DarloRich
Veteran Member
absolutely - but i suspect there is precious little profit in local newsI disagree. It's about maximising profit.
absolutely - but i suspect there is precious little profit in local newsI disagree. It's about maximising profit.
The accounts of the papers suggests there is enormous profit to be had hijacking local news sites and filling it with ad supported clickbait. This in turn suggests there is an appetite for local news, else the platforms wouldn't provide the clicks necessary.absolutely - but i suspect there is precious little profit in local news
NewsQuest publications are just as bad.Reach news sites are truly abysmal!
Caution! If you value your sanity and are using a mobile device, don't click on the link to Stoke Live or you'll be stuck there forever while the adverts load. Is there nobody within this organisation who actually checks that their sites actually function properly? Surely you can't raise revenue from advertising if none of it ever appears!
Typical Huddersfield Examiner version. at least once a week there's a "Let's Slag Off A Housing Estate" article. Sometimes it's "Let's Slag Off An Entire Town." Click on the article to find out where. The editor Mr Wayne Ankers, whose name I am not going to make fun of, angrily insists that he doesn't do clickbait.The headline deliberately doesn't tell the story.
When you click on it (as intended) you find out it's nothing to do with the local area.
It used to be a standing joke locally that everything in the Examiner had already been on the Marsden facebook page and had been lifted from there. That no longer happens, possibly because almost all the experienced journalists have left and their replacements don't know where Marsden is.But do we need newspapers to do this? The village where I live has a very active Facebook group which serves the same purpose - all the local events are posted there
The Examiner no longer has a base in Huddersfield, unless you count a particular town centre pub which one of their reporters frequents and about which he posts non-stories ad nauseum.So much is now done remotely, and often without proper editorial oversight things get out of hand more easily.
Private Eye refer to them as Retch plc. A lot of the content and style of another dreadful Reach newspaper, the Daily Express, finds it's way into the Huddersfield Examiner/Yorkshire Live. Not everything produced by Reach is terrible. The Northern Agenda (online newsletter and podcast) has some decent reporting, none of which finds its way into the Examiner even though a lot of it is relevant to the locality.I agree that local online news media is usually dreadful. Worst culprits are within the sweaty mitts of Reach, though it's a dual-edged sword.
The Manchester Mill. I'm a subscriber.There are quite a few upstarts getting going at the moment. One in Liverpool, another in Manchester. I hear they've got the monopoly worried.
Don't get me started on the Huddersfield Examiner. It's an embarrassment to the town. There have been complaints from the business community about the Examiner's negativity towards the town.I used to read huddersfield examiner, then online it became yorkshire live and it is just horrible.
Ah yes, Amanda From The Farm. Don't forget the Rebel Hairdresser, dodgy (and invariably wrong) predictions of the Exact Time some freak weather will arrive, THAT town centre pub and its whingeing landlord, "inflammatory headline designed to start a manufactured culture war argument", someone on twitter "raging" about something on Strictly, some trashy reality TV programme we wish we had never heard of, "everyone is saying the same thing about", a photo of some police tape, some takeaways with bad hygiene ratings, Piers Morgan, Megham Markle whoever she is, Jeremy Clarkson's Oxfordshire Farm and other similar garbage which I have for the time being managed to forget.And that's before we go into the content, articles actually used to be reasonable for a local rag but you can get news from as far as the south coast, every other article is yorkshire farm amanda this and some of the articles are just downright wrong.
I don't understand why funding for local democracy reporters goes to newspapers who have made a conscious decision to abandon local news reporting. Why not give the funding to organisations who want to do local news reporting rather than to those who don't?It's daft we pay so much to the BBC through taxation and nothing to secure truly local media. The Local Democracy Reporting Service funded by the BBC just gives yet more cash to the likes of trinity.
That'll be me in the Bournemouth Echo, a Newsquest rag. As per the OP "popular" is rather over used. I've been banned from the comments section there a number of times for correcting journalistic inaccuracies or downright basic grammar errors. I just re register 10 minutes later.These days the angry people are mostly in the comments asking why the latest piece of social media derived drivel is "news".
If you think the actual content is bad, I can only advise you to stay well away from the below-the-line comments.Reach news sites are truly abysmal!
Any other stereotypically hackneyed newspaper clichéd phrases out there?
Some possible examples...
"Breaking news..."
"Eyewitnesses said..."
"Last ditch efforts..."
"Shrouded in secrecy..."
"Tongues wagging..."
"Hotly contested..."
"Sparked debate..."
"Stinging rebuke..."
Must be any number of others...![]()
"Shoppers/Drivers/Commuters/Parents/Local Mum/Residents/day-trippers left fuming after..."Any other stereotypically hackneyed newspaper clichéd phrases out there?
Some possible examples...
"Breaking news..."
"Eyewitnesses said..."
"Last ditch efforts..."
"Shrouded in secrecy..."
"Tongues wagging..."
"Hotly contested..."
"Sparked debate..."
"Stinging rebuke..."
Must be any number of others...![]()
Yes, my local paper (in the days when it had paper versions a well as on site) referred to me in two separate articles as a boffin!Boffins
What? Last year Reach, which owns the Mirror, Express, and Star in addition to the largest amount of local papers / websites, had a profit of just £2.9m on revenue of £615.8m. The previous year they made a loss of £26.7m. Hardly enormous profits.The accounts of the papers suggests there is enormous profit to be had hijacking local news sites and filling it with ad supported clickbait.
Any other stereotypically hackneyed newspaper clichéd phrases out there?
Some possible examples...
"Breaking news..."
"Eyewitnesses said..."
"Last ditch efforts..."
"Shrouded in secrecy..."
"Tongues wagging..."
"Hotly contested..."
"Sparked debate..."
"Stinging rebuke..."
Must be any number of others...![]()
"Shoppers/Drivers/Commuters/Parents/Local Mum/Residents/day-trippers left fuming after..."
"Much beloved/hated [insert town name] landmark to be ...."
"Police race to ...."
"Hefty fine"
That would make quite a good headline! (By which I mean one which is a faithful representation of a typical local news headline, which I appreciate is a bad definition of "good")I honestly don't get why tabloids use capital letters for every second or third word of a headline.
4) Mark Labbett - aka ‘The Beast’ from the quiz show ‘The Chase’, or anything basically related to ‘The Chase’ in general (Mark Labbett has some kind of link to Tiverton and is married to his cousin, or something like that anyway).
The Bournemouth Echo is sadly my local rag, and to be honest every day they set a new low, last November they referred to Southbourne as Southampton in a headline, to change it hours later:That'll be me in the Bournemouth Echo, a Newsquest rag. As per the OP "popular" is rather over used. I've been banned from the comments section there a number of times for correcting journalistic inaccuracies or downright basic grammar errors. I just re register 10 minutes later.
Meanwhile, the URL says "southampton". Curiously the comments are off on that article, wonder why?"Why independent traders in Southbourne are thriving"
The comments were closed on that article because they universally and brutally took the mickey out of the Echo. I was one of them, got banned for that.The Bournemouth Echo is sadly my local rag, and to be honest every day they set a new low, last November they referred to Southbourne as Southampton in a headline, to change it hours later:
![]()
"It’s a thriving, exciting and full high street at the minute."
COMMUNITY spirit is keeping Southbourne going through difficult times, according to its traders.www.bournemouthecho.co.uk
Meanwhile, the URL says "southampton". Curiously the comments are off on that article, wonder why?
Unsurprisingly, the paper is owned by NewsQuest.
Newsquest, at least, do offer the opportunity to pay a subscription for an almost ad-free website.Well if people no longer want to pay for journalism this is what you get. Some years ago a really good local weekly paper was launched in the West Midlands but closed down after a few months due to low sales. Just have to stick to whatever mutant form the Meaning Evil has turned into.