• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Rail replacement on Cambrian Coast should bypass Tywyn

Status
Not open for further replies.

Shrop

Established Member
Joined
6 Aug 2019
Messages
1,350
From 12 September trains will be replaced by coaches from Machynlleth to Pwllheli. Looking at the timetable there is clearly an attempt to provide a fast and a slow service as far as Harlech, with the fast service stopping only at Tywyn and Barmouth, and the slow service leaving at the same time stopping at all (13) intermediate stations. In theory that's great if you want to get to the Harlech to Pwllheli section more quickly, but why oh why has the coach been routed via Tywyn?

Machynlleth to Barmouth can be done in 48 minutes by coach if travelled directly (based on a predicted car driving time of 43 minutes, and let's face it you can't overtake much on this route so a coach time will be little different). But the "fast" coaches are routed via Tywyn which means this section actually takes 1h28m, thus costing travellers 40 minutes. What kind if fast service is this, and what is it for? Passengers travelling from Shrewsbury etc to Tywyn only gain 7 minutes by taking the fast coach, so there's little point in it being for that reason, but those travelling to everywhere towards Barmouth and beyond will all have to take an extra 40 minutes. I wonder how many passengers travel to Tywyn, compared to those who travel to everywhere else? I would venture to suggest that 7 minutes to Tywyn only, really isn't worth costing 40 minutes to every other station from Barmouth onwards.

Can anyone explain this? For all the world this seems like it simply wasn't given much, if any thought, but surely it's not just bad planning?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

paul1609

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2006
Messages
7,992
Location
K
Im not local but I believe that Towyn is the number 3 station for passenger numbers on the Cambrian after Barmouth and Harlech and that off season internal traffic is more important than incoming mostly due to the schools traffic.
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
21,922
Location
Airedale
Im not local but I believe that Towyn is the number 3 station for passenger numbers on the Cambrian after Barmouth and Harlech and that off season internal traffic is more important than incoming mostly due to the schools traffic.
The other factor (from the previous closure) is that the minor stations can be (need to be in some cases) served by minibus.
Using the direct route (which I think was done back in the 70s) would mean providing a further full-sized bus for Tywyn.

I seem to recall one of our prolific international contributors sampled the service.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Doveymain158

Member
Joined
9 Apr 2014
Messages
135
Planning this timetable is a catch 21 situation. Its hard to please everyone. When the train service is operation all trains call at Tywyn. The fast bus calls at the larger stations which near the main roads. The slower service is usually a smaller vehicle which is suitable for access to the smaller stations. its hard to please everyone.
 

Shrop

Established Member
Joined
6 Aug 2019
Messages
1,350
Im not local but I believe that Towyn is the number 3 station for passenger numbers on the Cambrian after Barmouth and Harlech and that off season internal traffic is more important than incoming mostly due to the schools traffic.
So Barmouth and Harlech have greater numbers of passengers, all of whom will be delayed by 40 minutes, in order to save 7 minutes for Tywyn which has fewer passengers.
The other factor (from the previous closure) is that the minor stations can be (need to be in some cases) served by minibus.
Using the direct route (which I think was done back in the 70s) would mean providing a further full-sized bus for Tywyn.
So wouldn't this be best addressed by using a second minibus (or taxis if needed) just as far as Tywyn? That would need just 25 minutes to get to Tywyn, or 50 minutes for a round trip returning to Machynlleth. This would save 40 minutes for the driver of the Pwllheli coach, even if you completely discount the 40 minute time saving benefits to all of the passengers. And even though this flexibility probably already has more pros than cons, there's the additional option to not take the second minibus (or taxi(s)) away from Machynlleth if passenger numbers don't need it. Timetabling this extra 40 minutes in seems unnecessarily restrictive on the service, making little sense operationally and even less sense for passengers.
 

paul1609

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2006
Messages
7,992
Location
K
So Barmouth and Harlech have greater numbers of passengers, all of whom will be delayed by 40 minutes, in order to save 7 minutes for Tywyn which has fewer passengers.
As I understand it a large number of the passengers getting on at Barmouth are actually travelling to either Tywyn or Harlech and vice versa so aren't affected by the bus route. The numbers travelling through to Machynlleth outside of the school holidays are quite low so ts a case of prioritising the buses route to meet the needs of the maximum number of passengers.
 

geoffk

On Moderation
Joined
4 Aug 2010
Messages
3,921
Location
Exeter
NRE just says engineering work Machynlleth to Aberystwyth, 11th to 16th September.
 

Shrop

Established Member
Joined
6 Aug 2019
Messages
1,350
NRE just says engineering work Machynlleth to Aberystwyth, 11th to 16th September.
Hmm, Table 75 of the Monday to Friday (for example) public timetable which runs "until 10 December", with "from 12 September" in the title appears to say otherwise ...
 

BrianB

Member
Joined
21 Jan 2018
Messages
116
Hmm, Table 75 of the Monday to Friday (for example) public timetable which runs "until 10 December", with "from 12 September" in the title appears to say otherwise ...
Table 75 contains the Long term plan data which still stands Sep to Dec. Machynlleth to Aberystwyth appears to be additional Short term plan eng work for that week only and will therefore not make it into the NRT tables
 

TJM

Member
Joined
29 Jul 2016
Messages
64
One might note that a direct coach from Machynlleth to Barmouth would actually always be quicker than the current running time of the train!
 

Shrop

Established Member
Joined
6 Aug 2019
Messages
1,350
One might note that a direct coach from Machynlleth to Barmouth would actually always be quicker than the current running time of the train!
Absolutely right, but once road traffic has reached Tywyn, the absence of a road bridge to cross the Mawddach estuary and the need to travel all the way back inland to Dolgellau by road, makes a massive difference to reaching Barmouth.
 
Last edited:

chrisp37

Member
Joined
2 Sep 2022
Messages
182
Location
London
I will need to use this service on 15 September and 17 September. I have a rail trip to North Wales planned, involving Ffestiniog, Welsh Highland and (hopefully) Tal-y-llyn and Fairbourne railways. We're doing the whole thing by train (neither of us drive). One of the things I had been most looking forward to was the trip on the Cambrian Coast line from Porthmadog (where we will be based for part of the trip) to Tywyn to get to the Tal-y-llyn. We also need to get from Porthmadog to Machynlleth on 17 September (with a stop-off in Fairbourne en route). So I was somewhat disappointed to find out that that stretch of the line will be operated by a replacement bus service when we are there, but never mind, it's just a reason to go back next year.

Although I have been to Porthmadog before, I have no experience of that line or the public transport in the region. I do hope that the replacement bus/coach will be usable (i.e. not too full!). There doesn't look to be another good alternative to get from Porthmadog to Tywyn. There does appear to be an option involving 2 buses but with only a 5 minute changeover time between the two buses. There looks to be a better option from Porthmadog to Mac (the T2 bus) if you want to go directly, but given that we are hoping to visit the Fairbourne Railway en route, the replacement bus is likely the better option.

It's not completely clear to me whether the RMT strikes announced on 15 and 17 September will have any impact on this service. I contacted TfW and they said they were still planning to run their services as normal but would provide further updates in due course.

The Avanti situation is also making me quite nervous as we need to get from Euston to Lllandudno on Saturday 10 September and Avanti still haven't confirmed the timetable or released tickets for that date.
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
21,922
Location
Airedale
Absolutely right, but once road traffic has reached Tywyn, the absence of a road bridge to cross the Mawddach estuary and the need to travel all the way back inland to Dolgellau by road, makes a massive difference to reaching Barmouth.
The 26min time for MM to Barmouth is impressive, and suggests the time penalty is around 20min, though I agree you could do the direct route a bit quicker than that.

The total time of 2h49 for the fast bus isn't too bad compared with the train.
 

stuu

Established Member
Joined
2 Sep 2011
Messages
3,762
NRE just says engineering work Machynlleth to Aberystwyth, 11th to 16th September.
Barmouth Bridge has had major works in the last few years, and this is the last major closure - 11-September to 15 October, and then 13 November to 10 December
 

markymark2000

On Moderation
Joined
11 May 2015
Messages
5,090
Location
Great Britain
From 12 September trains will be replaced by coaches from Machynlleth to Pwllheli. Looking at the timetable there is clearly an attempt to provide a fast and a slow service as far as Harlech, with the fast service stopping only at Tywyn and Barmouth, and the slow service leaving at the same time stopping at all (13) intermediate stations. In theory that's great if you want to get to the Harlech to Pwllheli section more quickly, but why oh why has the coach been routed via Tywyn?

Machynlleth to Barmouth can be done in 48 minutes by coach if travelled directly (based on a predicted car driving time of 43 minutes, and let's face it you can't overtake much on this route so a coach time will be little different). But the "fast" coaches are routed via Tywyn which means this section actually takes 1h28m, thus costing travellers 40 minutes. What kind if fast service is this, and what is it for? Passengers travelling from Shrewsbury etc to Tywyn only gain 7 minutes by taking the fast coach, so there's little point in it being for that reason, but those travelling to everywhere towards Barmouth and beyond will all have to take an extra 40 minutes. I wonder how many passengers travel to Tywyn, compared to those who travel to everywhere else? I would venture to suggest that 7 minutes to Tywyn only, really isn't worth costing 40 minutes to every other station from Barmouth onwards.

Can anyone explain this? For all the world this seems like it simply wasn't given much, if any thought, but surely it's not just bad planning?
As someone who spent a fair amount of time of time on the block last year, I would love to know the same and having discussions with drivers, they say the same, especially at night. Unfortunately though, not a lot that TFW do with RRBs makes sense. From discussions I had, 90% or so were in agreeance that Tywyn wasn't needed. Infact, it was noticeable how much happier passengers were when Tywyn was missed (due to a road closure near Penhelig). Buses were 40 minutes quicker, coordinators said that buses couldn't get sent too early so pax had to wait a bit but most then went into town to get a coffee but if it was planned in officially, it would be a good 10 min stop off point (making it overall, 30 minutes quicker. 40 mins quicker but minus the 10 min stop off) for a toilet and refreshment break. I will say though, the amount of feedback that went through systems regarding that block last year and, based off the information that is known so far, not a single bit of it has been listened to for this year, and it will probably be ignored for next year.


There are only 2 logical reasons to send the coach via Tywyn. Firstly, if the minibus is busy for Fairbourne and Morfa, it provides extra capacity at lower cost than standbys (or just request low floor small service buses (or Solos as bus people will know them) to provide the stopper capacity rather than 16 seaters which aren't accessible, are cramped and no one wants to be on). Secondly and I think is the actual answer, TFW don't want passengers to have a faster journey by road as it would show up just how slow the train service is and it become a point that passengers prefer the bus over the train.

Planning this timetable is a catch 21 situation. Its hard to please everyone. When the train service is operation all trains call at Tywyn. The fast bus calls at the larger stations which near the main roads. The slower service is usually a smaller vehicle which is suitable for access to the smaller stations. its hard to please everyone.
The coaches also can't call at some stops due to them not being accessible at all for a coach to stop. Like a bus waiting at Tal-y-bont can't use the lift and would block the whole road if they were waiting time.

As I understand it a large number of the passengers getting on at Barmouth are actually travelling to either Tywyn or Harlech and vice versa so aren't affected by the bus route. The numbers travelling through to Machynlleth outside of the school holidays are quite low so ts a case of prioritising the buses route to meet the needs of the maximum number of passengers.
From my experience working on the block, actually, a good chunk of the traffic was Fairbourne and Morfa or Mach heading southbound. There were Tywyn passengers but rare for the stopper to be that full that it couldn't handle Tywyn passengers as well. There aren't silly high numbers travelling to Mach but certainly Sept-Oct there can be a few, mainly international tourists.

I will need to use this service on 15 September and 17 September. I have a rail trip to North Wales planned, involving Ffestiniog, Welsh Highland and (hopefully) Tal-y-llyn and Fairbourne railways. We're doing the whole thing by train (neither of us drive). One of the things I had been most looking forward to was the trip on the Cambrian Coast line from Porthmadog (where we will be based for part of the trip) to Tywyn to get to the Tal-y-llyn. We also need to get from Porthmadog to Machynlleth on 17 September (with a stop-off in Fairbourne en route). So I was somewhat disappointed to find out that that stretch of the line will be operated by a replacement bus service when we are there, but never mind, it's just a reason to go back next year.

Although I have been to Porthmadog before, I have no experience of that line or the public transport in the region. I do hope that the replacement bus/coach will be usable (i.e. not too full!). There doesn't look to be another good alternative to get from Porthmadog to Tywyn. There does appear to be an option involving 2 buses but with only a 5 minute changeover time between the two buses. There looks to be a better option from Porthmadog to Mac (the T2 bus) if you want to go directly, but given that we are hoping to visit the Fairbourne Railway en route, the replacement bus is likely the better option.
The T2 is a good alternative option, much quicker than the Rail Rep bus but the train connections aren't as good. I'll always promote the T2 and the Caelloi 3 over the RRB since they both accept and issue 1Bws (£6 bus ticket covering 99.9% of buses in North Wales) and they are a bit better than the RRBs in that they are regular and offer faster journeys sometimes.

I'd say one alternative, depending on any accessibility requirements, could be the Barmouth to Fairbourne boat. That then drops you at the end of the Fairbourne railway line. Lots of planning needed though to make all that work.

It's not completely clear to me whether the RMT strikes announced on 15 and 17 September will have any impact on this service. I contacted TfW and they said they were still planning to run their services as normal but would provide further updates in due course.
Normally, on strike days, all pre planned TFW work gets cancelled. The recent strikes stopped the Gloucester-Lydney blockade for example so I'd say that the chances are, no RRBs on strike days though given there is a strong commuter and student flow on this line, the case for buses is quite strong but it does seem to go against what they have done every other time a strike has been on.
 

Shrop

Established Member
Joined
6 Aug 2019
Messages
1,350
As someone who spent a fair amount of time of time on the block last year, I would love to know the same and having discussions with drivers, they say the same, especially at night. Unfortunately though, not a lot that TFW do with RRBs makes sense. From discussions I had, 90% or so were in agreeance that Tywyn wasn't needed. Infact, it was noticeable how much happier passengers were when Tywyn was missed (due to a road closure near Penhelig). Buses were 40 minutes quicker, coordinators said that buses couldn't get sent too early so pax had to wait a bit but most then went into town to get a coffee but if it was planned in officially, it would be a good 10 min stop off point (making it overall, 30 minutes quicker. 40 mins quicker but minus the 10 min stop off) for a toilet and refreshment break. I will say though, the amount of feedback that went through systems regarding that block last year and, based off the information that is known so far, not a single bit of it has been listened to for this year, and it will probably be ignored for next year.


There are only 2 logical reasons to send the coach via Tywyn. Firstly, if the minibus is busy for Fairbourne and Morfa, it provides extra capacity at lower cost than standbys (or just request low floor small service buses (or Solos as bus people will know them) to provide the stopper capacity rather than 16 seaters which aren't accessible, are cramped and no one wants to be on). Secondly and I think is the actual answer, TFW don't want passengers to have a faster journey by road as it would show up just how slow the train service is and it become a point that passengers prefer the bus over the train.
Thanks for all your comments, it sounds like you have a good bit of first hand knowledge. I guess you've read all of the comments upthread? I've seen numerous defences of why the "fast" service serves Tywyn, but none of them make good sense and it does seem like TfW really haven't thought this through, nor listened to comments from the bus drivers.
It seems like a sorry case of people on the ground with genuine experience, ie coach drivers AND passengers, don't have opinions that count, whereas the hallowed planners who may well never have used the service at all, possibly having never even been to the area, have the say. I'd welcome any response to this allegation, from anyone who could say that those planning the rail replacement services, actually have good experience of using it.

With regard to any possible TfW fear of the train service being slower than the road service, this shouldn't be an issue here. It's like comparing a road service with the scenic lines of Scotland. Yes, of course the line has benefits for serving remote communities, but many of its passengers travel it simply for its sheer beauty. I have little doubt that it would very soon be snapped up as a heritage line if it was released from its existing ownership.
 

paul1609

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2006
Messages
7,992
Location
K
Thanks for all your comments, it sounds like you have a good bit of first hand knowledge. I guess you've read all of the comments upthread? I've seen numerous defences of why the "fast" service serves Tywyn, but none of them make good sense and it does seem like TfW really haven't thought this through, nor listened to comments from the bus drivers.
It seems like a sorry case of people on the ground with genuine experience, ie coach drivers AND passengers, don't have opinions that count, whereas the hallowed planners who may well never have used the service at all, possibly having never even been to the area, have the say. I'd welcome any response to this allegation, from anyone who could say that those planning the rail replacement services, actually have good experience of using it.

With regard to any possible TfW fear of the train service being slower than the road service, this shouldn't be an issue here. It's like comparing a road service with the scenic lines of Scotland. Yes, of course the line has benefits for serving remote communities, but many of its passengers travel it simply for its sheer beauty. I have little doubt that it would very soon be snapped up as a heritage line if it was released from its existing ownership.
Having been involved in heritage railway infrastructure for upwards of 30 years I can assure you that theres zero chance of the Cambrian Coast ever being operated as a heritage railway.
In the current situation theres far more chance that existing heritage routes will close/ reduce their route mileage than adding new.
 

Shrop

Established Member
Joined
6 Aug 2019
Messages
1,350
Having been involved in heritage railway infrastructure for upwards of 30 years I can assure you that theres zero chance of the Cambrian Coast ever being operated as a heritage railway.
In the current situation theres far more chance that existing heritage routes will close/ reduce their route mileage than adding new.
Interesting comment, I didn't think heritage lines were struggling that much. But I do think the Barmouth to Porthmadog section (at least - and it would relieve the maintenance burden of the bridge) has all the attributes of a railway that people love to visit for leisure trips.
 

paul1609

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2006
Messages
7,992
Location
K
Interesting comment, I didn't think heritage lines were struggling that much. But I do think the Barmouth to Porthmadog section (at least - and it would relieve the maintenance burden of the bridge) has all the attributes of a railway that people love to visit for leisure trips.
Trust me theres zero chance of a 20 mile long standard gauge heritage railway operating in North Wales. I doubt its income would cover the operation of the trains let alone the infrastructure.
 

david1212

Established Member
Joined
9 Apr 2020
Messages
1,754
Location
Midlands
If the rail service and hence the Rail Replacement Buses / Coaches were more frequent there could be both direct Machynlleth to Barmouth and Machynlleth - Tywyn - Barmouth services. Depending on demand the latter could run throughout to Pwllheli, to / from e.g. Porthmadog or just link with a direct service at Barmouth.
Given reality the combination of a ( relatively ) fast bus stopping near to the main stations and a slower minibus serving all has to be the best compromise.
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
21,922
Location
Airedale
Having looked at this in more detail: the advantage of avoiding Tywyn is that north of Barmouth the fast bus (which calls everywhere from Harlech anyway) would be closer to the booked train times and one less vehicle would be required.

If sufficient capacity can be provided for Tywyn I now think that would be a better option, and (as I said upthread) I am fairly sure there is precedent.

Slightly OT, but does the minibus divert at any/all of Talybont, Dyffryn, Llanbedr and Llandanwg or stay on the main road?

PS this thread has (if you search hard) relevant comments
https://www.railforums.co.uk/thread...ce-travelling-on-rail-replacement-bus.222717/
 

markymark2000

On Moderation
Joined
11 May 2015
Messages
5,090
Location
Great Britain
Having looked at this in more detail: the advantage of avoiding Tywyn is that north of Barmouth the fast bus (which calls everywhere from Harlech anyway) would be closer to the booked train times and one less vehicle would be required.
Sadly, you couldn't save a bus as it would be far too tight on driving hours. 2h 20 each way would mean a driver is over their driving hours doing the full round trip. There has to be an hour break in Pwllheli (45 min legal break, plus taking into account small delays and getting from the station to layover and vice versa) and that wouldn't be possible if you saved a bus. The alternative would be to split the route and run it on domestic hours which is possible but I know it's not something that any of the Rail Replacement companies (By which I mean Abellio Rail Rep, Arriva Road, First Travel Sol etc), like to do.

If sufficient capacity can be provided for Tywyn I now think that would be a better option, and (as I said upthread) I am fairly sure there is precedent.
Can be done if anyone had the brains to get Optare Solos rather than minibuses. A number of people of reduced mobility use the 'minibus' trips and so the Solo is much better from that perspective. Has 23 capacity instead of 12-16. Solos can fit as Dilwyns had their Solo out on the minibus trip.

Slightly OT, but does the minibus divert at any/all of Talybont, Dyffryn, Llanbedr and Llandanwg or stay on the main road?
No, all of these stops are on the main road. Coaches would often stop if they were asked by the coordinator. Some drivers did point blank refuse but others said they are passing anyway so may as well stop. The only issue is that the stops are narrow and so not the most suitable for a coach, 100% not wheelchair lift compliant (but similarly, many other coach stops from Harlech to Porthmadog aren't wheelchair lift compliant)
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
21,922
Location
Airedale
Sadly, you couldn't save a bus as it would be far too tight on driving hours. 2h 20 each way would mean a driver is over their driving hours doing the full round trip. There has to be an hour break in Pwllheli (45 min legal break, plus taking into account small delays and getting from the station to layover and vice versa) and that wouldn't be possible if you saved a bus. The alternative would be to split the route and run it on domestic hours which is possible but I know it's not something that any of the Rail Replacement companies (By which I mean Abellio Rail Rep, Arriva Road, First Travel Sol etc), like to do.


Can be done if anyone had the brains to get Optare Solos rather than minibuses. A number of people of reduced mobility use the 'minibus' trips and so the Solo is much better from that perspective. Has 23 capacity instead of 12-16. Solos can fit as Dilwyns had their Solo out on the minibus trip.


No, all of these stops are on the main road. Coaches would often stop if they were asked by the coordinator. Some drivers did point blank refuse but others said they are passing anyway so may as well stop. The only issue is that the stops are narrow and so not the most suitable for a coach, 100% not wheelchair lift compliant (but similarly, many other coach stops from Harlech to Porthmadog aren't wheelchair lift compliant)
Thanks for all those comments - I didn't realise the restriction on hours, which knocks out the potential economy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top