• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Future of the Settle to Carlisle, Bentham and Ribble Valley lines

Status
Not open for further replies.

InkyScrolls

On Moderation
Joined
20 Jul 2022
Messages
1,460
Location
North of England
Because if you need to get a train that is 2 hourly from anywhere on the Bentham line to connect at Lancaster onto services that may be half hourly you might not want your day dictated by that.

Just checking google maps its 45 minutes to get to Lancaster by car from Clapham town.

To go by train its 38 minutes, plus a 5 minute drive from Clapham town to Clapham station. Its not far quicker by train. Its marginal at best and the further away you are from your local train station, the less optimal its becomes and because the Bentham line is so poorly situated for its stations with regards to the population it "serves" it suffers.

Due to the frequency of service there is a tiny window in which it is marginally quicker to get the train.
And how long would a bus replacement take?

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Because it's infrequent?
Surely that's an argument to increase the service frequency then, not can the entire line altogether.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Having checked myself, the current bus journey takes over an hour and a half from Clapham to Lancaster - hardly a suitable replacement for the 30 minute train journey.
 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Ken H

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2018
Messages
6,718
Location
N Yorks
Because if you need to get a train that is 2 hourly from anywhere on the Bentham line to connect at Lancaster onto services that may be half hourly you might not want your day dictated by that.

Just checking google maps its 45 minutes to get to Lancaster by car from Clapham town.

To go by train its 38 minutes, plus a 5 minute drive from Clapham town to Clapham station. Its not far quicker by train. Its marginal at best and the further away you are from your local train station, the less optimal its becomes and because the Bentham line is so poorly situated for its stations with regards to the population it "serves" it suffers.

Due to the frequency of service there is a tiny window in which it is marginally quicker to get the train.
Giggleswick station is only 1 mile from Settle. So people could (and do) drive to it. I do sometimes. Clapham is near the rail lines - but serves a massive sparsely populated hinterland. Rename it Keasden then people wont get so hung up on not being near Clapham. Bentham and Wennington are in the settlements.
 

InkyScrolls

On Moderation
Joined
20 Jul 2022
Messages
1,460
Location
North of England
On the subject of skipping stations (i.e. running 'semifast' or 'express'), there isn't really that much of a time saving possible on the S&C - even stopping only at Appleby an Settle en route to Skipton saves a maximum of just twenty minutes, at the expense of losing quite a number of potential passengers.

As for station reopenings, do any other than Culgaith have an active community interest in reopening? Other than Culgaith Scotby appears to be the only settlement of any size to be without a station (the original having closed in 1940), being almost on par with Appleby in terms of population, and with nearly four times as many residents as Langwathby.
 

507020

Established Member
Joined
23 May 2021
Messages
1,983
Location
Southport
On the subject of skipping stations (i.e. running 'semifast' or 'express'), there isn't really that much of a time saving possible on the S&C - even stopping only at Appleby an Settle en route to Skipton saves a maximum of just twenty minutes, at the expense of losing quite a number of potential passengers.

As for station reopenings, do any other than Culgaith have an active community interest in reopening? Other than Culgaith Scotby appears to be the only settlement of any size to be without a station (the original having closed in 1940), being almost on par with Appleby in terms of population, and with nearly four times as many residents as Langwathby.
Is there any progress on the linespeed increase? Even if the ‘fast’ train isn’t that much faster in terms of time, the all stops 158 doesn’t actually have that much capacity for any potential end to end Leeds - Skipton - Carlisle - Glasgow passengers.

When I went on the line, Crosby Garrett seemed far too large of a settlement not to have a station and the line passes right through it, not several miles away as with most of the named stations on what is supposed to have been a long distance main line. Will I get points taken off for mentioning the Hawes branch again?
 

geordieblue

Member
Joined
11 Jan 2020
Messages
789
Location
Leeds
On the subject of skipping stations (i.e. running 'semifast' or 'express'), there isn't really that much of a time saving possible on the S&C - even stopping only at Appleby an Settle en route to Skipton saves a maximum of just twenty minutes, at the expense of losing quite a number of potential passengers.

As for station reopenings, do any other than Culgaith have an active community interest in reopening? Other than Culgaith Scotby appears to be the only settlement of any size to be without a station (the original having closed in 1940), being almost on par with Appleby in terms of population, and with nearly four times as many residents as Langwathby.
Surely Scotby would be far better potentially served on the Tyne Valley line anyway? More trains that could stop there (although the chances of it getting built are pretty tiny I'd wager)
 

wilbers

Member
Joined
10 Mar 2022
Messages
512
Location
Penrith
Is there any progress on the linespeed increase? Even if the ‘fast’ train isn’t that much faster in terms of time, the all stops 158 doesn’t actually have that much capacity for any potential end to end Leeds - Skipton - Carlisle - Glasgow passengers.

When I went on the line, Crosby Garrett seemed far too large of a settlement not to have a station and the line passes right through it, not several miles away as with most of the named stations on what is supposed to have been a long distance main line. Will I get points taken off for mentioning the Hawes branch again?

Crosby Garrett, population c.195 - are you sure you aren't confusing it with somewhere else? I'm less than 25 miles from it, and don't think I've ever been there (unless you count going by it on the train).
 

InkyScrolls

On Moderation
Joined
20 Jul 2022
Messages
1,460
Location
North of England
Crosby Garrett, population c.195 - are you sure you aren't confusing it with somewhere else?
CG is a funny one; from the railway it looks fairly sizeable but the numbers don't support the notion!

Surely Scotby would be far better potentially served on the Tyne Valley line anyway?
Given the location of the village centre, probably, yes, though given the odd service pattern of the Tyne Valley line (compared with the far more regular, if not more frequent, service on the S&C), how well served is open to debate.
 

507020

Established Member
Joined
23 May 2021
Messages
1,983
Location
Southport
Crosby Garrett, population c.195 - are you sure you aren't confusing it with somewhere else? I'm less than 25 miles from it, and don't think I've ever been there (unless you count going by it on the train).
CG is a funny one; from the railway it looks fairly sizeable but the numbers don't support the notion!
It certainly looked too big not to be served. I remember it clearly because while Ribblehead is the longest viaduct on the line, Crosby Garrett is the highest. What exactly is the permanent population of Ribblehead? Crosby Garrett’s must be many orders of magnitude higher and yet Ribblehead warrants a station for what reason exactly?
 

Neptune

Established Member
Joined
29 May 2018
Messages
2,626
Location
Yorkshire
Given the location of the village centre, probably, yes, though given the odd service pattern of the Tyne Valley line (compared with the far more regular, if not more frequent, service on the S&C), how well served is open to debate.
Tyne Valley has 2tph EWD (2Axx to Morpeth, 1Nxx semi fast to Newcastle). Not perfectly clock face I grant you but that hasn’t caused a particular issue anywhere else on the line.
 

InkyScrolls

On Moderation
Joined
20 Jul 2022
Messages
1,460
Location
North of England
Tyne Valley has 2tph EWD (2Axx to Morpeth, 1Nxx semi fast to Newcastle). Not perfectly clock face I grant you but that hasn’t caused a particular issue anywhere else on the line.
Looking through the timetable for the Tyne Valley (a line which I don't know well at all) it appears that there isn't a single service which calls at all stations - there's always at least one which is skipped. Why is that? Is there an operational reason, or is it simply due to historical precedent (viz. the Carlisle - Leeds semifast services)?
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
21,981
Location
Airedale
Looking through the timetable for the Tyne Valley (a line which I don't know well at all) it appears that there isn't a single service which calls at all stations - there's always at least one which is skipped. Why is that? Is there an operational reason, or is it simply due to historical precedent (viz. the Carlisle - Leeds semifast services)?
If you mean West of Hexham, skip-stopping is offpeak only: Bardon Mill is indifferently sited for small communities that are on a good bus route, while Brampton is so far from its town that it used to have a horse-drawn branch line.
The turnrounds at Carlisle are tight, though, which might cause a problem for adding a station at Scotby (though I agree it would make better sense).
 

InkyScrolls

On Moderation
Joined
20 Jul 2022
Messages
1,460
Location
North of England
If you mean West of Hexham, skip-stopping is offpeak only: Bardon Mill is indifferently sited for small communities that are on a good bus route, while Brampton is so far from its town that it used to have a horse-drawn branch line.
The turnrounds at Carlisle are tight, though, which might cause a problem for adding a station at Scotby (though I agree it would make better sense).
That's interesting, thank you - as I say, my knowledge of the line is limited. Is there a case for closing one of the lesser-used stations (Bardon Mill, say) and essentially replacing it with one at Scotby?
 

70014IronDuke

Established Member
Joined
13 Jun 2015
Messages
4,089
...
As for station reopenings, do any other than Culgaith have an active community interest in reopening? Other than Culgaith. Scotby appears to be the only settlement of any size to be without a station (the original having closed in 1940), being almost on par with Appleby in terms of population, and with nearly four times as many residents as Langwathby.
Uh? According to Wikipedia, Scotby has a population of 2366 (in 2018).

Appleby has a popn of 3048 (2011 census). That's roughly 700 down, or c 23% fewer on Appleby.

And even if it were the same population, the vast majority of traffic from any Scotby station would be into Carlisle. Distance? Approx 2 miles. That's nowt.

At least some - 20%? - of Appleby's pre-Covid passenger usage of c 60,000 per annum will have been to Leeds, Bradford or beyond. Far more valuable passengers. (Yes, I know the S&C is subsidised, but these still count.)

More to the present: How have passenger numbers been affected by the cancellation of through trains because of the derailment at Petril Bridge Jcn?

And what about Settle? Those very precious passengers have lost the 07.30 into Leeds. This is a disaster, surely, for Settle commuters? This has to be THE key train of the day on the entire line, and it's been nixed while the line is sorted out at Pettril Bridge.
 

InkyScrolls

On Moderation
Joined
20 Jul 2022
Messages
1,460
Location
North of England
It certainly looked too big not to be served. I remember it clearly because while Ribblehead is the longest viaduct on the line, Crosby Garrett is the highest. What exactly is the permanent population of Ribblehead? Crosby Garrett’s must be many orders of magnitude higher and yet Ribblehead warrants a station for what reason exactly?
Permanent population of RHD is two - the owners of the pub. The station is there purely for the benefit of walkers (and the pub!).

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Uh? According to Wikipedia, Scotby has a population of 2366 (in 2018).

Appleby has a popn of 3048 (2011 census). That's roughly 700 down, or c 23% fewer on Appleby.

And even if it were the same population, the vast majority of traffic from any Scotby station would be into Carlisle. Distance? Approx 2 miles. That's nowt.

At least some - 20%? - of Appleby's pre-Covid passenger usage of c 60,000 per annum will have been to Leeds, Bradford or beyond. Far more valuable passengers. (Yes, I know the S&C is subsidised, but these still count.)

More to the present: How have passenger numbers been affected by the cancellation of through trains because of the derailment at Petril Bridge Jcn?

And what about Settle? Those very precious passengers have lost the 07.30 into Leeds. This is a disaster, surely, for Settle commuters? This has to be THE key train of the day on the entire line, and it's been nixed while the line is sorted out at Pettril Bridge.
I'll reply to your points in order.

I think my data was out of date for Appleby; it's larger than my figures suggested! Even so Scotby is easily among the larger settlements along the S&C.

Two miles is too far for most people to walk (these days at least); are you suggesting that any station within two miles of its prime destination is pointless? How far does it have to be to be worthy?

Regarding passengers to Leeds, I'm not sure what your point is.

Passenger numbers are lower at the moment but not as low as you might expect (based on my own experience of working the line).

As for the 0730 from Settle - it's unfortunate but a necessary consequence of the lack of ability for Carlisle crews and units to head south.
 
Last edited:

InkyScrolls

On Moderation
Joined
20 Jul 2022
Messages
1,460
Location
North of England
So? Pick a nice day and lots get off/on there. All paying real money.
That's the point I'm making - the local population may be negligible but Ribblehead must pay for itself many times over.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Is there any progress on the linespeed increase? Even if the ‘fast’ train isn’t that much faster in terms of time, the all stops 158 doesn’t actually have that much capacity for any potential end to end Leeds - Skipton - Carlisle - Glasgow passengers.
Not yet, no, and I suspect there never will be now the coffers are bare. As for skipping stops, twenty minutes saved in a four hour journey isn't arguably worth it! Unless as you say capacity is the main issue (which given the Adlestropian nature of the line outside the summer season seems unlikely).
 
Last edited:

507020

Established Member
Joined
23 May 2021
Messages
1,983
Location
Southport
Permanent population of RHD is two - the owners of the pub. The station is there purely for the benefit of walkers (and the pub!).
So Crosby Garrett has a population of almost 100x that of Ribblehead and is unserved? Are there any other lines which see such a disparity?
As for the 0730 from Settle - it's unfortunate but a necessary consequence of the lack of ability for Carlisle crews and units to head south.
So there are no units or crews in Leeds or Skipton who can run the service?
And on the not nice days real money still has to be paid to keep the station open....
It was actually raining when I went there and it didn’t affect my enjoyment of the day. The trains were a bit crowded though.
Not yet, no, and I suspect there never will be now the coffers are bare. As for skipping stops, twenty minutes saved in a four hour journey isn't arguably worth it! Unless as you say capacity is the main issue (which given the Adlestropian nature of the line outside the summer season seems unlikely).
This is a section of the Midland Main Line we’re talking about though. It is no different in nature to the section south of Kettering and should be treated as such. Leeds - Skipton - Carlisle - Glasgow traffic could make good use of the line without taking up capacity on the ECML or east-west routes.

I am genuinely unhappy about the lack of a west side Manchester - Hellifield service though, as it is a bit ridiculous to have to travel all the way over to Leeds from here to be able to reach the line.
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
21,981
Location
Airedale
As for the 0730 from Settle - it's unfortunate but a necessary consequence of the lack of ability for Carlisle crews and units to head south.
To my pleasant surprise (as the forum seems to have missed this), they have the choice of an RRB to Long Preston at 0720 or an additional train which starts from Appleby at 0725 (off the first down).

They are also now running an almost complete service including RRBs Appleby - Carlisle.

I realise NR/the FOC are paying but...
 

InkyScrolls

On Moderation
Joined
20 Jul 2022
Messages
1,460
Location
North of England
To my pleasant surprise (as the forum seems to have missed this), they have the choice of an RRB to Long Preston at 0720 or an additional train which starts from Appleby at 0725 (off the first down).

They are also now running an almost complete service including RRBs Appleby - Carlisle.

I realise NR/the FOC are paying but...
I've been impressed at the level of RRBs which have been provided - every service to or from Appleby is met by two coaches, one express from Carlisle and the other 'all stops', even the final services of the day (which are very poorly patronised indeed).

A look at RTT suggests the Tyne Valley line has fared similarly.
 

InkyScrolls

On Moderation
Joined
20 Jul 2022
Messages
1,460
Location
North of England
So Crosby Garrett has a population of almost 100x that of Ribblehead and is unserved? Are there any other lines which see such a disparity?

So there are no units or crews in Leeds or Skipton who can run the service?

It was actually raining when I went there and it didn’t affect my enjoyment of the day. The trains were a bit crowded though.

This is a section of the Midland Main Line we’re talking about though. It is no different in nature to the section south of Kettering and should be treated as such. Leeds - Skipton - Carlisle - Glasgow traffic could make good use of the line without taking up capacity on the ECML or east-west routes.

I am genuinely unhappy about the lack of a west side Manchester - Hellifield service though, as it is a bit ridiculous to have to travel all the way over to Leeds from here to be able to reach the line.
The question is whether CG would provide an adequate business case on its own - RHD only exists because the railway can make money off it.

At present units and crew are generally forming the previous return service from Appleby from what they usually would, which means some of them inevitably have to be retimed. You may not be aware but paths between Skipton and Leeds are rarer than rocking horse pats.

I would argue the S&C is quite different from the southern half of the Midland Mainline - Appleby is the only sizeable settlement en route, and even then is barely more than a large village. However I agree more could be made of it in terms of through traffic, especially if the linespeed upgrades ever come to fruition. Leeds to Glasgow over a 75 mph S&C would be roughly an hour faster than the current direct service.

As for services from Clitheroe and beyond, how much of a business case is there? Surely the number of people wishing to travel from Manchester to the S&C is quite small?
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,413
Location
Yorks
I'm not convinced by the argument that the S&C and surrounding countryside is a big tourist draw across the country "except in greater Manchester where they only go to the Peak district instead".

I would have thought some connecting services at the Hellifield end would be worth exploring.
 

Ken H

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2018
Messages
6,718
Location
N Yorks
I'm not convinced by the argument that the S&C and surrounding countryside is a big tourist draw across the country "except in greater Manchester where they only go to the Peak district instead".

I would have thought some connecting services at the Hellifield end would be worth exploring.
SSuO and dated high summer might work. But then thats true about some S&C workings. Not much business at Ribblehead on a cloudy dank November Friday
 

InkyScrolls

On Moderation
Joined
20 Jul 2022
Messages
1,460
Location
North of England
I'm sure it is a tourist draw for Manchester et al., but is it enough to warrant the cost?

Personally I believe it is because an improved public service is always a good thing, and the level of expenditure required to implement a regular service (especially if it acted as a BBN - HLD shuttle) would be quite low in this instance, but that doesn't mean that every possible service will or even should receive funding - I'm sure the money could be far better spent, given these financially stringent times, on certain other rail upgrades in or around Manchester.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

SSuO and dated high summer might work. But then thats true about some S&C workings. Not much business at Ribblehead on a cloudy dank November Friday
Perhaps one service per two hours to/from each of Blackburn (or beyond) and Leeds over summer? Residents of Appleby, Kirkby Stephen and Settle would appreciate a more frequent service but other stations could be skipped at certain times or by certain services, if expedient to the timetable.
 
Last edited:

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,741
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
I'm not convinced by the argument that the S&C and surrounding countryside is a big tourist draw across the country "except in greater Manchester where they only go to the Peak district instead".

I would have thought some connecting services at the Hellifield end would be worth exploring.

I'd more say a slight expansion of the summer DalesRail service would deal with most of the tourist draw. Operate it on a Saturday as well (where the earlier starts on other routes would allow connecting into it), and run a Manchester portion as well as the Blackpool portion. That would cover the majority of tourist demand, given that the Dales is mostly about daytrippers and those going for a weekend are less likely to be interested in going by train (and if going for a week you could then go Sat-Sat or Sun-Sun, or indeed Sun-Sat or Sat-Sun). If it was felt there was demand for Friday you could run a Friday evening one northbound only too, though that would be more complex in stock diagramming terms. For the rest of the week, other than in school holidays, they'd run pretty much empty (as the shortened "Lancashire Rambler" generally does).

This would cost a lot less than an hourly or two-hourly service all week which would just run empty.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,413
Location
Yorks
An expanded Dales Rail service might work. But how many people would be comfortable being tied to a couple of trains if they were on a long walk for example.

And don't forget, people working compressed hours with longer weekends, retirees, who seem to enjoy the line etc.
 

InkyScrolls

On Moderation
Joined
20 Jul 2022
Messages
1,460
Location
North of England
An expanded Dales Rail service might work. But how many people would be comfortable being tied to a couple of trains if they were on a long walk for example.

And don't forget, people working compressed hours with longer weekends, retirees, who seem to enjoy the line etc.
Perhaps four in each direction per day, or roughly one every four hours.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top