With a coach-based replacement, serving Manchester becomes an option.
ISTR it sometimes did, but then they restored the Clitheroe service which made it awkward. And Manchester to the North Pennines is rather a trek anyway.pity it never ran from Manchester
ISTR it sometimes did, but then they restored the Clitheroe service which made it awkward. And Manchester to the North Pennines is rather a trek anyway.
Clitheroe extensions failed in restoring your railway bids.This came up in the "May 2023 changes" thread but I'm wondering if anyone has ever thought of through services from Manchester to the Settle and Carlisle, by extending an existing Clitheroe service? Obviously there'd be little point on a midweek day in winter, but would there be demand on summer half-year weekends from about now through to the end of September?
It could for example be in the path of an existing Manchester-Clitheroe service which divides there, half returning to Manchester as normal and half continuing up the S&C.
Could be northbound in the morning and southbound in the evening.
They've had Dales Rail for a while, but I wonder whether Manchester (Piccadilly ideally) would be the natural origin for such a service?
If you're doing it, you'd probably want the simplest option of just Manchester-Hellifield or Appleby 1tp2h, with hourly Manchester-Clitheroes in between. I think on summer weekends there'd certainly be a decent market for it.This came up in the "May 2023 changes" thread but I'm wondering if anyone has ever thought of through services from Manchester to the Settle and Carlisle, by extending an existing Clitheroe service? Obviously there'd be little point on a midweek day in winter, but would there be demand on summer half-year weekends from about now through to the end of September?
It could for example be in the path of an existing Manchester-Clitheroe service which divides there, half returning to Manchester as normal and half continuing up the S&C.
I think Victoria is a more obvious origin point - not only does it limit the conflicts at Salford Crescent/Ordsall Lane but it also has platforms facing the right direction - you'd need to start from Man Airport to use Piccadilly 13/14. Also, people using this service are likely to largely come from the Manchester area - Yorkshire passengers are going to use the Leeds/Skipton option and further afield would change at Lancaster for the Little NW.They've had Dales Rail for a while, but I wonder whether Manchester (Piccadilly ideally) would be the natural origin for such a service?
This is one of those proposals that comes up every now and then. Seems like a really good idea, but in reality, no, it probably isn't. The forum regulars on here will be able to outline why.
Every chance it would just be carting fresh air around for much of the year, even if summer Saturdays/Sundays/BH only.
Might just be do-able as a one-off luxury charter train, but that's about it.
There'll be a market, but the question will be is it big enough to justify extra units and drivers, to which the answer is almost certainly not. I'm sure there's some market for it, just no one to justify the faff.My thoughts were based on people living in the Manchester area visiting the Dales, either for a day trip (day walk in the Three Peaks area for example) or long weekend (spending Saturday night away).
I don't know, but I'd have expected there to be a market for this if convenient transport exists. Manchester to the Dales is of course difficult by rail, with a long diversion via Leeds necessary. But I will admit I am not sure.
I was thinking Piccadilly because the connections from the South Manchester area would be better. Need it come from the Airport or could it come into 13/14 ECS? Or off a Buxton or Mid-Cheshire service if the times were right?I think Victoria is a more obvious origin point - not only does it limit the conflicts at Salford Crescent/Ordsall Lane but it also has platforms facing the right direction - you'd need to start from Man Airport to use Piccadilly 13/14. Also, people using this service are likely to largely come from the Manchester area - Yorkshire passengers are going to use the Leeds/Skipton option and further afield would change at Lancaster for the Little NW.
Well in theory it could come off anything but realistically you are not wanting to link it too strongly to anything else because it's got Castlefield and Darwen to negotiate. ECS into the Mayfield Loop and then a quick shunt to 14 might work but you've still got the Castlefield and Ordsall Lane issues. Man Vic is so much easier.I was thinking Piccadilly because the connections from the South Manchester area would be better. Need it come from the Airport or could it come into 13/14 ECS? Or off a Buxton or Mid-Cheshire service if the times were right?
But this was for political reasons and nothing to do with any potential train service.Clitheroe extensions failed in restoring your railway bids.
I would use it from Southport, i.e. beyond the Manchester because the diversion is shorter than going all the way to Leeds. Only having to get to Bolton to join it is reasonable.My thoughts were based on people living in the Manchester area visiting the Dales, either for a day trip (day walk in the Three Peaks area for example) or long weekend (spending Saturday night away).
I don't know, but I'd have expected there to be a market for this if convenient transport exists. Manchester to the Dales is of course difficult by rail, with a long diversion via Leeds necessary. But I will admit I am not sure.
Are you not aware how notorious P13/14 and Castlefield are? An extension of a Clitheroe - Rochdale service means running through Victoria and continuing to Rochdale.I was thinking Piccadilly because the connections from the South Manchester area would be better. Need it come from the Airport or could it come into 13/14 ECS? Or off a Buxton or Mid-Cheshire service if the times were right?
No, RYR was looking at business cases. the Political pressure was to advance as many schemes as possible, so if something failed it really didn't stack up.But this was for political reasons and nothing to do with any potential train service.
This doesn't really compete against the car, and would compare badly against TPE from Manchester to Lancaster and changing onto the local.Rather than running from Manchester all the way to Carlisle, why not run either from Manchester to Morecambe via Hellifield, when Morecambe doesn’t have a direct service to Manchester and there isn’t capacity for one on the WCML,
This service is never going to justify signalling changes. A brand new AB box is going to be next to impossible to justify, because if it's busy enough to spend that money on it's busy enough for TCB, and if it's not busy enough for TCB it won't justify a new AB box.or from Manchester to Hawes, reopening the single track branch line from Garsdale to what is the largest settlement in the vicinity of the Settle - Carlisle line and a hotspot for tourism in the dales, as well being a more convenient place to reverse than Hellifield? Either option would require the opening of a new Absolute Block signal box, but the alterations required would be quite localised and both provide connections further up the Settle - Carlisle.
There already is convenient transport for the vast majority who would want to do this: it’s called a car.My thoughts were based on people living in the Manchester area visiting the Dales, either for a day trip (day walk in the Three Peaks area for example) or long weekend (spending Saturday night away).
I don't know, but I'd have expected there to be a market for this if convenient transport exists. Manchester to the Dales is of course difficult by rail, with a long diversion via Leeds necessary. But I will admit I am not sure.
But this was for political reasons and nothing to do with any potential train service.
That could apply to most of the rail network, except for journeys to, or within, large cities!There already is convenient transport for the vast majority who would want to do this: it’s called a car.
Sounds a good plan.If DalesRail returns next year, which there are murmerings it might, it would carry more passengers if they ran a Manchester portion, yes. They could run 2-car from Blackpool and 2 from Manchester and join them somewhere along the way.
I'm less sold on the need for a frequent service.
To be fair I didn't personally suggest a frequent service, but rather one return trip on summer Saturdays and Sundays only.
So basically DalesRail but maybe Saturday as well? Fair enough.
I wonder if you might get more takeup for DalesRail on a Saturday due to there being better connections onto it from further afield, and due to more people going for days out on Saturdays getting back late than Sundays.
But I do think that to get a decent loading it needs to run through to at least Ribblehead, ideally Carlisle. Dumping people at unstaffed Hellifield for a connection that may or may not turn up isn't going to sell itself, and in my observation didn't.
I wasn't actually thinking of Hellifield as a termination point, but rather Carlisle.
The service would probably need to leave Manchester around 0830-ish to arrive in the Dales around 1000 (? - unsure of exact times) and then onto Carlisle approaching midday. The ideal return time from the Dales would presumably need to be around 1800 or 1900 (remember we're talking about the summer half-year, so it would still be daytime), to give people the chance of a good day out. So it would need to layover most of the day somewhere, or interwork with existing Leeds services. For both options, running through to Carlisle would be easier than terminating at a Dales station with little opportunity to store the unit anywhere (unless it then formed a short back to Leeds, or something).
It would cost more to provide though than the normal service. Through passengers would still use the faster train.How much difference could it make for loadings if Northern offered very cheap fares (much cheaper than the WCML route) for a potential direct Manchester-Carlisle via the S&C? Do you think for a weekends-only service a fare which is £20 cheaper could compensate for the journey taking a couple of hours longer? If it was to cater for people mainly travelling for leisure, as a weekend service would do, then these passengers wouldn't be under the same kind of time pressure as if it was a commuter or business-oriented service.
There is actually no valid walk-up fare that way, as Avanti have made them ROUTE LANCASTER.How much difference could it make for loadings if Northern offered very cheap fares (much cheaper than the WCML route) for a potential direct Manchester-Carlisle via the S&C?
To be fair, all the way to Carlisle was my idea when posting, albeit only with a once a day/weekends only/six months a year service. Terminating short of that would I suspect be fraught with problems and relies on a connection from Leeds turning up.I love the way that these proposals quickly grow arms and legs… all of a sudden the modest proposal (“extend an existing Manchester serve that currently terminates at Clitheroe further north to provide a once-a-day link”) becomes “Direct link from Manchester airport/ Buxton” / “portion working from Blackpool” / “heavily discounted fares” / “extend it all the way to Carlisle” / “frequent trains”… (And all of this on the days when Northern already struggle for staffing)
From what I've seen yes they do, as they do when Northern have their flash sales. Of course this doesn't mean that any service from Manchester would be any more viable than the current "not at all".It would cost more to provide though than the normal service. Through passengers would still use the faster train.
When Northern do their newspaper offer, do the existing Settle & Carlisle trains become noticeably busier?