Haywain
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 3 Feb 2013
- Messages
- 24,629
Because... politics.Why is this being said *now*?
Because... politics.Why is this being said *now*?
Because... politics.
The wording of the announcement would suggest trains will not be stopping at ManorsDfT has also issued press release about the reopening
![]()
Historic Northumberland Line to reopen next summer
Fully accessible stations are being built to give 6 Northumberland communities regular train services.www.gov.uk
Why is this being said *now*?
It’s possibly getting off topic as speculation, but not calling at Manors would allow the services to use the reversible line as far as Heaton. There seems to have been a presumption here that they’d naturally use P1, but if they didn’t then skipping Manors could make sense to give more pathing options especially in the up direction.The wording of the announcement would suggest trains will not be stopping at Manors
I do like some of the wording, "the line will stop at..." makes it sound like it is all short disconnected sectionsThe wording of the announcement would suggest trains will not be stopping at Manors
I think we can forgive the DfT press officers not being too careful about the differential between a Line (route) and Line (service).I do like some of the wording, "the line will stop at..." makes it sound like it is all short disconnected sections
Why? Nobody would plan to use Manors as in interchange between metro and heavy rail services given the extremely sparse national rail service, you'd use Central for that.Last time I was in Newcastle, a few years ago, I had difficulty finding Manors National Rail station from the Metro station. I knew they were separate stations but expected some signposting.
All lines through Manors are reversible, although generally the platform lines are used as the Up and Down Fasts, with the non-platform side a reversible slow line. However the crossovers at either end of Manors are used for trains to/from Newcastle throat to try and deconflict certain moves.Photos show a third track (with no platform). Is that the reversible line referred to?
Quicker to transfer from National rail to Metro there than carry on into central??Why? Nobody would plan to use Manors as in interchange between metro and heavy rail services given the extremely sparse national rail service, you'd use Central for that.
How many journeys are being made into Newcastle from the north on trains that call at Manors that want the metro and aren't using the buses or driving to a metro station nearer the origin?Quicker to transfer from National rail to Metro there than carry on into central??
For a journey like Tynemouth to Cramlington changing at Manors seems to make sense, rather than change twice to get to Central or go the long way round the loop.Why? Nobody would plan to use Manors as in interchange between metro and heavy rail services given the extremely sparse national rail service, you'd use Central for that.
Yes. Before electrification there were four tracks as far as Heaton, with the slow pair heading off towards Tynemouth. Afterwards they effectively laid it out as primarily an up and down pair for the ECML, and a third line as far as Heaton depot entry. The latter is what I meant by a reversible line. It would allow, for example, a down train from P5 to be crossed to the down line behind an approaching up train beyond Manors, or even beyond the former Heaton Station site.Last time I was in Newcastle, a few years ago, I had difficulty finding Manors National Rail station from the Metro station. I knew they were separate stations but expected some signposting. Perhaps things have improved since then. Photos show a third track (with no platform). Is that the reversible line referred to?
Quicker to transfer from National rail to Metro there than carry on into central??
Manors is only on the St James- Coast line so you can't go to central without either changing again at monument (or walking which is usually quicker given the metro is hardly frequent). If manors had a regular reliable national rail service I'm sure plenty wouldWhy? Nobody would plan to use Manors as in interchange between metro and heavy rail services given the extremely sparse national rail service, you'd use Central for that.
No reason not to have clear signage anyway. It doesn't hurt and is good from an accessibility perspectiveAnyone wanting the Metro for stations on the Yellow Line North of Newcastle will change at Northumberland Park rather than Central and anywhere South of there, changing at Manor's would involve changing trains twice since it's on the St James line.
There's very little logical sense changing there.
It may not hurt but it isn't free. And there's an art to signing something effectively in an urban area that requires time to locate the signs in the optimum positions. Time and experience aren't cheap, so the question becomes who pays? The railway says 'its' outside our boundary' and the council says 'it's being done for the railway, not for us' and so you have the mess British planning always ends up in.No reason not to have clear signage anyway. It doesn't hurt and is good from an accessibility perspective
No reason not to have clear signage anyway. It doesn't hurt and is good from an accessibility perspective
If Network Rail start surveying the line with drones, as they did with the Okehampton line, it is a good omen.point of order: The report does not say Northumberland Line to be re-opened to passengers. It says £10m has been secured for detailed design. That is NOT a commitment to build the line. Yet.
Do you realise you've just replied to a post that's getting on for three years old?If Network Rail start surveying the line with drones, as they did with the Okehampton line, it is a good omen.
Work to reopen the line started last year and construction has stated at many of the station sites, resignalling works have started and a lot of the line is being relaid with Ashington being the most advanced, lots of updates in the excellent newsletter done by the council https://www.northumberlandline.uk/post/newsletter-february and you can take a look at an aerial view of Ashington station under construction here:If Network Rail start surveying the line with drones, as they did with the Okehampton line, it is a good
Even with a solid opportunity like this the government has to drag it out and i do wonder how much it now is shoring up red wall areas anyhow great to see full commitment now made.I was at the TfN meeting in Newcastle today and specifically aaked Jamie Driscoll, metro mayor of the North of Tyne Combined Authority, if the service would stop at Manors. He said it would.
The opening next year was announced but not yet a date. We'll have to wait and see what the final timetable is.
Yeah no arguments about that. Personally I wish they'd shut the thing and use the time sitting there to open a station further North at either Heaton and/or around the Coast Road area. It's a waste of space and in the complete wrong place and both the above are massive residential areas with no form of train/metro.

No, to the best of my knowledge they’ve only ever publicised end to end timings. I don’t think there’s been any mention here yet of a track access application.Is there a provisional timetable available for the Northumberland Line?
A task for Nexus, surely. Incidentally on the journey I referred to I was heading for Chathill, so important not to miss the train!It may not hurt but it isn't free. And there's an art to signing something effectively in an urban area that requires time to locate the signs in the optimum positions. Time and experience aren't cheap, so the question becomes who pays? The railway says 'its' outside our boundary' and the council says 'it's being done for the railway, not for us' and so you have the mess British planning always ends up in.
Nexus don't operate in Northumberland yet* they are the Tyne and Wear transport authority.A task for Nexus, surely. Incidentally on the journey I referred to I was heading for Chathill, so important not to miss the train!