South. Unfortunately our pacer friends here wont let me bring any down to Kent!!

Hey, thats an idea with the pendys though. Turn them round when they get to Watford Junc (afterall, anywhere north of there is up north right?!!!!), and send 87s and Mk2s up from Watford to Brum, Pool, Manc land and Glasgow!! Oh boy, youd never keep me off the WCML! Wouldnt touch Euston, but id be going up and down between Watford and Glasgow everyday!!


I must confess that I thought your comments were sarcastic, so apologies for that! In fairness that vast majority of people would have made those comments though no doubt. I'm not sure I'd rather a Pacer than an Electrostar myself, though obviously the Pacer has more character! Though I think a journey on a Des-Dull-iro makes an Electrostar seem like it has bags of charisma!

To fight my corner in response to some other comments if I may;

There is no equivalent of the Pacer in the South East; the most "spartan" of the fleets - the 455/317/319 families - are more comfortably equipped than their equivalent 150/155/156 fleets - I'm unsure as to how a 455 is more comfortably equipped than any Sprinter set, even after SWT's excellent refurb, particularly a 155/156 which are comfy seated inter-regional sets? I'd also add that Southern have recently acquired a batch of Class 313 units, which are now amongst the very oldest MU's in service anywhere on the network, and which have no toilets (nor does a 455). These make their way as far as Portsmouth Harbour every day, that's a long journey on such an old, spartan train!

I have said before that I don't think it is a North/South thing, so much as a distance from London thing, which is why I agree that Bristol and the West also lose out. - Bristol/Swindon/Reading is prime London commuter territory, with Bristol itself being a major south western centre of trade and commerce in it's own right. If it were indeed based on distance from London, Bristol would have shiny new trains too! Instead, we have the largest fleet of 30 year old HST's running all of the intercity routes, and the same Sprinter fleets which serve many similar northern cities. Here lies an interesting point; when the Thames Valley route gets it's electrification, the 25 year old Class 319's which it will receive will be a backward step from the much more modern Turbo units. New wires, very old trains underneath them. Had this happened further up country, the north/south argument would again have been rolled out, but instead this time we see the south making do with old trains, even where a major project like electrification is concerned. FGW is still waiting on it's second batch of 150/1's, which will arrive once LM - further north than FGW - gets it's new 172 sets. FGW also has 158 sets which came from TPE, who got brand new 185's to replace them.

Our prime "top end" stock - the 185s - are not up to the same standards as the 350/450; and there is no equivalent of the 444/442 - on the subject of 442's, an integral part of their build was the recycling of very old traction gear from units which were several decades older than any Pacer unit!

So, I guess it all depends on your point of view, and which lines exactly you ride over I suppose! Nevertheless, this is always an interesting and very lively debate!
 

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,774
I had a mad vision of a twelve car Pacer on a Peak service from Portsmouth to Waterloo scary!:D
To be the same length as a 12 car 450 (or 377, etc), it'd have to be a 16 carriage formation. Even scarier!
 

ChrisCooper

Established Member
Joined
7 Sep 2005
Messages
1,787
Location
Loughborough
Remember though that 10 years ago the south was moaning about it's massive fleets of "ancient" slam door stock, and the average age of trains down there was much older than in the north. Basically the South had mostly 1960s trains, wheras the North was mostly 80s and 90s trains, so the South moaned. The South then got new trains, and the North now moans about it's 80s and 90s trains. In 20 years time the South will be back to moaning about it's ancient Electrostars and Desrios.
 

DarloRich

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
32,909
Location
Fenny Stratford
but those ancient slammers were MUCH better than the stuff we had! Which is the stuff we STILL have.

It was crap then - it is crap now! - it was crap when it was brand new.
 
Last edited:

Rhydgaled

Established Member
Joined
25 Nov 2010
Messages
4,859
FGW also has 158 sets which came from TPE, who got brand new 185's to replace them.
I should jolly well think so too, 185s are outer-suburban units, completly unsuitable for routes FGW use 158s on, like Cardiff - Portsmouth. However, as the E in TPE stands for Express the 185s probablly aren't suitable for that franchise either.

Our prime "top end" stock - the 185s - are not up to the same standards as the 350/450; and there is no equivalent of the 444/442 - on the subject of 442's, an integral part of their build was the recycling of very old traction gear from units which were several decades older than any Pacer unit!
That goes to show what others have said here, the age of something doesn't necessarily affect it's quality. 442s are decent trains, dispite having old bits (if what you say is true), but Pacer's aren't. Sprinters are decent too, if only because they can provide a fairly fast and (if their seats are specified correctly and they aren't overcrowed) comfortable service while weighing alot less than their modern equivelents.
 

BestWestern

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2011
Messages
6,736
I should jolly well think so too, 185s are outer-suburban units, completly unsuitable for routes FGW use 158s on, like Cardiff - Portsmouth. However, as the E in TPE stands for Express the 185s probablly aren't suitable for that franchise either.

That goes to show what others have said here, the age of something doesn't necessarily affect it's quality. 442s are decent trains, dispite having old bits (if what you say is true), but Pacer's aren't. Sprinters are decent too, if only because they can provide a fairly fast and (if their seats are specified correctly and they aren't overcrowed) comfortable service while weighing alot less than their modern equivelents.


Good point, the 185's are probably less suited to TPE work than the 158's they replaced, save for the obvious gain of being newbuilds. FGW uses its 158's not only on Portsmouth - Cardiff but also on a wide range of other routes, on which they're not really ideal. SWT has its 450's which are also outer-sub configuration, and are used on also unsuitable Portsmouth - Waterloo runs (see previous threads!).

442's most certainly do have recycled traction gear, from the 4REP units I believe, which were particularly powerful having been designed to haul the 'dead' 4TC trailer sets on the Weymouth route. I'm happy for the precise details to be corrected there!
 

junglejames

Established Member
Joined
8 Dec 2010
Messages
2,069
Remember though that 10 years ago the south was moaning about it's massive fleets of "ancient" slam door stock, and the average age of trains down there was much older than in the north. Basically the South had mostly 1960s trains, wheras the North was mostly 80s and 90s trains, so the South moaned. The South then got new trains, and the North now moans about it's 80s and 90s trains. In 20 years time the South will be back to moaning about it's ancient Electrostars and Desrios.

Im already moaning. About our brand new electrostars. Its about time we resurrected these slammers from the scrap heap!
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
but those ancient slammers were MUCH better than the stuff we had! Which is the stuff we STILL have.

It was crap then - it is crap now! - it was crap when it was brand new.

Think on the bright side DarloRich.
We may have had it better down here 10yrs ago when we had the slammers, but you now have it better than us!!! How times have changed! Give me a pacer or sprinter anyday.
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,093
Location
Redcar
Good point, the 185's are probably less suited to TPE work than the 158's they replaced, save for the obvious gain of being newbuilds.

Not sure I would agree with you there. The 185s have several advantages as far as I can see over the 158s. Firstly they are a shade faster which is useful on the ECML (and now of course the WCML), they have much better luggage provision than the 158s (important on an airport based service), they offer more capacity both due to all units being 3 cars and also they are much better to stand on than a 158 owing to better design and more space. But also with their door configuration they are well geared for loading and unloading large numbers of passengers as quickly as possible and with the loadings they get a peak times that is a very important factor. As for them not being 'Express' what do you want? They're 100mph units it's not worth the hassle making them capable of 125mph for a couple of reasons 1) They would only get to use it over short sections of the ECML and would be limited to 110mph on WCML as they lack tilt but most importantly 2) They would lose 1/3 of each outer coach to empty space as passengers aren't allowed to sit in first 1/3 of a outer vehicle.

158s are good units (indeed I'd say some of the best DMUs around) but personally I think the 185s are perfectly suited to the work they do on TPE.
 

Anon Mouse

Established Member
Joined
20 Mar 2011
Messages
1,274
185's have less luggage capacity than a 158. The large space in Coach C with the flip down seats is not a luggage area its the bike space (if thats what you are thinking about). 158's are much more flexible when strengthening services due to corridor connections allowing passengers and staff to circulate through the full train. The 185's are not too bad units, but I don't think they are the best unit for Airport services and certainly not suited for intercity style services.
 

142094

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2009
Messages
8,789
Location
Newcastle
Lack of luggage space on a 185 is frustrating, especially when you think that 95% of trains start or end at one of the UK's largest airports. Many a time I've seen the doors blocked by suitcases, leaving people having to push past to get on or off. A fourth carriage might solve this, although it might be better to take out a couple of seats and fit some more shelves in.
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,093
Location
Redcar
185's have less luggage capacity than a 158.

Did TPE 158s have a different internal layout to Northerns 158s now? Because if they were the same then it seems to me that 185s have more space for luggage (even without the tip down seating area). Also I really should know this seeing as I used to use TPE 158s, but my memory fails as this was before I started paying attention to trains properly.

158's are much more flexible when strengthening services due to corridor connections allowing passengers and staff to circulate through the full train.

Yeah you're right about that, my only real criticism of the 185s is the lack of corridor connections.

certainly not suited for intercity style services.

But how many of their passengers are doing inter-city length journeys? In my experience it seems to be mostly that when a unit in Leeds from Manchester arrives nearly all passengers get off and then a load more get on for onward journeys to Newcastle/Middlesbrough/Scarborough/Hull.

Granted Manchester-Glasgow/Edinburgh is an inter-city service and should have the stock to match, but 185s were not intended to run that service TPE just got lumped with it and has to do the best it can.

Still I feel we're wandering quite spectacularly off topic (even by RailUK standards :lol:) as this thread is supposed to be about Pacers!
 

Anvil1984

Established Member
Joined
28 Aug 2010
Messages
1,513
Bloody hell so off topic I cant see the topic

Anyhoo 158s v 185s

Yes the added speed of 185s can be useful on the long stretches but the 185s do have less luggage capacity than the 158s (with the exception of the Metro 158/9s that Northern have), the Bike space is next to hopeless on a 185 due to the tip up seats / people using it as a luggage space. Also the seats on most 158s seem softer and more comfortable than 185s too but that may be my personal though.

However from what I experience on 185s the Air-con is more reliable and the 1/3 and 2/3door layout is not an issue as it allows a quicker boarding and alighting at places at Leeds where people surround the nearest door (working 158s with the narrow doors its a nightmare at times).

But the 185s are too small and because IIRC the engines in the 185s no longer meet standards they will be tricky to lengthen maybe they need cascaded away to another TOC and repaced with a diesel derivative of the 350/444/450's, 4 or 5 coaches with gangway connectors and SDO for the small platforms too. I know it costs money but a man can dream can't he.

Going back on to topic and the 14xs, the same things can be leveled at them, not enough luggage space (working a weekend Harrogate line service using one of them can be absolutely atrocious once you factor regular passengers, mobility impaired passengers (sorry if that sounds wrong), bicycles, buggies), they are too short, not enough seats on board and atrocious layout (Merseyrail models specifically) with seating and the toilets well I'll not start on them. The 14x have their knockers but have done sterling work in the past however they have been outgrown by the increasing numbers of passengers using them and due to the age they will not as be as strong as when they first left the factory).

But the article writing is shabby, doesnt take into account a regular life of a train is about 30 to 40 years in comparison to buses and they arent that dangerous however if not maintained properly that may be an issue (see recent inicdent at Durham)
 

Rhydgaled

Established Member
Joined
25 Nov 2010
Messages
4,859
Not sure I would agree with you there. The 185s have several advantages as far as I can see over the 158s. Firstly they are a shade faster which is useful on the ECML (and now of course the WCML), they have much better luggage provision than the 158s (important on an airport based service), they offer more capacity both due to all units being 3 cars and also they are much better to stand on than a 158 owing to better design and more space. But also with their door configuration they are well geared for loading and unloading large numbers of passengers as quickly as possible and with the loadings they get a peak times that is a very important factor. As for them not being 'Express' what do you want? They're 100mph units it's not worth the hassle making them capable of 125mph for a couple of reasons 1) They would only get to use it over short sections of the ECML and would be limited to 110mph on WCML as they lack tilt but most importantly 2) They would lose 1/3 of each outer coach to empty space as passengers aren't allowed to sit in first 1/3 of a outer vehicle.

158s are good units (indeed I'd say some of the best DMUs around) but personally I think the 185s are perfectly suited to the work they do on TPE.
I wasn't suggesting giving them a higher top speed. There are (at least) two types of Express, Intercity and regional express. The latter is what I expect TPE to be, meaning 100mph is sufficent. However, it doesn't matter what sort of express you have, a 1/3 2/3 door configuration is wrong, they should have doors like a 158, 5-WES or 175. My brother cares little for public transport, but when he had to go from Cardiff to Nottingham by train (not a 185 of course, but another example of 1/3 2/3 door stock on regional express work) even he noticed this problem, "the doors were in the wrong place" he told me when he got back.
 

YorkshireBear

Established Member
Joined
23 Jul 2010
Messages
9,666
I wasn't suggesting giving them a higher top speed. There are (at least) two types of Express, Intercity and regional express. The latter is what I expect TPE to be, meaning 100mph is sufficent. However, it doesn't matter what sort of express you have, a 1/3 2/3 door configuration is wrong, they should have doors like a 158, 5-WES or 175. My brother cares little for public transport, but when he had to go from Cardiff to Nottingham by train (not a 185 of course, but another example of 1/3 2/3 door stock on regional express work) even he noticed this problem, "the doors were in the wrong place" he told me when he got back.

That may be right but i would not like to stand on p16 at leeds during rush hour with end doors. it would be horrible to watch. For the services it now provides with i think the doors are perfect. They allow maximum unloading and loading and also and i think this is key, give you a bit more space to get bags and luggage off.
 

Anon Mouse

Established Member
Joined
20 Mar 2011
Messages
1,274
Bloody hell so off topic I cant see the topic

Anyhoo 158s v 185s

Yes the added speed of 185s can be useful on the long stretches but the 185s do have less luggage capacity than the 158s (with the exception of the Metro 158/9s that Northern have), the Bike space is next to hopeless on a 185 due to the tip up seats / people using it as a luggage space. Also the seats on most 158s seem softer and more comfortable than 185s too but that may be my personal though.

However from what I experience on 185s the Air-con is more reliable and the 1/3 and 2/3door layout is not an issue as it allows a quicker boarding and alighting at places at Leeds where people surround the nearest door (working 158s with the narrow doors its a nightmare at times).

But the 185s are too small and because IIRC the engines in the 185s no longer meet standards they will be tricky to lengthen maybe they need cascaded away to another TOC and repaced with a diesel derivative of the 350/444/450's, 4 or 5 coaches with gangway connectors and SDO for the small platforms too. I know it costs money but a man can dream can't he.

Going back on to topic and the 14xs, the same things can be leveled at them, not enough luggage space (working a weekend Harrogate line service using one of them can be absolutely atrocious once you factor regular passengers, mobility impaired passengers (sorry if that sounds wrong), bicycles, buggies), they are too short, not enough seats on board and atrocious layout (Merseyrail models specifically) with seating and the toilets well I'll not start on them. The 14x have their knockers but have done sterling work in the past however they have been outgrown by the increasing numbers of passengers using them and due to the age they will not as be as strong as when they first left the factory).

But the article writing is shabby, doesnt take into account a regular life of a train is about 30 to 40 years in comparison to buses and they arent that dangerous however if not maintained properly that may be an issue (see recent inicdent at Durham)

Cheers you have answered all questions directed at me saves me typing it! :D

The aircon sometimes can be a dit dodgy on 185's mind, especially in Winter if an engine is isolated, however this Winter they coped better than the last so I guess TPE and Siemens have done some diagnostics.

Personally I would have the 158's back just for the more comftable standard class seats (1st class seats on 185's are great), the flexibility of corridor connections and the extra storage areas, cubby holes, convertable luggage racks with 2/3 flip downs under them and the ability for the Guard to open windows and control heat and aircon etc
 

Anvil1984

Established Member
Joined
28 Aug 2010
Messages
1,513
However if First Class was taken out I would take a 185 on the York - Blackpool runs anyday (well the bit I use between Leeds and York),

More reliable air-con (ok theres no windows but its better than the 25% chance it works properly on ours).
The plug doors which occasionally refuse to close at Garforth and other places.
3 coaches long (hate having 2 cars on 1641, it is absolute nightmare)
Door layout better for the Leeds crowds as well
Crew door for avoiding said Leeds crowds on 1641 when doing door duties

In favour of 158s,

DKS every door
bigger luggage racks
better (occasionally segregated) cycle / buggy space
opening windows (but not enough) of them

If our 158s were refurbed to the SWT 159 standards then it would be closer in my view (and more windows to open), but either way and to keep this close to topic I would pick both of thes units over a 142
 
Joined
17 Aug 2009
Messages
790
Location
Brigg Line
As much as I dislike them, the pacers aren't that awful once they have had a facelift and proper seats put in.
The worst ones are down in Devon where they still have the old bench style seats.

Some of them are still working in the North , dont know which unit number it was but been bounced around on a 142 nodding donkey from Sheffield Midland - Lincoln last week for 1hr and 10mins on a bench seat was not what I planned :(

It is a shame Northern dont have anymore class 156 sprinters , now they are nice :D
 

Anon Mouse

Established Member
Joined
20 Mar 2011
Messages
1,274
Some of them are still working in the North , dont know which unit number it was but been bounced around on a 142 nodding donkey from Sheffield Midland - Lincoln last week for 1hr and 10mins on a bench seat was not what I planned :(

It is a shame Northern dont have anymore class 156 sprinters , now they are nice :D

Northern have loads of 156's. I was on two of them yesterday!
 

Anvil1984

Established Member
Joined
28 Aug 2010
Messages
1,513
Just not in Yorkshire, likewise with 158s Northern have loads but not in Lancashire (Bar use on Calder Valley sevices to Man Vic or Blackpool). Wish I saw 156s more, 2 years in the job and havent worked one yet and I sign them allegedly
 

RobShipway

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2009
Messages
3,337
To highlight the fact that the SE gets new gear while the North gets old 15th hand crap the south doesnt want or is deemed not suitable for southern commuters. (yet it is ok for Northern commuters!)

IF a 142 turned up on my local line there would be a riot. This is despite it being perfect for Pacers, rural, slow, not that busy (other than peak times) However it feeds into Euston and St Pancras services at either end and is in the south. Result = 153/150 service

There is nothing wrong with a 150 when all you have known is a pacer. Lets do a swap, LM 150/153 for Northerns Pacers!

Where are the new 170 units for Northern? Where are the new 350 type units for Northern?

As has been pointed out earlier, those of us in the South East did until about a decade ago have to use 40 - 45 year old slam door stocks on routes such as Brighton - London. However, as has also been mentioned the most newest stock is for London with some routes such as the Brighton - Seaford route going from being run by Class 377 units to be run by 30 year old Class 313 units as the Class 377 units are being moved to bolster the Brighton - London services, but also to be used to run suburban routes from outer London into Victora/London Bridge.

The issue is not that the South east is getting the newer trains, but the London area is getting the newer trains. Before anyone mentions let me remind you that a 1980's pacer unit is newer than a 1970's class 313 unit.

The main reason I think that London is getting the newer trains is simple, 'The Olympic Games'.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top