Trnsprt4Sctlnd
Member
That’s because it does and is the answer at least in the short term.There was a mention of the 2 and 3 getting Yutongs, not seen a source. I thought having less buses but double deckers would make more sense.
That’s because it does and is the answer at least in the short term.There was a mention of the 2 and 3 getting Yutongs, not seen a source. I thought having less buses but double deckers would make more sense.
There was a mention of the 2 and 3 getting Yutongs, not seen a source. I thought having less buses but double deckers would make more sense.
Spot on. Same probably goes for most operators.First would not replace single deckers with new double deckers until the full COVID recovery is known. Second hand double deckers might have been a possibility.
What's a Hydroliner?The 2 is a busy route. Some Hydroliners would be good for the 2.
A Wright StreetDeck powered with hydrogen, not diesel.Spot on. Same probably goes for most operators.
== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==
What's a Hydroliner?
I do wonder if hydrogen becomes an option for Glasgow anytime soon to be honest. The key thing is that Aberdeen and the use of hydrogen there will be a good tool of information for the viability of the buses.A Wright StreetDeck powered with hydrogen, not diesel.
I mean it would make sense from a capacity point of view and services within Glasgow are frequent enough to be able to merit them compared to somewhere like FSE.I do wonder if hydrogen becomes an option for Glasgow anytime soon to be honest. The key thing is that Aberdeen and the use of hydrogen there will be a good tool of information for the viability of the buses.
What is their capacity out of curiosity?I mean it would make sense from a capacity point of view and services within Glasgow are frequent enough to be able to merit them compared to somewhere like FSE.
65 seats, 25 on the lower deck and 40 on the upper deck, it can be increased to 67 however Aberdeen's only have 4 seats on the back row of each deck.What is their capacity out of curiosity?
I'm sure most people here (and perhaps even First themselves) agree that the 2 should be decker operated and on a 10 minute frequency in "normal" times rather than 7-8 minutes. However given the current unpredictability and the poorer range it wouldn't make sense to buy BEV deckers for the 2. Doesn't nesserally mean the 2 is going to stay a single deck route permanently however, they could buy EV deckers for the 2 in a few years time and displace the single decks to another route.Yutongs make sense from a range point of view. They’ll be ideal for the 2 and 3. The E200EVs don’t have the range. I would say having a reduced frequency on the 2 may prove to be problematic as most workings are deckers with the odd E300 running around. The 2 is a busy route. Some Hydroliners would be good for the 2.
Thank you for the information. To be fair Glasgow City Council don't really do much that helps buses other than a couple of bus gates at most. I could honestly see a lot of the key profit makers being every 15 mins with more double deckers including the 2.65 seats, 25 on the lower deck and 40 on the upper deck, it can be increased to 67 however Aberdeen's only have 4 seats on the back row of each deck.
I doubt Glasgow will go for Hydrogen at the moment though, it's significantly more expensive than battery electric, you have to keep in mind that the council in Aberdeen are very strong proponents of Hydrogen and i doubt without them First would be running Hydrogen buses here, in contrast Glasgow's council just don't seem that interested. In 5-10 years time i wouldn't rule it out however, particularly on longer routes and for coaches i see Hydrogen in the long term prevailing over electric as it overs great range and convenience and with time cost/infrastructure will improve
I'm sure most people here (and perhaps even First themselves) agree that the 2 should be decker operated and on a 10 minute frequency in "normal" times rather than 7-8 minutes. However given the current unpredictability and the poorer range it wouldn't make sense to buy BEV deckers for the 2. Doesn't nesserally mean the 2 is going to stay a single deck route permanently however, they could buy EV deckers for the 2 in a few years time and displace the single decks to another route.
The main issue with this is service reliability. If services were guaranteed to run on time it would work but in Glasgow there is no chance of that unless the council do loads to tackle car use. You'd also need more recovery time on routes meaning more drivers and right now that isn't possible.Regarding the range of electrics, my belief is that in service charging is the way forward. Most days there are 3 or 4 9/A buses in the central reservation of Buchanan Bus Station (BBS). If SPT can be persuaded to fit charging point at BBS and other big terminus such as Braehead, Easterhouse, Silverburn (unused taxi rank in the bus station), Govan etc.
This could nullify the range issues.
This was considered by First prior to placing the order for the BYDs, the main reason against it is that topping up the battery constantly will cause it to degrade faster, it's much better for the longevity of batteries to discharge down as much as possible and then recharge back up rather than constantly discharging down to 80% and then back up to 100% repeatedly all day.Regarding the range of electrics, my belief is that in service charging is the way forward. Most days there are 3 or 4 9/A buses in the central reservation of Buchanan Bus Station (BBS). If SPT can be persuaded to fit charging point at BBS and other big terminus such as Braehead, Easterhouse, Silverburn (unused taxi rank in the bus station), Govan etc.
This could nullify the range issues.
See the degradation of batteries due to charging is highest when using high speed charging. If you use slower charging the degradation is a lot lower (simliar to opportunity charging buses/ battery trolley buses).This was considered by First prior to placing the order for the BYDs, the main reason against it is that topping up the battery constantly will cause it to degrade faster, it's much better for the longevity of batteries to discharge down as much as possible and then recharge back up rather than constantly discharging down to 80% and then back up to 100% repeatedly all day.
Some buses are out from 4-1 by the time they leave the depot empty and return back emptyIn Glasgow specifically trying to operate an electric double decker, for example on a 60, a full length route from 6am to 11:59pm, is unfeasible. Current models simply don’t have the electrical range if the vehicle is a plug-in overnight affair.
You could perhaps get around this by using Hydrogen powered vehicles, however the exorbitant cost of doing this for the time being would likely exceed the cost of ealier battery replacement due to Fast Opportunity Charging.
Hybrid-Diesels should’ve been a half way house for the last few years, but nope.
The 57s, perhaps even the 38 from Glasgow Fort to Newton Mearns will have issues like this. I'm not saying the problems are widespread, but using my judgement on what I’ve seen so far.
Jumping head first into a very shallow pool of water seems to be the methodology displayed in Glasgow with Electric Buses, a poor choice of business.
4AM till 1AM the following morning?Some buses are out from 4-1 by the time they leave the depot empty and return back empty
So a simple solution is to change the vehicle over halflway through the Day, or when it is running on low power at the depot. Then put it on charge. Which is what is done now.4AM till 1AM the following morning?
Yes, I wrote the above times for illustration purposes of the amounts of hours that buses can be on the road.
Further adding to the logistics of the day to day operation of the depot when there are already not enough drivers to operate a full service on the road. Where do the extra drivers come from to change buses over?So a simple solution is to change the vehicle over halflway through the Day, or when it is running on low power at the depot. Then put it on charge. Which is what is done now.
I fully agree with this. It would need a lot of extra drivers and even to cover current services a lot are still needed. I'd not be surprised if we seen more cuts before the SPT changes next month. Other than Dumbarton there seems to be issues everywhere else.Further adding to the logistics of the day to day operation of the depot when there are already not enough drivers to operate a full service on the road. Where do the extra drivers come from to change buses over?
I think that's only logistically possible at the moment as buses are being run off into the garage throughout the day when there's no relief driver to carry on.So a simple solution is to change the vehicle over halflway through the Day, or when it is running on low power at the depot. Then put it on charge. Which is what is done now.
I don't think ADL were actively seeking or encouraging new orders for diesel engined buses last year. They seem to have thrown their lot in with BYD and don't need the ongoing warranty issues that being a chassis provider brings.I'm surprised that there wasn't one last massive diesel order this year to be honest. The only issue is how long it may have taken to get here given how busy Alexander Dennis will be with the electric order.
We would all like to hope so but I'd imagine conditions getting better would be the big thing that would give First the upper hand on everyone. It doesn't matter what industry if you get working conditions and staff morale into a good place you'll easily get staff.Drivers have been offered double time for their days off; that should drastically improve services.
You’d like to hope. If i was getting offered double time for a day off i’d accept it based on the principle of why its being offered, if it was being offered because there was no staff because of a badly run company with management who’ve made it a bad working environment i’d certainly not be willing to take up the extra shiftsDrivers have been offered double time for their days off; that should drastically improve services.
If you felt that way towards your employers why on earth would you continue to work for them? There's plenty of companies out there looking for drivers - they can't all be bad.You’d like to hope. If i was getting offered double time for a day off i’d accept it based on the principle of why its being offered, if it was being offered because there was no staff because of a badly run company with management who’ve made it a bad working environment i’d certainly not be willing to take up the extra shifts