BBC reporting that ASLEF are balloting SWR drivers over the national pay dispute, and that drivers previously weren’t part of the other 14 TOCS striking due to a previous pay deal.
Was this the 3 year deal that was agreed c2019?
Good.
Pretty obviously it's the last option.What's good, BBC doing reporting, or a 3 year deal, or a ballot ?
Not obvious to me why a ballot is preferable to successfully negotiating a good deal without needing a strike threat. Usually better to keep powder dry until the day you need it.Pretty obviously it's the last option.
When are ASLEF expecting an offer from RDG ?
Is that true? Have SWR actually formally offered 0%?The pay offer is a whopping 0% . I don't think there is a need to keep powder dry.
Is that true? Have SWR actually formally offered 0%?
I see.I think the point being made is that, as things stand, the offer is zero!
Although in the specific case of SWR drivers, it's worth noting that they weren't in dispute in 2022-23 or before. They're only in dispute over 2023-24 (or beyond if it continues). This is in contrast to many RMT bargaining units who are still in dispute over last year, the year before that and maybe earlier.With inflation showing no signs of coming down in any significant way, it might be wondered just how many years these disputes will go on for.
So they can't be part of the general national dispute because they're not in dispute over the same thing.Although in the specific case of SWR drivers, it's worth noting that they weren't in dispute in 2022-23 or before. They're only in dispute over 2023-24 (or beyond if it continues). This is in contrast to many RMT bargaining units who are still in dispute over last year, the year before that and maybe earlier.
So they can't be part of the general national dispute because they're not in dispute over the same thing.
Hotheads on both sides will no doubt be hoping for a perpetual dispute to go on for years, while everyone else will be hoping for a quick settlement.
How can they be in dispute over 2021-22 and 2022-23 when they have already accepted a multi year deal covering those years, and which has been fulfilled?They are now.
Jolly good.Nobody I know in ASLEF wants this to go on a second longer than necessary, and nobody wanted the dispute in the first place. We (at my TOC) just want a pay rise for the first time since 2019, because bills do not pay themselves, and no bonfire of Ts and Cs.
I’m not involved but I suspect the SWR ballot will/is being treated differently to the national dispute ….after all they’ve had a massive pay rise from 2019-22. The strike dates may end up being on the same day as the other drivers, but for all intense purposes a separate dispute. HOWEVER - is there apetite amongst drivers to strike even though they’ve received a pay deal when others have not. Also - would senior management regard them as a special case and perhaps not award them any rise for this year! Who knows !
Routine reballot after 6 months. (The mandate is only legal for 6 months so if the dispute drags on there has to be a another ballot). I think this is the second reballot, so third vote in total.I have heard that ASLEF is also balloting once again for strike action at CrossCountry.
How can they be in dispute over 2021-22 and 2022-23 when they have already accepted a multi year deal covering those years, and which has been fulfilled?
HOWEVER - is there apetite amongst drivers to strike even though they’ve received a pay deal when others have not.
You must remember that where the railway is concerned there are three in the bed, unions, management and most importantly, the government.There surely has to be a better way than just eternal conflict between unions and management.
Industrial relations with SWR/SWT drivers have been good for many years, I don’t think there’s been a company wide dispute that has got anywhere close to a strike in the last 20 years.There surely has to be a better way than just eternal conflict between unions and management.