I’ve just read this whole thread, initially I started off intrigued which quickly gave way to morbid fascination, and ended with mild horror. Many people clearly talking a load of old cobblers, and possibly in need of some refresher training.
I genuinely can’t believe some of the things that’ve been posted - the suggestions made by some that systems like auto-stop are terrible, and the number of posters who admit to not using handbrake and prefer to ride their clutch at traffic lights. All utter, utter madness. Sadly it’s only a small minority of posters who I would trust to drive alongside, although I see people using the techniques described above daily, and it genuinely concerns me that so few people bother to take an interest in their driving, prolonging the life of the car or being considerate to others, and ignoring the guidance given in documents like the Highway Code.
And while I’m inadvertently choosing violence by insulting as many earlier posters as possible in this reply (



), I might as well also question the poster who suggested if a car is parked in a car park on ice, it could slide a few feet forwards if not left in gear…shurely the friction (or lack of) on an icy surface is between the rubber and the tarmac, so leaving the car in gear would have absolutely zero impact - it’s not like the wheels are rolling!! And to the poster suggesting not leaving a car in gear might invalidate warranty and insurance, thank you for proving you don’t read your insurance documents. I also have a bridge to sell you…
Given that posters on this forum are often the type of people who like to understand a given topic in lots of detail, and will often spend hours arguing the facts no matter how obscure (look at how many rivet-counting posts there are!), I genuinely expected to read a greater number of more enlightened replies, possibly with a sprinkling of ROSPA / IAM etc members posting and sharing their insight so we can all get some more perspective. I don’t think anyone else mentioned the Highway Code before me…for shame!!!
For what it’s worth (and to make sure I stay on topic!) - when parking I use my handbrake, and don’t leave in gear unless the situation requires it - eg on a steep hill. If on a hill I might also take other precautions as necessary, such as pointing front wheels towards the kerb (ie near side if parked with traffic) and / or using gears. I don’t think anyone else has mentioned using chocks either (for when parking off road, eg on a steep drive). I maintain my brakes and handbrake in good order, and I am confident to rely on them - I live in one of the more hilly parts of the U.K., so proper functioning is even more critical.
At traffic lights, the only answer is it should be *situationally dependant* - I.e. if first in line, pre-selecting gear and making early pre-start checks (especially when city driving) can be sensible whereas if further back in a queue, handbrake on and out of gear - in that order. Very few posters mentioned the dazzling effect of people sitting on brake lights when in stationary traffic - which is expressly mentioned in the Highway Code.
Another point worth making is that by using the handbrake, a driver can use their brake lights while stationary to give additional information / a warning to approaching road users. How often have you been stopped in a queue and seen someone approaching too quickly / not paying attention? Being able to give a couple of quick “flashes” by applying the brakes has certainly helped me to avoid over a dozen potential rear-end collisions over the last 5 years. Perhaps another situation where remaining with a foot on the brakes (with handbrake on) is if you’re at the back of a queue and traffic approaches you from a bend, where they might have less time to react - I will often show my brake light continually until another car arrives behind me, to help them see on their approach that traffic is stationary.
One other quick point. Several people have highlighted that handbrake and / nor gear when stationary could be of benefit / or not if rear ended in stationary traffic. I’ve unfortunately been rear ended in both situations, and can report that even with handbrake on, I was pushed a good 6’ forwards by the impact at about 20-30 mph. But on neither occasion did I hit the vehicle in front, as I’d left enough room in front of me. This is often referred to as being able to see “tyres and tarmac”, and not only provides space at the front in case of being shunted forwards, but also gives some protection in case the car in front rolls backwards, or if you need to manoeuvre (eg to make space for an emergency vehicle, or if the vehicle in front breaks down).
Of course, all of my comments and critiques are meant in a friendly way. If anyone feels hurt or insulted I apologise in advance - but I would also suggest some open minded and honest reflection might be helpful. Nobody is perfect…but a well known phenomenon with car drivers is that almost all will self-assess their abilities as “above average”. This is explained by the Dunning-Kruger effect (lots of info available by google) and I strongly recommend reading if you’re interested in human factors.
As a final thought (and not to be too much of an arsonist on this thread, honest!) this is a rail forum, and so it’s likely that many posters will be used to having regular routine assessments of their driving / workplace activities to make sure training is followed, standards are being maintained, good techniques used and all accomplished in a safe and efficient manner. Perhaps all road users should have some form of mandatory assessment too - imagine the rapid impact on road safety…