• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Rishi Sunak and the Conservative Party.

Status
Not open for further replies.

nw1

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2013
Messages
9,430
Oh, the innocence!

He owed Braverman, who might have brought some ERG support with her, whereas everyone loathes Williamson bar Sir Gawain himself. Presumably he was knighted for services to the tarantula industry!

Sir Gawain? Williamson himself I guess, presumably Gawain is the original Celtic form of Gavin.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,671
Sir Gawain? Williamson himself I guess, presumably Gawain is the original Celtic form of Gavin.
Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. ;)

The latest information, leaking from every corner it seems, will see him off, permanently. Telling a senior civil servant to 'slit his throat' and on a second occasion 'go jump out of the window' both in the presence of witnesses!! The man is quite possibly clinically mad, and certainly dangerous. Sunak needs to act NOW.
 

DynamicSpirit

Established Member
Joined
12 Apr 2012
Messages
9,218
Location
SE London
Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. ;)

The latest information, leaking from every corner it seems, will see him off, permanently. Telling a senior civil servant to 'slit his throat' and on a second occasion 'go jump out of the window' both in the presence of witnesses!! The man is quite possibly clinically mad, and certainly dangerous. Sunak needs to act NOW.

My first thought when I read 'Sir Gawain' was Piers Anthony - Bearing an Hourglass. I guess that's not the reference you were thinking of though :)
 

Lost property

On Moderation
Joined
2 Jun 2016
Messages
739
Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. ;)

The latest information, leaking from every corner it seems, will see him off, permanently. Telling a senior civil servant to 'slit his throat' and on a second occasion 'go jump out of the window' both in the presence of witnesses!! The man is quite possibly clinically mad, and certainly dangerous. Sunak needs to act NOW.
No ! No ! No ! you are completely wrong ! "he's exactly the right sort of man we needed at the M.o.D , lead from the front, non of this namby pamby desk bound paper shufflers stuff, tells it like it is, and really should be PM ! " (that's my Major Snottington Smythe (ret'd) and life long Mail reader impression btw )

But, there's a trend here...Patel, same allegations, Braverman, same allegations (leaks) and now Gav, effortlessly, allegedly, combining both.

Thankfully, we have a PM who casually mentioned "integrity " and "accountability" in the same sentence recently....unfortunately, he doesn't appear to have consulted a dictionary as to the meaning of the words, hence Gav and Leaky Sue remain attached to their respective office chairs....which, in many ways, is actually beneficial because the more the scandals develop and emerge, the more evidence can be produced at the next G.E to ensure the voting public can be under no illusions as to the calibre of individual currently representing the values of the version of the Tory party which bears no resemblance to the original ..and hence kick them into political oblivion for many years to come.
 

david1212

Established Member
Joined
9 Apr 2020
Messages
1,759
Location
Midlands
Two weeks in and the FTSE 100 is up to around 7300 from the low point of just over 6800 four weeks ago and around 7050 two weeks ago. Will the recovery continue followed by other funds managed by AJ Bell, Vanguard, pension providers etc or will the financial review halt or slow recovery?

I don't see Williamsongate as serious but IMO the very poor choice of Braverman for Home Secretary will continue to drag the Tories down. The security / email issues of both her and May are off the headlines at least for now but something else will come along.

Generally regarding security / confidentiality phones & computers for government use ought to be locked down so personal email & social media accounts etc can not be accessed on them and government email and confidential information systems locked down so personal devices can not access them. In an ideal world any device connecting to the government system would just be a dumb terminal but guaranteed access 24/7 from anywhere is still a step too far.
 

jfollows

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2011
Messages
10,180
Location
Wilmslow
Significant commentators such as Anne McElvoy ("The Economist") are saying that Gavin Williamson is done for (https://twitter.com/annemcelvoy):
Effectively after the “slit your throat” reported comment on top of all else , Gavin Williamson is now gone. For Sunak,it’s just a matter of some sort of process to look evenhanded. But the patten is too bad to ignore- plus no real “job” at stake here
Good, I can't stand the man. He acts as if he is competent whereas he never is. Mind you, he's not alone in that!
 

nw1

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2013
Messages
9,430
From the Guardian, admittedly in 2016: (https://www.theguardian.com/politic...emove-pet-spider-from-office-gavin-williamson)

'Williamson spoke earlier this week about how the tarantula was part of his team. He said: “You have to look at different ways to persuade people to vote with the government and it’s great to have Cronus as part of the team. Everyone is obsessed with Palmerston and Larry the cat, but in the whips’ office we have a proper pet." '

Sounds just a bit creepy.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. ;)
Still struggling to get it. Is Sir Gawain Sunak? Just thinking of "the only person not to dislike him" as you said above.
And the Green Knight, is that an ironic reference to COP27?
 
Last edited:

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,671
From the Guardian, admittedly in 2016: (https://www.theguardian.com/politic...emove-pet-spider-from-office-gavin-williamson)

'Williamson spoke earlier this week about how the tarantula was part of his team. He said: “You have to look at different ways to persuade people to vote with the government and it’s great to have Cronus as part of the team. Everyone is obsessed with Palmerston and Larry the cat, but in the whips’ office we have a proper pet." '

Sounds just a bit creepy.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


Still struggling to get it. Is Sir Gawain Sunak? Just thinking of "the only person not to dislike him" as you said above.
And the Green Knight, is that an ironic reference to COP27?
I'll be quite honest and admit to almost total ignorance on the subject of Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, other than the existence of it and something of its history and provenance. As a bookseller I had to feign knowledge on so many things to do with books and literature in general, and often felt underread. I always regarded it as my job to be as good a seller of books as possible to aid my customers with their choices, and not the best read. Given I only sold new books and my wife, a business partner, was extraordinarily well read on the fiction side, I don't think we did too badly overall. That's a long-winded way of admitting that the getting of it can be exactly what you wish. 'Too quick-witted for his own good' was the report from my form master at the end of my first secondary school year, but we disliked each other intently! :)
 

nw1

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2013
Messages
9,430
I'll be quite honest and admit to almost total ignorance on the subject of Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, other than the existence of it and something of its history and provenance. As a bookseller I had to feign knowledge on so many things to do with books and literature in general, and often felt underread. I always regarded it as my job to be as good a seller of books as possible to aid my customers with their choices, and not the best read. Given I only sold new books and my wife, a business partner, was extraordinarily well read on the fiction side, I don't think we did too badly overall. That's a long-winded way of admitting that the getting of it can be exactly what you wish. 'Too quick-witted for his own good' was the report from my form master at the end of my first secondary school year, but we disliked each other intently! :)

It rings a bell from my school days but I've forgotten the details. Just thought you were setting a riddle based on it ;)
 

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,671
Williamson has resigned.
”becoming a distraction…..”
Just after Anne Milton, Deputy Chief Whip 2015-17 when he was Chief Whip, laid into him on Channel Four News. Sunak should have got there first, from the Tory point of view: yet another huge own goal. He should be stripped of his knighthood now, the scumbag.
 

dgl

Established Member
Joined
5 Oct 2014
Messages
3,074
Not really, the question is why should a person was made a minister in the first place.
Quite, him resigning might make things worse as now Starmer can question Sunak as to why he did not have the balls to at least suspend him pending investigation when all the revelations came out and can ask Sunak which one is next.
 

SuspectUsual

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2018
Messages
6,850
His resignation letter is an open goal. With regard to the second complaint (the “slit your throat” and “jump out of the window” stuff), he says “I refute the characterisation”, rather than denying he said it. So basically his defence appears to be “yeah I said some grossly offensive stuff but I didn’t mean it like that”.

Absolutely despicable man.

But still, he’ll get 16 grand for resigning after two weeks.

Makes me sick
 

jfollows

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2011
Messages
10,180
Location
Wilmslow
His resignation letter is an open goal. With regard to the second complaint (the “slit your throat” and “jump out of the window” stuff), he says “I refute the characterisation”, rather than denying he said it. So basically his defence appears to be “yeah I said some grossly offensive stuff but I didn’t mean it like that”.

Absolutely despicable man.

But still, he’ll get 16 grand for resigning after two weeks.

Makes me sick
He’s said he’s not taking the money, as it happens.
EDIT https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-63563639
He later tweeted that he would not be taking any severance pay, traditionally given to ministers when they leave office.
 
Last edited:

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
8,050
Location
Surrey
His resignation letter is an open goal. With regard to the second complaint (the “slit your throat” and “jump out of the window” stuff), he says “I refute the characterisation”, rather than denying he said it. So basically his defence appears to be “yeah I said some grossly offensive stuff but I didn’t mean it like that”.

Absolutely despicable man.

But still, he’ll get 16 grand for resigning after two weeks.

Makes me sick
Yes he is a nasty piece of work and one of the more extreme whips of modern times but bullying goes on behind the scenes and Speaker Hoyle had a chance to expose the whips bullying tactics over the fracking vote a few weeks ago but he turned a blind eye to it. The Speaker could take on this moral issue but isn't. Time for someone who can modernise this stale place still living in Victorian times.
 

nw1

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2013
Messages
9,430
Shame thats spoilt Starmer evening he will have to find something else to pin on Sunak tomorrow

Appointing Williamson in the first place. Not to mention Braverman.

Nothing's changed. Sunak is still labelled with "jobs for his mates" (Williamson) or [insert explanation here] (Braverman).
 

jfollows

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2011
Messages
10,180
Location
Wilmslow
Appointing Williamson in the first place. Not to mention Braverman.

Nothing's changed. Sunak is still labelled with "jobs for his mates" (Williamson) or [insert explanation here] (Braverman).
As well as "can't be bothered to go to COP 27 because I'm too busy"
 

SuspectUsual

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2018
Messages
6,850
Nothing's changed. Sunak is still labelled with "jobs for his mates" (Williamson) or [insert explanation here] (Braverman).

[insert explanation here] is surely “keeping the right wing headbangers onside”?
 

nw1

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2013
Messages
9,430
[insert explanation here] is surely “keeping the right wing headbangers onside”?

It's "there are various theories as to why he re-instated Braverman, but I'm not sure which is true". ;)
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
28,766
Location
Nottingham
It's "there are various theories as to why he re-instated Braverman, but I'm not sure which is true". ;)
Interested to know what the other reasons might be. It must have been obvious to Sunak that Barverman wouldn't achieve anything constructive, would alienate the sort of swing voters he needs, and the very act of appointing her created an attack line against him. If she's intended as a lightning conductor for criticism then she's looking like the sort of lightning conductor that only goes down as far as your roof timbers.

Even fishing in the talent puddle that's the Parliamentary Tory Party, there must have been others that could have done the job better. On the other hand, I can't see that Williamson enjoyed significant support from any part of the party, except maybe the tarantula.
 
Last edited:

WizCastro197

Established Member
Joined
12 May 2022
Messages
1,468
Location
Reigate
If I am honest, every PMQs I see, I notice Mordaunt erring less and less when Rishi Sunak said things that can easily be disputed, she knows he is weak and the whole country does as well. Even through the whole Gavin Williamson little chitchat frontbenchers all got a little rowdy but not Mordaunt, she seemed a little quiet.
 

nw1

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2013
Messages
9,430
Interested to know what the other reasons might be. It must have been obvious to Sunak that Barverman wouldn't achieve anything constructive, would alienate the sort of swing voters he needs, and the very act of appointing her created an attack line against him. If she's intended as a lightning conductor for criticism then she's looking like the sort of lightning conductor that only goes down as far as your roof timbers.
Another theoretical explanation (though unlikely) is that he tolerates Braverman's policies and actually wants a hardliner in the post. However I would agree that the "wanting to please the hard-right of the Tory party" is the most likely explanation. That said, doing things to please them just makes him look weak.
Even fishing in the talent puddle that's the Parliamentary Tory Party, there must have been others that could have done the job better. On the other hand, I can't see that Williamson enjoyed significant support from any part of the party, except maybe the tarantula.
Maybe the tarantula could stand as the Tory candidate in the constituency vacated by Dorries, assuming that Boris doesn't get there first.
 

Cloud Strife

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2014
Messages
2,965
Another theoretical explanation (though unlikely) is that he tolerates Braverman's policies and actually wants a hardliner in the post. However I would agree that the "wanting to please the hard-right of the Tory party" is the most likely explanation. That said, doing things to please them just makes him look weak.

It does, but I think he doesn't have a choice. That wing of the party still has strength in depth, and they couldn't care less about Sunak.

If I am honest, every PMQs I see, I notice Mordaunt erring less and less when Rishi Sunak said things that can easily be disputed, she knows he is weak and the whole country does as well.

Mordaunt is in a very good position right now. All she has to do is do really nothing to offend anyone between now and the election, and when the Tories inevitably lose, she can take over with a mandate to build the Tories in her vision. She's been very, very careful so far, and I don't think anything will change between now and the election.
 

Scotrail12

Member
Joined
16 Nov 2014
Messages
840
Hancock just claimed on IAC that he's went in because there is now "stability" in the government.

What a complete insult!
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
8,050
Location
Surrey
If I am honest, every PMQs I see, I notice Mordaunt erring less and less when Rishi Sunak said things that can easily be disputed, she knows he is weak and the whole country does as well. Even through the whole Gavin Williamson little chitchat frontbenchers all got a little rowdy but not Mordaunt, she seemed a little quiet.
Mordant just keeping her head down detached enough not to be associated with Sunak although her opportuinty has probably been and goine as Sunak will solder on till late 2024 now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top