• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Comedic "things you would ban": minor things that irritate you

Techniquest

Veteran Member
Joined
19 Jun 2005
Messages
21,843
Location
Nowhere Heath
Can we just ban the use of "Crimbo" for Christmas, and "arvo" for afternoon.

Beyond irritating, both of them. <( <(

Absolutely. Arvo is a new word to me, but oh my it is annoying me. It is bizarre how annoyed by it I am!

Whilst we're on Christmas also calling it "the big day". I find this highly irritating.

Yes! Absolutely agreed on this.

I’d ban youtube shorts/tiktok.

Yes! Please do, I'm beyond annoyed with YouTube Shorts, especially when it turned some of my older videos into 'shorts' and completely messed them up! Ugh! TikTok, the sooner that goes into the history books the better. I've never downloaded or used it, and I never will.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Gloster

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Sep 2020
Messages
13,044
Location
Up the creek
People who, when it is raining, hide in the bus shelter and let someone else stand in the rain to wave it down. The moment the bus’ doors open they move across the pavement at the speed of light and jump onboard ahead of anyone else. The worst was a businesswoman-type who pushed past a couple of passengers who were waiting for an old woman to get off and nearly knocked the old woman down; she had to make a grab to stop herself falling. When the driver tried to give the businesswoman a mild telling-off, she just walked away without an apology.
 

Calthrop

Established Member
Joined
6 Dec 2015
Messages
3,689
Absolutely. Arvo is a new word to me, but oh my it is annoying me. It is bizarre how annoyed by it I am!

Ah, it's just our Australian friends -- they have a passion for abbreviating words, and ending the abbreviation with "-o": I find this -- condescendingly and patronisingly -- rather sweet in its unsophisticated way. At times, Australia has had various forms of obligatory military service: which landed up being called "the Nasho" (National Service). Similarly, unemployment relief, bureaucratically termed "Sustenance": which became "the Susso".
 

Techniquest

Veteran Member
Joined
19 Jun 2005
Messages
21,843
Location
Nowhere Heath
Ah, it's just our Australian friends -- they have a passion for abbreviating words, and ending the abbreviation with "-o": I find this -- condescendingly and patronisingly -- rather sweet in its unsophisticated way. At times, Australia has had various forms of obligatory military service: which landed up being called "the Nasho" (National Service). Similarly, unemployment relief, bureaucratically termed "Sustenance": which became "the Susso".

It just seems bizarre to me. I could perhaps understand it in the days of being charged per individual text message on mobile phones, I don't miss that at all. I could definitely understand it on an old fashioned mobile phone, the less button presses to type a text message the better. In the modern world, no I don't get it. Perhaps I'm just getting old!
 

cb a1

Member
Joined
9 Mar 2015
Messages
463
It just seems bizarre to me. I could perhaps understand it in the days of being charged per individual text message on mobile phones, I don't miss that at all. I could definitely understand it on an old fashioned mobile phone, the less button presses to type a text message the better. In the modern world, no I don't get it. Perhaps I'm just getting old!
Don't worry, you're not old till you make fewer button presses :lol:
 

Techniquest

Veteran Member
Joined
19 Jun 2005
Messages
21,843
Location
Nowhere Heath
Middle age? You must be joking! Middle age starts at 50 nowadays....although IMO a lot depends on one's mentality. :smile:

Well I feel middle-aged, by the time I reach 50 I dread to think what I'll be like! Already getting to the point of being clapped out and beyond too much physical work!
 

cb a1

Member
Joined
9 Mar 2015
Messages
463
I hope I'm not misunderstanding that too much, I'm trying to figure out what you mean! I've reached middle-aged and that sucks enough!
It's just a light hearted reference to old pedants like me who tut when people use less rather than fewer.
In general terms if it can be counted use fewer, if it can't be counted use less.
E.g. there were fewer people on the train.
I put less sugar in my coffee.
Key presses can be counted therefore fewer.
 

Techniquest

Veteran Member
Joined
19 Jun 2005
Messages
21,843
Location
Nowhere Heath
It's just a light hearted reference to old pedants like me who tut when people use less rather than fewer.
In general terms if it can be counted use fewer, if it can't be counted use less.
E.g. there were fewer people on the train.
I put less sugar in my coffee.
Key presses can be counted therefore fewer.

OK that makes sense, now I've re-read both my and your posts. An impressive bit of pedantry!
 

adrock1976

Established Member
Joined
10 Dec 2013
Messages
4,450
Location
What's it called? It's called Cumbernauld
It's just a light hearted reference to old pedants like me who tut when people use less rather than fewer.
In general terms if it can be counted use fewer, if it can't be counted use less.
E.g. there were fewer people on the train.
I put less sugar in my coffee.
Key presses can be counted therefore fewer.

How does this fit in with for example, database queries?

You specify "less than" or "greater than" whatever the value if it is numeric.
 

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
9,276
How does this fit in with for example, database queries?

You specify "less than" or "greater than" whatever the value if it is numeric.
Its computers, so my instinct is to blame Americans :D

The misuse of decimate is beginning to really grate - I'm not sure if it due to growing older and grumpier or if it is just being (mis)used more often.
 

DelW

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2015
Messages
6,043
It's just a light hearted reference to old pedants like me who tut when people use less rather than fewer.
In general terms if it can be counted use fewer, if it can't be counted use less.
E.g. there were fewer people on the train.
I put less sugar in my coffee.
Key presses can be counted therefore fewer.
You need one of these:
(Sales listing for a teeshirt with a relevant cartoon)
 

daveo

Member
Joined
13 Dec 2015
Messages
238
Culinary abbreviations that really annoy -
Slaw -
what has cole done to deserve banishment?
Ju - please! Do you mean sauce (or perhaps gravy)?
 

D6130

Established Member
Joined
12 Jan 2021
Messages
9,134
Location
West Yorkshire/Tuscany
Culinary abbreviations that really annoy -
Slaw -
what has cole done to deserve banishment?
Ju - please! Do you mean sauce (or perhaps gravy)?
To which I can add:
Reduction - melted
Shrooms - reduced funghi?

I think that 'ju' is usually spelled 'jus'....certainly by the French. (Culinary pedant alert!) ;)
 

Jimini

Established Member
Joined
8 Oct 2006
Messages
2,176
Location
Reading
The misuse of decimate is beginning to really grate - I'm not sure if it due to growing older and grumpier or if it is just being (mis)used more often.

Yeah that one irks me as well -- however it's now been redefined in the dictionary. Bit disappointing yet not unexpected:

`
verb
past tense: decimated; past participle: decimated
  1. 1.
    kill, destroy, or remove a large proportion of.
    "the inhabitants of the country had been decimated"
    • drastically reduce the strength or effectiveness of (something).
      "public transport has been decimated"
  2. 2.
    HISTORICAL
    kill one in every ten of (a group of people, originally a mutinous Roman legion) as a punishment for the whole group.
    "the man who is to determine whether it be necessary to decimate a large body of mutineers"
 

Gloster

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Sep 2020
Messages
13,044
Location
Up the creek
Alibi. It is word that has a precise and useful meaning: that you were elsewhere when something, usually criminal, occurred. More and more it is used nowadays for any old excuse.
 

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
9,276
Yeah that one irks me as well -- however it's now been redefined in the dictionary. Bit disappointing yet not unexpected:
I refuse to accept that - its just saying how it is misused, that doesn't make it right!
It even has dec in it to refer to ten. It particularly annoys me that it isn't usually applicable, understating events - ie the referred to deaths/damage is way more than 10%.
 

Calthrop

Established Member
Joined
6 Dec 2015
Messages
3,689
You need one of these:
(Sales listing for a teeshirt with a relevant cartoon)

Ah, yes, the dear old Pedants' Revolt -- led by Which Tyler.

Yeah that one irks me as well -- however it's now been redefined in the dictionary. Bit disappointing yet not unexpected:
I refuse to accept that - its just saying how it is misused, that doesn't make it right!
It even has dec in it to refer to ten. It particularly annoys me that it isn't usually applicable, understating events - ie the referred to deaths/damage is way more than 10%.

Perhaps being annoyingly contrarian -- I entertain a certain amount of sympathy for the misuse of "decimate": the "dec = 10 / derivation" factor aside, I reckon that the word somehow looks / sounds more horrific and holocaustic, than just one in ten being killed: people's going with that feeling is unscholarly, but understandable. (I gather that part of the punishment-factor in the old Roman penalty of decimation; was that in the killing of the one man in ten, the legionaries were compelled to slay their own chums -- which must indeed have been nasty for them.)
 

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
9,276
the legionaries were compelled to slay their own chums -- which must indeed have been nasty for them
To maintain the pedantry.....they were slaying a colleague, not necessarily a chum. I'm sure your level of horror would vary depending on which of your colleagues it was ;)
 

Calthrop

Established Member
Joined
6 Dec 2015
Messages
3,689
One does feel that it would be liable to spoil the day to some extent anyway, for those most immediately concerned -- reckon that people don't change very much, through the ages ...
 

Purple Train

Established Member
Joined
16 Jul 2022
Messages
2,478
Location
Exile or exile
Yeah that one irks me as well -- however it's now been redefined in the dictionary. Bit disappointing yet not unexpected:
<(
Are they going to redefine "literally" as "kind of a statement of emphasis"? Or "like" as "a word that you can, like, use wherever you want in the sentence"? Or have they done so already?
It's deeply, deeply annoying. I think I might have to start taking Lynne Truss's advice and wander around the streets in a balaclava, fiercely brandishing cut-out punctuation on a stick, and waving a variety of grammatical placards.
 

D6130

Established Member
Joined
12 Jan 2021
Messages
9,134
Location
West Yorkshire/Tuscany
<(
Are they going to redefine "literally" as "kind of a statement of emphasis"? Or "like" as "a word that you can, like, use wherever you want in the sentence"? Or have they done so already?
It's deeply, deeply annoying. I think I might have to start taking Lynne Truss's advice and wander around the streets in a balaclava, fiercely brandishing cut-out punctuation on a stick, and waving a variety of grammatical placards.
As long as you don't start taking Liz Truss's advice! :lol:
 

Top