• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Nuneham Viaduct shut - Didcot- Oxford

Status
Not open for further replies.

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,602
Location
Northampton
Well, they (the great un-known "They") know what they've done and what they're gonna do, don't they?
'They' could post an explanation on here, then we wouldn't be guessing all the time. That'd be nice, but I suppose it would invite amateur criticism before the event which'd be a nuisance to 'them' I guess.
I'm sure in due course NR will release an explanatory video covering everything.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

AndyPJG

Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
543
My experience of piling was different. The steel tubes, about 400mm diam, had a 'plug' of gravel dropped into them, coming to rest on a slightly coned steel lid, or hat, or foot, or base - it'll have a name, no doubt. Then each pile was craned to the vertical and suspended over the disignated spot, and a big weight dropped down the bore onto the gravel cushion at the bottom. Each drop pulled the tube down into the ground - 200mm per drop at first, gradually reducing drop by drop. The engineer in charge stopped the operation when sucessive drops yielded lesss than a pre-determined amount - about 5mm - that sort of thing. They were then burned off at the appropriate height, a pre-formed re-inforcement 'cage' slid down the bore, then filled with concrete. He had a vibrator attached to the reinforcement cage which ensured the penetration of the mix to the very bottom - where the gravel plug was. The builder then constructed formwork for the re-inforced concrete foundation beams which spanned pile-to-pile, so both the steel tube and it's concrete core both remained.

I don't think they did that here.
That type of pile was a specialty of 'Franki Piling'. A close variation on your description was there was no metal baseplate, but the pile was driven in the same way with the gravel plug drawing the casing downwards to a predetermined depth, but then the casing was held and the gravel plug was driven further and formed a 'bulb' beyond the casing (both outward and downward. The shaft was then filled with reinforcement and concreted, with the concrete compacted by the casing being oscillated vertically as it was removed. This gave good loading capacity with both endbearing by the bulbous end, and skin friction from the shaft concreted against the natural ground.
There were hundreds of these piles installed at Thorpe (M3/M25) interchange in the first half of the 1970s, including many raked at 1:4 to resist thrust from high retaining walls and a pain for me to set out those rakers.
 

LYRobert

Member
Joined
18 Apr 2022
Messages
88
Location
Banbury
That type of pile was a specialty of 'Franki Piling'. A close variation on your description was there was no metal baseplate, but the pile was driven in the same way with the gravel plug drawing the casing downwards to a predetermined depth, but then the casing was held and the gravel plug was driven further and formed a 'bulb' beyond the casing (both outward and downward. The shaft was then filled with reinforcement and concreted, with the concrete compacted by the casing being oscillated vertically as it was removed. This gave good loading capacity with both endbearing by the bulbous end, and skin friction from the shaft concreted against the natural ground.
There were hundreds of these piles installed at Thorpe (M3/M25) interchange in the first half of the 1970s, including many raked at 1:4 to resist thrust from high retaining walls and a pain for me to set out those rakers.
Yes, maybe that's what I witnessed. It's a long time ago (1991), and I'm not sure now about the sequence of events - after all, I was but an innocent by-stander, hanging about after a regular site visit (I was the architect) to watch this rare (for me) procedure.
 

rower40

Member
Joined
1 Jan 2008
Messages
583
Two queries:
How does one pronounce "Nuneham"? (Is it the same as the Cambridge College Newnham?) I've never heard it spoken, only seen it written.
Is the rebuilding still on target for re-opening on Sat 10th June?
 

stuving

Member
Joined
26 Jan 2017
Messages
737
How does one pronounce "Nuneham"? (Is it the same as the Cambridge College Newnham?) I've never heard it spoken, only seen it written.
If you look at newspaper mentions of Nuneham Courtenay, about 1% of them are spelled Newnham. At such a low level you'd probably call that a mistake, rather then a variant spelling. But it does suggest the pronunciation of the two was identical.
 

GrimJosef

Member
Joined
24 Apr 2023
Messages
6
Location
Didcot
It will depend on who is speaking.

I'm not an Oxfordshire native but I've lived within 10 miles of Nuneham Courtenay, as the crow flies, for all but 3 or 4 years out of the last 45. Someone with a strong 'rustic' Oxfordshire accent will say Noo-numb. He will also compliment you on your noo car.

Someone who's lucky enough to live in North Oxford might well say Knew-numb. I've never heard anyone use an audible h in the middle.

Wikipedia says the place was spelt Newenham from the time of Domesday until 1764, and Nuneham thereafter. 1764 was the year that the 1st Earl of Harcourt, who lived in nearby Nuneham House (built 1756) demolished the old village, which was in the way of the plans he had for his estate gardens, and built a brand new one far enough away that he couldn't see it. It seems he altered the spelling of its name too.
 

Nicholas43

Member
Joined
16 Jun 2011
Messages
652
Location
Radley
Today 29 May the contractor is continuing to build up the replacement embankment, using hardcore. Each, frequent, truckload is spread by diggers. At least one layer has been compacted by serious rolling.
I couldn't yet see how the south end of the south span is going to be connected to the Chunky Things which are fixed to the north side of the cills.
 

mr_moo

Member
Joined
7 Sep 2009
Messages
650
Location
Cambridgeshire
More Kudos for Stuart Calvert and the comms team. Doing a great job of keeping everyone informed.
Massive kudos to the engineering team - this is incredible to watch!
 

Nottingham59

Established Member
Joined
10 Dec 2019
Messages
3,339
Location
Nottingham
Update (from last week, 26 May) by Network Rail is here.
On that video, the bridge main truss beams now seem to project beyond the line of the 8 piles that will form the abutment. How did that happen? Last week, it looked like they would need an offset cap to support the main beams.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,602
Location
Northampton
On that video, the bridge main truss beams now seem to project beyond the line of the 8 piles that will form the abutment. How did that happen? Last week, it looked like they would need an offset cap to support the main beams.
It's all in the angles... :lol:
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,602
Location
Northampton
I guess so :D
It was the photo in post #818 that was misleading.
In that photo, it can be seen that the bridge beams project between the piles, and then in the latest updates they can be seen resting on the capping beams between each pair of piles.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,290
I guess so :D
It was the photo in post #818 that was misleading.
If you compare that one with the other 2 photos from the same Twitter post, they’re in #813, you can see it’s the exception, almost certainly because it’s taken on an angle to the vertical. The later photo in #835 also shows an overlap between the centre span, (which is slightly lower), and the centreline of the piles.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Update:

Another report by BBC South’s Paul Clifton on Twitter here:

I’ve grabbed a view from the video, showing the end view across the new piles, now in two rows.

IMG_1285.jpeg
 
Last edited:

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,602
Location
Northampton
I’ve grabbed a view from the video, showing the end view across the new piles, now in two rows.
Do you know if the right-hand line of piles will be cut/driven to the cill beam height or will there be packing between the cill beam and bridge span?
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,290
Do you know if the right-hand line of piles will be cut/driven to the cill beam height or will there be packing between the cill beam and bridge span?
No idea sorry, but it seems logical the latest piles will be cut down at some stage, at least to below ballast depth. Don’t know how they usually deal with the interface along the line of the tracks.
 

Nicholas43

Member
Joined
16 Jun 2011
Messages
652
Location
Radley
I'm puzzled that Network Rail say the span will be 'lowered' to rest on the new abutment. The span looks, to me, as though it's horizontal now (having been jacked up from a pronounced lean).
 
Last edited:

mr_moo

Member
Joined
7 Sep 2009
Messages
650
Location
Cambridgeshire
Stuart Calvert mentioned in the video that they were working on a 50mm gap for the last component, so I wonder if it's 50mm higher than horizonatal currently?
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
8,016
Location
Surrey
If you compare that one with the other 2 photos from the same Twitter post, they’re in #813, you can see it’s the exception, almost certainly because it’s taken on an angle to the vertical. The later photo in #835 also shows an overlap between the centre span, (which is slightly lower), and the centreline of the piles.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Update:

Another report by BBC South’s Paul Clifton on Twitter here:

I’ve grabbed a view from the video, showing the end view across the new piles, now in two rows.

View attachment 136305
Great progress and puts the doomsters firmly in the long grass that the date would be achieved.

Nothing like a crisis to bring out the best in our industry.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
18,602
Location
Northampton
Great progress and puts the doomsters firmly in the long grass that the date would be achieved.

Nothing like a crisis to bring out the best in our industry.
Yes, it will be interesting to see whether they hand it back with full linespeed and no restrictions or if there are still some follow up works to do. Massive credit to the engineers of many varieties who have come up with the idea and then executed it so smoothly (we hope, fingers crossed).
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,854
Yes, it will be interesting to see whether they hand it back with full linespeed and no restrictions or if there are still some follow up works to do. Massive credit to the engineers of many varieties who have come up with the idea and then executed it so smoothly (we hope, fingers crossed).

Id be astonished if there wasn’t a speed restriction, if only for the new track on the approaches.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top