• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Could London Underground services be franchised?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

DavyCrocket

Member
Joined
27 Oct 2006
Messages
670
Tbf, the Moderation of Competion was written into the franchise by the DfT, not Virgin

Well Virgin could have accepted the competition. After all Beardie often complains about the regulations in place and is a fan of non regulation. (I'm not a WSMR advocate by the way, just what's been in Private Eye!)
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
So what are LOROL responsible for?! :L

Operation of the trains and stations, revenue collection and protection and employment of staff.
They do also share revenue risk (90/10 to TfL, IIRC) as well as their dosh for running the trains and the likely bonus.
 

Mojo

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
7 Aug 2005
Messages
21,190
Location
0035
So what are LOROL responsible for?! :L
Operating the train service, providing the station staff and train crews, selling tickets, maintaining the trains and stations, service control, CCTV, revenue protection, managing station upgrade projects.
 
Joined
26 Jan 2011
Messages
8
Location
Earlsfield, SW18
Could there be a case to float the Underground on the stock market, so that those who use it become official stakeholders rather than taxpaying contributors? It'd mean the people would have more of a say, if ultimately less of a right to protest, at the way their transport was controlled and operated.

'McGuinness
 

DavyCrocket

Member
Joined
27 Oct 2006
Messages
670
Could there be a case to float the Underground on the stock market, so that those who use it become official stakeholders rather than taxpaying contributors? It'd mean the people would have more of a say, if ultimately less of a right to protest, at the way their transport was controlled and operated.

'McGuinness

Like British Gas, BT, BP and soon the Royal Mail you mean?

The past few years has shown that there is not enough money to be made, therefor the scope for private investment is reduced.
What could work is that HMG could invest in public services and then reap the reward of the improvements through better productivity, more employment, easier access.
 

colchesterken

Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
768
As I see it, all privatision does is add another layer of cost to pay shareholders and chief executivies. look at the shambles we have in gas and electric the increased costs and the profits being made by ther power companies.look at the subicides paid to companies like virgin when all that could be ploughed back in the railways
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top