SuspectUsual
Established Member
- Joined
- 11 Jul 2018
- Messages
- 6,829
There is also all the sites on the industrial site. It makes you wonder if it would work as its a long way to the distribution depots and how many lorries make the trip each day carrying part loads.
So, from the perspective of one retailer....
The Coop deliver to approximately 4,000 stores across the UK, have over a thousand suppliers, over 20,000 different products, and a network of a dozen depots. Their supply chain is very complex, and also (for fresh food) operates on a just in time basis - stock is ordered from suppliers at breakfast time on day 1, is delivered to depots by mid-morning on day 2, and the first despatches are at 2pm on day 2. It has to be like that because the shortest life product only has 4 days life into depot - delaying moving that stock on just causes a massive wastage issue
Any delay causes issues, but inevitably they occur. What this means for fresh is that a delay to the end of intake delays the start of picking, which then puts despatch times at risk. If those deliveries are on the in-house fleet, it gives a degree of ability to roll with the punches and maintain a level of service. When the despatch time is cast in stone, that cannot happen, and it means stores going without stock. That's what happens for the stores where despatch times are dictated by ferry schedules, and adding a rail leg would basically do the same.
If you go to a Coop on one of the Scottish islands you'll see this a lot - the depot in Scotland is most at risk of late deliveries because on average its further from the suppliers' sites (so compressed timings plus more road miles where accidents etc can happen) and those stores are governed by ferry schedules
More generally, distribution networks operate most effectively when there's a single way of working.
Oh, and you haven't explained how your fantasy goods train is going to handle refrigerated and frozen food