Man of Kent
Member
- Joined
- 5 Jul 2018
- Messages
- 908
No, just Wigan.Is this a 'super' replacing Stagecoach Wigan and Arriva/Rotala's Bolton garages?
No, just Wigan.Is this a 'super' replacing Stagecoach Wigan and Arriva/Rotala's Bolton garages?
Oldham only have 29 E300s. 67406 is in another part of firstgroup.I know you know but to the uninitiated, public sector bids have a 10 day "standstill" period between the award being notified to the lucky recipient(s) and the public announcement of the award. This is to allow any challenges to be raised by the parties involved in the process.
I don't know if they would risk having such information coming out ahead of an award. First Oldham also has a batch of 30 2013 e300s and 4 Eclipses - could be replacements for those.
If they were to have a super depot, not certain that a spot near the centre of Wigan would be the correct location. More like AthertonIs this a 'super' replacing Stagecoach Wigan and Arriva/Rotala's Bolton garages?
I knew it was roughly 30 but hadn't bothered counting themOldham only have 29 E300s 67406 is in another part of firstgroup
So, purely as an example...TfGM are only owning the super depots, winners of the smaller franchises are able to use whatever premises they want.
the Martland Park site is a backup planning application for a temporary depot (which could be expanded to permanent depot) in case Stagecoach refused to sell or lease their depot.
The planning application suggests Martland Park is very much a permanent structure, including a 10 bay workshop.TfGM are only owning the super depots, winners of the smaller franchises are able to use whatever premises they want.
the Martland Park site is a backup planning application for a temporary depot (which could be expanded to permanent depot) in case Stagecoach refused to sell or lease their depot.
Rotala has indicated (in its annual report) that it is willing to sell Bolton depot (at the right price). However, as a larger operator, it is barred from bidding for the smaller franchises, so Eccles' future may well be leased to someone else.So, purely as an example...
If the main Bolton franchise was won by First (!), the likely plan would be to take over their old depot from Rotala. Meanwhile, if Rotala won one of the smaller franchises, they might still be able to use their Eccles depot or even something else?
With regards to the Stockport depot, is it the case that the Daw Bank depot was in the area that was planned to be part of a total redevelopment of that part of the town area?There hasnt been any move to provide a temporary Bolton depot so its likely that issues been settled, the Stockport depot already has the transfer in place and likely others do too.
I'm unfamiliar with the rules of this tender process but seems unfair that they are barred from going for smaller franchises.Rotala has indicated (in its annual report) that it is willing to sell Bolton depot (at the right price). However, as a larger operator, it is barred from bidding for the smaller franchises, so Eccles' future may well be leased to someone else.
It's worth noting that the Bolton large tender includes routes operated by Arriva as well as Diamond (and the First Vantage routes); what I don't know is if it excludes any routes currently run by Diamond. Where tendered journeys are run by a different operator, those have (unsurprisingly) been included in the main franchise.
One of the main initial objections from small operators was that there was the danger of them completely missing out.I'm unfamiliar with the rules of this tender process but seems unfair that they are barred from going for smaller franchises.
You can always put in measures to ensure standalone bids. I did one in 2020 with two locations and they had to be fully independent. Just as well as we won one but not the other!!One of the main initial objections from small operators was that there was the danger of them completely missing out.
If large operators were allowed to bid for small franchises as well as large ones they could easily bid on the basis of package bids thus potentially not allowing the small operators a look-in.
Yes, it's certainly going to be interesting!You can always put in measures to ensure standalone bids. I did one in 2020 with two locations and they had to be fully independent. Just as well as we won one but not the other!!
Anyhow, we'll find out in a week or so and then this thread will explode!
This distinction between large and small franchises could discriminate against operators unable to bid for certain routes.One of the main initial objections from small operators was that there was the danger of them completely missing out.
If large operators were allowed to bid for small franchises as well as large ones they could easily bid on the basis of package bids thus potentially not allowing the small operators a look-in.
Would you like to enlighten me as to what the problem with the Vantage operation is for First and do we know the outcomes of the tender yet?I'm unfamiliar with the rules of this tender process but seems unfair that they are barred from going for smaller franchises.
As it is, First will be relieved to be free of the Vantage problem
They took it on "at a price" - not certain if it's a fixed price contract. Whatever it was, it was regarded as onerous which is why Diamond didn't take it on when they bought Bolton depot.Would you like to enlighten me as to what the problem with the Vantage operation is for First and do we know the outcomes of the tender yet?
The planning application suggests Martland Park is very much a permanent structure, including a 10 bay workshop.
Rotala has indicated (in its annual report) that it is willing to sell Bolton depot (at the right price). However, as a larger operator, it is barred from bidding for the smaller franchises, so Eccles' future may well be leased to someone else.
It's worth noting that the Bolton large tender includes routes operated by Arriva as well as Diamond (and the First Vantage routes); what I don't know is if it excludes any routes currently run by Diamond. Where tendered journeys are run by a different operator, those have (unsurprisingly) been included in the main franchise.
Anyone can bid for anything. There is nothing to stop a small operator bidding for a large one or a large operator bidding for a small one.One of the main initial objections from small operators was that there was the danger of them completely missing out.
If large operators were allowed to bid for small franchises as well as large ones they could easily bid on the basis of package bids thus potentially not allowing the small operators a look-in.
Not what I'd been informed, but thanks for the correction if that is indeed the case.Anyone can bid for anything. There is nothing to stop a small operator bidding for a large one or a large operator bidding for a small one.
Due to be announced on Friday (16th).do we know the outcomes of the tender yet?
Wasn't it that First were tied to the contract and couldn't (cheaply) get out of it?They took it on "at a price" - not certain if it's a fixed price contract. Whatever it was, it was regarded as onerous which is why Diamond didn't take it on when they bought Bolton depot.
Is it not the case that from inception until the advent of the Covid-19 pandemic, the Leigh Guided Busway exceeded the forecasted passenger usage numbers?Wasn't it that First were tied to the contract and couldn't (cheaply) get out of it?
Indeed it did do so.Is it not the case that from inception until the advent of the Covid-19 pandemic, the Leigh Guided Busway exceeded the forecasted passenger usage numbers?
I know it's not a fixed price Gross Cost contract. It may be something like the current Kent Fastrack arrangement, where Arriva run the services commercially in return for exclusive access to the Busways on payment of an access fee.They took it on "at a price" - not certain if it's a fixed price contract. Whatever it was, it was regarded as onerous which is why Diamond didn't take it on when they bought Bolton depot.
Almost like a franchise!I know it's not a fixed price Gross Cost contract. It may be something like the current Kent Fastrack arrangement, where Arriva run the services commercially in return for exclusive access to the Busways on payment of an access fee.
Yes, a proper franchise, unlike the TfGM "franchises" which will really be simple contracts!Almost like a franchise!
Is it not the case that from inception until the advent of the Covid-19 pandemic, the Leigh Guided Busway exceeded the forecasted passenger usage numbers?
Almost like a franchise!
As I say, I don't know the intricacies but First wanted out from Manchester but they couldn't move Vantage on when they exited Bolton.
Definitely not what I heard. They had purchasers for all three depots and did not want to remain in Manchester.Heard the opposite, they kept the Vantage as it was so lucrative.
Agreed. Same as what I heard.Definitely not what I heard. They had purchasers for all three depots and did not want to remain in Manchester.
As Passenger Transport went to press, it was understood that Go-Ahead was poised to be a big winner from the first tranche of tenders to franchise Greater Manchester’s bus network.
Informed sources said the London-based group was set to snap up at least one of the major contracts in the first area to be franchised, covering Wigan, Bolton and parts of Salford.
Go-Ahead’s success will be a bitter blow for its rivals, namely incumbent operators Stagecoach and Rotala, although it has been suggested that Rotala has also picked up some work from the first tranche of contracts.Go-Ahead’s success will be a bitter blow for its rivals, namely incumbent operators Stagecoach and Rotal
The introduction of the first franchised bus services in Wigan, Bolton and Salford is expected to take place on September 17, 2023. Bids for the first contracts were received by Transport for Greater Manchester by September 9, with eight companies bidding for the two large contracts, two companies bidding for all except one of the small franchises, and a further company bidding for one small franchise.
Bidders were informed about whether they had succeeded or not on November 25, with contract awards expected to take place on December 16 following the obligatory standstill period.
The Expression of Interest for the second tranche of contracts, covering the north east of the region was issued in September and will be operational at the end of March 2024. The third tranche, covering the south of Greater Manchester, will be contracted by the end of March 2024 and be operational by January 5, 2025.
Is this the same Go-Ahead organisation who operate in Australia and New Zealand?Does anyone know who the Lonodn Based group is?
Go-Ahead set for GM bus franchise success
www.passengertransport.co.uk
Does anyone know who the Lonodn Based group is?
Go-Ahead set for GM bus franchise success
www.passengertransport.co.uk