If there is an emergency switch off, what happens to the trains that are already in motion?
On DC linesCould you be more specific? Do you mean an emergency switch off of power supply / traction current, on AC or DC lines?
On DC lines
IIRC If they can't get to a platform, I think they would get another train in and get a train to train evac done or wrong line working to get it to a previous Station.Depending on the circumstances, the switch off will be delayed to get trains into platforms
What is the procedure for drivers if traction power is lost?
Assuming you are in motion and signalling allows you to proceed, do you coast for as long as possible? Immediately come to a stop? Something else?
Could be different at other TOC’s but depending on formation and where the Pans are located and their own policy’s but the rule book states for a loss of line light which is what would happen if the power went off;
“If the line light goes out and you have made one attempt to reset, which was not successful, and either of the following applies.
- The only pantograph in use is not on one of the first three vehicles.
- There is more than one pantograph in use on the train.”
“You must
- operate the pantograph down button, if you are driving a train with a pantograph in the raised position
- stop the train immediately
- report the incident to the signaller.”
If you are for example driving a 4 car 387 you which the Pan would either be in the 2nd or 3rd vehicle you can coast to the nearest station providing signals allow, it would also be advisable to contact the signaller while on the move to advise them, this might not be the case at other TOC’s
There are other situations where different rules apply if for example you see someone near the OLE or damage to the OLE
I believe that, all things considered, drivers would to coast in an attempt to reach the next station.Assuming you are in motion and signalling allows you to proceed, do you coast for as long as possible? Immediately come to a stop? Something else?
I believe that, all things considered, drivers would to coast in an attempt to reach the next station.
There was a case a few years back where a driver managed to coast all the way from Bushey to Euston (https://www.standard.co.uk/news/lon...london-euston-after-a-power-cut-a3748781.html).
Depends on the need for the emergency switch off, someone in contact with the live supply then the switch off is immediately that the ECR gets advisedNormally, the signaller will be aware an emergency switch off is going to take place, and usually trains will have been brought to a stand, in stations where possible, before the switch off is taken.
Depending on the circumstances, the switch off will be delayed to get trains into platforms, with wrong direction moves or emergency permissive working if necessary.
And of course there's any number of situations where the breaker might trip without ECR being able to do very much.Depends on the need for the emergency switch off, someone in contact with the live supply then the switch off is immediately that the ECR gets advised
Indeed but they will try and reset it twiceAnd of course there's any number of situations where the breaker might trip without ECR being able to do very much.
Isn’t that potentially rather dangerous for those at/near the cause of the problem?Indeed but they will try and reset it twice
There is a deliberate time delay before realising the breakers to give time for an Emergency callIsn’t that potentially rather dangerous for those at/near the cause of the problem?
What if it doesn't involve railway staff though, maybe at a station or level crossing?There is a deliberate time delay before realising the breakers to give time for an Emergency call
Given that there is no meaningful difference between the fault current and that drawn by a couple of EMUs accelerating hard, it's more likely that a trip is a false positive than an actual danger condition.Isn’t that potentially rather dangerous for those at/near the cause of the problem?
I don't think the public would give that any consideration. And there's a gap in the conductor rail at level crossingsWhat if it doesn't involve railway staff though, maybe at a station or level crossing?
The public are more likely to be less wary and think “well it’s stopped sparking, it must be off now”.
Noting that this is a DC thread, but to be clear for anyone reading this post without that context, it applies to third rail DC but not to 25kV. The higher voltage means a very high current flows through a short circuit, way more than that drawn by several trains in normal operation.Given that there is no meaningful difference between the fault current and that drawn by a couple of EMUs accelerating hard, it's more likely that a trip is a false positive than an actual danger condition.
I may well be misunderstanding the physics but I was thinking if someone fell on the 3rd rail, and when someone might think it’s safe to move them.I don't think the public would give that any consideration. And there's a gap in the conductor rail at level crossings
It’s made very clear to railway staff that you don’t put your own life at risk. You wait until you have confirmation that the third rail (or indeed the OLE) is safe before helping any injured person.I may well be misunderstanding the physics but I was thinking if someone fell on the 3rd rail, and when someone might think it’s safe to move them.
Railway staff who have PTS training. I don't think it's mentioned to othersIt’s made very clear to railway staff that you don’t put your own life at risk. You wait until you have confirmation that the third rail (or indeed the OLE) is safe before helping any injured person.