• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Fishguard to get 2 hourly service from September

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rhydgaled

Established Member
Joined
25 Nov 2010
Messages
4,859
Little England you say? Pembroke, yes. Tenby, yes. Milford Haven/Haverfordwest, probablly. But Fishguard? I'm not so sure. Yes the coast is slightly more Englishy, but Fishguard is pretty much north of the Landsker.

Not sure what you mean there! There are no stations on the SDL, unless you mean Bynea and Llangennech - and it could be argued that they are more deserving of a fast train to Cardiff than Wolfscastle!
I was refering to the possibility (raised by Railfuture Wales, then the RDS, a while back and mentioned in this thread) of new stations (including a Morriston parkway). And yes, the places you mention are more deserving of a fast service to Cardiff than Wolfscastle, however any more than 1 train per 2 hours on the Fishguard line would be overkill, at least until Milford Haven gets an hourly service, so the only train able to serve Wolfscastle just happens to be the fast to Cardiff (if there was an hourly to Milford, I'd imagine the current fast would not stop, even by request, at Clunderwen or Clarbeston Road).

I'm delighted to hear the news - a Carmarthen to Fishguard shuttle will be sufficient to test the demand for a better service.

Hopefully there will be enough usage to justify an expansion towards the sort of service Rhydgaled would like to see.
Yeah, don't get me wrong, I'm glad something is being done about the present awful service level. It's just that I'm worried that with a service only to Carmarthen the usage might be low and if so the result will likely be the end of the line. The two changes needed to get from north of Fishguard (Cardigan, Newport, Dinas Cross, Lower Fishgaurd) to anywhere beyond Carmarthen might put off alot of potential passengers. Also, if we want those 15min time savings we need to get a regular train service over the district line before the Gowerton re-doubling. It doesn't need to go to Fishguard but, if there's no service then, Network Rail might cut the District Line (I think it is mentioned in the RUS).

Would it take much to re-open Fishguard and Goodwick station, looking at Google Street view, there seems to be the foundations there from the old station.
Wolfscastle might be a difficult one, but Fishguard & Goodwick shouldn't pose too much of a problem. Foundations? The whole building is still there. It is in a bit of a state though, in need of alot of TLC. Still, better than Milford Haven, nothing left at all there. I had an idea a while back to try and get some volunteers together to try and restore the Fishguard & Goodwick structure, but I've no idea how to go about it. There are a couple of shots of the station in my Trains For Fishguard video here.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Greenback

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
9 Aug 2009
Messages
15,268
Location
Llanelli
I was refering to the possibility (raised by Railfuture Wales, then the RDS, a while back and mentioned in this thread) of new stations (including a Morriston parkway). And yes, the places you mention are more deserving of a fast service to Cardiff than Wolfscastle, however any more than 1 train per 2 hours on the Fishguard line would be overkill, at least until Milford Haven gets an hourly service, so the only train able to serve Wolfscastle just happens to be the fast to Cardiff (if there was an hourly to Milford, I'd imagine the current fast would not stop, even by request, at Clunderwen or Clarbeston Road).

Yeah, don't get me wrong, I'm glad something is being done about the present awful service level. It's just that I'm worried that with a service only to Carmarthen the usage might be low and if so the result will likely be the end of the line.

Ah, I've got you now!

The trouble is, if there is going to be a regular service over the SDL, then stations at places like Ynysforgan might be needed in order to justify it. A Morriston Parkway, if built, would serve a large catchement area, and it would be difficult not to have trains stopping there.

But we are getting ahead of ourselves a bit! Much will depend on the timing of the trains, and the conenctions available at Carmarthen. I await more details with interest!
 

Whistler40145

Established Member
Joined
30 Apr 2010
Messages
6,149
Location
Lancashire
Why does Fishguard Harbour need or warrant 2 trains per hour, it's like going to the end of the earth! Nothing there!
 

Rhydgaled

Established Member
Joined
25 Nov 2010
Messages
4,859
Why does Fishguard Harbour need or warrant 2 trains per hour, it's like going to the end of the earth! Nothing there!
Nothing there my foot. Goodwick - poulation 2050, Fishguard - population 3240 (total 5290). North Pembrokeshire is a bit tourist infested in the summer too, would be nice if more of them didn't bring their cars with them.

As for other places the station would serve:
  • Dinas Cross (pop: 500ish)
  • Newport (1000ish)
  • Felindre Farchog 70ish
  • Moylegrove (a bit over 100) (wouldn't have thought they'd be very interested, being off the bus route, but that's where one of the lead petitioners is from)
  • Eglwyswrw (180ish)
These might, if the bus I suggested is provided, be interested in the train from Fishguard to Carmarthen. That brings the total to 7140. If the fast service to Cardiff I suggested is put on instead, at the same every other hour frequency, then you might extend the market to Cardigan (4,200ish) and St Davids (1470ish). Journey time from Cardigan to Carmarthen by direct bus is about the same as via a bus to Fishguard followed by the train. By then the total population is over 12 and a half thousand.
 

merlodlliw

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2009
Messages
5,852
Location
Wrexham/ Denbighshire /Flintshire triangle
Why does Fishguard Harbour need or warrant 2 trains per hour, it's like going to the end of the earth! Nothing there!

1.Its election time.

2.Its a train every two hours.

3.Winter is nine months of the year.

4.To make it work & get figures,like a few other lines,for nine months it will be free travel for locals.Also not a penny is set aside for infrastructure improvements.

The loser in all of this is the Cambrian, delayed ertms has killed off any hope of extra services for years, the pot is now empty plus all ATW stock is spoken for.
Population during the out of season is,Welshpool 6k,Newtown(largest town in Powys) 13k,Caersws 1.5K,Borth under a K, Aberystwyth 25k includes 8 k resident students or thereabouts.The line is in need of extra services , but politics says not, use the bus. So much for the Welshpool dynamic loop.

Bob
 

Pacerpilot

Member
Joined
7 Jun 2010
Messages
347
The other ATW stock will not be able to operate on the Cambrian. Are you really going to be grudge the people of Fishguard some extra services or should they make do with the current services at 1330 and another at ten to two in the morning?
 

merlodlliw

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2009
Messages
5,852
Location
Wrexham/ Denbighshire /Flintshire triangle
The other ATW stock will not be able to operate on the Cambrian. Are you really going to be grudge the people of Fishguard some extra services or should they make do with the current services at 1330 and another at ten to two in the morning?

I never said I was against the idea, any new service is better than lifting the lines, I was just making the point its election time, that's why its announced now

Bob
 

RobShipway

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2009
Messages
3,337
As an outsider to Wales who has visited the Fishguard area a few time by car, I would have loved to have done it by train, however other than maybe the FGW service if it still runs to Fishguard I believe there should be trains from other parts of the country.

However, from memory ther is only one platform at the harbour station in Fishguard so with the number of trains I would think about sending down there you would have to make the line two track and have Fishguard station have about 5 platforms as Portsmouth Harbour does to enable them to terminate there.

I would have at least two trains a day from London Paddington and also 3 trains a day from Manchester that has travelled down to Birmingham and then on down to Fishguard personally.
 

krus_aragon

Established Member
Joined
10 Jun 2009
Messages
6,105
Location
North Wales
4.To make it work & get figures,like a few other lines,for nine months it will be free travel for locals.Also not a penny is set aside for infrastructure improvements.

Not free, but the Fishguard branch is already part of the West Wales railcard scheme for local residents, so there'll be discounted travel for many.
 

Bevan Price

Established Member
Joined
22 Apr 2010
Messages
8,338
I've never had any problem in walking into or out of the harbour station, whether to/from Fishguard or Goodwick.

Is there a bus service between Fishguard Harbour and Fishguard town or Goodwick ? It looks a long walk, especially for anyone with luggage. The success of an experimental service will depend on how many people use it, and that will need short, but reliable connections at Carmarthen to the Swansea line.

Would it be feasible to run Fishguard services as portions of Milford Haven services (attaching / detaching at Clarbeston Road), or of Pembroke Dock services (attaching / detaching at Whitland) ?

(Yes, I know you could not attach a Pacer or 153 to a Class 175, so some changes in dmu diagrams might be needed)

Bevan
 

Pacerpilot

Member
Joined
7 Jun 2010
Messages
347
Whitland is an option. Both platforms are permissive for the purpose of attaching/detaching multiple unit. Some Milford and Pembroke Dock services used to spilt there not so long back.
 

anthony263

Established Member
Joined
19 Aug 2008
Messages
6,892
Location
South Wales
Run the trains to carmarthen to connect with the Pembroke Dock services.

However when the IEP's arrive at FGW maybe 1 of the 5 carriage set's could be extended to Fishguard especially if it pprovides a through service between Fishguard & Swansea, maybe buy extending the daily Carmarthen - London service to start at/run to fishguard
 

Greenback

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
9 Aug 2009
Messages
15,268
Location
Llanelli
As an outsider to Wales who has visited the Fishguard area a few time by car, I would have loved to have done it by train, however other than maybe the FGW service if it still runs to Fishguard I believe there should be trains from other parts of the country.

FGW no longer run to Fishguard.

However, from memory ther is only one platform at the harbour station in Fishguard so with the number of trains I would think about sending down there you would have to make the line two track and have Fishguard station have about 5 platforms as Portsmouth Harbour does to enable them to terminate there.

Ther eis no need for additional track or platforms for five extra trains a day!


I would have at least two trains a day from London Paddington and also 3 trains a day from Manchester that has travelled down to Birmingham and then on down to Fishguard personally.

Why?!

Not free, but the Fishguard branch is already part of the West Wales railcard scheme for local residents, so there'll be discounted travel for many.

Ther emay also be free travel for concessionary pass holders in winter.

Is there a bus service between Fishguard Harbour and Fishguard town or Goodwick ? It looks a long walk, especially for anyone with luggage. The success of an experimental service will depend on how many people use it, and that will need short, but reliable connections at Carmarthen to the Swansea line.

Not sure about the bus services. It's a fairly short walk to Goodwick, Fishguard is further, but only about 15 minutes I'd say.

Connections at Carmarthen will be vital in getting people to use the trains. Hopefully, they will connect into the Manchester services.
 

daikilo

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2010
Messages
1,623
Run the trains to carmarthen to connect with the Pembroke Dock services.

However when the IEP's arrive at FGW maybe 1 of the 5 carriage set's could be extended to Fishguard especially if it pprovides a through service between Fishguard & Swansea, maybe buy extending the daily Carmarthen - London service to start at/run to fishguard

More likely, if and only if it provides ...

That said, improved public transport should improve house values and tourist interest which should improve the local economy which should justify improved transport .. I wish all the best to this attempt at the virtous circle. Much better than rolling over and playing dead, and objectively this may be the last chance not to do so.

p.s. may need a few millions in WDA advertising to kick-start the process though ...
 

Rhydgaled

Established Member
Joined
25 Nov 2010
Messages
4,859
4.To make it work & get figures,like a few other lines,for nine months it will be free travel for locals.Also not a penny is set aside for infrastructure improvements.

The loser in all of this is the Cambrian, delayed ertms has killed off any hope of extra services for years, the pot is now empty plus all ATW stock is spoken for.
Population during the out of season is,Welshpool 6k,Newtown(largest town in Powys) 13k,Caersws 1.5K,Borth under a K, Aberystwyth 25k includes 8 k resident students or thereabouts.The line is in need of extra services , but politics says not, use the bus. So much for the Welshpool dynamic loop.

Bob
Would be supprised if the free travel scheme is to be extended to Pembrokeshire, seeing as they cut back the times of year it was allowed elsewhere. Have you heard anywhere that it will be free?

As an outsider to Wales who has visited the Fishguard area a few time by car, I would have loved to have done it by train, however other than maybe the FGW service if it still runs to Fishguard I believe there should be trains from other parts of the country.

However, from memory ther is only one platform at the harbour station in Fishguard so with the number of trains I would think about sending down there you would have to make the line two track and have Fishguard station have about 5 platforms as Portsmouth Harbour does to enable them to terminate there.

I would have at least two trains a day from London Paddington and also 3 trains a day from Manchester that has travelled down to Birmingham and then on down to Fishguard personally.
That would be a bit excessive. Yes, there is only one platform, but I think you might technically be able to run an hourly service without needing any re-doubling, but it wouldn't be justified until:
  • Aberystwyth, Milford Haven and Tenby (preferablly Pembroke Dock but that would require extra infrastructure) have an hourly service
  • All passenger lines in Wales (plus some presently frieght only ones) have at least a 2-hourly service (excepting the frieght-only ones, I think that's only Heart Of Wales and Conwy Valley)
  • GWML to Swansea electrified and parts (if not all) of the ValleyLines network wired and operated by class 377s

As for destonations, Milford Haven would be a higher piority for restoration of a direct London service, just as it is for an hourly service. FGW no longer go beyond Whitland on the Fishguard route (they turn off for Pembroke Dock, and that's summer Saturdays only). A few years ago (before I moved to Wales I think) they did run both Fishguard's trains, which later slipped to just the night one and eventually (2003 springs to mind, but I'm probablly wrong) they pulled out altogether (I did hear a rumour that they took over 1 night service during the volcanic ash cloud, but I doubt that's true). I'm 99% sure the Manchester trains coming into Pembrokeshire at the moment do not travel through Birmingham.

The idea I'm talking about, running an express to Cardiff with 158s, is itself a comprimise. Originally my plan was to have a 4-car 158 from Portsmouth to Cardiff every hour, with a 2-car set splitting off at Cardiff every other hour and continuing to Fishguard. That would have releived crowding on the Portsmouth - Cardiff and given Whitland, Carmarthen and Llanelli a direct link to Bristol and Portsmouth. I eventually abandoned the idea when I realised the unit wouldn't get back from FGH in the correct hour so it would have to be hourly to Carmarthen and I couldn't find enough 158s. There's only 6 mark2 DBSOs to make up the trains to release 158s, assuming you can put 5 in service a day (1 spare) on the Holyhead - Birmingham (4-car 158s) that's 10 released units, but I doubt there's that many Holyhead - Birmingham diagrams. Even if there were, 10 units probablly isn't enough for all that plus making Aberystwyth hourly (which is more important than saving a change of trains at Cardiff). I hope FGW finish with ATW's 150s soon so that Aber-Y can have hourly.

Run the trains to carmarthen to connect with the Pembroke Dock services.

However when the IEP's arrive at FGW maybe 1 of the 5 carriage set's could be extended to Fishguard especially if it pprovides a through service between Fishguard & Swansea, maybe buy extending the daily Carmarthen - London service to start at/run to fishguard
If you're doing the Fishguard - Carmarthen shuttle then it would probablly be better to connect with the Carmarthen - Manchester train (as that goes to Cardiff as well as Swansea). There's 2 extra platforms at Carmarthen if they are needed (one on the other side of the rather bare island platform and a short bay on the main platform). With my plan however, it would be better to have a two way connection with the Pembroke Dock service, allowing Fishguard passengers to get to Swansea (or Gowerton or intermediate stations like Ferryside) and Pembroke branch passengers to use the fast service to Cardiff. The reverse would be needed in the other direction.

IEP is a pontential problem, with their 26m coaches will they even be able to reach Carmarthen? Certainly I've heard somebody raise concerns about the Pembroke Dock service.

I'm dead against the bi-mode idea too. They are disinsentive for further electrification, and would use more fuel than an Intercity 125 while running under diesel power and at least as much fuel as a diesel loco dragging a plain electric train. The weight of the diesel engines would increase damage to the track and the electricity consumpsion of the train while under the wires, which on our electricity mix is bad for the enviroment. It would throw away the advantage of greater reliability of an electric train.

Dragging an EMU to Pembroke Dock (even assuming it will fit) would be difficult too, you'd either have to run round at Carmarthen or fit the EMU cabs AND the diesel locos with some form of push-pull equipment. I don't think East Coast services need to reverse to reach Aberdeen or Inveness though.

So, IEP might not fit, bi-mode is a bad idea, and Carmarthen is a problem for a dragged EMU. What's my solution? Replace all East Coast's stock with IEP electrics (leave 125s on the Hull and Harrogate if there's no room to attach a dragging diesel) and use the Intercity 225s on London - Swansea. As mark4 rakes already have TDM all you need to do then is fit a few diesel locos with TDM and take the class 91 off the set at Swansea and attach your push-pull capable diesel. Simples... While your at electrifing the line out to Swansea you could fit the 225s with ERTMS and if possible regenerative breaking and you'll have a really energy efficent train (Pendos have regenerative breaking yet use a similar amount of electricity to a 225) with a 140mph top speed.



Edit: On buses, there's a fairly frequent Monday - Friday (and I'm pretty sure also on Saturdays) Fishguard town service from Fishguard Roundabout (libary, and the main bus stop for the town) running to Goodwick (passing close to Fishguard & Goodwick station). Fishguard Harbour station/ferry terminal is served by 2 or 3 buses a day, all around the time of the daytime train (again not Sundays I think). This has the same number as the town service, but runs only between Fishguard Roundabout and the harbour.
 
Last edited:

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
18,058
Location
Reston City Centre
What are passenger numbers like for the ferries? Is this still well patronised (now we have Ryanair etc) or is it more of a historical hangover (that there'd be a big fuss if the token London link were abandoned)?
 

Greenback

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
9 Aug 2009
Messages
15,268
Location
Llanelli
There are still quite a few on the ferries, though it is a far cry from the days in the late 1990's and early 2000's when the bars on board would be packed out!
 

merlodlliw

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2009
Messages
5,852
Location
Wrexham/ Denbighshire /Flintshire triangle
Would be supprised if the free travel scheme is to be extended to Pembrokeshire, seeing as they cut back the times of year it was allowed elsewhere. Have you heard anywhere that it will be free?

Just my opinion after chatting to a local Council Transport Officer who as responsibility for rail, his thoughts were that to get people used to it, the free travel scheme may be used on this line, but bus companies who get less from WAG for free travel would object, on the line to Blaenau from Junction ATW get around treble per mile as compared to bus operators. But I am pretty sure it wont be allowed to carry fresh in the low populated areas this train will cover out of season. I wish the trial well,perhaps Ieuans last branch of the money tree.
I am also sure the branch with two trains a day must have been under the microscope, Sundays early morning train from Fishguard leaves passengers stuck at Swansea for 4.5 hours while awaiting the first rail service to anywhere.

I also note at Holyhead Stenna are taking the HSS out of mothballs due to a big surge in demand,according to yesterdays paper.


Bob
 
Last edited:

anthony263

Established Member
Joined
19 Aug 2008
Messages
6,892
Location
South Wales
Would be supprised if the free travel scheme is to be extended to Pembrokeshire, seeing as they cut back the times of year it was allowed elsewhere. Have you heard anywhere that it will be free?


As for destonations, Milford Haven would be a higher piority for restoration of a direct London service, just as it is for an hourly service. FGW no longer go beyond Whitland on the Fishguard route (they turn off for Pembroke Dock, and that's summer Saturdays only). A few years ago (before I moved to Wales I think) they did run both Fishguard's trains, which later slipped to just the night one and eventually (2003 springs to mind, but I'm probablly wrong) they pulled out altogether (I did hear a rumour that they took over 1 night service during the volcanic ash cloud, but I doubt that's true). I'm 99% sure the Manchester trains coming into Pembrokeshire at the moment do not travel through Birmingham.

IEP is a pontential problem, with their 26m coaches will they even be able to reach Carmarthen? Certainly I've heard somebody raise concerns about the Pembroke Dock service.

I'm dead against the bi-mode idea too. They are disinsentive for further electrification, and would use more fuel than an Intercity 125 while running under diesel power and at least as much fuel as a diesel loco dragging a plain electric train. The weight of the diesel engines would increase damage to the track and the electricity consumpsion of the train while under the wires, which on our electricity mix is bad for the enviroment. It would throw away the advantage of greater reliability of an electric train.

Dragging an EMU to Pembroke Dock (even assuming it will fit) would be difficult too, you'd either have to run round at Carmarthen or fit the EMU cabs AND the diesel locos with some form of push-pull equipment. I don't think East Coast services need to reverse to reach Aberdeen or Inveness though.

So, IEP might not fit, bi-mode is a bad idea, and Carmarthen is a problem for a dragged EMU. What's my solution? Replace all East Coast's stock with IEP electrics (leave 125s on the Hull and Harrogate if there's no room to attach a dragging diesel) and use the Intercity 225s on London - Swansea. As mark4 rakes already have TDM all you need to do then is fit a few diesel locos with TDM and take the class 91 off the set at Swansea and attach your push-pull capable diesel. Simples... While your at electrifing the line out to Swansea you could fit the 225s with ERTMS and if possible regenerative breaking and you'll have a really energy efficent train (Pendos have regenerative breaking yet use a similar amount of electricity to a 225) with a 140mph top speed.

I do have a photo somewhere which shows that the current FGW service to/from carmarthen on weekdays used to start/run to Milford Haven, As for IEP running through to carmarthen it will have to as there is a few people who use the direct link and there would bew a outcry from people if the link were to be withdrawn.
 

Rhydgaled

Established Member
Joined
25 Nov 2010
Messages
4,859
I do have a photo somewhere which shows that the current FGW service to/from carmarthen on weekdays used to start/run to Milford Haven, As for IEP running through to carmarthen it will have to as there is a few people who use the direct link and there would bew a outcry from people if the link were to be withdrawn.

Yeah, notice I said Milford Haven would be a higher piority for restoration of a direct London service, implying that I knew the route had a through HST once. Not sure if it lasted beyond BR into FGW days though. I'd like to know for sure whether the route has sufficent loading guage for 26m coaches. If there isn't room for 26m coaches, that public outcry would be very useful in getting the completly mad bi-mode IEP idea scrapped.

Another thing about bi-mode IEP: it would be 15%-20% more expensive than an existing 2+8 HST over the London to Cardiff route, that could be turned into a saving of around 8% with a straight electric unit. How much does it cost to run an existing 2+8 on that route? I'd like to work out just how much more in money terms that 15%-20% is, enough to extend the Cardiff terminators to Swansea perhaps?
 

anthony263

Established Member
Joined
19 Aug 2008
Messages
6,892
Location
South Wales
personally i do agree that the wire should got to swansea and maybe buy a fleet of IEP for the east coast mainline with some of the class 91 & mk4 trains being transfered to operate the London - south wales services with a class 57 or something being used to haul the trains between Swansea & Carmarthen the trains would have at least 12-15 minutes turn arround at Swansea based on the timetable i have come up with.



I think the IEP would ''just'' be able to get to Carmarthen , no chance of them getting on the Pembroke dock branch particulary because of the curve at Narberth and the tunnel afterwards.

As for your idea of running express services from Carmarthen - Cardiff this would be a problem as there are hardly any spare paths between Bridgend & Cardiff, the option i cam up was to have a express service which stopped @ Morriston & Llandarcy then non stop to Bridgend before stopping @ Pencoed & Pontyclun journey time from Carmarthen - Cardiff would be 90 minutes 15-20 minutes quicker than it takes now.

LLanharren would be served by a hourly Maesteg - Cardiff - Ebbw Vale service which would also service Pencoed & Pontyclun.

To free up some paths i have looked at diverting some of the steel trains to run via the Heart of wales line.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
19,706
To free up some paths i have looked at diverting some of the steel trains to run via the Heart of wales line.

Highly unlikely, it is RA5 and needs special authority to run freight down there. You will also need to lighten the freight tonnage too, max load is 1600 tonnes for a 66 down the HoW, steel trains run at 2000+
 

CNX

Member
Joined
24 Feb 2011
Messages
101
There are still quite a few on the ferries, though it is a far cry from the days in the late 1990's and early 2000's when the bars on board would be packed out!

And that's a far cry from the mid 1970's, when Summer Saturdays produced 2 twelve coach trains from Paddington, one of which also conveyed motorail vehicles. Happy days!

Oh, nearly forgot, one of the regular ferries that operated the route was the Sealink classic SS Avalon. I think the other is currently languishing on a North Wales beach.
 
Last edited:

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
18,058
Location
Reston City Centre
There are still quite a few on the ferries, though it is a far cry from the days in the late 1990's and early 2000's when the bars on board would be packed out!

Cheers.

I've noticed Holyhead and Stranraer becoming more of "a line for locals" rather than "a line for ferry passengers" - presumably the same is true of Harwich too - didn't know whether the numbers justified a Fishguard service still.
 

Rhydgaled

Established Member
Joined
25 Nov 2010
Messages
4,859
personally i do agree that the wire should got to swansea and maybe buy a fleet of IEP for the east coast mainline with some of the class 91 & mk4 trains being transfered to operate the London - south wales services with a class 57 or something being used to haul the trains between Swansea & Carmarthen the trains would have at least 12-15 minutes turn arround at Swansea based on the timetable i have come up with.
I think that's a bit lengthy, provided there are points close enough to the station you should be able to swap locos in 10mins if they have automatic coupling systems (158s can split in less than 5, but they tend to wait around a bit afterwards to let passengers on and off).

I think the IEP would ''just'' be able to get to Carmarthen, no chance of them getting on the Pembroke dock branch particulary because of the curve at Narberth and the tunnel afterwards.
So no IEP to Pembroke Dock confirmed then, another reason to avoid them, think of all those tourists driving to Pembrokeshire or flying abroad instead.

As for your idea of running express services from Carmarthen - Cardiff this would be a problem as there are hardly any spare paths between Bridgend & Cardiff, the option i cam up was to have a express service which stopped @ Morriston & Llandarcy then non stop to Bridgend before stopping @ Pencoed & Pontyclun journey time from Carmarthen - Cardiff would be 90 minutes 15-20 minutes quicker than it takes now.

LLanharren would be served by a hourly Maesteg - Cardiff - Ebbw Vale service which would also service Pencoed & Pontyclun.

To free up some paths i have looked at diverting some of the steel trains to run via the Heart of wales line.

Says here that headways are 6mins. 60 divided by 6 is 10 trains per hour. The document says:
we can identify at least 6 fast (20 minute) and 4 slow (30 minute) all stations or freight paths
between Bridgend and Cardiff

So:
  • 1tph PAD - SWA Express (INTERCITY 225)
  • 1tph PAD - SWA Semi-Fast (IEP EMU)
  • 1tph Manchester - SWA - Milford Haven (175 or 158)
  • 1tph CDF - CMN - FGH via Swansea District Line (158 or 153 pair) (and this would not be used every other hour to start with. In the very long term I'd have a 2nd train per hour which would go on a reopened line to Aberystwyth).
  • 1tph SWA - Cheltenham Spa (class 377) (all-stations)
  • 1tph Maesteg - Ebbw Vale Parkway (class 377) (all-stations) (if you want 2tph to Maesteg you could join the 2nd train with the SWA - Cheltenham service or make it an extension of Vale Of Glamorgan trains.

That leaves 2 fast and 2 slow paths per hour for freight (frieght doesn't call at stations so class 90 hauled freight might be able to use a fast path).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top