I agree - this one is relatively simple to implement, though, and it surprises me that all retailers didn't make the effort to support it
It's not really a case of not making the effort, it's a case of priorities. Doing work to upsell an ""innovative"" product (first class without catering) which has been bodged into the fares data for a single TOC who can currently barely run 50% of their timetable has just not made the cut to date. If everyone offered standard premium, it might be a different story.
Right, well, it is still a reason to use another retailer because I want to buy a ticket, not email someone to beg they sell me a bike ticket whenever they get around to it and hope both human and bike tickets I want are still available then.
If you read my original message, you'd see that I noted it wasn't optimal - but it is
something and better than what was available this time last year, which is why I spent the time working on it in the first place - as a precursor to a full implementation. Clearly folks will still find a reason to whine about anything though so I wonder why I bother, sometimes..
It'll be properly integrated into the retail process next year, I'm sure. The biggest blockers to this aren't really technical ones at present.
No need to "beg" the customer services staff to do anything, either, they tend to try to be pretty helpful.
neither would Trainsplit's cherrypicking of able-bodied motorists who drive to stations and only use simple tickets
Ah yes, definitely a deliberate business decision to screw over all the cyclists
