Yes, I agree, that's terrible.
Next train on the left, with calling points below. Following trains on the right screen. Job done
Agree. Basically just make it near enough the same as a National Rail one which most people will be familiar with.
It'd be fine to do it by way of "S1 to Reading, S2 to Heathrow" and the likes if calling points were totally consistent and simple but I don't think they are?
As stated these are on trial at a couple of stations to get passenger feedback on which options are best.
Would be nice if they'd also try a more conventional mainline-style layout.
Hopefully the revisions have also addressed some of the long-known gross errors of getting out of kilter with the actual trains running, particularly at times of disruption.
This is absolutely terrible...At Liverpool Street Station. This one shows a different style on the right panel with a scrolling line diagram but larger red crosses for stations not called at.
They are two separate screens, so not sure that would be feasible.
One of them is about the same size as a normal 3 line scrolly one and could use the same format. Other stuff like special notices could go on the other one.
I have never encountered these ones, which I might understand. As discussed here before, I refer to trains in service with passengers inside actually at the platform being shown as "not in service" at every one of their stops in the core, trains mid-core completely missing from the indicators, and such like.That will always from time to time until a train enters the central section, as the CIS is consistently estimating and might get it wrong. Happens on London Underground too and anything with a countdown timer has the potential to have this issue.
I have never encountered these ones, which I might understand. As discussed here before, I refer to trains in service with passengers inside actually at the platform being shown as "not in service" at every one of their stops in the core, trains mid-core completely missing from the indicators, and such like.
The drivers might spot a mismatch on the platform indicators as they enter, and make an announcement, but of course with this novel style of having them over the doors rather than the traditional hung across the platform nobody in the train now gets to see them.


The real issue seems that the train internal information and signalling was done by one supplier, who (fortunately) seemed to know what they were doing, while the public information was done by a different supplier, and the interface between the two seems to have been done by the interns. Actually that is probably unfair, as the departures rubbish displayed last Christmas/New Year, with the special timetables, apparently taxed the key members of the software team, but to no avail.Ah I see. I've personally not see much of that recently compared to previously which might suggest TfL have got to the bottom of that issue. A "not in service" which is actually running sounds like an incorrect cancellation.

As stated these are on trial at a couple of stations to get passenger feedback on which options are best.
| 1 - Heathrow Terminal 4 . | All stations ✅ |
| 2 - Terminates here | |
| 3 - Maidenhead | Not calling at ❌ Acton Main Line, West Ealing and Hanwell . |
| 4 - Heathrow Terminal 5 | All stations ✅ |
I think international travellers who may or may not speak English would find it more reassuring if the airport trains were simply displayed to include the other terminals served plus recognised symbol, but not the ‘(change at…)‘ from this post’s opening photo -
1 - Heathrow Terminal 4 . All stations ✅ 2 - Terminates here 3 - Maidenhead Not calling at ❌ Acton Main Line, West Ealing and Hanwell . 4 - Heathrow Terminal 5 All stations ✅
They are supposed to be an improvement? They're pathetic. You could get a 5 year old to do better.
Where will the station interchange information go or are they removing that completely?
Is the interchange info really needed? You've got the maps and if you've got a station in mind, you probably already know the interchange option(s).
Given what other countries do, seeking to harmonise calling patterns and number the services EL1, EL2 etc with clear maps on display would be the best option. Same with the Met - either all Amershams should be fast, or all trains should call all stations. That is without question the best way to do an urban fast metro.
Then all you need to show is EL1 Heathrow T5, say, and everyone knows (or can easily find) what that means.
Is the interchange info really needed? You've got the maps and if you've got a station in mind, you probably already know the interchange option(s).
My god these are hideous - who is designing these! They are so over complicated. I agree with others, they should just note where the services are NOT calling at. Or the line diagrams should reflect the calling patters in a better way (eg two lines West from Paddington) so everyone knows the Heathrow services are not 'all stations'At Paddington westbound today. Eastbound still shows old style. No more scrolling through the line diagram.View attachment 143679View attachment 143680