• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Liz Truss and the Conservative Party.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Gloster

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Sep 2020
Messages
13,015
Location
Up the creek
Why don’t we connect Truss to a generator? With all the constant U-turns she’d be rotating so fast that she would produce enough electricity to keep the country going through the coldest winter.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,568
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Truss has said in PMQs that there'll be no spending cuts. This comes across as something to get her through the day, but is going to cause havoc tomorrow onwards: it means she'll have to u-turn on the mini Budget, or announce cuts and be seen to have lied, or do nothing but watch a spectacular market crash on Friday in line with the BoE saying their support ends then.

I thought BoE had themselves U-turned?
 

brad465

Veteran Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
11,503
Location
Taunton or Kent
Why don’t we connect Truss to a generator? With all the constant U-turns she’d be rotating so fast that she would produce enough electricity to keep the country going through the coldest winter.
She and her Cabinet also provide plenty of gaslighting.
I thought BoE had themselves U-turned?
They appear to have done a doughnut now.
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
33,705
Location
Scotland
I thought BoE had themselves U-turned?
They stated on Monday evening that the QE would definitely end on Friday. They then hinted that they might continue it past the end of the week, but this morning confirmed that their original position was unchanged.

I don't know if that counts as a U-turn or not.
 

SuspectUsual

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2018
Messages
6,789
Truss has said in PMQs that there'll be no spending cuts. This comes across as something to get her through the day, but is going to cause havoc tomorrow onwards: it means she'll have to u-turn on the mini Budget, or announce cuts and be seen to have lied, or do nothing but watch a spectacular market crash on Friday in line with the BoE saying their support ends then.

Unless I missed it, two really vital words were missing from what she said

Real

Terms

I suspect it’s just the usual weasel words and those on benefits are going to be in for a tough time
 

Noddy

Established Member
Joined
11 Oct 2014
Messages
1,653
Location
UK
You wouldn’t think they could make it any worse but after Rees-Mogg claiming that the BBC was misrepresenting what was happening and Truss saying they’ll be no cuts apparently they can.

I see six of the last eight polls covering the last week all put Labour at over 50%. The remaining two have them in the high 40s. Meanwhile the Tories are ranging from 20-26. They are in for an absolute kicking. I’ve personally been screwed by the mini-budget interest rates rise and know loads of folk who have had problems as well. I certainly won’t be forgetting this.
 

dosxuk

Established Member
Joined
2 Jan 2011
Messages
2,439
I'd love to know where the cabinet are getting their advice from to make them behave in the way they have since Truss became PM. Each day seems to result in even more bizarre behaviour and decision making from the cabinet. At the moment, they're even making the Johnson government look sane - at least their poor decisions seemed to have actual thinking behind (save big dog half the time), whereas this lot just seem to be trying to fly by the seat of their pants with little thought to any consequences of their actions.

I've seen more strength and stability from jelly left to cool in a broken fridge.
 

Ediswan

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2012
Messages
3,436
Location
Stevenage
Doesn't he inspire confidence !....apparently, the economy is in good shape...he seems to forget his own was shifted out of the UK pretty rapidly, but, at least the nanny will still get paid with no concerns about a crashing economy !

I heard that live. It came across as yet another attempt to deny that the mini-budget was in any way a cause of the ensuing financial market problems.
 

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,671
I heard that live. It came across as yet another attempt to deny that the mini-budget was in any way a cause of the ensuing financial market problems.
The 'interview' was an object lesson in a government refusing to accept that anything they had done could be criticised in any way whatever. Any crisis had been caused by the 'independent' Bank of England not putting up interest rates enough just prior to Kwarteng's statement, the pension funds had only themselves to blame for their actions and, oh yes, how dare the BBC (in the person of Mishal Husain) was breaking impartiality rules by daring to suggest the Tories were in any way to blame! Interestingly enough, the mild Husain pointed out that she'd expressed no opinion but merely asked a question, which was true, but off the ninny went for his next interviewer to talk down to. I'd love him to come up against Andrew Neil, who'd eviscerate him, which is why of course he won't dare to. The interview with Husain started with his usual oh-so-humble schtick of apologising for being a couple of minutes late, then launching into what was an unbridled verbal assault on Simon Jack, the Business Editor, who merely echoed what so many in the business world were/are saying, including for the first time the Daily Mail in their editorial. The Tories know they're in trouble when the Mail starts waving the red flag!
 

brad465

Veteran Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
11,503
Location
Taunton or Kent
Yeah Truss appears to be in trouble:


Liz Truss has addressed the 1922 committee of Tory MPs this evening. The PM told MPs they should focus on the energy price guarantee and "highlight the devastation that would have been caused to small business had we not acted"

Truss also told Tory MPs that Labour "has no plan beyond the next 6 months" and no plan to help businesses.

Tonight's 1922 meeting sounds pretty dire. One MP said: "the mood was honestly funereal, horrendous. I was shocked at how brutal it was". Truss took sharp criticism on mortgages, polling and her economic record. Another MP, "there was a sense this just can't go on"

MPs present at the '22 say @halfon4harlowMP accused Liz Truss of "trashing workers' conservatism" and "everything the party has stood for over the last decade". The PM looked shocked and denied that was the case.

Several MPs say tonight’s 1922 was the worst they experienced and it failed to calm the mood. One said that the mood reflected that Truss had “no authority” among MPs: “At least a couple of times, there was a ripple of chatter going on at back while she was still talking”
 

nw1

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2013
Messages
9,430
People have drawn comparisons between Johnson and Nero before.

By an odd coincidence, Nero was followed by 3 obscure emperors each of whom lasted mere months.

So could Truss be the first of three spectacularly short-lived Tory PMs before we finally vote the whole damn lot of them out? ;)
 

jfollows

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2011
Messages
10,132
Location
Wilmslow
Following the last post, there's a quote from The Economist (https://www.economist.com/leaders/2...made-britain-a-riskier-bet-for-bond-investors):
LIZ TRUSS is already a historical figure.

However long she now lasts in office, she is set to be remembered as the prime minister whose grip on power was the shortest in British political history. Ms Truss entered Downing Street on September 6th. She blew up her own government with a package of unfunded tax cuts and energy-price guarantees on September 23rd. Take away the ten days of mourning after the death of the queen, and she had seven days in control. That is the shelf-life of a lettuce.
I no longer subscribe to The Economist but it's always been reasonably representative of my views. It's not exactly hysterical or anti-Conservative either, although it's more pro my kind of old school Conservatism than the current lot.

The Times reports (https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/...nomic-reform-stymied-by-the-details-5cwnxk8x8) that "Operation Rolling Thunder", plans for business deregulation reform, has been delayed and is being referred to by some as "Operation ****storm" because it's "off to a thunderous start".
 
Last edited:

Ediswan

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2012
Messages
3,436
Location
Stevenage
The Times reports (https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/...nomic-reform-stymied-by-the-details-5cwnxk8x8) that "Operation Rolling Thunder", plans for business deregulation reform, has been delayed and is being referred to by some as "Operation ****storm" because it's "off to a thunderous start".
Are they aware of the historical comparison ? I recall a previous Operation Rolling Thunder:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Rolling_Thunder
Operation Rolling Thunder was a gradual and sustained aerial bombardment campaign conducted by the United States (U.S.) 2nd Air Division (later Seventh Air Force), U.S. Navy, and Republic of Vietnam Air Force (RVNAF) against the Democratic Republic of Vietnam (North Vietnam) from 2 March 1965 until 2 November 1968, during the Vietnam War.

Result: US Failure
The Times photo, with the pointed shoes, reminds me of Rosa Klebb (Bond villain).
 

birchesgreen

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2015
Messages
7,673
Location
Solihull
People have drawn comparisons between Johnson and Nero before.

By an odd coincidence, Nero was followed by 3 obscure emperors each of whom lasted mere months.

So could Truss be the first of three spectacularly short-lived Tory PMs before we finally vote the whole damn lot of them out? ;)
Why not, let me be the first to compare Liz Truss to Galba. Though i feel she is more an Otho.
 

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,671
Following the last post, there's a quote from The Economist (https://www.economist.com/leaders/2...made-britain-a-riskier-bet-for-bond-investors):

I no longer subscribe to The Economist but it's always been reasonably representative of my views. It's not exactly hysterical or anti-Conservative either, although it's more pro my kind of old school Conservatism than the current lot.

The Times reports (https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/...nomic-reform-stymied-by-the-details-5cwnxk8x8) that "Operation Rolling Thunder", plans for business deregulation reform, has been delayed and is being referred to by some as "Operation ****storm" because it's "off to a thunderous start".
Anne McElvoy is Executive Editor of the Economist and is married to Martin Ivens, ex editor of the Sunday Times, whose father Michael headed a right wing pressure group Aims for Industry at the end of the last century. She'd be unlikely to steer her magazine down anything other than a centrist or centre-right direction, I feel. My wife had, in the course of her work, to have dealings with Aims for Industry, though, and always found them unpleasantly dogmatic politically.
 

david1212

Established Member
Joined
9 Apr 2020
Messages
1,754
Location
Midlands
As each day passes I can only presume either that either Truss & Kwarteng have discovered a forest of Magic Money Trees or are sleep walking while dreaming. If the latter they need a very loud alarm to wake them up to reality.
 

Class 317

Member
Joined
7 Jul 2020
Messages
567
Location
Cotswolds
As each day passes I can only presume either that either Truss & Kwarteng have discovered a forest of Magic Money Trees or are sleep walking while dreaming. If the latter they need a very loud alarm to wake them up to reality.
And one set for as quick as possible like yesterday
 

Berliner

Member
Joined
8 Oct 2020
Messages
399
Location
Edinburgh
And one set for as quick as possible like yesterday
I highly doubt the tories will agree to an early election. They know the game is over and they won't be doing anything to give up power that easily. It would require a large number of tory MPs voting to force an election they know they wil most likely lose. The party always puts itself first so we can forget about an early GE.
 

birchesgreen

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2015
Messages
7,673
Location
Solihull
Liz Truss is now facing opposition to her plan to halt new solar farms on marginal farm land from that well known forward thinking progressive... Jacob Rees Mogg! You really couldn't make this **** show up.
 

brad465

Veteran Member
Joined
11 Aug 2010
Messages
11,503
Location
Taunton or Kent
Liz Truss is now facing opposition to her plan to halt new solar farms on marginal farm land from that well known forward thinking progressive... Jacob Rees Mogg! You really couldn't make this **** show up.
I also saw reports Braverman is being snubbed with regards to involvement in immigration plans after recent remarks went down badly with India. If your Home Secretary has to be cut out of policymaking in the domain of the Home Secretary, you've made a bad appointment and the failure to dismiss her shows Truss already has no authority.
 

philosopher

Established Member
Joined
23 Sep 2015
Messages
1,513
Liz Truss is now facing opposition to her plan to halt new solar farms on marginal farm land from that well known forward thinking progressive... Jacob Rees Mogg! You really couldn't make this **** show up.
If it has got to the point where even Jacob Rees Mogg is saying more sensible stuff that Truss, things must be really bad!
 

jfollows

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2011
Messages
10,132
Location
Wilmslow
I also saw reports Braverman is being snubbed with regards to involvement in immigration plans after recent remarks went down badly with India. If your Home Secretary has to be cut out of policymaking in the domain of the Home Secretary, you've made a bad appointment and the failure to dismiss her shows Truss already has no authority.
Apparently there's an imminent "free trade deal" with India in the works (clearly the government wants to be able to announce as many of these as it can as a benefit of Brexit etc.) but it will come with agreements on travel and immigration from/to India, and Braverman's negative comments about "illegal immigration from India" have disrupted the progress of the negotiations on the trade deal. So the UK people responsible for the deal have had to dismiss Braverman's comments, which doesn't look good from whatever perspective you view it.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Liz Truss is now facing opposition to her plan to halt new solar farms on marginal farm land from that well known forward thinking progressive... Jacob Rees Mogg! You really couldn't make this **** show up.
At the time of rising fuel bills this seems to be another example of Truss pushing her theories about how the world should be in the face of reality, and indeed it's unusual for Rees Mogg to be appearing sensible in this context.
The stereotypical Truss/Tory supporter is dead against wind farms within 50 miles of where they live, but couldn't care less about solar panels on unused farm land unless they're also a farmer, in which case they'd probably be in favour of solar panels on their unused land if they get money for it.
It seems that Truss is driven by a collection of ideologies which mainly appear a bit barmy and is well out of touch with reality, and in particular with the reality that affects large numbers of people who voted Conservative in 2019 and won't do so again in 2024.
 
Last edited:

bspahh

Established Member
Joined
5 Jan 2017
Messages
2,440
At the time of rising fuel bills this seems to be another example of Truss pushing her theories about how the world should be in the face of reality, and indeed it's unusual for Rees Mogg to be appearing sensible in this context.
I think Liz Truss has as much interest in solar farms as Boris Johnson has in cardboard models of buses. They are something to use as a distraction from bigger stories.
 

takno

Verified Rep - Traksy
Joined
9 Jul 2016
Messages
6,593
I think Liz Truss has as much interest in solar farms as Boris Johnson has in cardboard models of buses. They are something to use as a distraction from bigger stories.
Actually that's an interesting point. Now that Boris has a bit of slack time he should probably be putting together a bit of an exhibition of his model buses, just to prove he wasn't telling lies
 

Typhoon

Established Member
Joined
2 Nov 2017
Messages
3,540
Location
Kent
Why not, let me be the first to compare Liz Truss to Galba. Though i feel she is more an Otho.
Galba, surely. Firstly, I've heard of him (and I suspect that Truss will remain long in the memory for all the wrong reasons, in the same way that Chamberlain is; although there the comparison ends.) Secondly, I don't think Truss plotted Johnson's downfall, he is responsible for that. Thirdly, Otho took what might be called an honourable way to leave the stage*. I somehow doubt Truss will.

* - if Wikipedia have got it right. I had to look him up.

Actually that's an interesting point. Now that Boris has a bit of slack time he should probably be putting together a bit of an exhibition of his model buses, just to prove he wasn't telling lies
He'll point to a pile of cardboard on the floor and claim that they were scrapped following the ongoing reduction of services that started under his premiership because local authorities did not subsidise them/ passengers did not use them/ companies put on the wrong routes/ Shapps got it wrong (delete as applicable).
 

nw1

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2013
Messages
9,430
I highly doubt the tories will agree to an early election. They know the game is over and they won't be doing anything to give up power that easily. It would require a large number of tory MPs voting to force an election they know they wil most likely lose. The party always puts itself first so we can forget about an early GE.

Except if one is forced (with sane Tories* joining the opposition parties in this respect) because the government and country are in a bad state and mass protests, strike action spreading to other sectors, and so on occur due to government inaction (or the wrong action).

This is a government unprecedented in its sheer incompetence** within my lifetime, certainly. Trying to take a neutral, non-partisan tone here, but it seems to me that the state of the government is very much worse than the vaguely comparable cases of Major 1992-97 and Brown 2007-10. So arguments about whether an early election occurs or not are rather different to those preceding times.

(* with safe seats, or with such high moral standards that they are prepared to possibly lose their seat and/or they're hedging their bets that they will be re-elected as an MP if they do the 'right thing')

(** assuming it is just incompetence, of course, and there are not underhand motives)

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Apparently there's an imminent "free trade deal" with India in the works (clearly the government wants to be able to announce as many of these as it can as a benefit of Brexit etc.) but it will come with agreements on travel and immigration from/to India, and Braverman's negative comments about "illegal immigration from India" have disrupted the progress of the negotiations on the trade deal. So the UK people responsible for the deal have had to dismiss Braverman's comments, which doesn't look good from whatever perspective you view it.
It certainly doesn't make Truss look competent by appointing a hard-right, foaming-at-the-mouth anti-immigrationist like Braverman. If she had any sense she'd have appointed a middle-of-the-road figure who doesn't have an "attitude" towards immigration that might disrupt such trade deals. They clearly have not learnt from Patel (or don't want to).
 
Last edited:

Berliner

Member
Joined
8 Oct 2020
Messages
399
Location
Edinburgh
Except if one is forced (with sane Tories* joining the opposition parties in this respect) because the government and country are in a bad state and mass protests, strike action spreading to other sectors, and so on occur due to government inaction (or the wrong action).

This is a government unprecedented in its sheer incompetence** within my lifetime, certainly. Trying to take a neutral, non-partisan tone here, but it seems to me that the state of the government is very much worse than the vaguely comparable cases of Major 1992-97 and Brown 2007-10. So arguments about whether an early election occurs or not are rather different to those preceding times.

(* with safe seats, or with such high moral standards that they are prepared to possibly lose their seat and/or they're hedging their bets that they will be re-elected as an MP if they do the 'right thing')

(** assuming it is just incompetence, of course, and there are not underhand motives)

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


It certainly doesn't make Truss look competent by appointing a hard-right, foaming-at-the-mouth anti-immigrationist like Braverman. If she had any sense she'd have appointed a middle-of-the-road figure who doesn't have an "attitude" towards immigration that might disrupt such trade deals. They clearly have not learnt from Patel (or don't want to).
Are there any sane or morally rich tories anymore? They wre all purged when Boris made the new cohorts pledge allegiance to him and Brexit in 2019 and I don't see much of a change change of heart since then.

They have pretty much all stood by idiotic policies and helped prop up Boris during his tenure. I still think Truss would win a VONC if one was pushed for.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top