• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Battersea Park Upgrade

Status
Not open for further replies.

PGAT

Established Member
Joined
13 Apr 2022
Messages
2,128
Location
Selhurst
I'll link the IanVisits article here:

Battersea Park Station in south London could be set for a significant upgrade, as Wandsworth Council and Network Rail work together to deliver a reconfigured station with step-free access. The station currently has a ground-floor ticket office that leads up to platforms on the second floor through a fairly narrow set of stairs and corridor and lacks step-free access. The narrow and quite steep stairs are also quite inconvenient for everyone else to use. A preferred scheme to upgrade the station was presented to Wandsworth Council in 2021 which would create a second entrance at the other end of the platforms which would then include step-free access. However, that plan is on hold due to costs, and now Network Rail has proposed an alternative cheaper scheme to the council.
The motivation for the station upgrade is partly to provide long overdue step-free access, but also as the station is expected to get busier as the nearby Nine Elms development expands, the station would likely not be able to cope with passenger numbers.

Although the council report doesn’t mention it, there’s the potential for London Overground trains to call at the station more frequently in the future. At the moment, Overground trains call there in the early morning and late evening to maintain access rights, but with more trains expected to use the line, there’s the possibility that Battersea Park Station would become a normal part of the Overground network.

Transport for London (TfL) would likely not want to increase services though unless step-free access is available.

The indicative plans would see a new north-south pedestrian route created along the eastern side of the station, where there’s currently a path giving access to the railway arches from the north side, but is blocked at the southern end.

That newly opened path would then lead to a new station entrance, which would be suggestive of being located in one of the railway arches.

The station has five platforms, and the majority of trains use platforms 3/4, with a handful per day at platforms 4/5 while trains don’t currently use Platform 1. Therefore, the plans would see the stairs to platforms 4 and 5 rebuilt, and then step-free access would be provided to platforms 2/3 and 4/5. Step-free access wouldn’t be provided to the disused platform 1, although the design would safeguard access should it be needed in the future. That would be more likely if the above mentioned increase in London Overground services was to come into use.

The current estimated cost of the station upgrade was put at around £35.6 million (inc contingency). At the moment, Wandsworth Council currently has £17 million to spend on an upgrade for the station, plus around £4 million from the Department for Transport (DfT) Access for All improvements programme, which pays for step-free access upgrades.

According to Wandsworth Council, Network Rail has identified the potential to seek additional funding from its Renewals Budget and from the Access for All improvements programme to help close the gap. However, that would still leave a funding gap, but Network Rail is now working on a revised scheme which would reduce the cost of the project to a point where it can be delivered with the available funds of around £20 million.

That revised plan now needs to be investigated to ensure the expected cost savings are achievable in fact rather than just in theory. That extra work is expected to take until early 2025, and the council says that Network Rail has indicated that it would seek to commence the implementation as soon as practicably possible after the detailed design is complete.

The decision to proceed with the amended scheme is being put to Wandsworth Council’s Transport Committee later this week.

Assuming all goes ahead, then the station would be likely to get a new entrance and step-free access towards the end of 2026.

Is it likely to actually happen? Discuss here
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Basil Jet

On Moderation
Joined
23 Apr 2022
Messages
1,090
Location
London
Would a proper service mean a reduction of one of the other branches, or new stock? I presume they don't have spare stock sitting around waiting just in case, this not being Edinburgh.
 

Sad Sprinter

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2017
Messages
3,186
Location
Way on down South London town
If they run more Overground trains to Battersea Park, may as well go to Victoria and give the poor souls of Peckham and Denmark Hill (more in the case of the latter) a better service to Central London/the West End. They could terminate in platform 8.
 

LUYMun

Established Member
Joined
15 Jul 2018
Messages
1,382
Location
Cancelled
If they run more Overground trains to Battersea Park, may as well go to Victoria and give the poor souls of Peckham and Denmark Hill (more in the case of the latter) a better service to Central London/the West End. They could terminate in platform 8.
The station would need to be double tracked to avoid capacity constraints (reinstating platform 6), not at least shortening the lengthened platform 4...

The passengers at Denmark Hill might as well take the fast Southeastern train to Victoria directly in that case.
 

PGAT

Established Member
Joined
13 Apr 2022
Messages
2,128
Location
Selhurst
The single track at Platform 2 is more than capable of handling 4tph during weekends or diversions so a new platform wouldn’t be necessary
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
23,313
Given the width of the London bound platform, how could a lift be accommodated? The steps take up almost the entire width of the platform.
 

LLivery

Established Member
Joined
13 Jul 2014
Messages
1,715
Location
Southeastern land
Would a proper service mean a reduction of one of the other branches, or new stock? I presume they don't have spare stock sitting around waiting just in case, this not being Edinburgh.

Pretty safe to say they can't reduce the frequency of any branch, especially Sydenham or Clapham. There's 16tph through the core, they are (were?) proposing 2tph extra to Crystal Palace, but they have the fleet that. With Battersea Park, that'd be 22tph. The reliability would be interesting, to say the least.
 

Farigiraf

Member
Joined
23 Jul 2023
Messages
1,177
Location
Bridge on the River Cam
Could Battersea Power Station shopping centre contribute for refurbishment/rebuilding? Might attract some out of London visitors from e.g. Epsom. The OSI to the tube is helpful
 

Sad Sprinter

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2017
Messages
3,186
Location
Way on down South London town
Pretty safe to say they can't reduce the frequency of any branch, especially Sydenham or Clapham. There's 16tph through the core, they are (were?) proposing 2tph extra to Crystal Palace, but they have the fleet that. With Battersea Park, that'd be 22tph. The reliability would be interesting, to say the least.

Does Battersea Park really need the LO? If anything the Victoria to Bexleyheath service should go to the Overground, upped to 4tph and call at Wandsworth Road, Clapham, Brixton and Brockley. If you really wanted to serve Battersea you could reopen the LCDR station at Battersea Park and route Chatham fasts via Stewarts Lane
 

Dr_Paul

Established Member
Joined
3 Sep 2013
Messages
1,545
London Reconnections was a great site back in the day before the Brexit/COVID era. The boundless optimism of these site, and some of the good old commenters, have long gone.
I've not seen London Reconnections for some time, and now my virus-chaser blocks it!
 

LLivery

Established Member
Joined
13 Jul 2014
Messages
1,715
Location
Southeastern land
Does Battersea Park really need the LO? If anything the Victoria to Bexleyheath service should go to the Overground, upped to 4tph and call at Wandsworth Road, Clapham, Brixton and Brockley. If you really wanted to serve Battersea you could reopen the LCDR station at Battersea Park and route Chatham fasts via Stewarts Lane

I can't disagree with that
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,523
Location
Northampton
Pretty safe to say they can't reduce the frequency of any branch, especially Sydenham or Clapham. There's 16tph through the core, they are (were?) proposing 2tph extra to Crystal Palace, but they have the fleet that. With Battersea Park, that'd be 22tph. The reliability would be interesting, to say the least.
20tph through the core max, and even that's pushing the limits of the signalling there.
Does Battersea Park really need the LO? If anything the Victoria to Bexleyheath service should go to the Overground, upped to 4tph and call at Wandsworth Road, Clapham, Brixton and Brockley. If you really wanted to serve Battersea you could reopen the LCDR station at Battersea Park and route Chatham fasts via Stewarts Lane
LO would rather not have Battersea Park, if it can get more space at Clapham Junction, which is where people generally want to go. Any suggestion of transferring individual lines of the SE Metro network to LO is pretty much a non-starter as transferring stock or crew away from SE would leave it very short and make the planning and resourcing of the overall SE network very difficult. Platform 0 at Clapham has been looked at several times and AIUI is still in TfL/LO strategic thinking but as of yet no money has been found for serious works.
 

Sad Sprinter

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2017
Messages
3,186
Location
Way on down South London town
LO would rather not have Battersea Park, if it can get more space at Clapham Junction, which is where people generally want to go. Any suggestion of transferring individual lines of the SE Metro network to LO is pretty much a non-starter as transferring stock or crew away from SE would leave it very short and make the planning and resourcing of the overall SE network very difficult. Platform 0 at Clapham has been looked at several times and AIUI is still in TfL/LO strategic thinking but as of yet no money has been found for serious works.

The whole point of the Overground is to strengthen connectivity in and between the inner suburbs. South London is absolute fertile territory for Overground expansion and should have, in my opinion been where the Overground started instead on the old Silverlink routes. If we can't improve select routes and put them on the tube map to create efficient rail corridors in the Victorian spaghetti of South London's railways then I am left wondering what the point of the Overground is.
 

SynthD

Established Member
Joined
4 Apr 2020
Messages
2,028
Location
UK
If we can't improve select routes and put them on the tube map to create efficient rail corridors in the Victorian spaghetti of South London's railways then I am left wondering what the point of the Overground is.
The South London Line was Victoria to London Bridge, it was given to LO to free up terminal platforms. The Overground is (generally) for creating efficient rail corridors that don't end at major termini.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,523
Location
Northampton
The whole point of the Overground is to strengthen connectivity in and between the inner suburbs. South London is absolute fertile territory for Overground expansion and should have, in my opinion been where the Overground started instead on the old Silverlink routes. If we can't improve select routes and put them on the tube map to create efficient rail corridors in the Victorian spaghetti of South London's railways then I am left wondering what the point of the Overground is.
The point of the overground was to take underutilised orbital corridors and bring them up to the standard London required to fulfill 2 key purposes: Intercept journeys that might take the opportunity to avoid zone 1, and to allow people in previously underserved areas to access London's public transport network by the provision of greater capacity to key interchanges. It's done these things fantastically well and is a model other cities globally are looking at as well as TfL looking at opportunties to expand like the Dudding Hill line.
SE Metro is a radial, not orbital, route and requires a large proportion of it's capacity to carry people into and out of central London. If you were to split out the SE inners from the SE Outer services you would need much stronger segregation of the two networks, which requires things like the Bakerloo Line Extension taking over the Hayes line.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top