Is it just me or did Mikey look
a) Just a little too enthusiatic about necking the wine and
b) Slightly sozzled when arriving at the latest luxury hotel - his face was nearly as florid as that shirt...
We commented about this too - think he probably needed the hotel after sampling the local produce
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Overall, I have to say I have enjoyed the series, and did so the initial one (even the family have been, even if they thought I was mad at first!)
Some bits are more interesting than others (namely when I know the areas) but I have learnt a number of things over the series, including things locally.
Yes, there are some inconsistencies in filming but the most of them I am overlooking, and in areas I don't know, I don't notice anyway, though I do agree trains running tail lights first on the wrong line could be easily avoided really.
The only things I have picked up on as glaring errors are:
- Travelling to Chester-Le-Street, Portillo on a 185 morphed into him getting off a Voyager (which he commented to be almost too long for the platform) - and I'm not sure travelling from Newcastle that this would be even possible.
- Batley mysteriously turning into the nearby town of Dewsbury (not that I'm complaining as such) - not sure if that is because Dewsbury station would be in the Bradshaws as it opened in 1848.
From seeing the programme too, there are a few places I'd like to visit, such as Betys-y-Coed (which I can now pronounce

).
One thing that I wonder is whether some of the people he talks to actually know or if he does just start talking to them - the ladies in Sandwich yesterday and the people on the fish market the other day (who I think asked him if he was doing his "railway thing") seemed quite surprised to see him. Of course, they can film these things and if it doesn't work out, they can cut it out of production I guess.